Friday 18th July 2025
Blog Page 1866

North-south divide remains

0

Admissions statistics for Oxford’s 2010 entry show a huge regional bias towards London and the South East.

Despite extensive spending on outreach schemes and summer schools, a total of 40% of accepted students came from schools in London and other South Eastern areas, in comparison to 1.9% from the North East, 1.6% from Scotland and just 0.9% from Northern Ireland.

However, similarly to last year, the under-representation of these three regions is a reflection of the number of applications received.

Only 1.5% of the 17,144 applications received for October 2010 came from teenagers in the North East. There is less than a 1% difference between the percentage of successful applications in the region and those in London and the South East.

A spokesperson for the university said, “Most British universities will see a very strong bias in student numbers towards local students from the area or region, and Oxford manages to attract students from around the UK and also from around the globe.”

Some undergraduates from the North East agreed that teenagers in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the North East choose to apply to universities closer to home for reasons of cost and convenience, with a number of able applicants being attracted to prestigious universities such as Durham and Edinburgh.  Welsh students who go to university in Wales pay only a third of what univeristy in England costs.

However, many held the view that academically able pupils in these regions may choose not to apply to Oxbridge purposely.

Dave Fairburn, an English student from a comprehensive school near Hull, remarked that, “there appears to be a difference in culture” between secondary schools in different parts of the country.

“Not just at my school, but in many throughout the area, there was a lack of ambition. The very culture…is different to the one I’ve found at Oxford.”

Lewis Wingfield, who was educated in Newcastle, added that in his experience “there is a perception, especially among state school pupils, that because there aren’t many people from the North East at Oxford, Oxford musn’t want them or must discriminate against them.

“There’s a big inverse snobbery thing – people talk about ‘posh southern snobs’ and feel they would be talked down to and disrespected for their accent.”

However, through its access and outreach work, Oxford reaches 76% of schools which offer post-16 provision.

In addition, since 2008, the university gives applicants from disadvantaged backgrounds an increased chance of invitation to interview. Tutors now look at the average results achieved by the candidate’s school, and whether they have spent time in care or attended an access summer school. Any student with sufficient A Level predictions who meets at least three of these criteria will be interviewed.

Yet the 2010 statistics show that a difference in application progression between the state and independent sectors still exists across the UK.

342 of the 12,333 UK candidates withdrew their application at some stage during the process. 209 of these were from the state sector, whereas only 118 came from independent schools.

Even in London, an area with the second greatest proportion of acceptances, students from the two sectors describe very different perceptions of Oxbridge.

One state school student said, “Many, myself included, for a lengthy period of time considered Oxford to be full of Tarquins swanning about croquet lawns and felt they could never relate.”

However, an undergraduate from an independent school remarked, “I think that the year was split into two – those that thought Oxbridge was where they would be in a few years and those that knew they wouldn’t be, but respected their intellect.”

But despite these divisions, Oxford appears to have achieved its aim of admitting the most able students. A total of 88% of applicants sitting three A levels in June 2010 exceeded the standard offer of AAA, with 40% of these gaining three A* grades. Only 12% of those accepted achieved AAA or below.

The news comes after it was announced in January that Oxford will introduce the A* grade in many MPLS courses.

A spokesperson for the university said, “It is now clear that many students in the sciences who take A levels get the A* grade, and that it would be reasonable to ask for an A* in many science and maths courses.”

VC embraces Chinese uni

0

Oxford’s Vice-Chancellor Professor Andrew Hamilton has announced a new scheme to enhance academic co-operation with China as he attended the 100th birthday celebrations of Beijing’s Tsinghua University.

Representatives of over 120 universities were present, ranging from Chinese institutions to Oxford, Cambridge and Harvard.

Following an agreement made at the event, Oxford and Tsinghua will begin an increased program of co-operation within academic research, and an enhanced exchange of students and faculty over the next 5 years.

Students from China would be able to undertake summer research placements at Oxford, whilst similar programmes in China will also be offered to those at Oxford. Additional ‘Li and Fung Scholarships’ will support the exchange of students between China and Oxford, whilst seminars and workshops will also be co-hosted under the new scheme. The sharing of academic materials was also proposed.

