Sunday 6th July 2025
Blog Page 517

Review: BOYS

0

Boys, by Ella Hickson, centres on a group of men at the crisis point between university and the real world. As both Benny and Mack conclude their lives as students and as Cam prepares for a career-defining music recital, Timp drowns out the drudgery of his aimless job with drugs, booze and sex. Together, they approach a watershed in life as they are faced with the ending of the lease on their flat and a harsh confrontation with their own futures. We watch, captivated, as their internal chaos escapes into actuality.

The real strength of this production was in the fullness of its characters; they were all crafted to be far beyond the sum of their plot points. The audience was presented with six developed and diverse people rather than meagre shadows of personality. There was also no dominance of any one character, even though that may have been expected to be the case with the animated, and unpredictable, Timp, funding much of the comic relief. Rather, larger-than-life Timp (Charlie Wade), enhanced the somber and ruminative character of Mack (Josh Shepherd-Smith). Just as the obsessive and somewhat timid Benny (Alasdair Linn) opposes the more easy-going yet internally disorientated Cam (Joe Woodman). The girls, Sophie and Laura, played by Georgie Dettmer and Tara Kelly were not reduced to romantic interests of the ‘boys’ but were distinct with their own morals, feeling and depth. The group created was dynamic and acutely realistic.

The complementarity of the cast, their best acting by far was in scenes where they were all together, allowed them to bounce off each other, at once existing as incredibly tired of each other’s company and at the same time hopelessly and fondly codependent. These scenes were vibrant and excruciatingly real. There was constant movement, no static characters waiting for a repetitive tedium of call-and-response, but actors bouncing off one another, at once interrupting and talking over each other but still perfectly clear and understandable in what they were saying. The juxtaposition between pop and classical music embodied the flow of the erratic nature of the play as the characters hopped from situation to situation, clinging to anything that distracted them from the realities they were trying to avoid. 

Under the amber glow of a plastic bag over the light, both a comforting warm presence and an unsettling haze, the set design was a perfect realization of the emotions of the play. The tumultuous and claustrophobic flat was littered with rubbish bags, empty and partly full bottles and drugs. This mess grew over the duration. As Timp walked on the tables, kicking bottles and spilling drinks, the characters were able to truly exist and interact with a set making it more real than the oft preserved and untouched set designs which are usually seen in performances. The intricacy of the set is testament to the design team: from ‘boobs’ arranged in letters on the fridge, to the notes about ‘loud sex’ on the pin board, they presented a set which was acutely authentic and perfectly symbolic.

Directors Charlie Barlow and Millie Tupper created a perfect expression of a mental bedlam, as the turbulence of life comes to the forefront with its uncontrollable and untamable nature. This whirl of fast-paced plot truly makes it feel as life is slipping away and the increasing disarray encapsulates the suffocating existential fever gripping the play.

University plans to announce its commitment to Oxford Living Wage

0

Oxford University plans to announce its commitment to pay the Oxford Living Wage to its staff from August 2020.

The Living Wage in Oxford is £10.21 per hour as of November 2019, when the council increased it from £10.02.

To become an accredited Living Wage Employer, all directly employed staff need to be paid a Living Wage, with a plan to extend it to regular sub-contracted staff.

The Oxford Living Wage Campaign, a student organisation that has pressured the University into adopting the living wage, says: “These workers, who are employed in cleaning, catering, events, maintenance, and other necessary jobs, are an integral part of our university community. Excluding them from this protection is shameful.

“In the long term, the new policy is dangerous for workers—even those who will benefit initially from the Living Wage today.

“By leaving a loophole that excludes outsourced workers from the Oxford Living Wage rate, the policy generates a perverse incentive for the University to hire more subcontracted workers at a lower rate of pay, rather than creating good, sustainable living wage jobs. We call upon the University to commit to paying all workers, including subcontracted workers, the Oxford Living Wage. We call upon constituent Colleges to adopt the Living Wage standard for all staff, regardless of contract.

