Sunday 10th May 2026
Blog Page 779

Meet the Parents: College Families Explained

The college family is a huge part of Oxford life. It not only helps you get to grips with what Oxford is like before you come, but also provides you with a network for academic and welfare support throughout your time here.

Extended college families can also form great social groups. They often go for meals, drinks and activities together and act as a great way to forge friendships between academic years.

College parents

The chances are your college parents will be the first people you here from in Oxford. They weren’t randomly assigned to you, but chosen for you because it was believed they could best help you flourish here. One of them almost certainly studies the same subject as you, this means that they can provide great informal academic help. College parents are good for asking all those questions you don’t want to ask your tutors, and you may often get a far more truthful answer from them as well. Adjusting to the Oxford workload can be difficult, if you need a hand with notes, problem sheets or essay structure, they should be more than happy to help you out.

Getting married

The idea of getting “college married” maybe seem strange to some, but the institution has some great benefits. The first thing to stress is that they are usually completely platonic and act as the basis of long lasting friendships. There’s also very little need to conform to the traditional view of marriage. College marriages come in all shapes and sizes— three or four-way marriages are not unheard of.

Different colleges have different rules regarding who you can and can’t marry. Its generally advised against marrying someone who does the same subject as you, as it limits the range of children you can be assigned. It’s also advised against getting married too early on in Michaelmas, as you don’t know if you and your spouse will still be friends later in the year.

How it works

If your college parents are doing their job right, they should take you and your siblings for a meal early in Freshers’ Week. This acts as a good way for you to meet each other properly. Asides from this your relationship with them works both ways. drop them a message asking if they want to go for a coffee if you know they are having a tough week, or pidge them some chocolates and a card if they have exams coming up. You are very much there for each other. When it comes to having your own children, you’ll be expected to write letters welcoming them to college much the same way you received them.

It may all seem a bit bizarre at first, though it is honestly a fantastic network that is the basis for many friendships, stories and escapades—just remember it’s all a bit of fun.

‘Cowboy Woman’ is Thailand’s celebrity street food chef

When we think of cowboy hats and pulled pork, we probably think of barbecues in Alabama not street markets in Thailand. But walking beside the northern gate of Chiang Mai, Thailand’s biggest northern city, you will find a woman wearing a cowboy hat, meat cleaver in hand.

This woman, perhaps the most famous face in Chiang Mai, is known to the locals simply as ‘Cowboy Woman’. Her respect, love and passion for the food she creates makes her the perfect symbol for this haven of street food delights.

Often our unaccustomed eyes look at street food with more trepidation than intrigue, more anxiety than excitement.

With the safety nets of the modern restaurant all but gone, it truly is just you and the food. Inevitably, doubts pop into your head: “That’s an interesting colour for a sausage to be”, or “Can it really be that cheap?” or the age-old, “That’s a hell of a lot of flies”.

It would be a mistake, however, to avoid all street food stalls because of their lack of sink, table cloth or TripAdvisor rating. In reality, true, authentic street food will put a bigger smile on your face than even the most esteemed restaurants – all without breaking the bank.

In Chiang Mai, street food rules supreme. Food is not just functional there – as it can be in the West – instead, it is a lifestyle that impacts every waking moment.

Given its elevated status, the street food in Chiang Mai is complex, joyful and, ultimately, very, very delicious. Take Suki Haeng, a beautifully balanced pork stir-fry filled with bright yellow and green cabbage mixed with glass noodles.

Take Khao Soi, the noodle soup for which the city is famed: fragrant, colourful, light yet rich. The name literally means “cut rice”, referring to the traditional method of manually cutting the rice with scissors. Following the tradition started by the Southern Chinese Yunnanese Muslims, the dough for the rice noodles is stretched out on a cloth over boiling water. After this sheet is steamed, the noodle is rolled out and cut with scissors. No fancy machines to be seen on these streets.

Take Khao Kha Moo, tender stewed pork legs handed out by the Cowboy Woman. She chops the pork and serves it over a bed of rice all for 30THB (70p). Her food has gained so much recognition by tourists and locals alike that she was visited by the celebrity chef Anthony Bourdain when he travelled to Chiang Mai in 2014.

