Tuesday 24th June 2025
Blog Page 1837

Not so MDMA-zing

0

I push open the door to the cubicle and yank down the seat of toilet.  It’s reverberating with the music. My friend pulls a small plastic bag from her clutch.  She taps the powder onto the seat and I cut us 2 lines each with my bod card — how Oxford. Ripping the cardboard off a pack of Rizla, we both take our lines and wipe down the seat, and then we leave the bathroom.

That was 2009 and that drug was mephedrone.  In 2009-2010, it was the fourth most popular street drug, only just behind cannabis, cocaine and ecstasy.  Readily available and with minimal side-effects, mephedrone had one especially great draw: it was completely legal to possess and supply.  In April 2010, following widespread media coverage of deaths linked to the drug, intense pressure was placed on the government (who happened to be campaigning for an upcoming election) to ban mephedrone, and it was quickly reclassified to class B. 

Since the reclassification of mephedrone, there has been a marked increase in the number of legal highs on the market.  Due to the synthetic nature of these drugs and the rate at which new highs are being churned out each year, legal highs have been coined ‘designer drugs’. When one becomes illegal, their chemical composition is tweaked in labs desperate to stay one step ahead of the law and cash in on a lucrative market, and soon students across the country are popping, smoking and snorting the latest legal craze.

It’s pretty easy to see why students might find these highs alluring.  After a long day of lectures and tutorials, a drama rehearsal, a sports game and a music lesson, why wouldn’t you consider a harmless pick-me-up before you head off to Park End and return home in time to do your tute sheet for the next day? Drugs are hardly limited to Oxford students, but in an environment where we’re pushed and pressured as elite and gifted, it seems almost sensible to indulge in a little chemical stimulation, and if you can do it legally, all the better. 

The route to the legal high often starts small. You’re fifteen, you’re stumbling around in the local park on your third Smirnoff ice and someone whips out the poppers. Even now, my local newsagent on St. Clement’s has a stash of ‘room odouriser’ nestled in amongst the mars bars and twixes, perfect for a little teenage reminiscence.  About sixteen you move onto the nitrous canisters, concealing the bulky equipment needed to fill your balloons before you headed to a club, fake ID in hand, as a penchant for whipped cream to unsuspecting parents.  To be honest, at that point you probably moved onto choking on a joint that was largely, if not entirely, dry grass and oregano.  But here you are at Oxford, the world at your feet, and a drug charge on your criminal record no longer seems rebellious and thrilling.

I decided to find out whether legal highs that are fast-saturating the drug market could ever be the best alternative to ‘real drugs’.   All in the name of research I found a ‘head shop’ in Oxford town centre to try out one of the current popular additions to the market. My friend was having a house party the next day – crazy, I know, but if it all went wrong, I figured I wouldn’t be the only person vomiting in the garden. Behind a red barrier in the ‘head shop’, surrounded by signs that state the area is strictly for over-18s only, sits a glass topped cabinet in front of rows of shisha pipes and bongs. The cabinet is stocked with all the latest and most popular legal highs. ‘For smoking, Black Mamba and Vanilla Ice are the most popular among students, and for pills, red rocket,’ the guy behind the counter mutters, pointing them out for me. ‘If you want a pill, then this one’s good,’ he indicates towards a small blue packet. What drug is it similar to, I ask. He draws a line with his finger under a box at the bottom of the packet, ‘NOT FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION’. ‘I can’t really talk about it,’ he shrugs. So I opt for ‘a good, new high on the market’ —AMT.  A quick google search tells me that it’s a psychedelic and a stimulant. Apparently I’m in for a ride somewhere between MDMA and LSD; pretty good for over-the-counter.

Wanting to add some scientific weight to my experiment, I decided not to drink for the duration of the party so, having popped the pill 45 minutes before leaving, I was expecting the effects to hit me soon. They didn’t.

One hour in: I’ve spent an hour listening to drunken slurring, utterly sober, desperate for the toilet after copious amounts of lemonade yet with pupils the size of frisbees, hoping the AMT will hit. Two long, arduous hours in: I’m coming up. Three hours: Spaced out and giggly. I’ve had a lot of conversations about who killed my friends’ fish. It’s difficult to focus but I’ve got a good buzzed feeling.  Four hours: Colours are pulsating, I’m nauseous and I’ve got a headache — this is more like a migraine. Five hours: I’ve gone home — the floor’s moving, my jaw hurts, my head’s pounding and I can’t stop moving my legs. Six hours: I fell asleep. For a long time. I’m really not sure this worked that well as a stimulant. 

So did it live up to its expectations? Despite the psychedelic promises, I didn’t discover the secrets of the universe; I did, however, discover that the fish died because someone put rum in the tank. Mind-opening, I think not.