As well as celebrating Tsinghua’s birthday, the “Tsinghua Consensus” was reached by the University representatives. It was decided that the Universities would attempt to strengthen co-operation and exchange, maintain a commitment to excellence, play a more important role in international issues, and “improve the development of human civilization”.

The Consensus echoes growing calls that, in a time of shifting global economic dominance, the export of top quality higher education will become increasingly important for Western economies.

Fourth year Mansfield student Melvin Chen, who was born and lived in China, was positive about the relationship. He said, “Grassroots initiatives that promote understanding, collaboration and investment between China and the developed world are critical to the future prosperity of both parties.

“I believe that the development of global leaders who intimately understand both cultures is one of the great challenges of this century. Fostering greater academic collaboration will be key in this respect.”

However, whilst Hamilton discussed the growing need for global co-operation amongst Universities, some have questioned Oxford’s increasingly warm relationship with China.

The Vice Chancellor accepted an honorary doctorate from Tsinghua and revealed how over 3,000 senior Chinese government officials have received short-term training programs in Oxford in recent years.

The University’s Advanced Leadership Development Programme trains politicians up to Vice Minister level, and is run through the Department for Continuing Education in association with the UNDP.

A spokesperson for the university confirmed that this training is partly aimed at helping Chinese leaders to meet Millennium Development Goals.

St. Catz student Pascal Jerome commented, “China’s human rights abuses are grave and many, but the risk of legitimising these transgressions through academic collaboration is surely outweighed by the opportunity of naturally fostering human rights ideals in the higher echelons of Chinese government.”

Oxford University is currently home to around 750 Chinese students, 4% of the total student body and, as stated by Hamilton, “China has become the biggest source of students following the United Kingdom and the United States”.

He stressed that enhanced globalisation for universities did not necessarily mean taking a fundamentally different approach. Whereas many Western universities have rapidly established new overseas campuses in countries such as China, Oxford has not yet announced any plans to do so.

Students caught in Syrian unrest

0

Oxford University has advised all ten students still in Syria to return to the UK, in light of growing protests against President Bashar Al-Assad’s eleven  year rule.

The recommendations come after the Foreign and Commonwealth Office advised all British Nationals to leave Syria unless having “a pressing need to remain” after the bloodiest week so far in the violent unrest which has rocked the country.

One third-year student who returned home on Friday claimed that, although he had experienced none of the protests directly, “fifteen minutes away [in Harasta] there were protesters being arrested and someone was shot by the security forces.”

The suburb of the Syrian capital, Damascus, has become a focus of the opposition protests during the past week.

“The key thing as well is that the number of people dying [in Syria] is far greater than the news reports,” the student, who wished to remain anonymous, said.
 
First year PPE student, Morgan Norris-Grey, who went to Syria with his family for 12 days at the end of March, said that he saw government-sponsored protests in Hama, Latakia and Damascus.

He explained, “I wasn’t in the vicinity of the main sites of anti-government protests at that time, but perhaps dissenters in other areas didn’t yet have the confidence to come out on the streets.
 
“The pro-government protests did however seem to be orchestrated to some degree, with school children and students provided with posters and given the day off school.”

Human rights groups have reported that the number of deaths caused by the clamp-down on anti-government protests has risen to 500.

In Syria’s south, 200 members of the ruling Baath party are also alleged to have resigned.

A spokesperson for Oxford University Press Office confirmed that all students in Syria would be home by this Thursday.

IDB scholarships launched

0

The Islamic Development Bank and Oxford University have launched a joint scholarship programme to enable students from IDB member countries to study for DPhil courses in science and technology

The scholarships will cover fees, as well as providing a maintenance grant. Five scholarships will be available every year for the next five years.

The 56 IDB countries include Saudi Arabia, Libya, and Iran. Andrew Hamilton, Oxford Vice Chancellor, termed the launch as historic, saying that it “is precisely what universities like Oxford are all about”.

In a statement, Oxford University said, “providing funding so that the very best students can come to Oxford regardless of their own financial circumstances is vital if Oxford is to attract the best students.”

Cambridge overtake Oxford

0

Cambridge has dethroned Oxford as the nation’s leading institution, says a new university league ranking released last Sunday.

