Tuesday, May 6, 2025
Blog Page 488

Oxford receives £5.5m AI research funding

0

The University of Oxford has received £5.5 million from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and will lead a national project for research into artificial intelligence.

The funding will be used to provide supercomputing services which will aid scientific research throughout the UK.

Oxford will lead the Joint Academic Data Science Endeavour (known as JADE 2) set up by the investment.

JADE 2 will be hosted at the Hartree Centre in Cheshire, providing state-of-the-art computing facility for research into Artificial Intelligence (AI), machine learning, and molecular dynamics. It will be run as a national facility, with free access to academics through a Resource Allocation Panel.

The project will be led by Professor Wes Armour, Department of Engineering Science. Professor Armour told Cherwell: “JADE 2 will deliver AI advances across a wide range of different sectors, financial services, manufacturing, retail, the public sector, energy and healthcare.

“By supporting the new UKRI Artificial Intelligence Centres for Doctoral training, JADE 2 will support the education of the next generation of researchers in AI, Mark Robins who in turn will keep the UK at the forefront of the AI revolution for many years to come.”

Discussing the importance of funding to Oxford, Professor Armour also said: “JADE will provide the computational competitive edge for Oxford researchers to remain at the forefront of research in AI/ML.

“In doing so, Oxford researchers will be able to attract the brightest students, who will in turn become the next world leaders.”

JADE 2 will also support the development of computing skills in scientific research and provide career opportunities for research software engineers in the UK.

EPSRC Executive Chair Professor Dame Lynn Gladden said: “Computation is becoming an evermore important scientific tool.

“The High Performance Computing Services announced today will give research-ers access to the tools they need to make breakthroughs in a wide range of fields that impact on how we live our lives.”

Though the project is led by Oxford, 19 universities are supporting JADE 2, including Cambridge, Imperial College London, University College London, and Warwick University.

EPSRC is part of UK Research and Innovation, the national funding agency investing in science and research with a budget of more than £6 billion.

Former US Attorney General warns of Russian election interference in Oxford Union address

0

Former US Attorney General Matthew Whitaker asserted that Russia is “trying to interfere” in the 2020 US Election, speaking at the Oxford Union on February 21st.

The Oxford Union hosted Whitaker for an evening speaking event open to Union members and guests. Whitaker reaffirmed his support for President Donald Trump, stating that Trump “is tireless, he does not grow weary and what you see is what you get.”

He stated that Kremlin efforts to involve itself in US elections go back to the Reagan era, and continued throughout the 2016 and 2018 elections.

Whitaker cautioned that “we have to be on guard,” but reiterated his confidence in the Department of Justice, specifically commenting that the FBI has “a unique view as to how to interrupt [Russia’s] effort,” including “counterespionage, counterintelligence, all of the kind of things that you do when other countries are trying to interfere in your domestic elections.”

This comes in the wake of Shelby Pierson, the US intelligence community’s top election security official, delivering a briefing to lawmakers last week warning that Russia is believed to be already taking steps to interfere in the 2020 election with the explicit goal of a second term for President Trump. The briefing paints a comprehensive picture of Russia’s various efforts, with projects ranging from hacking and weaponizing social media to attacks on election infrastructure, according to CNN.

Whitaker additionally weighed in on the Ukraine scandal in the Q&A session, claiming that the President’s attempts to obtain dirt on former Vice President and current Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s son is “not an impeachable offense” and does not lead to “a safe harbour” for presidential powers.

Affiliated with the Republic Party, Whitaker was Attorney for the Southern District of Iowa before being appointed as Department of Justice Chief of Staff in 2017, thereby formally entering the Trump administration. After former Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ resignation on November 7th, 2018, Whitaker was appointed to serve as Acting Attorney General, and remained in this role until February 14th, 2019, when current Attorney General William Barr was sworn into office.