Bourdain was a man who broke down stigma, biases and cultural boundaries so he could focus on the amorous relationship between maker, eater and the food. Always honest and frank, he gained his fame by revealing previously unearthed culinary secrets: how much butter goes into all our food, the days we should avoid fish, what happens when you order meat well done – the list goes on.

Abandoning the professional kitchen, Bourdain showed the world that food is more than an allotted number of calories. Instead, he believed that food is tied up with emotion, memory and relationships. Cowboy Woman represents this ethos, telling Bourdain: “I’m happy when people eat, and they say the food was good”.

This simple joy expressed by street vendors across Thailand is the reason for such culinary success. Indeed, the way Thais love their food manifests itself differently to that of many Western chefs.

Thai food is not about meticulous accuracy. For the most part, innovation and futuristic artistry go out the window. These dishes are passed down through generations. They are dishes that, in many ways, transcend those who make them. Thais revere their food and expect their guests to do so too. Perhaps such a respect for the food we make, eat, and enjoy is an attitude we could all adopt.

A new college is to be opened in the next five years

0

Oxford University is planing to open a new college for the first time in 30 years, in a bid to keep pace with Ivy League competitors. 

According to a provisional strategic plan, over the next five years the university will build 1,000 new rooms for graduate students and “at least one new graduate college”.

If created, this college would be the first established since 1990, when Kellogg College was opened for graduate students.

The proposals are yet to be approved by the university’s dons, but have been accepted by Oxford’s governing body. 

According to these plans, the postgraduate population would increase by 850 students over the next five years, while an additional 200 undergraduate places would be created. 

According to Nick Hillman, the director of the Higher Education Policy institute, this proposed increase in post-graduate places is financially motivated.

He said: “Oxford and Cambridge say they lose money on every undergraduate whereas for post graduates you can charge the full market rate and more.

“Oxford doesn’t compare itself to other institutions in the UK, it compares itself to other institutions around the world such as Ivy League which have more graduates than undergraduates.”

While fees for undergraduates at Oxford are capped at the national limit of £9,250 per annum, the university claims that the real cost of educating the average Oxford undergraduate student is almost £16,000 thanks to the university’s tutorial model. 

In relation to these plans, New College’s bursar, David Palfreyman, commented on the fact that Ivy League competitors are generally smaller than Oxford and Cambridge at undergraduate level. 

He said that being in order for Oxford to be  “a world class university and a super research university à la Harvard, Stanford, Yale, Princeton” it requires a larger population of postgraduate students to carry out said research.

The plans also aim to “set ambitious targets” to “reduce by 2023 gaps in attainment by gender, ethnic origin and socio-economic background”.

They intend to create a substantial increase in the number of undergraduates from groups which are poorly represented at the university.

A spokesperson for the university said the plans are being examined and discussed, adding: “The University will comment more fully when its plan has been widely reviewed and formally adopted.”

Flying saucers and the end of the world: Oxford Fringe sci-fi shows question life as we know it

0

Oxford theatre has wandered into science fiction. Into a place where aliens eat pickled eggs and families crawl into their basements to survive the apocalypse that’s coming. Or rather, it has wandered into the minds of the kind of people that believe in aliens and apocalypses, telling their stories, and unpicking their lives.

Wax House Theatre’s Doom’s Day, this year’s OUDS National Tour, tells the story of doomsday prepper Joseph Doom, in his own words – much of the script is lifted from one of his many free e-books about his life. The cast multi-role their way through the story, swapping checked lumberjack shirts and American accents – some good, some less good – to depict ‘a child of the 60s’ who became increasingly disenchanted with 1970s America. Director Laura Day is impressively experimental in the range of theatrical techniques they have built the production upon, packing it full of soundscapes, movement sequences and lip sync. Matilda Hadcock was particularly good at embodying the voice of a Sarah Koenig-esque reporter, all crisp gestures and curiosity. And James Walsh, for me the stand out actor, did a lovely job recreating the moon landings with nothing but tin foil and breath control. But at times, it feels like the production is rushing through a theatrical chocolate box of styles and techniques, for a purpose we never quite discover.