“There is no longer any excuse for low pay in the Colleges, while the University acknowledges its obligation to workers. We understand that the new policy deepens the precarity of non-academic work at the university; this move complements the university’s complicity in the worsening casualization of academic jobs. We join in solidarity with non- academic and academic workers, organized through the UCU, in the fight against casualization and insufficient pay across the UK higher education sector.”

The City Council sets the Oxford Living Wage as 95% of the London Living Wage, which is £10.75. The national minimum wage for adults is currently £8.72. The £10.21 Oxford Living Wage means, if an employee works a 37 hour week, they will receive a minimum annual pay of £19 644. This is calculated by using the Minimum Income Standard, which finds what people need to be able to afford the basic level of goods.

Oxford City Council says: “The Oxford Living Wage has been created to promote liveable earnings for workers. It reflects the fact that Oxford is one of the most expensive cities to live in the UK, and helps accredited employers demonstrate they value their workforce.

“With expensive housing in the city, many workers have to choose between spending more money to live in the city, or more on travel to get to work. The Oxford Living Wage has been created to promote liveable earnings for workers. It reflects the fact that Oxford is one of the most expensive cities to live in the UK, and helps accredited employers demonstrate they value their workforce.”

A spokesperson for Oxford University said: “The University of Oxford can confirm it has agreed to sign up to pay the Oxford Living Wage (OLW), making it the largest employer in the city to do so. More details will be announced shortly. As part of our commitment to the OLW, we have also agreed to include all sub-contracted employees as soon as practicable.

“Colleges are independent employers and will make their own decisions on the Oxford Living Wage, but they are collectively considering the details of the scheme.

“The OLW is 95% of the London Living Wage, in recognition of the high cost of living in Oxford, and was set in November 2019 at £10.21 per hour. “

New Women’s History professorship named after Hillary Clinton

0

The University of Oxford is to create a new Chair of Women’s History, named after former US Secretary of State and 2016 Democratic Presidential Nominee Hillary Clinton.

The University plans to create the new professorship in perpetuity, embedding the role of women’s history permanently into the fabric of the History Faculty. The Development Office states on their fundraising website that the new Chair will “provide the leadership needed to ensure that women’s history is represented on the global stage and that the progress we have made in recent decades cannot be undermined.”

It is hoped that this new Chair will “encourage more young scholars to pursue a doctorate in women’s history”, and the position will allow for collaboration with the Women in Humanities Research Centre at Oxford and the Centre for Gender, Identity, and Subjectivity within the History Faculty. The choice to endow this Chair in 2020 marks the University’s celebration of 100 years of women receiving degrees, corresponding with the first female Vice-Chancellor.

A University spokesperson told Cherwell: “[t]he new chair will encourage the most promising scholars to conduct cutting- edge research that is original in conception, methods, and vision, including women and their histories in the mainstream of the discipline, and will inspire and sustain a new vision for history in which women’s lives are central”; recruitment is to be initiated in Spring 2020.

Vice-Chancellor Louise Richardson said: “[for] far too long women have remained in the background, and the world has suffered as a consequence. This is changing, but far slower than many of us would like. The Hillary Rodham Clinton Chair in Women’s History at Oxford will accelerate this change and help bring women to where they belong, in the forefront of history and society.”

The University is seeking £4.2 million in endowment for this position, and is currently fundraising through the Development Office. The North America Office of the University calls Clinton “a champion for women, an advocate for women’s policy priorities, and a voice for women’s vital role in society and in history” in its fundraising brochure, specifically highlighting her 1995 speech to the UN in which she coined the phrase “women’s rights are human rights”.

Hillary Clinton tells the University’s Development Office that “History reveals the past, informs the present, and shapes the future. Yet the story has largely focused on men, including women only as an afterthought or in a supporting role. That must change. Oxford has embraced this challenge. The Hillary Rodham Clinton Chair in Women’s History will lead the way, emboldening a global network of scholars and students. I am both grateful and honored.”

The Clintons hold long-standing connections with the University. Hillary Clinton delivered the 2018 Romanes Lecture, titled ‘Making the Case for Democracy’, in the Sheldonian Theatre.