The temporary nature and lack of Senate confirmation in Whitaker’s appointment caused controversy among legal scholars, and at least 9 unsuccessful legal challenges were launched against his appointment. While in office as Acting Attorney, General Whitaker directly supervised Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel investigation, as well as announcing charges against Chinese technology giant Huawei.

He has since returned to private practice, appearing regularly on conservative news and analysis programs and working as Outside General Counsel for antivirus firm PC Matic.

The Oxford Union has declined to comment on Whitaker’s remarks.

Fire Brigade come out in support of UCU strikes

0

The Oxfordshire Fire Brigades Union (FBU) has publicly expressed their solidarity with the upcoming strikes.

The University and College Union (UCU) is a trade union representing those in higher education and has held numerous strikes in Oxford this past year.

A member of the Oxfordshire FBU spoke at a UCU protest which occurred outside of the Clarendon Building, which is part of the University of Oxford.

On the night of February 20th, the Oxfordshire FBU uploaded a video of the speech at the protest to Twitter captioning it, “Strike action! Strength and Solidarity to all involved! Keep up the good fight.”

Jimmy Harris, Oxfordshire FBU chair, said: “The trade union movement was built on solidarity and, as trade unionists, we stand with our comrades against injustice at the hands of employers.”

“We know what it’s like to face attacks on our pay, employment conditions, and pensions – and even beat the government in court over the former.”

Harris also spoke on the importance of the UCU strikes for other trade unions facing similar problems as it gives hope to other workers facing similar difficulties.

Harris told Cherwell: “UCU members should stand strong and united. Every time a trade union stands up to these attacks and wins, it gives hope to millions of other workers who are facing the same challenges all over the world today.”

The FBU was in a prolonged disagreement with the government over pensions and has been involved in repeated strikes over pension disagreements.

In December 2019, the FBU won their court case against the government claiming that the government’s treatment of firefighters pensions was unlawful age discrimination. Speaking to Cherwell, the UCU emphasised the connection between the UCU and FBU being part of a larger trade movement. Aris Katzourakis, Oxford UCU Co-President, told Cherwell: “UCU and the FBU are part of a broader trade union movement, and their struggles should not be seen in isolation.”

“UCU is currently engaged in disputes over pay and equalities, effectively conditions of employment, and pensions.

“The FBU have been engaged in a dispute with the government over their pensions, and this long and tough dispute has stretched for many years.

“And the firefighters have recently won their dispute, where the government changes were found to be unlawful age discrimination.

“We hoped to learn from their victory in their more than four year-long battle for their pensions.”

Katzourakis added that the Oxford UCU and FBU have opened communication with the broader trade union network in and around Oxford.

According to the UCU, the external organisations the UCU has connected with have offered moral support, speakers, or donated to the UCU strike fund in some cases.

When speaking of the support from the FBU, Katzourakis said it is encouraging to have the support of a successful union. Katzourakis said: “To have the support of a union that has taken on the government against all odds and won, is rather encouraging.”

“Solidarity across the trade union movement is a source of strength.

“While each trade union has its own particular characteristics, the UCU is firmly rooted in the UK trade union movement, and we can learn from and support each other in the struggles ahead.”

Rhodes Trust aims to renovate headquarters

0

The Rhodes Trust has applied for permission to renovate its headquarters to become a “world-class convening centre.” The planning permission will be considered by Oxford City Council.

The Trust is located in Grade II* listed Rhodes House on South Parks Road. The Rhodes Scholarship is an international programme enabling students to study at Oxford University.

Mat Davies, Director of Estates for Rhodes House, told Cherwell: “Rhodes House as it stands today is largely untouched from the time it was completed in 1929, and so making any change is a serious business. We are working with world class architects (Stanton Williams), engineers, conservation experts and historians to ensure that we understand fully the original architectural intent when Herbert Baker created his designs, to ensure that any alterations, modifications or technical updates respect the historic design and craftmanship.”

The planning permission included a statement from Professor Louise Richardson, the Vice Chancellor of Oxford University, supporting the Rhodes Trust’s proposals.