I asked several of my friends the reason why they take legal highs. Of course, all of them pointed out that they were legal, but the responses from my friends indicated one thing — that there was a wide spread belief that legal highs, simply because they were ‘legal’ meant they were safe.  In fact, in 2008, Richard Brunstrom, chief constable for Northern Wales, said that ecstacy was ‘far safer than aspirin’.  In 2009, Professor David Nutt, ex-head of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, publically stated that ecstasy, cannabis and LSD are far less harmful than legal drugs such as alcohol and tobacco.  Ecstasy is said to be solely responsible for between 10 and 17 deaths a years, not inconsequential but a startlingly low number compared to the statistics for alcohol-related deaths. In recent years there has been a call to downgrade ecstasy from class A to class B, and in the light of the extensive testing and information that is now available, the government are in a much more informed position to make a decision about its classification.  With the rate that legal highs are flooding into shops and online, it’s almost impossible for the government to crack down on their manufacture and sale. 

It’s difficult to argue with Nutt’s logic that properly tested drugs, like ecstasy, whose effects are known and recorded, could possibly be more hazardous than drugs which haven’t been tested, whose short-and long-term side-effects are virtually unknown and which can be purchased by anybody from unknown sources over the internet. The majority of these legal highs are cooked up in factories in China, shipped over in packing baring the infamous ‘not for human consumption’, preventing any need to reveal the real chemical contents of that packet, with no regulations and nobody accountable if it all goes wrong. It could be that ‘legal highs’ are in fact more dangerous than the drugs you’re substituting them for.

Websites offer a vast range of  legal ecstasy, speed, psychedelics and herbal highs.  Salvia, a powerful hallucinogen, has become one of the most popular drugs online, and statistics say that its now being taken twice as much as LSD by teenagers in search of a potent trip. The problem is, these websites run without regulation and the unknown substance you’re gleefully shoving into your body could be lethal.

Oxford is awash with drugs; it’s not an underground subculture; you don’t have to scratch the surface very hard to find a coke-coated key, sock-covered fire alarm or a well-used bottle of Oust desperate to cover up any lingering scents before your scout arrives.  Yet the rate at which the use of legal highs is rising is alarming; there have been no trials, no tests, no risks assessed, and no ideas about addictiveness or bodily harm.  And while students keep taking drugs, legal or otherwise, the market keeps increasing, and one drug banned today only paves the way for a new one tomorrow.  I can be honest about the fact that today I’d choose a round of shots over a line off a dirty toilet seat, but it won’t make any difference.  The market is growing because demand is increasing, and in Oxford, these legal highs might be about to become a big problem.  I’m not a hypocrite. I’m the first to admit that mephedrone was good, really good, and its popularity must have meant a lot of people agreed with me too.  But there’s something behind that carrot of ‘legal’ dangled temptingly in front of your eyes that it can be all too easy to forget that legal doesn’t mean safe.

For the love of food

0
It seems bizarre that, when food is such an essentially great thing, we are told having less of it will make us happy. The lifestyle obsession with “diets”, and of imposing specific restrictions on our food consumption, is often presented as the only way of improving personal well-being. This is all perfectly acceptable, and sensible dietary practices are to be commended, but it is misguided that such restrictions are the only beneficial possibilities to arise from our relationship with food. The other common practices are to give recipes, or to promote the value of certain foodstuffs, yet neither of these is obviously related to happiness – they are far too pragmatic for that.
There is an unexplored potential in “food therapy”, in embracing food and finding pleasure from it. In such a hectic environment as Oxford, shopping can feel like an aggravating necessity, but if indulged in properly can become a period of relaxation in your day. Rather than doing a Schumacher with the trolley, a slow perusal of the options can turn a chore into a pleasure, and in buying the occasional top-brand item, nice food becomes satisfying retail therapy. And what to do with these gourmet luxuries? The act of cooking, for all students, is an extension of their usual working practices, but without that key judgmental element. For arts students, it involves that same spontaneous creation as an essay (hopefully) does, and for scientists, a similar evaluation of set elements in order to arrive at a variable outcome. The pleasure comes from the ability to indulge in the dish, regardless of its objective quality; few people will tell you that your dish is bad, and no-one will be in a position of authority to do so. Even if your soufflé (ambitious) doesn’t rise, you can always try again, but no-one’s going to let you rewrite your essay.
Finally, what is often overlooked by writers is that, for the modest amongst us, indulging in food is a harmless temporary thrill of immorality. There are no painful repercussions in a lemon tiramisu, which seems a pretty great alternative if you don’t fancy drinking vodka out of a sock while getting off with your college brother, or something like that. No-one’s going to be reminding you about dessert the morning after. 

It seems bizarre that, when food is such an essentially great thing, we are told having less of it will make us happy. The lifestyle obsession with “diets”, and of imposing specific restrictions on our food consumption, is often presented as the only way of improving personal well-being. This is all perfectly acceptable, and sensible dietary practices are to be commended, but it is misguided that such restrictions are the only beneficial possibilities to arise from our relationship with food.