By the end of the show, we really do know a huge amount about Joseph Doom – what his schooldays were like, where his family comes from, his strange and faintly disturbing romance with his school-teacher-and-then-wife. Why? His was a moving story, especially in the moment he must painstakingly undress his wife after she has suffered a stroke (a moment they could even have made more of). But is it an important one? I don’t think this production quite knew.

A production that does know exactly what its point is Poltergeist Theatre’s (one of New Diorama’s Graduate Emerging Companies) Lights Over Tesco Car Park. The four principal characters, gradually established as a group of Oxford students who befriend a shadowy figure called Robert – a man “in communication” with an extra-terrestrial – strike an immediately comfortable rapport with the audience. They share our sceptical view of Robert’s sightings, inviting us to laugh at the titles of internet articles like ‘The Same Aliens That Killed JFK Just Rigged The World Cup’, but also constantly push us to pick over our assumptions about what makes something true. ‘If I told you that the brownie I gave you earlier was made from my poo, does that make it less delicious when you ate it?’ asks the slightly whacky Julia (Julia Pilkington), while the other characters cringe along with the audience.

But director Jack Bradfield has made sure that the show is never really embarrassed by its own weirdness. Confidently, deftly, the cast invite audience members onstage to join them in recreating various real life UFO sightings, with some wittily imaginative assistance from water guns, balloons and flying saucers. And by the end, you realise that the work of the play has been to gently widen its interest in UFOs into a much bigger, and more theatrically pertinent, question about belief – because, in the theatre, we choose suspend our disbelief all the time. Plunged into the dark in the final scene, the four actors lift up their phones, fingers pressed over the torch light to make four dull red pin pricks. I know it’s an iPhone, but I’m seeing an alien. It’s a choice I make, that all the audience make, and truth has very little to do with it. We share a moment, witness an illusion. That’s the power of theatre, and that’s why Lights Over Tesco Car Park is more than just a play about aliens with a delicious Bowie soundtrack.

This article was corrected 18/08/18 to reflect the fact that Laura Day was the sole director of Doom’s Day.

Matriculation: Everything you need to know

Matriculation is the formal ceremony in which Freshers’ are officially enrolled into the University. You’ll typically matriculate towards the end of Freshers’ week, though it can sometimes be as late as mid-October, depending on when your college has booked it for.

An official University ceremony, you’ll need to wear what is essentially the Oxford equivalent of a school uniform called sub fusc. Relax though, this will be one of the only times you have to, as its only really worn for exams apart from this.

Sub fusc typically consists of a white bow tie or black ribbon, a waist length gown and square hat called a mortarboard. The hat is not actually worn, you just carry it to the ceremony and chances are it’ll end up being used as a pencil case or spare change dish for the rest of the year.

The outfit can be purchased for as little as £15 from shops on High Street like Shepherd & Woodward and Ede & Ravenscroft, alternatively you can find it online and order before you arrive at Oxford. The gown you may also use for college formals quite regularly so try to look after it.

The ceremony itself takes place inside the Sheldonian Theatre. For all its hype its over in a matter of minutes. You all file in, the Vice Chancellor gives a short speech and reads a  Latin passage, and before you know it its done – you’re now officially a member of the University!

This leaves the rest of the day to eat, drink and be merry. Make the most of the occasion and get as many photos for your Facebook and Instagram as you can. College’s typically have professional photographers to take a year group photo also, and sometimes individual ones as well.

This is also a good opportunity to give punting a go as well, so head down to Magdalen Bridge or Cherwell Boat House to see if you can master the tricky technique. Some of the clubs in Oxford also host special events to celebrate the day (aptly named “Matriculash”). Keep an eye on Facebook for these events, or you can ask your Freshers’ Reps or Entz team for more information closer to the time on where you can get tickets.

Matriculation is so much more than a ceremony. It’s a day full of fun activities, weird Oxford quirks and fun photo opportunities, so don’t hold back. Even if you have work due, you’ll regret missing out later on in the year, so give yourself the day off and celebrate becoming a member of the University in style.