It said: “The centre will provide much needed purpose-built facilities – including on-site accommodation – in a prime location in town. As a hub for the Rhodes Scholars and the Atlantic Fellows, the new facility at Rhodes House will attract a global cohort of people committed to engaging critically and actively with society’s most pressing issues.”

Rhodes House held a public consultation to propose plans for new accommodation, conferencing facilities, and general renovation in September 2019.

The consultation boards from this event said: “Our aspiration is to enhance and improve the facilities of the building and gardens, which is essential in order to meet the present and future needs of the Rhodes Trust.”

The Rhodes Trust expect an increase of Scholars from 260 to 325 by 2028, saying: “This reflects the increasing importance of Rhodes House as a central hub for the exchange of knowledge and ideas, and for social interaction, amongst those various cohorts and others in the future.

“The benefit of academic institutions having residential accommodation is well proven, particularly the creation of immersive residential environments where communities can be fully supported for the entire event as a ‘retreat’ without being punctuated by the need to disperse to local hotels.”

These initial plans outlined a convening centre for up to 200 people, 40 guest bedrooms, office space for up to 67 staff, meeting rooms, and further facilities.

Rhodes House was built in memory of imperialist and alumni Cecil Rhodes, who founded the Rhodes Scholarship.

Prominent Rhodes Scholars include Bill Clinton, Wasim Sajjad, and three Australian Prime Ministers.

Oxford’s Finley Tapp wins Winter Love Island

0

Oxford City’s Finley Tapp was crowned winner of the sixth series of Love Island on Sunday with girlfriend Paige Turley.

The pair split a 50k cash prize, returning home from Cape Town on Wednesday.

The couple said in a post-exit interview that they were planning on spending their winnings on a holiday in April, as well as putting some of it towards their move to Manchester together, and a dog for their new home.

Paige has also said that she will not be giving ex-boyfriend Lewis Capaldi a share of the money despite him joking that his fame helped her get on the show.

Paige said: “That’s just Lewis, it comes as no surprise he said that. But I can’t give him any money because once I pay off my debts there’ll be nothing left.”

Tapp is expected to see out his contract with Oxford City football club after breaching its terms in January to go on the reality dating show.

Mick Livesey, the club’s commercial director, said in January: “He was [in breach of his contract] but I think you need to take a pragmatic sort of view: A 20-year-old lad, he’s offered all this reality TV stuff.

“He has a contract, so he has to finish the contract he has with the football club. He’s done very, very well for us.”

Mr Livesey told BBC Radio Oxford: “I can assure you that all new players we sign from now on, we will be putting clauses in their contracts. I think we’re going to have to.”

He added: “We’re an ambitious football club, we’re going from strength to strength and we’re looking to build. This hasn’t been ideal. It is probably disruptive to the club and results.”

Oxford City Football Club were not informed of Tapp’s decision to go on the show.

The club released the following statement last month: “The club was not aware Finn Tapp was going on Love Island – this is normal protocol for all contestants. We understand and wish Finn luck on the show.”

Tapp was signed by City from MK Dons last summer, making twelve appearances in the National League South for the Club.

Cherpse! Jaya and Raphael

0

Jaya Rana, Hertford, English, First year

We met under the Bridge of Sighs and walked around Oxford for a bit before deciding to go to Missing Bean – but as there were no seats we ended up going to George Street Social.

First impressions?
He seemed really nice – he was very friendly and very talkative which was lovely, plus he had a really cool dress sense. On the walk there we chatted about how we’ve found first year, and asked about each other’s colleges.

Did it meet up to your expectations?
I didn’t really go in with any expectations as it was very last minute so yeah I’d say it did! I just thought it would be fun to meet new people, and Raphael was nice, so yeah, I’d say it did.

What was the highlight:
I don’t know if there was one specific highlight, although if I had to say one thing in particular, it was interesting finding out more about German culture, and what life at Oxford is like for an international student.

What was the most embarrassing moment:
Probably the fact that I struggled to navigate the way to Missing Bean after living in Oxford for two terms now.