In the same year she was the keynote speaker at the University’s Bonavero Institute of Human Rights, unveiling a statue of former US First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt. She was also made an honorary fellow of Mansfield College. Hillary Clinton’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, studied politics as a Rhodes Scholar at University College but did not receive a degree. However, in 1994 he received an honorary law doctorate and a fellowship from Univ. Their daughter Chelsea Clinton received an MPhil in international relations at Univ in 2003, and she went on to complete a DPhil in 2014.

Cherwell has reached out to the Clinton Foundation for comments.

City council increase spending on homelessness

0

Oxford City Council has announced it will be spending £1.2 million more on preventing homelessness and rough sleeping next year.

The additional funds bring the council’s total spending on the issue to £7.4 million, and are part of a larger effort by the council to transform their approach to homelessness.

Much of the money will go towards the completion of the new shelter and assessment hub in Floyds Row, the first wing of which opened last month.

It’s a space co-designed by people experiencing homelessness that includes a range of accommodation, a treatment room for drug and alcohol dependency and intensive support to help people move on from a life on the streets.

The centre will be fully open in April, providing a warm, calm and safe environment for those sleeping rough to access support and advice on accommodation.

Councillor Linda Smith said, “On most days, an hour in the heart of our city will reveal the terrible human cost of a national homelessness crisis sparked by austerity, welfare reform and a broken rental market.

“Much less obvious is the work that we and our partners do to help hundreds of people off the streets every year … Homelessness is not inevitable and it is not something we will ever accept.”

This comes on top of the progress the council and charities have made in reducing the numbers of those rough sleeping in the city.

43 people were counted sleeping on the streets last November, a number down nearly a third since 2017.

Moreover, the council has said that in 2019 it prevented homelessness for 458 families. Hopefully the extra funding will lead to even better statistics next year, as more people are helped to access the safe housing they need.

Merton pledge support for Homeless Charter

0

Merton College announced last Tuesday that they have pledged support for Oxford Homeless Movement Charter, becoming the latest Oxford organisation to join the cause.

The Oxford Homeless Movement Charter aims to help rough sleepers and provide the accommodation and support they need to help them off the streets, to rebuild their lives, and to prevent a return to street homelessness.

The organisation also aim to ensure that through their network of organisations and volunteers that people who are sleeping rough have the “same opportunity to access information, work, training, volunteering, leisure and creative activities as the rest of Oxford’s community”.

Following last week’s meeting of Merton College’s Governing Body, where they agreed to support the charter, the college’s Warden Professor Irene Tracey said: “I am delighted by the enthusiastic and unanimous support for OHM by our Governing Body. This is the first step in what we hope will be a long and impactful journey working alongside OHM to eliminate homelessness in our beloved city.”

In an online statement the College said that they were “proud to be playing a part” in working towards eliminating homelessness across the city.

In addition to signing the Charter to support its vision and values within the college, Merton pledged to make an annual donation to the cause for the next five years.

Merton have also published OHM suggestions of how to help including giving time, expertise and ideas to the Movement’s member charities who need support, either as a volunteer with a partner charity or through sharing your skills

They have also proposed inviting an OHM charity partner to come and talk to organisations about homelessness to raise understanding, as well as a commitment to inclusive recruitment procuring services locally from social enterprises and purposeful businesses, and paying the real Living Wage or higher.

Merton College has been contacted for comment.

University refuses to release Schwarzman vetting documents

0

Oxford University has refused to release documents to Oxford Students’ Union relating to the vetting of a £150 million donation made by Stephen A. Schwarzman for the construction of a new humanities centre.

A motion which passed during the Union Council’s meeting in 3rd week of Hilary requested that the University release the full details relating to the vetting process of Mr Schwarzman’s donation so that a public review of the process could take place.

The motion also requested that Oxford demonstrate “a transparent ethical framework for donations,” to ensure that any donations are “consistent with the University’s stated values of sustainability and equality.” It further requested information relating to the honours Mr Schwarzman will receive for his donation.

