Wednesday 13th May 2026
Blog Page 852

Makeup as personal empowerment?

0

For anyone who knows me, my defining physical characteristic would likely be ‘eyeliner dots.’ A touch ironic, perhaps, that rather than any genetic feature it is my makeup that stands out. Yet for me this is brilliant; I am in control of the image I project to the world, and can assert my identity accordingly.

For my chubby pre-teen self, wearing makeup provided a much-needed confidence boost, a means of seeing my reflection and thinking ‘okay, that’ll do’. Whilst hindsight tells me that caking my acne-covered face in Maybelline Dream Matte Mousse was not the most sensible skincare move, this act allowed me to re-assert the control over my appearance that hormones taken from me. However, in a strict all-girls grammar school this approach to beauty was frowned upon. Teachers warned that wearing makeup would diminish the reputation of the school, because why on earth would an intelligent young woman waste time applying winged eyeliner?

You only need look around Oxford to see that this isn’t the case. Rather than a marker of vanity or ill-intelligence, the wide-spread consensus is that makeup is a means of expressing oneself. Our choices of self-presentation help construct individuality that we are so ardently encouraged by tutors to cultivate. It is a talking point, the start of a conversation. I bonded with one of my closest friends in college over an admiration of her electric blue lipstick, and our friendship is founded upon a shared love of both poetry and MAC cosmetics. What is more, the choice to wear makeup can be a political statement in the face of patriarchal standards that condemn it. Oxford’s drag scene provides strong evidence of this: groups of individuals expressing themselves outside of socially-constructed expectations of behaviour, displaying facets of their identity through makeup, clothing, and performance art.

The choice not to wear makeup may be equally empowering. Once again, this decision has no correlation to one’s intellectual integrity. It is time we regard these two as mutually exclusive and hold a mirror up to the society that enforces this very principle.

LGBT flags deserve more than a week

0

It seems appropriate that the theme for LGBT history month this year is ‘Geography: Mapping the World’ when considering how large the international student contingent is here at Oxford.

This month we look to commemorate sombre events. For example, the 30th anniversary of the passing of section 28, which prohibited local authorities from disseminating materials that ‘promoted homosexuality’ in schools and the 40th anniversary of the murder of Harvey Milk, the USA’s first out gay elected councillor. But there is a lot to be celebrated too, as citizens in Australia and also 16 other Central and South American nations can enjoy same sex weddings for the first time.

30 years ago, it was stated in Section 28 that a local authority “shall not intentionally promote homosexuality or publish material with the intention of promoting homosexuality”, an act only repealed in 2003 in the UK. LGBT history is frequently littered with taboo and silence. I therefore see no more fitting way to commemorate LGBT history month by flying Pride flags in defiance throughout February.

So why do so many colleges still refuse to fly the flag for the entire month? Students at a variety of colleges have struggled to get the flag flown for the entire month with mixed results.

Some colleges have notably been successful. Students at Oriel have negotiated their way to flying it for the full month for the first time. But even at colleges that have agreed to fly the flag, for example my own college, St Anne’s, the prospect was not immediately welcomed.

Many ask whether a whole month is truly necessary, or even wonder if this fight is worthwhile, or merely a self-congratulatory show of support for a cause that is largely won. It’s first important to note that the flagpoles in Oxford are largely unused. Flying a flag is virtually costless to a college. The decision not fly the flag is just as active as the decision to fly it. Whilst the college loses very little, the lonely spires certainly look better with a splash of colour. Flash back to a younger version of myself, a closeted Oxford applicant, who was blown away when he first looked around Oxford and saw the vast number of flags hanging out of windows representing every identity under the sun. My closeted self could not wait to get here.

Flags do not just exist to congratulate ourselves, they stand as a signal of who we are and who we would like to be, a city that welcomes everyone. If colleges can show support, then why shouldn’t they. LGBT people are an ‘invisible’ minority and awareness is always positive, especially in LGBT history month. This is a fast and easy way to ‘flag’ up LGBT matters and spark discussion about the history of this community and the issues that pertain to them today.

Colleges have fought back, arguing that flying the flag for awareness and support purposes would open the floodgates, allowing hundreds of obscure flags needing to be flown. Others have raised concerns that the LGBT flag may be seen as a divisive political signal that the college should not engage with. Firstly, I think we can all agree that flying other flags to represent other minority groups is no bad thing. There is no reason why we shouldn’t support the flagpoles being used throughout the year to support a variety of groups. More importantly, every stance that we make may cause a division somewhere if we choose to look for it. Remaining ‘neutral’ in this case is not an option.