Describe the date in 3 words:
Short, friendly, sweet

Is a second date on the cards:
He seems lovely, but probably not, as I think it’s more of a friends thing

Raphael Decker, St Hugh’s, E&M, First year

Due to some interesting circumstances in the arranging of our date, we ended up meeting at the Bridge of Sighs at 10:15am, not the best time for a date in my opinion, as it required getting up at a reasonable time. After a brief walk through the city to find a café that wasn’t completely packed, we ended up at George Street Central for a fairly good coffee and an equally enjoyable conversation. Topics ranged from the usual introduction to our respective extracurriculars and oxford’s architecture. All in I had a fairly good and time and it seemed like she did too, although I didn’t see many sparks flying.

First impressions?
She was there early and seemed very friendly.

Did it meet up to your expectations?
I had no expectations going into it, so I’ll say yes

What was the highlight?
It didn’t really have particular highlight to me, though the overall quality of the chat was fairly good.

What was the most embarrassing moment?
Other than the few seconds of awkward silence near the end, not much.

Describe the date in three words:
Coffee, friendly, chill

Is a second date on the cards?
Maybe?

Get Withs and Guilty Feminists

0

So here I am, tackling this morally ambiguous minefield head on with an investigation into ‘get withs’ and whether or not they really are feminist. Dear reader, I have no high-ground here. Once or twice I’ve found myself engaging in a ballsy display of PDA on a club dancefloor and whilst I’ve never profoundly regretted it, I’ve never been a huge fan either (sorry boys).

This hasn’t always been deliberate. Between the institutionalised racism and the blatant misogyny, I’m pleased we’ve left the 1950s in the past. But I really wish we’d held onto the whole dancing thing. These days if you’re dancing opposite someone, you’re overthinking how much eye contact is normal and when you should make it, desperately trying to coordinate your limbs in a way that isn’t embarrassing for all involved. All whilst an ever changing playlist of unhelpful hits sabotages you at every turn. You don’t so much dance with someone, as face off across a dancefloor, playing an elaborate game of ‘chicken’ and attempting to read their mind. What happened to hands looped around a neck and a little side to side swaying? Instead, this move now seems to be the universal code for a kiss – only I didn’t get the memo. Accidental initiation aside, I normally leave feeling at best ambivalent and at worst slightly disappointed, whatever the quality of the kiss. ( I do tend to worry about my technique after I’ve had a couple of shots… boys, I’m sorry?)

I am one of the last hopeless romantics but somewhere between being out of conversation starters to bellow across a dancefloor, flattered, or frankly just feeling the inevitable oncoming, I’ve more than once given into a kiss. There have never been fireworks (sorry again, boys) and despite the enthusiastic approval I get from friends, it always leaves me feeling a little bit flat. I want a kiss to come with electric anticipation; maybe after a date the moment before we say goodbye, when it’s inevitable in a way that doesn’t invoke mild dread – so why have I settled for less?

This is where my feminism kicks in and I blame the patriarchy for my problems. I can be insecure. I don’t love how my hair looks in a ponytail and sometimes I worry I’m a bit too prim and proper on a night out. So, if a guy is coming onto me and my hair’s in a ponytail or I’m feeling a little bit out of my depth, it’s easy to be flattered. Attraction fundamentally boils down to confusing chemicals and a very human desire for intimacy and often, validation. This doesn’t make it intrinsically wrong but I know I’m not ‘getting with’ for the right reasons – I’m relying on a guy’s apparent attraction to me as a way to boost my own self-esteem. It’s a bit too 1950s for my liking and I don’t want to define myself in the male gaze. But it’s always nice to be wanted. Not to mention, in a culture that often promotes promiscuity, the approval I get from friends after lip-locking with a cute guy becomes a badge of honour. Who knew kissing someone with a symmetrical face could earn you so much respect?