Responding to the motion, Oxford said “All decisions about donations are made by the University’s Committee to Review Donations, whose members include Oxford academics with expertise in relevant areas like ethics, law and business. This committee considers whether donations or research funding are acceptable under University guidelines. The Committee reviews all the publicly available information about a potential donor and can take legal, ethical and reputational issues into consideration. The Committee Oxford City Council has announced it will be spending £1.2 million more on preventing homelessness and rough sleeping next year.

“The additional funds bring the council’s total spending on the issue to £7.4 million, and are part of a larger effort by the council to transform their approach to homelessness. Much of the money will go towards the completion of the new shelter and assessment hub in Floyds Row, the first wing of which opened last month. It’s a space co-designed by people experiencing homelessness that includes a range of accommodation, a treatment room for drug and alcohol dependency and intensive support to help people move on from a life on the streets. The centre will be fully open in April, providing a warm, calm and safe environment for those sleeping rough to access support and advice ensures the good governance of the funding of University activity, and openness and transparency around the sources of that funding.”

Regarding the gifts and honours Mr Schwarzman would receive due to his donation, the University clarified that while the building will be named “The Stephen A. Schwarzman Centre for the Humanities,” it is against university policy to let donations influence academic policy or appointments, meaning that Stephen Schwarzman would not receive any honorary fellowship or associated role for his donation.

Oxford Student’s Union is yet to respond to the University’s answers to the questions asked at the meeting.

Speaking to propose the motion at the Student’s Union Ben Jacobs, council member from Pembroke College, said: “The University has made it clear that these single large philanthropic donations are a precedent for fundraising for the future. They’ve talked about keeping pace with our American competitors. Looking at the comparison the University have made to America and this idea that we need big philanthropic donations, if you look at the States in the last year we had the cash-for-places scandal, Epstein and the MIT media lab, lots around Sackler donations. It is clear what can happen if we just look at competition between universities rather than looking at ethical and accountable frameworks within the University for who we want to take money from and who we want to name our buildings after.”

The motion criticised many of the financial interests of the Blackstone Group, the investment firm chaired by Mr Schwarzman, including the role the group has played in the deforestation of the Amazon Rainforest, and in the global housing crisis.

The motion also highlighted links between Stephen Schwarzman, Donald Trump, and the Koch brothers. It levels the claim that Mr Schwarzman sought to “legitimise socially and ecologically destructive practices” through investment at internationally renowned universities.

The new humanities centre will unify seven faculties and six libraries in one site, near Green Templeton College in Jericho. In 2019 a number of academics voiced their opposition to Oxford University’s acceptance of the £150 million donation by Stephen Schwarzman which made the centre possible. The letter argues that the centre “will be built with the proceeds of the exploitation and disenfranchisement of vulnerable people across the world.”

The donation to Oxford follows a similar donation made by Mr Schwarzman of $150 million to Yale University in 2015, and $350 million to Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2018. The latter donation laid the groundwork for a $1 bn school of artificial intelligence at MIT.

Cambridge lawn destroyed by Extinction Rebellion

0

Extinction Rebellion members destroyed part of the Trinity College lawn in Cambridge on Monday.

The activists were digging up the lawn in protest against the college’s plans to sell off land they own in Suffolk to an individual who was intending to use it to develop a lorry park.

Cambridge XR tweeted: “Trinity College owns Innocence Farm in Suffolk and is attempting to sell the land to the Port of Felixstowe so they can develop a lorry park for 3,000 vehicles. “We must call time on those profiting from the destruction of nature.”

In Cambridge student newspaper Varsity, Trinity College has also been accused of having: “£9.1m directly invested in companies involved in oil and gas exploration, production, and refinement, and £7.79m invested in companies that carry out fracking.”

A spokesperson for the college has said: “Trinity College regrets the criminal damage done to its property beside Great Gate. “The College respects the right to freedom of speech and nonviolent protest but draws the line at criminal damage and asked the protestors to leave. Academics at Trinity are actively engaged in research to understand and develop solutions to climate change.”

Police have been criticised for their failure to intervene in the protest. No arrests took place on the day the damage took place, though the Cambridge police have since reported that “a crime has been recorded for criminal damage”.