Failure to make a statement of support can be easily read as an endorsement of those who would disregard the LGBT community. Silence may seep through the history of the LGBT community, but it should not be our future. Engaging in politics is unavoidable and there is no better way to engage with it than as brightly and as boldly as possible.

Sia and her wig: disguise or clever marketing tool?

3

Australian pop singer Sia is famous for her world-class vocals on songs like ‘Chandelier’, but her chosen attire gains her just as much attention: she chooses to only appear in public when wearing a wig that covers her face.

Her wig acts as a veil, concealing herself from her fans and allowing her to maintain an aura of privacy and mystery. She has expressed her dislike regarding the destabilising nature of fame, and the wigs give her a sound excuse to place herself out of the limelight. However, is she being deceptive, and creating mystery in order to sell albums? She said herself to James Corden in a Carpool Karaoke episode when discussing her wig, “I thought what doesn’t exist in pop music today? And it was mystery!”

Her Twitter bio does little to demystify the life of singer: “i am sia i was born from the bumhole of a unicorn named steve.” The majority of her tweets are signed off by ‘Team Sia’ rather than herself, and her profile picture is a photo of a young girl named Maddie Ziegler, who regularly appears in place of Sia at press events and in her music videos.

Her Instagram page, arguably the most personal of all the social media platforms, contains no photos of that morning’s brunch or cute dog snaps, but instead features mainly album promotion images. In a social media-obsessed era, this level of secrecy is unusual for a celebrity, who usually has to open themselves up to the public to connect with fans.

At 42 years old, Sia isn’t the typical young female pop star. Her wig could also be a clever marketing ploy to deceive people’s expectations and place an older woman in a predominantly younger genre, appealing to the audience by presenting her as faceless and letting her voice and talent speak for itself.

So what will happen next? Perhaps she will slowly unveil herself, creating a narrative of intrigue and letting her fans get to know her. However, once the wig has gone, the mystery will disappear and thus one of the main marketing features of her brand will have vanished. In an age where information is so readily available, an air of mystery and deception may be vital in order to survive.

A letter to: my future employer

0

Dear Future Employer,

So, here we are. After the 18 spring weeks, 20 years of work experience and one Nobel Prize that it took to procure the entry level job advertised on your website, it seems that you have chosen me to join your prestigious, highly esteemed midmarket financial firm.

With a humanities degree, I started off as a dreamer. The impurities and imperfections of the world used to pain me enormously. I vaguely remember my sixth form essays which argued for nuclear non-proliferation, universal healthcare and even, frighteningly, a federal Europe. When I started university, I recall all the different ways I thought the world could change and how I could help change it. There wasn’t an issue too big or too small. Global warming, Palestine and polio – I was to solve, liberate and cure the world from all its woes. How misguided I was.

Alas, having gained an invaluable insight into the corporate world after the four day experience arranged by your firm, I realised how truly minuscule my previous aspirations were. The intricacies of bi-annual financial statements and miscellaneous administrative tasks are where my passion truly lies. It was through the professional, yet friendly, nature of your company that I truly understood where my heart lay, having received my offer letter informing me “with pleasure” that I had out-performed so many of my peers to attain this graduate role.

Sometimes, while clearing out my room, I rifle through my tattered school newspaper articles, politics essays and even my Oxford personal statement. I am reminded of the boy I once was. It would be remiss of me to say that these things do not occasionally cross my mind. At your firm’s four day Spring Insight programme, in the momentary lulls, away from the unanimous euphoria of the occasion, I looked out at the view. There was a stunning vision of the Thames Barrier and an assortment of Industrial Warehouses – it was then I recognised how misguided I truly was.

I realised how profoundly correct I was at all the key junctures of my career. In first year, when I flirted with the idea of an eco start up, I remembered that 90 per cent of start ups fail – how right I was. When I wanted to volunteer at a Microfinance Initiative in Bali, I knew that turning it down for a three week Hedge Fund experience, sorted out by my father, was the right choice. And now, as I am on the threshold of joining your firm, I know that the 30 years of processing and financial jargon that lay ahead of me are the right choice. As the Sufi poet Rumi said, “Set yourself on fire and seek those who fan the flames” – that is why I seek your firm and look forward to filling out the new Joiners surgery forthwith.

Yours faithfully,

Musty

Oxford SU votes to support UCU strike

0

Oxford SU will stand with academic staff in their upcoming pensions strikes, following an ‘Extraordinary Council’ meeting last night.