Oxford scholar questions £335m painting’s Da Vinci attribution

0

An Oxford art historian is refuting Christie’s auction house’s attribution of ‘Salvator Mundi’ to Leonardo Da Vinci alone, almost a year after the painting was sold at the New York auction house for a record breaking $450m (£335m).

Matthew Landrus, a fellow at Wolfson college, believes Leonardo’s hand to be responsible for between 5% and 20% of the work. Other considers the painting to be one of 16 still extant by Da Vinci.

Landrus told Cherwell that “the painting is by Leonardo and his studio, along with the assistance of Bernardino Luini.”

Evidence has led Landrus to conclude that Luini was “the only reasonable candidate for much of the authorship,” stating that Salvator Mundi ought to be called ‘a Leonardo studio’ painting.”

Landrus told The Guardian that a “comparison of Luini’s paintings with the ‘Salvator Mundi’ will be sufficient evidence” to support his view.

He highlights areas including Christ’s face, hair, clothing and shoulders and cites similarities between the work and Luini’s ‘Christ among the Doctors' as proof of his argument.

He told Cherwell: “In my opinion, the painting is by Leonardo and his studio, along with the assistance of Bernardino Luini.

“I think it is the best available example of several versions produced in Milan between April 1508 and September 1513, and that Leonardo provided the design and initial drawings, while also finishing the sfumato modelling and atmospheric effects.

“This was not unusual for Leonardo and his studio, and indeed paintings produced in this manner were often sold as original works by him.

“I attribute part of the Salvator Mundi to Barnardino Luini, according to stylistic, historical and technical evidence.

Referring an article in The Guardian last week, Landrus told Cherwell: “The Guardian’s 6th of August reference to a ‘substantial update’ to my 2006 book on Leonardo is only a change to a caption in the forthcoming edition of that book.

“I will discuss the available evidence about this Salvator Mundi in a different publication.”
 
The latest edition of Landrus’ book ‘Leonardo da Vinci’ is set to be published next month.

A Christie’s auction house spokesperson refuted Landrus’ argument, telling the Antiques Trade Gazette: “The attribution to Leonardo was established almost 10 years prior to sale by a panel of a dozen scholars, and was reconfirmed at the time of the auction in 2017.”

The painting, labelled by some critics as the “male Mona Lisa”, depicts Christ making a gesture of benediction with his right hand and holding a crystal orb representing the cosmos in his left.

Once part of Charles I's Royal collection and sold for just £45 in the 1950s when it was mistaken for a copy, the work is considered by many as the last remaining Leonardo in private hands.

Contrary to Landrus’ view, Trinity College Oxford’s Emeritus History of Art professor Martin Kemp has promised to publish “a conclusive body of evidence,” showing “that the Salvator Mundi is a masterpiece by Leonardo,” in a book to be released next year.

The painting was purchased for $400m in addition to $50m in fees by the Abu Dhabi Department of Culture and Tourism,
making it the most expensive painting ever purchased. Meanwhile, Luini’s auction record is a mere $654,545, according to the Art Sale Index.

It will be unveiled next month at the Louvre Abu Dhabi before being displayed in Paris next year.

McQueen Review – “an example of masterful documentary film-making”

0

An example of masterful documentary film-making, Ian Bonhôte’s film McQueen follows the famous designer’s journey to popularity, his highs and lows, and what made his creations so successful.

The feature length film combines old interview tapes with thematic and artistic graphics, while showcasing some of McQueen’s most momentous designs, catwalks and career choices. As the son of a teacher and taxi driver, with one O-level in Art, McQueen began his career as a tailor’s apprentice, Anderson & Sheppard, then working his way through fashion schools and other employers in the industry. McQueen was always revered as a master in creating an impeccably tailored look. By the end of his career, McQueen had worked as the chief designer at Givenchy, while at the same time cultivating his own label, and thus producing about 15 collections a year. McQueen became infamous for bringing theatre and spectacle to his catwalks while simultaneously incorporating new technologies to create a kind of dark and fantastical world.