Three people have been arrested since the protest, including 19 year old Caitlin Fay and 26 year old Gabriella Ditton. The Extinction Rebellion activists also blocked Trumpington Road in the city on Sunday in a campaign “to force local institutions to take action on the climate emergency”.

Images of the destroyed lawn have been circulating across social media, sparking outrage from a number of individuals.

Allison Pearson, columnist for The Telegraph, tweeted: “A Cambridge councillor points out that if lads from the Arbury estate blocked roads or dug up lawn they’d be banged in the slammer. “Middle-class dons’ children arrested? Heaven forbid!”

Others, however, have expressed support for the rebels’ actions. Eco columnist for The Independent, Donnachadh McCarthy took to Twitter to say: “Hey @xr_cambridge digging up a tiny patch of ecologically dead lawn made your exposure of climate criminality by Trinity College the number TWO item on bbc website last night! Howls of outrage are of public being shaken out of lethal complacency. It is part of the process. Awesome.”

The scheme to develop a lorry park on the college’s Suffolk land has been rejected.

Students show their love for the climate

0

Last Friday, February 14, more than 100 school students gathered in Bonn Square as part of Oxford’s latest climate strike.

Taking place on Valentine’s Day, the ‘love and inclusion’ themed protest aimed to raise awareness of the climate crisis and promote community engagement. It was organised and managed by the Oxford branch of the UK Student Climate Network (UKSCN).

Bearing placards and banners bearing slogans such as ‘Respect existence or expect resistance’ and ‘The climate is changing, so why aren’t we?’, protesters converged in Bonn Square before moving through central Oxford. The day also saw dance performances and live music from Band For Climate.

Local schools said that they had not officially authorised the absence. Despite this, a number of students (some of whom were as young as six) were joined by parents and grandparents in a show of solidarity.

Many had no previous experience of climate strikes but took the opportunity to make their voices heard. Speaking to the Oxford Mail, 13-year-old Catherine Monelle said, “This is my future and I have not had a chance to make any impact yet. I may not be able to change a lot but it is important I do my bit.”

The protest marked a year since the first major climate strike in Oxford. In February 2019, an estimated 1500 students marched through the city demanding that the government take immediate action. Yet activist EJ Fawcett believes little has changed in this period. The 18-year-old explained: “We will continue to rally for the foreseeable future… We do not want to have to strike at all, we want to be able to live our lives and play videogames, read books and go to school.”

The striking students in Oxford joined scores of teenagers protesting across the country. In London, demonstrators carried banners proclaiming “Roses are red, violets are blue, our Earth is burning and soon we will too” as they marched through Parliament Square.

Similar scenes were to be found in Bristol, Glasgow, Brighton and Birmingham where protesters ignored miserable conditions and took to the streets.

Nobel Peace Prize nominee, Greta Thunberg, started the climate strike movement in Stockholm in August 2018. She said that there were more than 2,000 Valentine’s day strikes due to take place across the globe. She went on to add that larger events are being planned for the coming months in the hope of encouraging governments to address climate change.

Petition released to Boycott Taylors

0

A petition has been released to boycott Taylors, a chain of sandwich and deli shops across Oxford. The petition was created by Oxford student Atticus Stonestrom, a co-chair of the Oxford Coalition Against Homelessness (OCAH), and has been supported by Turl Street Homeless Action (TSHA).

The petition is a response to an incident which occurred in one of the cafes last summer when staff refused to allow two rough sleepers to drink their beverages on the premises, despite the fact that they had purchased the beverages in the store. According to the TSHA and the two individuals in question, Taylors demanded that the rough sleepers leave after taking their orders because of an offensive ‘odour’, supposedly deterring other customers from eating their food.

According to OCAH, the company issued a private apology for “miscommunication”, but OCAH reports that they “nonetheless failed to acknowledge the discriminatory nature of this conduct, in particular refusing to give assurance that this kind of behavior would not occur again.”