Delegates passed a motion by 56 votes to 13, mandating Oxford SU’s sabbatical officers to issue a statement in full support of the University and College Union’s (UCU) strike action. It also called on the University to oppose the impending pension reforms which will impact thousands of University employees.

However, while passing with a large majority, several students expressed concern at the impact on teaching. One student told Cherwell that the SU “now supports finalists being left with potentially no teaching whatsoever for three weeks”.

The emergency meeting, held at St Catherine’s College, was called after a failure to pass an acceptable motion regarding the University and College Union’s (UCU) strike last week.

The SU had previously faced widespread criticism for their initial statement, which said it was “regrettable” that the proposed strike could adversely affect students’ education.

In contrast, last night’s motion offered a far stronger support for the academics’ industrial action.

It called on students to support their lecturers and tutors, even if that means not attending classes, with an exemption being made for compulsory assessments.

It also mandated the vice president for graduates, Marianne Melsen, to contact all graduate students and encourage them to join the UCU.

However, despite the amendment excluding compulsory examinations, concerns were still raised at impact the strikes will have on students.

One fourth year told Cherwell: “Tutors and academic staff are absolutely justified in being aggrieved by changes to their pensions.

“But, it’s also important that our student union supports the interests of students. Despite claims made about solidarity and long-term effects, the motion Oxford SU passed today – encouraging students not to attend classes, and offering support to strikers – means that the SU now supports finalists being left with potentially no teaching whatsoever for three weeks, which is deeply worrying.

“Oxford SU is there to represent students, and while we should show our support to tutors in other ways, we should not be supporting the strike.”

UCU’s planned walk-outs are a response to proposed reforms of the Universities Superannuation Scheme, the fund which provides the pensions to academic staff at universities such as Oxford.

Independent estimates suggest that the changes would cause a typical lecturer to lose £200,000 in pension contributions by the time of their retirement.SU votes to support UCU strike

Raise and Give falls short

0

Oxford SU’s charity fundraising organisation Raise and Give (RAG) made just £800 at their annual 2016 ball, compared to an average fundraising total of £3,633 over the past five years.

RAG also raised an overall net total of £35,000 for all of their events in 2016/17, compared witha £59,910.62 average over the past five years.

At RAG’s central fundraising event of 2016, The Mad Hatter ball, student organisers raised
£37,885.63, but spent £37,085.16, bringing the net total of money raised for charity that evening to £800.47.

In the academic year 2016/17, RAG raised £106,806.78, and spent £72,177.14.
The net money raised that year stood at £34,629.64.

This compares to an average net figure of £ 59,910.62 going back to 2012.
Oxford SU’s Head of Student Engagement and Communications, Emily Beardsmore, told Cherwell: “RAG is a Student led group any one can get involved and run for the committee.

“The Committee changes each year and each committee has different priorities.

“Oxford SU will continue to support students to raise money for charity.”

Victory preview – ‘a truly fantastical world’

0

Lusciously dark is the only way to describe Carnival Theatre’s take on Howard Barker’s Victory. Taking place in an absurd and fictionalised version of Charles II’s Restoration, the play centres on Susan Bradshaw (played by Bea Udale-Smith) as she journeys through a world in upheaval to find the scattered pieces of her husband’s corpse… It is as bizarre and grotesque as it sounds – featuring dismembered limbs as props, vile language, and sumptuous costumes. The scenes I saw combined a frenetic, animal energy with royal pompousness – the result is a world that is overflowing in excess, both of charm as well as brutality. Director Julia Pilkington says she was attracted to Barker’s unique use of language which clashes rich poetics against coarseness and vulgarity. I was struck by how darkly compelling the scenes I saw were: grief, sarcasm, animality, and hilarity bubble through the language and physicality of the cast. I witnessed Bradshaw and Scrope (Alex Rugman) crawling like dogs and climbing out windows, King “Charlie” (Adam Diaper) throw a tantrum and take his trousers off during his coronation, and royal mistress Devonshire (Rosa Garland) describe the colour of a baboon’s bum whilst trying to seduce the King. The cast’s dexterity in moving through abrupt tonal shifts was impressive; balancing the absurd against moments of tenderness and humour. Udale-Smith in particular was terrifyingly compelling as she portrayed Bradshaw’s grief with something that is perhaps best described as pathetic desperation.