The other common practices are to give recipes, or to promote the value of certain foodstuffs, yet neither of these is obviously related to happiness – they are far too pragmatic for that.There is an unexplored potential in “food therapy”, in embracing food and finding pleasure from it. In such a hectic environment as Oxford, shopping can feel like an aggravating necessity, but if indulged in properly can become a period of relaxation in your day.

Rather than doing a Schumacher with the trolley, a slow perusal of the options can turn a chore into a pleasure, and in buying the occasional top-brand item, nice food becomes satisfying retail therapy. And what to do with these gourmet luxuries? The act of cooking, for all students, is an extension of their usual working practices, but without that key judgmental element. For arts students, it involves that same spontaneous creation as an essay (hopefully) does, and for scientists, a similar evaluation of set elements in order to arrive at a variable outcome.

The pleasure comes from the ability to indulge in the dish, regardless of its objective quality; few people will tell you that your dish is bad, and no-one will be in a position of authority to do so. Even if your soufflé (ambitious) doesn’t rise, you can always try again, but no-one’s going to let you rewrite your essay.

Finally, what is often overlooked by writers is that, for the modest amongst us, indulging in food is a harmless temporary thrill of immorality. There are no painful repercussions in a lemon tiramisu, which seems a pretty great alternative if you don’t fancy drinking vodka out of a sock while getting off with your college brother, or something like that. No-one’s going to be reminding you about dessert the morning after. 

Oxford’s Best: Pizza

0

This is another New Yorker thing: pizza. Ok, it’s technically an Italian thing, and technically you guys are closer to Italy, but we aren’t living in a scene from Under the Tuscan Sun and New York slices are legendary. Oxford pizza, maybe less so.

Let’s start with the lower end of the scale, shall we? There’s always Dominos. I won’t lie, I’ve ordered it in times of need; the place is open until five in the morning.  No one has that much willpower. However, I also can’t hide the fact that Domino’s pizza is a culinary plague upon this earth. Plus they won’t deliver for less than £11 which still will only buy you a medium pie with burnt pepperoni. Pizza Hut is, in my opinion, no better and yet I have never seen swankier Pizza Huts in my life. At least they have the good sense to pretend they’re better. 
A similarly speedy though considerably less shameful option is Pizza Artisan on St. Aldates. People scream in the streets about these pies. Let me tell you, it was just ok. As my friend Jason put it, Pizza Artisan is ‘overhyped pizza with cult following’ and the owner ‘has an uncanny resemblance to Russell Crowe’s loyal slave in Gladiator.’ The second half is less relevant, but you’ve got to watch out for him; he will try to pressure you into adding garlic to your six pound truck pizza. The crust is not nearly crusty enough but eating your drooping slice on the curb by Christ Church makes you feel inexplicably cool. 
As for the actual restaurants, these too leave much to be desired. I’m a pizza purist and as such Fire and Stone freaks me out. If you go with a big group of students on a Thursday, however, you can get a descent four-pound pizza and several bottles of house wine. I know ASK Italian is hardly the crème de la crème of Oxford dining, but it’s where I’ve had my favourite pizza. The Gamberetti. It’s hardly a ‘pure’ kind of pizza, involving prawns, crème fraiche and courgettes, but technically my friend ordered it and I was just along for the ride.      

Let’s start with the lower end of the scale, shall we? There’s always Dominos. I won’t lie, I’ve ordered it in times of need; the place is open until five in the morning.  No one has that much willpower. However, I also can’t hide the fact that Domino’s pizza is a culinary plague upon this earth. Plus they won’t deliver for less than £11 which still will only buy you a medium pie with burnt pepperoni. Pizza Hut is, in my opinion, no better and yet I have never seen swankier Pizza Huts in my life. At least they have the good sense to pretend they’re better. 

A similarly speedy though considerably less shameful option is Pizza Artisan on St. Aldates. People scream in the streets about these pies. Let me tell you, it was just ok. As my friend Jason put it, Pizza Artisan is ‘overhyped pizza with cult following’ and the owner ‘has an uncanny resemblance to Russell Crowe’s loyal slave in Gladiator.’ The second half is less relevant, but you’ve got to watch out for him; he will try to pressure you into adding garlic to your six pound truck pizza. The crust is not nearly crusty enough but eating your drooping slice on the curb by Christ Church makes you feel inexplicably cool. 

As for the actual restaurants, these too leave much to be desired. I’m a pizza purist and as such Fire and Stone freaks me out. If you go with a big group of students on a Thursday, however, you can get a descent four-pound pizza and several bottles of house wine. I know ASK Italian is hardly the crème de la crème of Oxford dining, but it’s where I’ve had my favourite pizza. The Gamberetti. It’s hardly a ‘pure’ kind of pizza, involving prawns, crème fraiche and courgettes, but technically my friend ordered it and I was just along for the ride.      