His influence on the fashion community cannot be understated. At the same time, his personal life, as an openly gay designer dealing with drug abuse and depression, illuminates the pressures and failings of the fashion world.

In light of Kate Spade’s suicide in June 2018, it seems more important than ever before to speak about mental health within the fashion community. The documentary explores the lead up to McQueen taking his own life – the loss of his mother, the pressure of his work, and most notably the loneliness he experienced within his popularity. McQueen’s disturbing themes and haunting designs have been thought of as visually expressing the mental difficulties he faced throughout his life. The documentary is direct about his death, and doesn’t shy away from the subject. It’s easy to see how the fashion world can become overbearing and crushing. With the glamorous yet fickle cover of luxury and beauty, it is important to be aware of what is ‘faked’ in the name of publicity and acknowledge the true difficulties involved not only in entering and but also in sustaining oneself in the industry.

McQueen’s designs reflected the turmoil and darkness he felt inside. The most striking aspect of McQueen’s career are his catwalks/fashion shows. Much of the documentary centres around a few of his most famous collections and how they’re presented. Unlike the standard, long black runway with 20 or so models filing through, McQueen created a narrative and drama. The models would be asked to move in creative and unnatural ways, bringing the clothes to life. The themes surrounding the catwalk were always intended to enhance the collection’s voice. His most notorious catwalk, VOSS SS/2001, placed an enormous glass box in the middle of the show. At the end, the walls of the box smashed to the ground, revealing a naked model on a chaise longue, surrounded by moths, wearing a gas mask to obscure her face. Alexander McQueen once commented: “God, I’ve have some freaky shows”.

With McQueen setting the bar for all emerging designers, one has to wonder if we’ve seen anyone make such an impact? Of course, the usual fashion houses are grabbing and losing our attention every season, but very few individuals have made such a name for themselves. McQueen reminds us of the raw potential of fashion, in that it’s an incredibly emotional art form: and art is exactly what McQueen created.

Released in June 2018, McQueen is a moving exploration of the isolation that comes with talent and success. This film is for those hoping to see both a showcase of the spectacular work of McQueen combined with a compassionate account of the arduous life behind it.

Welcome Freshers!

Dear Freshers,

You’ve done it! That results day envelope which has been the cause of sleepless nights, anxious pacing, and stomach churning has turned out to be a source of huge relief. You’ll doubtless be fielding praise from adoring relatives and friends – enjoy it, you deserve it. But, this is far from the end of the road – the next few years promise to be some of the most exciting of your life.

In the meantime, buckle in for two months of anticipation while you eagerly await to join us here. The post-results period can be anti-climactic and watching your other friends slowly disappear off across the country throughout September is not always fun. We would say that living vicariously through friends’ social media during this time is almost mandatory, as Facebook and Instagram become dominated by wave after wave of gap yah snaps and messy freshers’ pics. Try to resist the urge to do the infamous ‘Fresher’s UK Tour’ however – you’ll need all the rest you can get before October.

But if your reading list, college family letters, and those endless emails from Student Information aren’t a large enough dose of what’s to come at Oxford, watch this space! Keep Off the Grass will be supplying you with exclusive content up until your first day, with tips on fashion, freshers, and food. Look out for our printed publication which will be issued in your Freshers’ pack in 0th week and (we hope) will give a comprehensive run-down of the year ahead, condensing the life lessons of erstwhile freshers from Lady Margaret Hall to Regent’s Park.

Looking forward to seeing you all in Bridge!

Fin and Libby ? xx

Let’s Talk About: Medicine Resits

1

Revising a third of my course wasn’t exactly how I was planning to spend my summer, but unfortunately that’s what happens when you don’t meet the pass mark. This seems perfectly fair, unless (as is the case for me) you’re being made to revise because you missed the pass mark by 1%.