According to the research conducted by the The Complete University Guide, this year Cambridge has jumped ahead of Oxford in the specific areas of research, entry standards and completion rates.

Over the past ten years, Oxford has occupied the top spot in the guide’s rankings with the exception of this year and 2007, when it was nudged out by Cambridge.

Despite Oxford’s shift, the University Guide’s top five institutions remain the same group: Imperial College London continues to rank third, whilst London School of Economics and Durham have swapped positions as fourth and fifth.

Mast we deface the High Street?

0

Recent plans for the construction of a 15 metre high telephone mast on Oxford High Street have been met with outrage from local businesses and colleges.

A commissioned workforce began excavations at the traffic island outside All Souls college, in a preliminary investigation as to whether or not the underground services would be suitable for a radio base station.

Elizabeth Crawford, domestic bursar at University College, said, “None of the neighbouring Colleges on the High Street were informed of the trial hole that was excavated last week on behalf of a mobile telephone company.”  

She added, “The planning regulations do not require that local people are notified for such exploratory work.”

There has been a joint effort of late between traders and colleges to clean up and restore the High Street, and many believe that the mast, which will improve 3G coverage for Vodafone and O2 customers, is in direct opposition to such renovations.

Jeremy Mogford, owner of the Old Bank Hotel and Quod restaurant, said, “The idea of a mast there is simply appalling.”

Crawford echoed this, stating, “I cannot imagine that any business or College in the High Street would regard such an installation with anything other than astonished horror.”
As yet, the plans are still in the pipeline for the mast and an official application has not yet been made to the council.

Ilana Clark, a spokesperson for Vodafone UK Ltd., said, “This site is still in the early stages and a proposed design has not yet been finalised. We have identified that we need to improve the 3G coverage to our customers in central Oxford.”

After being notified of the project by Univ’s domestic bursar, Keith Mitchell, leader of Oxfordshire County Council, said, “My personal view is that sounds like a monstrous carbuncle on the High.”
Crawford told Cherwell, “Were a  planning application to be submitted, Univ College would certainly exercise its rights to comment on it… I hope that the students who live in Univ, many of whom look over the High Street would also exercise their right to comment on any such application.”

She added, “Were permission to be granted, I think it highly likely that the College would appeal against such a decision.”

Vodafone have also had two applications rejected for similar stations in Bath, as well as withdrawing a January application for a mast in front of the War Memorial in St. Giles, which was branded as “sacrilege”.

Oxford triumph in pentathlon

0

Oxford men’s modern pentathlon team secured their 14th successive Modern Pentathlon Varsity victory in Cambridge during the vacation.

Despite banners produced by the Cambridge crowd claiming that Oxford’s incredible winning sequence would be ended, the dark blues claimed the win by 29,652 points to 28,616.

It was doubly satisfying for Oxford as they also won the women’s event, ending Cambridge’s winning streak.

Women’s Captain Alice Self said, “having lost my previous four matches I was desperate for a win before leaving Oxford.”

Modern Pentathlon consists of swimming, running, fencing, horse riding and shooting – supposedly the test of the ultimate warrior.

Each competitor competes in every event, with their combined scores contributing to the team total.

Clare Kane top scored for the women’s team, and Harry Tabor was Oxford’s best performer in the men’s event.

5 Minute Tute: The Media and the Royal Wedding

0

Has the press treated Kate Middleton differently from Lady Diana Spencer?

 

You bet. For reasons that have never been entirely clear, Prince Charles’s various relationships with women received inordinate press attention throughout his 20s and into his 30s. When it became clear in 1980 that Diana was “the one”, the popular newspapers went into overdrive. A so-called rat-pack of staff reporters and photographers emerged, augmented by a host of freelance hangers-on. They harried and harassed Diana on a daily basis for months. Barely a day passed without a picture of her being published alongside speculative stories, often based on quotes from anonymous “friends”. By contrast, Kate Middleton has received much less coverage and been subjected to very little harassment.

 

Why should Kate have had such an easy ride?

 

In the wake of Diana’s death, itself attributed in part to the pressure of press interest, both the press and the Palace took stock. National newspaper editors amended their code of practice in order to prohibit undue harassment, and the machinery of self-regulation, the Press Complaints Commission (PCC), opened up a dialogue with the Palace. An unwritten concordat enabled Charles and Diana’s sons, William and Harry, to enjoy their schooldays in relative peace. In William’s case, that “deal” also protected him from press scrutiny during his time at university, when he met Kate. So she also benefited from the papers’ enforced reticence.