A spokesperson for Taylors told Cherwell that: “the allegation about Taylors discriminating against homeless people is inaccurate and untrue. We are aware of an incident in July where two individuals were asked to leave our premises due to a number of customer complaints over a period of approximately one week about a strong, unpleasant odour originating from them. The conversation between us and Adrian and Theodora was, unfortunately, handled poorly by the then Shop Manager and they were not given a clear reason as to why they were asked to leave. They assumed that this was down to their appearance and the fact that they were homeless which is regrettable as this was absolutely not the case.”

They went on to say: “We do not discriminate against anybody visiting our shops. However, we do have a duty of care to our customers and we cannot allow individuals to remain on our premises when other customers are walking out and raising complaints about hygiene standards in an establishment which provides food throughout the day. None of this has anything to do with the fact that the people asked to leave our premises were homeless.

“We are acutely aware of the serious homelessness problems within Oxford but this incident is being taken out of context and exaggerated. We have apologised for our initial poor handling of the communication and this apology was accepted. Oxford’s homelessness situation is a large and complicated issue to resolve and far beyond our circle of impact. We have however been discussing this internally and are working out ways where we can, in our own little way, play our part and do what we can to help.”

The petition advocates boycotting all Taylors establishments until they issue a public apology for the incident and assent to a list of demands put forward by OCAH. These include agreeing not to eject customers who have not displayed harmful behaviour, even on the basis of other customers’ complaints; not to deny service or entry to such customers; not to enforce time limits if there are enough tables free for new customers; and not to harass rough sleepers or treat them differently from any other customers.

Stonestrom posted the petition with the caption: “Those of you who know them have probably heard about the absolutely appalling treatment Theodora and Adrian have received in the past year; unfortunately this kind of persecution is common.

“Here’s an attempt to push back; please do sign and help publicise as much as you can.”

In a comment Stonestrom told Cherwell: “Unfortunately persecution against rough sleepers is commonplace; the demands we’re raising here are a bare minimum for combatting this kind of conduct.”

The petition can be found online at: https://www.change.org/p/oxford-businesses-boycott-against-discrimination-of-rough-sleepers-by-oxford-businesses?fbclid=IwAR1N4Ibp5cQTM27e8RMhpm6sg22zrNebtmt4xiUHZ5yH0_O2ba1QHXsrSF8

Colleges debate financial support for the UCU strike

0

University College and New College, have debated motions in support of the UCU strikes. New College’s JCR narrowly rejected a motion supporting the strikes with amendments pledging to give money to the strike fund, if it was deemed to be a legal donation (dependent on consultation with the Bursar). Univ’s JCR passed the motion to support the strikes.

Policy motions at New College require a two-thirds majority to pass, and the final results were: In Favour= 52.22%; In Opposition= 28.89%; Abstention= 18.89%. Questions were raised in the meeting about the legitimacy of giving to the UCU strike fund due to the policies of colleges on giving money to outside institutions (such as those with charitable status).

The UCU states on their website concerning the strike fund that: “If members vote to take action: those of you earning £30,000 or more will be able to claim up to £50 from the third day onwards; those of you earning below £30,000 will be able to claim up to £75 per day from the second day onwards.”

The strikes commenced on Thursday 20th February, and are spread out in three clusters: Cluster 1: Thursday of 5th week – Wednesday of 6th week (4 working days) Cluster 2: Monday of 7th week – Thursday of 7th week (4 working days) Cluster 3: Monday of 8th week – Friday of 8th week (5 working days)

The University and Colleges Union are organising and participating in the strikes. The UCU is a trade union which represents those employed in higher education.

This means the union represents casual researchers and teaching staff, “permanent” lecturers, and academic-related professional services staff. Any employee of the university who falls under one of these categories and is a member of the UCU is eligible to participate in the upcoming strikes.

It is unclear how wide-ranging strikes will be this year, and exactly how many lecturers intend to strike. Although all UCU members have the right to strike, whether to strike or not is left to the discretion of the individual. Cherwell understands that approximately 50% of the Oxford UCU branch turned out to vote in the strike ballot. Of those, around 75% voted in favour of action, meaning that around 38% of Oxford UCU members have returned a vote to strike.

More information about the UCU strikes can be found here: https://cherwell.org/2020/02/17/ucu-strikes-what-you-need-to-know/