Now consider the claim that ‘get withs’ are a way for empowered women to reclaim their sexual autonomy. Whilst I’ll be the first in line to support women owning their sexuality – as the orgasm gap persists and overt female desire is often fetishized or shamed – is this really the way to do it? Surely noncommittal intimacy isn’t the ultimate way to establish our power over the patriarchy? It seems like an overly literal interpretation of “make love, not war”. We don’t need ‘get withs’ to get our message across. If you want to stick it to The Man, then by all means go for it – but will The Man really get the message from a cheeky snog? Sure, reclaim your right to your own pleasure and if that means a ‘get with’ then go for it, but don’t find yourself leaning in because it’s inevitable, or flattering and then attempt to justify it later with a feminist angle. You are worth so much more. Part of the feminist movement is encouraging women to recognise their self-worth and not settle for anything less than exactly what they want. Your self-worth should never have to come from someone else or be compromised for someone else.

This isn’t just a heterosexual issue. It’s always good to establish an equal power balance in any sexual situation and you should never feel less than 100% comfortable trusting someone else with your body. Anyone who gets to kiss you should feel really lucky, not just pleased their gamble of buying you that drink paid off, or relieved that you broke the awkward-bopping, out-of-things-to-say silence.

If you really like the person you’re dancing across from give them your number and hang out another time, preferably somewhere you don’t have to make conversation at a shrill yell. Their lips will still be there later and half the fun lies in the anticipation. Kissing can be completely magical and perfectly good fun on a dancefloor, but don’t bother if you aren’t totally into it. Put those lips to work on the lyrics of that Lizzo song instead. I promise it doesn’t make you boring. We need the endorphins that come from a killer bop, friends who occasionally elbow us in the face on the dance floor and a jumper for the smoking area far more than we need kisses on a night out. Whilst ‘get with’ culture is standard for our generation and I love that we are shaking off the shame that’s previously been associated with accepting our sexual selves, that doesn’t mean it’s a requirement for a successful night out. I can’t be the only one who’s kissed someone for all the wrong reasons and yes, it isn’t the end of the world, but “I might as well” isn’t what happily ever afters or feminist principles are built on. We can do better.

Towards a Contested Convention?

0

Almost every election cycle, pundits fret over the possibility of a contested convention as soon as primary races get heated. Now, however, more than ever before, this looks a real possibility – with an extensive field still in contention dividing up the delegates, a frontrunner who is perpetually in conflict with the party’s establishment, and the stakes higher than ever, the Democratic Convention in Milwaukee, set to take place place from July 13ththrough July 16th, might just be the first contested one since 1952.

Here is your definitive guide to understanding how Democrats might nominate their general election candidate. 

What is a Contested Convention? 

The American presidential primary is an indirect election. When a candidate competes in state caucuses and primaries, they are not competing for votes directly, but for delegateswho will then vote for them at the convention. The method for allocating these delegates varies from state to state, but generally a candidate must reach a viability threshold of 15% statewide or in a specific congressional district to receive any delegates. From there, the number of delegates is determined by their performance, with different states and congressional districts awarding different numbers of delegates depending on size, population, and likelihood to vote for a Democrat in the general election.

By the end of the primary, 3 979 delegates will have been awarded in total, with a candidate needing a majority – 1 991 – to win the nomination.

In the first round of voting, delegates are bound to vote for the candidate that won them in the state contests. However, if no candidate reaches the magic majority of delegates, the convention moves to a second round of voting. This round is different for two reasons. First, various party elites and elected officials whose votes carry extra weight – known as superdelegates– are able to participate in the second ballot of voting.  Before a 2018 DNC rules change, superdelegates could vote in the first round of voting, but many on the left – including the Sanders campaign – saw this as an unfair influence of the establishment over people, so the rule was changed. Second – a candidate can choose to pledge their delegates to another candidate to give them an edge or a majority (often in exchange for a political, personnel, or policy guarantee). 