Waka-waka, it’s time for (South) Africa

The journey from Cape Town airport into the main city gives you a sense of what’s in store for the visitor to South Africa – even this short trip is enough to show the breathtaking variety in the country that Nelson Mandela famously described as ‘a rainbow nation at peace with itself and the world.’ The taxi followed a road between the greenery of the iconic Table Mountain and the vivid blue coast as we passed by baboons and were overtaken by BMWs. More discomfiting contrasts also become obvious on this journey: while the city skyline is dominated by hotels and office blocks, and the streets there are lined with bars, restaurants and shops, on the outskirts of the city the Nyanga township stretches for miles along the side of the motorway. Around 23 000 people live in this colorful, crowded, ramshackle settlement and unemployment is close to 50%. The townships, formed under the notorious Group Areas Act, are a potent reminder that South Africa’s troubled history still very much affects people today. 

e journey from Cape Town airport into the main city gives you a sense of what’s in store for the visitor to South Africa-even this short trip is enough to show the breathtaking variety in the country that Nelson Mandela famously described as ‘a rainbow nation at peace with itself and the world.’ The taxi followed a road between the greenery of the iconic Table Mountain and the vivid blue coast as we passed by baboons and were overtaken by BMWs. More discomfiting contrasts also become obvious on this journey: while the city skyline is dominated by hotels and office blocks, and the streets there are lined with bars, restaurants and shops, on the outskirts of the city the Nyanga township stretches for miles along the side of the motorway. Around 23 000 people live in this colorful, crowded, ramshackle settlement and unemployment is close to 50%. The townships, formed under the notorious Group Areas Act, are a potent reminder that South Africa’s troubled history still very much affects people today. 
That history is perhaps nowhere so palpable as on Robben Island-the location of the infamous prison which housed political prisoners during the apartheid period, including Nelson Mandela himself. Today the island is a National Heritage Centre and has been preserved as it was then, although it is now populated by guides and tourists rather than prison wardens and their charges. On the ferry journey across from Cape Town Waterfront what strikes you is the island’s proximity to the shore, its hard to imagine how it would have felt to be so effectively isolated though the mainland was so tantalizingly close. The island lies less than 7km out in Table Bay and is only 3km long, yet Mandela spent eighteen years of his 27 year imprisonment here, along with hundreds of other anti-apartheid activists. You can see the cell where he passed the nights for almost two decades, as well as the quarry where political prisoners were forced to spend their days on hard labour. 
One of the most fascinating things about a visit to the island is that the tours are given by former political prisoners, hammering home how horribly recent apartheid really was. Our guide spoke and answered questions with both equanimity and ironic humour, making the tour by turns heart-breaking and heart-warming. For me, one of the lasting images of Robben Island was the noticeboard that’s still on the wall, detailing food rations according to prisoner bands: political prisoners were entitled to less than other criminals and ‘black’ comes below ‘colored’ and ‘white’ on the chart. It seemed to show how utterly pervasive institutionalised racism was, even determining access to such basic human rights as food and water. 
Sadly, the effects of apartheid are still visible beyond this isolated island; poverty is still a major problem and economic differences tend to fall along similar lines to ethnic ones. Nevertheless, we saw few people begging and the resourcefulness and determination of the people is obvious: there are markets and roadside stalls selling everything from fresh fruit and firewood to paintings and carvings. Buskers and street artists abound in Cape Town and residents from the townships walk for miles every day in search of temporary washing, cleaning and building work. Several entrepreneurial folk have developed a system of watching tourists’ cars for a small fee which operates in the place of pay and display, whilst artists seem to be able to fashion sculptures, jewelry, handbags and decorations from pretty much anything-I came home with a picture frame that was formerly newspaper and an ostrich that started life as a coke can. We also saw very few signs of crime itself, although the signs of its prevention are more prominent than anywhere else I’ve been. Properties are surrounded by eight foot walls with electric gates and plastered with signs advertising the particular armed guard company that covers them.  The people I met-almost without exception-were extremely friendly and charming, the street-vendors were particularly persuasive and I left with my suitcase considerably fuller than when I arrived. 
Leaving the colour and bustle of Cape Town behind we travelled East down the coast through Hermanus and towards Cape Agulhas, the Southernmost tip of Africa where the Atlantic and Indian Oceans meet and you can swim between the two (although if you’re there in August I’d recommend you stick to paddling.) On this journey South Africa’s amazing variety really came into its own; I challenge you to find another place where you can see vineyards, beaches and forests; spot whales, buffalo and penguins; try surfing, cage diving with sharks and ostrich riding- all in a few days travelling. And yes I did just say Ostrich riding. At Oudtshoorn they breed, house and race ostriches and if any tourists are willing to humiliate themselves they let you have a go. This was simultaneously one of the most terrifying and hilarious things I have ever done, the basic premise being that you sit on its back and operate the neck like a joystick. It has to be seen to be believed.  
We also took advantage of the opportunity to go sky diving-the operation consisted of an office that was essentially a shed in a field and a tiny plane without seats, piloted by an excitable Aussie. Before take-off the gleeful Yorkshireman manning the desk informed me that, ‘there’s none of that nanny state nonsense over here’ as he passed me my forms. ‘You can sign your life away if you want to-you couldn’t even sue me!’ Words of comfort indeed. Luckily the tandem dive was incredible and I felt no cause for legal action. Free falling is a feeling like nothing else and we even spotted a couple of whales as we floated down over Plettenberg bay, before coming back to earth for an oh-so-graceful landing. 
Another highlight along the route was a trip to an elephant sanctuary offering you the chance to get up close and personal with these gentle giants. At Knysna Elephant Park they take in elephants orphaned or in danger from the poachers that are still are a serious threat on larger game reserves. Part of the trip involves leading them hand-in-trunk in a bizarre sort of conga line on a walk through the forest. Sadly, several of the elephants have had their trunks caught in snare traps so that the tips are cut off, making it hard for them to fend for themselves in the wild. The reserve offers them a safe home and helps them to adapt to life without these very dexterous extremities.  On a less sombre note, it also inhibits their ability to control the flow of mucus from what is –essentially – a giant nose. Something my Dad found out first hand as he paired up for a stroll. 
At Knysna reserve I also met Mashama, a Zimbabwean man who had crossed the South African border fleeing the political, economic and humanitarian crises in his home country. He found work at the sanctuary but he is one of a very lucky minority amongst the millions of his countrymen who have left home in search of a better life in South Africa. When I met him he had been unable to contact his family for several weeks, and actually visiting them seemed out of the question. Zimbabweans without work permits or even identity papers slip through the official immigration channels in their thousands despite the crocodile-infested Limpopo River and the armed border guards. But though they may escape political persecution or economic hardship at home they remain extremely vulnerable members of society in their neighboring country. Mashama was grateful for his good fortune; he said he wished we could visit his country and that it was very beautiful, but that there was no future there whilst Mugabe was still alive. 
Our final days in South Africa were spent on the stunning Amakhala game reserve, where the descendants of colonial settlers have reintroduced African wildlife to lands that they had previously been driven off to make room for sheep farming. The wildlife waits for no man so safari drives start bright and early before the sun comes up.  Watching the sunrise with a group of giraffes and a hot chocolate is definitely worth getting out of bed for, and brunch with the buffalo by the watering hole certainly tops off an amazing morning. 
On our second day there was a real buzz of excitement at the lodge as the elephants were nowhere to be seen. Losing a herd of elephants seemed both unlikely and worrying to me until the situation was explained. One of them was heavily pregnant and these communal creatures retreat into the bush to protect mother and child when she’s about to give birth. We set off in the evening to try and track them down-how hard could it be right? You’d be surprised how well elephants can play hide and seek when they want to. Nevertheless our guide David eventually spotted them amongst some trees in the distance and with a lot of help we managed to make them out through the binoculars. It was pitch black when we finally caught up with the herd; we turned off the jeep, turned on the torches and managed to catch a glimpse of the day old baby girl-alive and kicking and 22 months in the making.  I really couldn’t have imagined a better way to spend our last night in Africa.   
A two week trip to South Africa seemed pathetically perfunctory in comparison to what the country has to offer; despite all the experiences I had it still felt like we had barely scratched the surface. It’s a country with a painful history and many challenges still to face, but it is also vibrant, exciting, fascinating and diverse. One thing you can say for certain is that there is never a dull moment in the ‘rainbow nation’. 