To match this rich script, Carnival Theatre have created a sumptuous aesthetic. Mia Parnall’s costumes should be applauded for their debaucherous magnificence. Marie-Antoinette style wigs, embroidered bloomers, billowing dresses, and capes help embody the bacchic moment of the Restoration. When I asked about the sound design, I was told that Nathan Geyer’s compositions feature ‘jangly, abrasive, warped harpsichords’ to match the historical dissonance of the setting. It is clear that the cast and creatives are highly invested in matching the text’s excess as they build a truly fantastical world. Pilkington’s passion for the project is infectious. She described how the cast channel various animals in rehearsals to spice up the many minor characters. She comments that even smaller characters have fantastically poetic lines, and that she wants to do them justice by giving them ‘a smack of colour’.

In this riotous production, my only worry is that the excess of character, language, costume, and sound might overwhelm, preventing some of the emotional impact from landing. I’m reassured by comments from the cast, such as when Garland spoke about the work they had done on deciding when to invest characters with depth and when to render them as comic grotesques. The luxuriousness of the spectacle is strikingly ambitious in scope, but I have faith in the team’s execution (pun intended) of this vision. Overall, Carnival Theatre’s production promises to be one hell of a romp, and should not be missed. The dedication of the cast and crew to creating this succulent and brutal world is truly exciting, and I wish them all the best.

Joe Inwood elected new SU President

0

Joe Inwood has been elected SU President, winning with 1114 of first-choice votes.

He narrowly beat rivals Hannah Taylor and Ellie Dibben, who secured 1091 and 1025 votes respectively. A total of 234 students voted to reopen nominations.

Overall turnout for the elections was 17.6 per cent – a decrease from last year’s figure of 19 per cent.

Inwood will start his term on 24 June and serve for the 2018-19 academic year. Alongside the rest of the sabbatical team, he will work full-time and receive a salary.

The six students elected as sabbatical officers, alongside the National Union of Students (NUS) delegates and student trustees, are as follows:

President – Joe Inwood

VP Access and Academic Affairs  – Lucas Bertholdi-Saad

VP Charities and Community – Rosanna Greenwood

VP Graduates – Alison D’Ambrosia

VP Welfare and Equal Opportunities – Ellie Macdonald

VP Women – Katt Walton

NUS Delegates – Niamh White, Rida Vaquas, Mercy Haggerty, Samuel Dunnett, Alexander Curtis and Hugo Raine

Student Trustees – Ivy Manning, Atticus Stonestrom, Jack Wands

The Kite Runner review – ‘a choreographed exuberance prose cannot achieve’

0

Transferring a novel to the stage, particularly one as distinguished and beloved and as Khaled Hosseini’s ‘The Kite Runner’, requires sensitivity and an authoritative creative vision. Matthew Spangler’s timely production, under the direction of Giles Croft, excels in exploiting the opportunities of the stage, stripping Hosseini’s tale of friendship, fatherhood, and redemption to the essentials, with invigorating results.

A play will not have the subtle, cumulative effect of hundreds of pages of prose consumed over several days. Spangler accepts this, but the decision to have Amir (Raj Ghatak) present onstage, narrating his life throughout, and reflecting retrospectively on the characters who shaped him, efficiently conveys the idea threading Hosseini’s novel together: that a person is formed by his experiences, and must be judged by his relations to others. This sense is also rapidly transmitted within the first seconds, with Spangler’s placing of Hassan (Jo Ben Ayed), Baba (Gary Pillai) and Soraya (Ameira Darwish) onstage as Amir begins his monologue recounting his ‘formative’ years.

One initially jarring aspect is the way in which Amir, meant to be a boy enacting Westerns in his garden in Kabul, is wearing the stubbornly middle-aged combination of a white shirt tucked into trousers favoured by off-duty solicitors. But perhaps this is the point; the audience must consider the professional, Californian Amir of the present day as the child dragged from innocence by the abuse of his closest friend, racial intolerance, and war. Amir’s San Francisco drawl switches to Farsi in the initial scenes depicting the fiercely loyal friendship between himself and Hassan, the latter played with a haunting, almost ethereal innocence by Jo Ben Ayed. Leaping between languages like this reminds us of the layers of Amir’s cultural identity, an element very well suited to theatrical interpretation. The character of Baba, interpreted by Pillai in a stand-out performance, is similarly enhanced by stagecraft. The shock of Baba’s transition from the distant, irritable entrepreneur to a man reduced to ‘two suitcases and one disappointing son’, ultimately emerging as a father so devoted that his last act is to cling to life long enough to see the marriage of his son, is effectively compressed into two hours.

Perhaps why this production works so well is because of Spangler’s observation that in the novel, Amir’s first-person narrative is a cathartic, confessional process. It is one that, in retrospect, cries out for dramatization, the result of which is Amir’s unifying monologue. There is a greater sense that the character reaches maturity by articulating his guilt than in the novel, and his elation in redeeming himself, finding the ‘way to be good again’, has a choreographed exuberance prose cannot achieve.