So, a “brokered convention” is a convention that reaches a second round of voting because a candidate fails to reach a majority in the first round, but is resolved easily in the second round, with the result a foregone conclusion. For example, Elizabeth Warren could pledge her delegates to Bernie Sanders and give him a majority. Or, Joe Biden could win a large majority of superdelegate and moderate candidate support in the second round and unite a majority of the party. 

A “contested convention”, by contrast, is a convention where no candidate reaches a majority in the first round, but the result of the second round of voting is truly in doubt. This could mean candidates fail to create majority coalitions around them in the second round, that they are unable to cut deals with other candidates, or that the party remains too divided to choose.

Will there be a Contested Convention?

FiveThirtyEight has a model that calculates the odds of no candidate reaching a majority at 65% – the most likely outcome according to their forecast by far. 

This likelihood skyrocketed after Biden’s large and broad win in South Carolina. While Bernie is expected to better on Super Tuesday than Biden, Amy Klobuchar and Pete Buttigieg dropping out of the race, and their pending endorsements, will undoubtedly tighten the race. 

Another factor that affects the probability of a contested convention is the size of the field – if Elizabeth Warren and Mike Bloomberg stay in much longer than Super Tuesday, they will likely wrack up a considerable number of delegates, but without a real path to the nomination. Both have suffered polling dips since the end of the early primaries, but will likely compete for delegates around the country. They could further divide and dilute the delegate race and make it harder for Bernie or Biden to garner a majority. 

Moreover, with the primary race become more expensive and geographically much larger, candidates’ ability to fund themselves and sustain their campaigns will remain crucial considerations in understanding the ch         ances of a contested convention. Financial reports from just a few days ago show that Biden has only 7M$ left in the bank, and more difficulty with his fund-raising apparatus. Bernie has 17M$ and a money-raising machine. If Biden is out-raised and out-spent by Bernie, it remains unclear whether Biden might be able to sustain a challenge to Bernie until June. If Biden continues to accept PAC support and keep up financially, he will be a threat and will increase the likelihood of a contested convention. And of course, Mike Bloomberg’s Super Tuesday showing will indicate much about his ability to compete from a delegate perspective – if he does well, that is another division factor of delegates. 

What will happen at a Contested Convention?

Above all else, the answer to this question depends on how large the leading candidate’s (likely Bernie) plurality is. There is much historical precedent to suggest that if Bernie has a large lead over whoever finishes second (likely Biden) but just fails to reach a majority, smaller candidates and super delegates will coalesce around him to give him a majority. Conversely, if two candidates (likely Bernie and Biden) are close and both relatively far from a majority the outcome is entirely more uncertain. 

The role party elites, or superdelegates, will play is crucial to this equation: whether they defy popular will and back a candidate who failed to win a plurality, or whether they coalesce around the plurality winner is unkown but fundamental to understanding what might happen. Of course, this is complicated by Bernie’s difficult relationship with the Democratic establishment, as shown by the New York Timesreport on how difficult it will be for Bernie to assemble a coalition of party elites. 

Candidates seem to be preparing for this potential situation. Other reports from Politicohave already shown that other candidates like Mike Bloomberg expect to exploit this weakness of Bernie’s at a potential contested convention. Elizabeth Warren has positioned herself as a unifier between progressive and establishment Democrats, and Joe Biden has been flexing his establishment support more and more. 

If Biden is very close to Sanders, his longstanding relationships in the Democratic Party might poise him to close his delegate gap on Sanders. Bernie’s ability to broker deals on politics, personnel, and policy might become essential here: will he join forces with Elizabeth Warren and nominate her for Vice-President? Will he be willing to drop some of his most unpopular policies for his platform in exchange for superdelegate support? Will he agree to take PAC money and endorse all Democratic Party candidates down the ballot? 

Nevertheless, all party elites and actors at the convention are operating under severe constraints. The specter of the “rigged primary” looms large over Milwaukee, especially from the Sanders camp if they win a plurality and doesn’t get the nomination.  Moreover, the democratic implications of superdelegates overturning the primary results would create a narrative that might be difficult to overcome – so it doesn’t seem especially likely that a contested convention results in a surprise. 