That history is perhaps nowhere so palpable as on Robben Island-the location of the infamous prison which housed political prisoners during the apartheid period, including Nelson Mandela himself. Today the island is a National Heritage Centre and has been preserved as it was then, although it is now populated by guides and tourists rather than prison wardens and their charges. On the ferry journey across from Cape Town Waterfront what strikes you is the island’s proximity to the shore, its hard to imagine how it would have felt to be so effectively isolated though the mainland was so tantalizingly close. The island lies less than 7km out in Table Bay and is only 3km long, yet Mandela spent eighteen years of his 27 year imprisonment here, along with hundreds of other anti-apartheid activists. You can see the cell where he passed the nights for almost two decades, as well as the quarry where political prisoners were forced to spend their days on hard labour. 

One of the most fascinating things about a visit to the island is that the tours are given by former political prisoners, hammering home how horribly recent apartheid really was. Our guide spoke and answered questions with both equanimity and ironic humour, making the tour by turns heart-breaking and heart-warming. For me, one of the lasting images of Robben Island was the noticeboard that’s still on the wall, detailing food rations according to prisoner bands: political prisoners were entitled to less than other criminals and ‘black’ comes below ‘colored’ and ‘white’ on the chart. It seemed to show how utterly pervasive institutionalised racism was, even determining access to such basic human rights as food and water.