There are elements of the plot that would have no doubt posed initial concerns for Spangler and Croft: the rape of Hassan, his murder, the staging of the kite runners of Kabul. The first two of these elicited the revulsion, then seething outrage, of every audience member. Transmitted through disturbing silhouette, these scenes illustrated the essential inhumanity of such atrocities: the attackers are devoid of character, reduced to sociopathic phantoms.

Whilst successfully tackling the upsetting material, Croft’s production has a lightness that saves the audience from complete despair. Ghatak’s delivery of the monologue is sensitive to the gentle humour which hallmarks Hosseini’s fiction: describing Baba’s slavish devotion to Reagan, and his pleasure at finding an English term to describe Assef (Soroosh Lavasini): ‘sociopath’, are examples of this and act as respite to the unashamedly disquieting moments. The joy of the wedding scene, set to the Afghan song Ahesta Boro, similarly elevates the mood and offers a sense of spectacle that a novel could not achieve. Most uplifting, and most masterfully staged, is the depiction of the freedom that Amir attains in shedding his psychological burden in rescuing Hassan’s son. In the closing scene of eponymous kite running, the sound effects, generated by cast members spinning schwirrbogen, a rattle-shaped instrument that whistles like the wind, were absorbing and successful in mirroring Amir’s frenzied joy. Composer Jonathan Girling described the onstage tabla player, the musician Hanif Khan, as the ‘next most important person’ in ‘The Kite Runner’. Khan’s performance, which begins as the audience enters the theatre and ends only at the curtain, the man sitting onstage for the full two and a half hours, gives the tale cohesion and the emotions an urgency.

One flaw in the production is its time constraints. In the novel, for example, the shock of the news that Hassan is Amir’s brother, and the distress produced by Zorab’s suicide attempt, build up over several paragraphs, and readers can flick back to alter their interpretations and refresh themselves of foreshadowing events. Compressing such revelations into seconds, regardless of characters’ outraged dialogue, does lose this effect, and it may be that the audience does not receive sufficient time to process such information; but there is little a dramatist can do to alter this. Spangler’s stage adaptation is unashamedly that: it stands alone as drama– myself and a friend who had never read the novel were equally engrossed – offering a fresh and timely revision of Hosseini’s classic.

Brasenose grad’s attempt to sue Oxford dismissed

1

The High Court has dismissed Oxford graduate Faiz Siddiqui’s case against Oxford University. Siddiqui had sought damages of £1m after receiving a low 2:1 instead of the first he expected.

The History student, who graduated from Brasenose College in 2000, claimed his academic disappointment had been due to poor teaching in his Indian Special Subject.

The University said in a statement: “History has been studied and taught with distinction at Oxford for longer than at almost any other university and the quality and range of its History teaching and examining across the collegiate University has long been widely recognised.”

According to the court summary, Siddiqui claimed his exam performance had prevented him from gaining a position at a top American Law college and had given him a “shattering blow” that had precipitated serious mental health issues.

Siddiqui achieved his poorest marks in the History ‘gobbets’ paper.

Siddiqui claimed that he had only been taught enough material to answer “5% of the gobbets”.

However, it was suggested that Siddiqui’s poor performance could have been explained by a number of factors, including “a severe episode of hay fever.”

A subject ambassador for History at Corpus Christi College, Emily Foster, said: “It is definitely possible to do all the work in the world and still have a terrible paper – not everything comes up every year.

“Generally the teaching can vary a lot depending on the tutor’s interests but we have so few contact hours (typically no more than 3-4 a week) that I really couldn’t see that affecting his degree substantially.

“Most of our work is pretty self-guided. As you can probably tell whilst I sympathise with Siddiqui I can’t really imagine any degree of bad teaching setting him that far back given how much work we do ourselves.”

The court concluded: “When students are incurring substantial debts to pursue their university education, the quality of the education delivered will undoubtedly come under even greater scrutiny than it did in the past.

“There may be some rare cases where some claim for compensation for the inadequacy of the tuition provided may succeed, but it is hardly the ideal way of achieving redress.

“Litigation is costly, time and emotion consuming and runs the significant risk of failure, particularly in this area where establishing a causative link between the quality of teaching and any alleged “injury” is fraught with difficulty.

“There must be a better way of dealing with this kind of issue if it cannot be resolved by the individual concerned simply accepting what has happened and finding a positive way forward.”