 

So what happened to the rat-pack?

 

After Diana’s death in 1997, the papers were consumed with interest in the relationship between Charles and the woman he admitted had long been his mistress, Camilla Parker-Bowles. Would they marry or not? The squad of royal reporters therefore remained in place to follow that story. But Camilla was neither as glamorous as Diana, nor was she a fashion icon, so the photographic pursuit died down. As the years passed, with Charles’s aides carefully re-building his reputation in order to allow him to marry without undue controversy, and Camilla offering no hostages to fortune, newspaper interest dwindled. By 2005, when they married, the rat-pack had already disintegrated.

 

Surely there were, and are, eager paparazzi around to obtain candid pictures of Kate?

 

The hordes of freelance photographers who followed Diana around in the 1990s, and lived off the handsome proceeds, have largely disappeared. There is no market in British publications for their work. With one or two exceptions, editors have obeyed their own code by refusing to publish pictures obtained by harassment or due to intrusion. Editors are now expected to make themselves aware of the provenance of the pictures that arrive in their offices. On the rare occasions when they have overlooked that obligation by publishing, the Palace has contacted the PCC on Kate’s behalf and there have been swift, and usually public, apologies. 

 

Does this mean that William and Kate will enjoy a marriage free from all press intrusion?

 

Yes, if they maintain the same level of distance from newspapers in future as they have done thus far. One key reason for the huge coverage of Charles and Diana’s marriage was the off-the-record briefings of journalists by their aides and friends and, in Diana’s case, directly by her. It appears very unlikely that William and Kate will fall into that trap. However, there could be a problem in an heir to the throne vanishing from newspapers because monarchy depends to an extent on visibility. Then again, will there be newspapers by the time he becomes king? Sounds like the subject for a future Cherwell Tute…

Bod showcases Bible

0

The Bod will exhibit King James’ Bible between 22nd April and 4th September.

The third and definitive English translation of the Bible was commissioned by King James I of England at the recommendation of John Rainolds, President of Corpus Christi College.

The exhibition is entitled ‘Manifold Greatness: Oxford and the Making of the King James Bible’, and commemorates the 400th anniversary of the publication of the King James Bible.

Dr. Diarmaid MacCulloch, a member of the Theology faculty commented, “It’s good that the Bodleian and the University have decided to show how important was Oxford’s part in creating the King James Bible because it is a book of worldwide significance in its own right, not just because of the fact that it is a version of the Bible.”

al-Assad’s days are numbered

0

The future of Syria, it seems, will be decided within the next few days. The escalating violence being carried out by President Bashar al-Assad’s security forces has reached unprecedented levels in the last week. It is sadly becoming an all too familiar sight – a Middle Eastern dictator resorting to force in order to quell an internal challenge to his rule. Pictures and reports from Libya, Bahrain, and Yemen all tell a similar story.

On Good Friday at least 76 civilians were shot dead in fourteen towns and villages across Syria. The bloodiest day of the uprising so far raised the total death toll to over 300 since mid-March when the pro-democracy demonstrations began.

Yet there were reportedly tens of thousands marching through the streets on a day that had been named ‘Great Friday’ by the protestors. In spite of the genuine dangers associated with critical expression of any kind, these people risked everything and gathered en masse to voice their anger and dissatisfaction with the President. Their demand was loud and clear – an end to the regime and an end to authoritarian rule.

All this seemed incredibly unlikely as I crossed the border from Turkey just over a month ago. The first rumblings of unrest had already begun in the southern town of Dera’a, but as I journeyed south to Damascus with three friends they seemed distant and provincial. As we looked out of the coach window into the vast, barren, empty desert, Syria seemed an improbable place for the ‘Arab Spring’ to take root.

Over the three weeks we spent in the country, we did not encounter any anti-regime sentiment. The only two demonstrations we did come across were both in fact pro-government. The first seemed to be a fairly spontaneous outburst of gratitude for the President in the wake of his announcement that the Emergency Laws, which have been in place almost 50 years, were to be loosened.