 Sadly, the effects of apartheid are still visible beyond this isolated island; poverty is still a major problem and economic differences tend to fall along similar lines to ethnic ones. Nevertheless, we saw few people begging and the resourcefulness and determination of the people is obvious: there are markets and roadside stalls selling everything from fresh fruit and firewood to paintings and carvings. Buskers and street artists abound in Cape Town and residents from the townships walk for miles every day in search of temporary washing, cleaning and building work. Several entrepreneurial folk have developed a system of watching tourists’ cars for a small fee which operates in the place of pay and display, whilst artists seem to be able to fashion sculptures, jewelry, handbags and decorations from pretty much anything-I came home with a picture frame that was formerly newspaper and an ostrich that started life as a coke can. We also saw very few signs of crime itself, although the signs of its prevention are more prominent than anywhere else I’ve been. Properties are surrounded by eight foot walls with electric gates and plastered with signs advertising the particular armed guard company that covers them.  The people I met-almost without exception-were extremely friendly and charming, the street-vendors were particularly persuasive and I left with my suitcase considerably fuller than when I arrived. 

Leaving the colour and bustle of Cape Town behind we travelled East down the coast through Hermanus and towards Cape Agulhas, the Southernmost tip of Africa where the Atlantic and Indian Oceans meet and you can swim between the two (although if you’re there in August I’d recommend you stick to paddling.) On this journey South Africa’s amazing variety really came into its own; I challenge you to find another place where you can see vineyards, beaches and forests; spot whales, buffalo and penguins; try surfing, cage diving with sharks and ostrich riding- all in a few days travelling. And yes I did just say Ostrich riding. At Oudtshoorn they breed, house and race ostriches and if any tourists are willing to humiliate themselves they let you have a go. This was simultaneously one of the most terrifying and hilarious things I have ever done, the basic premise being that you sit on its back and operate the neck like a joystick. It has to be seen to be believed.  

We also took advantage of the opportunity to go sky diving-the operation consisted of an office that was essentially a shed in a field and a tiny plane without seats, piloted by an excitable Aussie. Before take-off the gleeful Yorkshireman manning the desk informed me that, ‘there’s none of that nanny state nonsense over here’ as he passed me my forms. ‘You can sign your life away if you want to-you couldn’t even sue me!’ Words of comfort indeed. Luckily the tandem dive was incredible and I felt no cause for legal action. Free falling is a feeling like nothing else and we even spotted a couple of whales as we floated down over Plettenberg bay, before coming back to earth for an oh-so-graceful landing.

 Another highlight along the route was a trip to an elephant sanctuary offering you the chance to get up close and personal with these gentle giants. At Knysna Elephant Park they take in elephants orphaned or in danger from the poachers that are still are a serious threat on larger game reserves. Part of the trip involves leading them hand-in-trunk in a bizarre sort of conga line on a walk through the forest. Sadly, several of the elephants have had their trunks caught in snare traps so that the tips are cut off, making it hard for them to fend for themselves in the wild. The reserve offers them a safe home and helps them to adapt to life without these very dexterous extremities.  On a less sombre note, it also inhibits their ability to control the flow of mucus from what is –essentially – a giant nose. Something my Dad found out first hand as he paired up for a stroll. 

At Knysna reserve I also met Mashama, a Zimbabwean man who had crossed the South African border fleeing the political, economic and humanitarian crises in his home country. He found work at the sanctuary but he is one of a very lucky minority amongst the millions of his countrymen who have left home in search of a better life in South Africa. When I met him he had been unable to contact his family for several weeks, and actually visiting them seemed out of the question. Zimbabweans without work permits or even identity papers slip through the official immigration channels in their thousands despite the crocodile-infested Limpopo River and the armed border guards. But though they may escape political persecution or economic hardship at home they remain extremely vulnerable members of society in their neighboring country. Mashama was grateful for his good fortune; he said he wished we could visit his country and that it was very beautiful, but that there was no future there whilst Mugabe was still alive.

 Our final days in South Africa were spent on the stunning Amakhala game reserve, where the descendants of colonial settlers have reintroduced African wildlife to lands that they had previously been driven off to make room for sheep farming. The wildlife waits for no man so safari drives start bright and early before the sun comes up.  Watching the sunrise with a group of giraffes and a hot chocolate is definitely worth getting out of bed for, and brunch with the buffalo by the watering hole certainly tops off an amazing morning. 

On our second day there was a real buzz of excitement at the lodge as the elephants were nowhere to be seen. Losing a herd of elephants seemed both unlikely and worrying to me until the situation was explained. One of them was heavily pregnant and these communal creatures retreat into the bush to protect mother and child when she’s about to give birth. We set off in the evening to try and track them down-how hard could it be? You’d be surprised how well elephants can play hide and seek when they want to. Nevertheless our guide David eventually spotted them amongst some trees in the distance and with a lot of help we managed to make them out through the binoculars. It was pitch black when we finally caught up with the herd; we turned off the jeep, turned on the torches and managed to catch a glimpse of the day old baby girl-alive and kicking and 22 months in the making.  I really couldn’t have imagined a better way to spend our last night in Africa.  