What does this mean for the Democratic Party?

Then Convention being in June, should there be a contested convention, Democrats would only give their nominee 6 months to compete in the general election, all while Trump has spent over 45M$ in digital advertising alone since 2018. This would mean that the candidate would have a very small amount of time to plug this gap, and would make the Democrats’ task undoubtedly more difficult.

This convention would also be a very public airing of dirty laundry. It would exacerbate the “anti-establishment” feelings on one side, and the “anti-progressive” feelings on the other. It could divide the Democrats in a way to depress base turnout in the election. This would also probably be exploited by President Trump, who has shown a keenness to get involved and exacerbate intra-party fights happening in the Democratic Party. The contest between Bernie and Biden is problem that cuts at the heart of the struggle for the Democratic Party’ soul. This battle would not be a pretty one to watch at a contested convention. 

Finally, should a contested convention nominate a candidate who goes on to lose the general election, there would be a serious distrust of the DNC and the establishment that might just tear the whole infrastructure of the Democratic Party down. This would be seriously damaging to the Party as an institution around the country, and would likely create reputational damage that would jeopardize not just the Party’s chances at the Presidency, but also thousands of Senate, House, Governor, and State Legislature seats. 

Brits 2020: Where performance met politics

0

This year’s Brit awards took place on the 18th of February, and did not disappoint as a night of celebration of British culture, entertainment and amazing performance. Perhaps the most stand-out part of this year’s awards show however, was the sheer diversity present in the nominees, winners and performers on the stage.

The Brits took place in the O2 Arena in London, and the winners in each category were largely unsurprising. Lewis Capaldi took home both Best New Artist and Song of the Year for ‘Someone You Loved’. Mabel was awarded Female Solo Artist, thirty years on from the time that her mother Neneh Cherry took home the same award. All the artists and guests were in high spirits, from drinking on the podium as Lewis Capaldi did, to downing a glass of neat tequila in the audience in the case of Lizzo. The show was a celebration of British music and culture and a pleasure to watch, anchored by host Jack Whitehall.

Despite the show being an entertaining night, full of the best live performance the country has to offer, the most significant take-away from this year’s Brits was the artists’ use of the platform they were given as a means of political speech. A lack of diversity and representation has been a major issue in many awards shows in the past, and the Brits are no exception. The awards show came under fire in 2016, when it was announced that almost all of the nominees in the British categories were white; provoking the hashtag #BritsSoWhite. This was especially disappointing as it followed 2015: a pivotal year for the UK grime scene, one that is pioneered by predominantly black men and women. Since then, it seems as if the organisers have taken an active effort to recognise and reward the achievements of a diverse range of performers. 

Many artists made use of their short opportunity on stage to call out the faults of the British government. In his acceptance speech for International Male Solo Artist, Tyler the Creator called out ex-PM Theresa May for banning him from the UK for using ‘hate’ speech, not dissimilar to what has been freely said by high-profile white artists such as Eminem. However, perhaps the most poignant speech of the night was made by Dave, a twenty-one year old rapper who took home the award for Best New Album for Psychodrama. Dave chose to perform his song, ‘Black’, written both to highlight the struggles that come with being a black person in our society, and what black people have been able to achieve despite this. In an extra verse written especially for this performance, Dave called out the Prime Minister Boris Johnson, labelling him a ‘real racist,’ and highlighting that even if racism is less of a problem in Britain than other places, this does not erase the fact that it is a very real and present struggle – especially in the current political climate. Dave also used this as an opportunity to bring necessary attention to the victims of the Grenfell Fire who are still waiting for housing, and as a tribute those who sadly lost their lives in the London Bridge terror attacks last year. 

The extremely well-spoken South London native’s performance was met with a mixed response. Many praised his lyricism and use of his platform to spread a meaningful message, whilst others reprimanded him for judging Boris Johnson without knowing him personally. Whether we agree with Dave or not, it is undeniable that his performance marked a monumental moment for Black Britons everywhere. The demand for creativity from more than just white people in a way legitimised his voice, and he used it to present issues close to the heart of many Black Britons – rather than just an opportunity to self promote.