It was as if every car in Damascus was out on the roads that evening. On our way back into the capital, our taxi’s progress was halted by an enormous procession of vehicles – horns blaring, flags waving from windows, chanting voices rising up into the dusty Damascene air. The capital’s radio-waves hummed with the energy of nationalist songs, which were occasionally paused to give a fervent voice the opportunity to extol the President’s generosity to the nation. There was an electric charge in the atmosphere.

The second demonstration we came across was clearly planned and of a different nature, largely because the participants were all schoolchildren. The chants were all the same, the banners all sported the same slogans, and the flags were all still the national flag – and yet, somehow, this was a much more unsettling sight. The vehemence and zeal with which these young children chanted the President’s name was, for me, a chilling manifestation of the regime’s power.

It later came to light that the President had given all schoolchildren and civil servants in Damascus the day off so that they could take to the streets in support of his regime. Meanwhile parents who did not want their children to take part in the rally were required to hand in a letter explaining exactly why that was.

With the benefit of being able to follow events on Aljazeera and BBC World in our flat, we were aware that the rest of the country was not so passionately pro-Assad. There were further outbreaks in Dera’a and intermittent bursts of activity in Latakia on the coast. But had we not had access to these news stations, our awareness of the situation would have been extremely distorted.

The state-run Syrian news channels were painting a very different picture. According to them, there were no protests; the unrest was being caused by foreign and internal powers seeking to promote sectarian violence and disrupt the unity of the nation. Syrians were being told explicitly not to trust international news channels, which were also attempting to throw petrol on the fire.

In recent weeks the Syrian news agencies have begun to focus on the ‘martyrs’ of the unrest, the state’s policemen. A typical headline from SANA’s website (Syrian Arab News Agency) from Sunday tells it all – “Interior Ministry: 286 Policemen Wounded by the Armed Groups since the Beginning of Syria’s Events”.

The successful uprising in Egypt hinged upon information. The role played by the young, internet-savvy middle classes in Cairo who used Facebook and Youtube to counter the government’s attempts to control the flow and distribution of information is well known. The populace is now not as credulous or as naive as it once was, and dictators across the Middle East are beginning to recognise this. Information has led to empowerment.

This is what I was told by Dr. Arshin Adib-Moghaddam, lecturer in Middle East politics at SOAS (The School of Oriental and African Studies) – “people have gradually lost their fear of the state and their trust in the political system… Absolute monarchies and dictatorial quasi-republics are simply not tenable anymore”.

Hosni Mubarak’s speech on the eve of his eventual departure from office illustrated just how out of touch he was with the common sentiment. He was seen as a relic from the past, still preaching superstition while his people demanded the truth.

Nonetheless the battle for information was always going to be tougher in Syria than it was in Egypt. According to Freedom House, journalists in Egypt did have partial freedom to criticise the government before this year. In Syria, however, the research body stated in 2010 that there was “broad state control over all print-media” and that the government carried out “online censorship and monitoring”. In practice, Assad commands the entire national media.

This has helped him cultivate a great deal of genuine popular support across the country, a fact that should not be dismissed. His face can be seen everywhere – always the same narrow-set, piercing blue eyes and patchy moustache – on towering government buildings and on state-sponsored roadside bill-boards, yes; but also on car-bonnets, on the back wall of a barber’s shop, and in private living rooms up and down the country. Thus, although fear is always a factor, there is also a cult of personality surrounding Assad which still resonates with a lot of people.

And yet recently the President’s position is looking increasingly vulnerable. Offering empty concessions with one hand whilst meting out violent suppression with the other, he appears desperate and uncertain. So far his major speeches have fallen on deaf ears, too – there are indeed times when Assad looks and sounds like Mubarak in the last days of his rule, out of touch and rapidly losing ground.

It is still uncertain how the situation in Syria will be resolved – whether it will be the next Tunisia or Egypt, or whether it will become increasingly more violent like Libya, only time will tell. The regime hopes it will be able to silence the demonstrations as the leaders of Iran did two years ago. At the moment, it is all in the balance. What is certain, however, is that change, in whatever form it lurks, is just around the corner. And it does seem likely that Bashar al-Assad’s days are numbered.