A two week trip to South Africa seemed pathetically perfunctory in comparison to what the country has to offer; despite all the experiences I had it still felt like we had barely scratched the surface. It’s a country with a painful history and many challenges still to face, but it is also vibrant, exciting, fascinating and diverse. One thing you can say for certain is that there is never a dull moment in the ‘rainbow nation’. 

Street Style #9

0

Accessories are frequently an afterthought, flung on in a few seconds in order to look more dressed up – but often accessories can make an outfit. As we see below, the headband, adorable bicycle necklace and oversized bag push quite a mainstream outfit into more high-end territory.

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3483%%[/mm-hide-text]

Photography: Catherine Bridgman

Street Style #8

0

This girl is clearly working what those in the fashion scene like to call the ‘black is the new black’ look. It takes a lot of guts but always somehow seems to come off with an air of stylish understatement. Long hair in a centre parting, oversized bag and sunglasses – simplicity as done by the cool kids. 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3482%%[/mm-hide-text]

Mario Kart Cuppers: Part II

0

The Worcester-Oriel syndicate of 2 Guys, 1 Kart, consisting of Ethan Worth and Joe Evans, looked like they’d needed to set their alarm clocks to be up in time for 3pm. They appeared to struggle to find their way to the sofa, let alone give their opponents any trouble. However, they quickly confounded expectations with savant-like play that defied rational explanation. Alas Smith and Jones arrived with typical understated gravitas and an impressively sized audience in tow, confounding all rumours that Harris Manchester was an urban myth. They informed the crowd that their best player had been unable to come, forcing the substitution of Jonathan Parish.

Parish, with only four months of experience in the driving seat, had barely taken his L-plates off, but quickly established himself to be the dark horse of the tournament. From the go, the inaccurately named Alas Smith and Jones played with an eye to detail, strategically switching seats before the match was underway. It was the brash 2 Guys, 1 Kart who found themselves sinking into the notoriously undersprung yellow sofa. Their choice of Princess Peach and Princess Daisy was no less diligent, causing every minor race event to be met with a gruelling torrent of royal giggles and screams.

In the first race, GBA Bowser’s Castle, bleary-eyed Jones (playing as the perpetual underdog Luigi) proved that what he lacked in expertise, he made up for in raw, untamed skill. Something of a savant on the track, he shrugged off any number of glancing shots from Smith and Parish, continually regaining the lead only to throw it away in an unforced lava dunking. Worth, in patriotic pink as Birdo, was not so impervious, finding himself being bullied into submission by the princess pair. In the end, the tortoises of Alas Smith and Jones triumphed over the hares of 2 Guys, 1 Kart.

It was this consistency, as well as effective teamwork, that would go on to win them the match, proven when 2 Guys, 1 Kart upped the ante with Rainbow Road. The audience waited with baited breath to see who would be the first to plummet off the track, but thankfully didn’t have to wait unduly long until Smith took that honour, twice. Parish demonstrated that he could cope just fine without his teammate, neatly dispatching 2 Guys with 1 bomb and giving time for Smith to recover his dignity. Evans, apparently oblivious to the lessons in teamwork from the other team, shunted Worth clean off the track in his scramble to regain pole position, deftly jumping out the way of a POW block and batting away all red shells from an increasingly desperate Parish.

2 Guys, 1 Kart were all too aware that they needed a comfortable victory to stay in the match, hanging onto the leads in DK’s Jungle Parkway with grim determination. An eleventh-hour retaliation from Smith gave teammate Parish the opportunity he needed to snatch second place away; but it was not enough to shut down the match.

2 Guys, 1 Kart inexplicably selected the motorcyclist’s nightmare Wario’s Gold Mine as the start of their comeback tour. It seems the stress of being in the back seat was wearing away at 2 Guys: Evans lobbed a green shell at Worth before taking a plunge. However, Worth’s cruise in pole position was abruptly ended by a beautiful one-two; a blue shell from Smith followed by a flattening from Parish. The moral of the match – that there’s no ‘I’ in ‘Mario Kart’ – hung heavily in the air for all to appreciate. However, a blue shell on the finish line saw Evans snatching the match from the lion’s mouth, leading to cries of “Rape!” from the peanut gallery.

The outcome of the match once again hinged on the final match, and Alas Smith and Jones’ final decision: Koopa Cape. It was certainly no holiday for these senior citizens, who were flattened by a resurgent Evans and electrocuted by the tunnel fans. No matter: the leading team were still apparently suffering from communication problems, with Worth cleaning up Evan’s banana skins as fast as he could lay them. Even the impartial onlookers were quietly satisfied by the sight of a last-minute blue shell from Smith appearing, like a white-winged angel of justice, in Worth’s rearview mirror, giving him what was probably the first bath he’d had for weeks, while Parish simpered his way to victory.