Obviously, the pass mark is there for a reason. One might argue that it is somewhat arbitrary, but at the end of the day the Oxford University Medical School is training the future doctors of the NHS. Unlike in other subjects, where the content taught may be less relevant to a future career, it’s really rather important that we know the bones of the skeleton, for example, or the basic science behind breathing and gas exchange. For those of you lucky enough not to be familiar with the way in which medical students are examined, we have two types of exam: written and multiple choice. If you don’t score highly enough on the written exams, you’re called in for a Viva Voce examination. The point of these oral exams is to make sure you know the topic(s) you didn’t score highly on sufficiently, without making you resit the entire paper. This is useful because in many cases students make one or two small yet significant errors which sabotage their performance, and there are only a few topics that need retesting.

I believe I can confidently speak on behalf of the entire student body when I say that Vivas, as they’re known colloquially, can be a godsend. So long as you pass, they can save weeks (if not months) of revision and stress during a period otherwise intended for relaxation and recuperation. With this in mind, it would make sense to also arrange Vivas for those who didn’t quite do well enough in the multiple choice papers (as I understand it, this was the case until 4 years ago). Of course it would be more time consuming, as each exam covers 20 topics as opposed to 3 in their written counterparts, but one would think that the Viva Voce examiners would only need to assess the very lowest-scoring topics in order to confirm that the student in question had a reasonable knowledge of their course. Furthermore, Vivas would only be necessary for those students near the pass/fail border, which past examiners’ reports indicate would be a rather small number.

I’m not suggesting the pass marks ought to be lowered (this year’s was 69%), but resits ought to be a last resort. No one wants a doctor who scraped 40% in their first year exams, but time is a precious resource, and the time of those who just failed to reach the bar set for them shouldn’t be wasted re-memorising information that won’t be relevant for years to come.

Failing an exam is one thing, but realising you’ve failed by one mark is infuriating beyond words – especially when that one mark results in the loss of two thirds of your summer. While Oxford may be ranked the best university in the world for medicine, the department certainly isn’t infallible. We only need to look at the recent breach of the General Data Protection Regulation that the department experienced, which resulted in a list of the full names of the candidates called for vivas being sent to the entirety of the first year cohort to see that blunders are most definitely made. As with any organisation, they’re capable of making mistakes, and I believe the removal of Vivas for multiple choice exams is one of them – one that cuts deep for those of us who were a hair’s breadth away from success.

Top Australian universities beat the Russell Group for economic influence

0

Top universities in Australia wield as much as 30% more economic influence than the UK’s leading grouping of research universities, according to a recent study.

Recent analysis found that the “Group of Eight” (a collection of Australia’s leading universities) injected the equivalent of £37.9 billion into the economy in 2016, roughly £4.7 billion per institution.

The Russell Group, by contrast and despite having 24 institutions, contributed only £3.6 billion per institutions, or £86.8 billion across the group, in the same period.

Group of Eight universities are thought to benefit from their larger size than British universities, taking in an average of 18,000 students compared to around 11,000 at the average Russell Group university.

Ian Jacobs, the Vice-Chancellor of the University of New South Wales (a Group of Eight member) commented that “The Go8 is an intense economic driver, even compared to the Russell Group, which is one of the most pre-eminent in the world.”

However, Jacobs, a former vice-president at the University of Manchester, admitted that it would be “unwise” to “read too much” into side by side comparisons, though argued that they suggested “the Go8 is perhaps more impressive than we have thought.”

Dr Gavan Conlon, the leader of the education team at London Economics who conducted the study, argued that the results were distorted by certain “natural advantages” in Australia, including its relatively closed economy.

Other studies also suggest that the Russell Group makes a greater contribution to the economy through revenues generated by teaching and learning activities, which could total as much as £20.7 billion a year, compared to just £2.78 billion from the Group of Eight.

Dr Conlon said that he had been surprised by the “spillover effect” of research from the Group of Eight, commenting that the “multiplier” of 9.76 for its research spending (the amount generated for every pound spent) was higher than expected. Money spent on research by the Russell Group, meanwhile, had a multiplier of just 5.5.

Although many universities have commissioned their own studies of economic impacts, most have only considered the impacts of their expenditure, and Dr Conolon argues that more sophisticated analyses like his own should take into account the universities’ wider economic impact.