However, it does seem prudent to not be too quick in applauding this change in attitudes towards representation and diversity at the Brits. This wariness is raised simply by looking at its problematic history. Views spiked after Skepta’s performance in 2017 with a stage full of black men in hoodies, which many reported as being ‘outrageous.’ Would the British public have had the same reaction had it been a stage of white men? Unlikely. It is hard not to wonder whether those at the Brits truly see the importance of recognising these artists, or are simply trying to increase their views with provocative performances they know will ignite conversation. Either way, it is clear that diverse artists have been able to pave the way for themselves in an environment which has historically regarded them with apprehension, and we really do love to see it. 

Review: That Reminds Me (2019)

0

Fragmentary, authentic and poetic – Derek Owusu’s latest publication, That Reminds Me, succeeds in its painfully honest exploration of a young Ghanaian boy’s journey into adulthood. 

When plucked out of the security of his foster home, eight-year-old ‘K’, Owusu’s protagonist, must forge new relationships with his biological family in a lonely, metropolitan sphere. Reading the dust-jacket protecting the memoirs contained in this hardback semi-biography reveals that, in just 113 pages, Owusu will question “identity, belonging, addiction, sexuality, violence, family and religion”. 

Integral to Owusu’s story is its indefinability. As readers we are inclined to compartmentalise, to secure a text to a genre, form, or literary tradition. In the critical reception of Owusu’s piece thus far, the terms ‘novel-in-verse’, ‘semi-biography’ and ‘rhythmic prose’ have all been posited. Whilst these terms are helpful, I admire Owusu for his ability to defy such classifications. 

Split into five poignant sections (Awareness, Reflection, Change, Construction and Acceptance), That Reminds Me shows the vitality to be found in momentary flashbacks, whether about significant milestones or mundane everyday experiences. The mention of chocolate cornflake cakes, messages on MSN, getting the annual MOT, Nokia mobiles, Cornettos or the application of Deep Heat makes the novel simultaneously personal and widely relatable.  

The most appealing aspect of Owusu’s narrative is the mosaic-style structure constituted by snippets of K’s memories. K is not on a journey with a destination of unity in mind. Owusu portrays a character who learns to become comfortable in brokenness, and, more importantly, acknowledges brokenness as an inherent facet of the human condition. There are moments where it is difficult to ascertain whether the words on the page are descriptions of reality or K’s imagination ­­– but this is precisely the point. In only ever giving us limited insights into K’s experiences, we arguably learn more about him than if we were reading an extensive description conventional to the bildungsroman novel. 

Each section is signposted by a pencil illustration of a spider’s web. As the narrative progresses, the web develops. In the last section, the spider sits proudly in the middle of the web, surrounded by his intricate creation. The spider’s web becomes emblematic of the narrative web Owusu so delicately offers us. Fragile, awe-inspiring and complex: I could not pick a more apt image for K. Along with the illustrations, the insightful snippets make this novel feel more like a diary you are reading in secret, an opportunity one should feel privileged to have. 

Inscribed in the paratext of the novel is an author’s note:

“This is the story of K. If you believe your life to be as fictitious as K’s, if you find yourself within the pages of this book, then you are holding the pen and not me”

Encapsulated in K’s story is an applicability almost inescapable. This is a story about being human as much as it is about race. When asked by researchers at Penguin Books for the best piece of writing advice he had ever received, Owusu answered with, “For goodness sake, just write in your own voice, Derek!” I can only commend Owusu for not only fulfilling this advice but capturing the voices of other underrepresented people in contemporary literature. I sincerely believe this book has an accessibility inviting to all readers. 

In regard to Derek Owusu himself, I thank him for defying form, for giving readers ‘K’ and for, most admirably, allowing us to ‘hold the pen’.