 

The final score: 2 Guys, 1 Kart – 76, Alas Smith and Jones – 98

Oxford Explored

0

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3474%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3475%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3476%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3477%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3478%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3479%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3480%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3481%%[/mm-hide-text]

Anti-trafficking policy back in the spotlight

0

The British Government’s recent decision not to renew its funding for the Poppy Project, an initiative of the feminist charity Eaves, which provides specialist shelter, support and legal assistance to female victims of trafficking, has once again raised questions over the way in which anti-trafficking policy is formulated in this country. When the announcement was first made, cries of outrage were heard across the media. Since Poppy had lost the government tender to the Salvation Army, accusations of ideology clouding sound judgement were multiple, and were accompanied by claims of austerity trumping justice for those in need.

Within days, however, the simple picture built around this decision had become more complex. Nichi Hodgson, writing in the Guardian, echoed critiques of activists from across the anti-trafficking field when she highlighted that Poppy’s work is itself highly ideological (and highly contested), given that it has long centred around a campaign to prevent trafficking by outlawing the sex industry entirely. Beyond Poppy, commentators and activists are increasingly asking serious questions about the government’s claim to be ‘victim-centred’ or to have adopted a ‘rights-based’ approach in preventing trafficking and protecting people from it. I have sought to draw on both my own and related research in examining these claims.

Great debates rage over how, and indeed whether, the crime of ‘trafficking’ should be defined. Some argue for a broad definition encompassing any involvement in the process of exploitation, whereas others opt for a simpler focus solely on the ‘end-use’ mistreatment certain individuals face. Despite the debate, international agreement has coalesced around the basic UN ‘Trafficking Protocol’ formula that ‘trafficking = movement + exploitation’. In Britain, the government has adopted the UN definition, and has passed a series of Acts in order to give it the legal platform to prosecute, both in the case of sex trafficking and trafficking for forced labour. Beyond this, it has mandated the Serious Organised Crime Agency to tackle the underworld elements of the crime and has trained police officers and immigration officials in how to spot what it sees as evidence of it. As the Poppy controversy has highlighted, it also funds certain safe-houses for victims.

Notwithstanding the government’s legal and administrative measures, lead practitioners in the anti-trafficking field have identified a number of major problems with the British response and lament a huge gulf between the Government’s approach in principle and the effects of that approach in practice. Chief among civil society complaints is what many argue is an excessive focus on immigration – the movement component of the trafficking definition – despite Home Office commitments to tackle forced labour and the exploitation that waits at the end of the trafficking chain. In this regard, it is worth nothing that the Government’s anti-trafficking team is staffed almost entirely by UK Borders Agency officials trained to deal with immigration offences. Police interventions have focused heavily on ‘rescuing’ foreign women trafficked into prostitution and have done little to address either victims of non-sexual exploitation or those British or non-British individuals who are in the UK legally but whose working conditions equate to trafficking. Prevention strategies have largely encouraged people not to migrate as a means of protecting them from eventual exploitation, rather than offering them safe channels to move and ensuring they can work in safety when they arrive.

Relatedly, health care professionals working with victims of trafficking have suggested that the authorities’ approach is so aggressively anti-migratory that it re-traumatises victims when in questioning. One commentator told me that the desire amongst UKBA staff to repatriate was so extensive as to disincline him to work with the authorities any further.

If, as was explained above, the crime of trafficking equates to movement plus exploitation, and if, as the Government has stated, its intent is to employ a human rights-based policy, many believe that the operational focus principally on the migratory aspects of the crime fundamentally reverses the order of priority, in a way that is detrimental to victims and their well-being. Organisations working in the field therefore suggest that anti-trafficking policy should be re-aligned to focus on forced labour, where the priority response is in increasing the power and reach of labour inspectorates such as the Gangmasters Licensing Authority in order to eradicate exploitative working conditions across the British economy. To do this, one commentator suggested, would be ‘to ignore the one immigration criminal in order to save the 99 victims of trafficking/exploitation, as opposed to dealing with the one at the expense of the 99’. Added to this, academics and activists have repeatedly argued that more attention is needed to address the causes of trafficking. Given that, as studies show, most ‘trafficked people’ choose either to migrate or to engage in exploitative labour (even when they are aware that the consequences may be negative), questions must be asked as to why migration is such an attractive option and why people would tolerate exploitative working conditions in the first place.

Fundamentally, as Canadian academic Nandita Sharma has suggested, the answer lies in the fact that global neoliberal economic policies which promote the free movement of capital whilst simultaneously restricting the movement of labour have led to an ever-increasing impoverishment of non-Western workers and a destruction of the political and social safety-nets that may once have protected them. Until it takes steps to change these realities, whatever the British government does in the fight against trafficking will remain little more than window dressing.