Tuesday, May 6, 2025
Blog Page 1798

No small feat

0

Arrietty, a tiny person living under the floorboards and ‘borrowing’ items from the humans above, first appears as a flash of red in the long-grass half seen out of the corner of a child’s eye. Shô, a sick boy who has come away from the city to live with his aunt, is fascinated by rumours of ‘little people’ in the house and he grows more and more interested hoping (in his own shy way) to protect them from the villainous housekeeper. Based on Mary Norton’s The Borrowers, this animation’s plot and setting feel more European than the majority of previous Ghibli offerings. The film is both an unexpected take on the children’s book and another surprising turn from Studio Ghibli: fans of either the book or great writer/director Hayao Miyazaki won’t be disappointed.

Arrietty is interested in curiosity in all forms, from the obsessive detective work of the housekeeper to the pre-pubescent embarrassment found in the relationship between Shô and Arrietty. Shô gapes wide-eyed at Arrietty as she picks bouquet sized bay-leaves at her own level, while the animals, whether ants scampering over a block of sugar or grasshoppers squabbling over a dropped flower, show an equal wonder for the world around them . The imagination displayed in Arrietty is impressive, establishing a unique set of rules and scales for its imaginary world: early on, Arrietty’s mother is pouring tea from a miniature kettle, drop by drop. When her mother tells her, ‘I do hope your father wasn’t caught in the downpour,’ we are all the more concerned for having been acquainted with what counts for a raindrop in the world of the borrowers; while not dangerous per se, a rain storm for Arrietty equates to being pelted with several gelatinous cups of tea. The film’s imaginative reconstructions of everyday objects at times resemble a series of Russian dolls – when Arrietty and her father clamber out of the exit to a secret passageway (a fireplace in a doll’s house), there was a genuine murmur of amazement from children in the cinema and incredulous whispers of ‘Where are they now?’. Children are greeted with the gentle surprise of discovering new equally peculiar environments within the wider but economically drawn house and gardens.

Experiencing the film in cinematic surround sound really brings its incredible soundscape to the forefront. In a striking moment, Arrietty steps out onto a kitchen surface. For the borrowers sound is subtly distorted: the creaking of burdened shelves, the noise of the metal pipes behind the wall or the sound of little-shoes across a makeshift staircase of nails are all amplified and, as in the case of a grandfather clock, can sound monstrously oppressive (although speech is miraculously heard without difficulty in borrower/human interaction). The dubbing too was excellent. There was very little of the over-earnest voice-acting anime fans have learnt to loathe. Will Arnett was especially well cast as the asocial Shô. Having praised the intricacies of the soundscape the ‘celtic’ flutey music could be a little intrusive at times, but this is a niggle. 

This film isn’t a goggly eyed big/small adventure: the remit of The Borrowers or Honey I Shrunk The Kids was to evoke perpetual excitement by unveiling blown-up miniature after miniature, each more potentially dangerous than the last: giant falling milk bottles, killer bugs etc. etc. The chief seduction of Arrietty is not just the wow-factor of exploring a smaller world. Arrietty hopes to make its world not progressively stranger but more and more familiar. Having been invited into their world the danger is not cartoon but immediate and emotional. Fear is not the only emotion the borrowers associate with being seen by humans; when Shô sees Arrietty for the first time, she pulls up a tissue to cover herself, blushing, as if he had caught her naked. In place of terror and heart-racing danger, Arrietty offers serious and emotional peril for every character and expects an audience to be genuinely concerned, and we are. It might be worth seeing the film on a Sunday afternoon, just to make sure there are children around, so that you can gasp and whisper along with them.

Top scores at the BBC Proms

0

The Proms has come a long way from its humble beginnings in 1895. Since the BBC’s involvement in 1927, the festival has continued to expand both in scope and in international attention. This is of course reflected in the continually ridiculous (but entertaining) last night of the Proms; and this year, also in the excitement of the first. Opening with a commission from contemporary female composer Judith Weir and ending with Leoš Janáček’s Glagolitic Mass (performed by the BBC singers), the night encompassed an astonishing variety of musical styles and nationalities, and provided a platform for contemporary composition that is much needed in the current musical climate. Sandwiched between the two was Liszt’s Second Piano Concerto, performed by Benjamin Grosvenor. Having burst onto the public music scene with his performance in the BBC Young Musician competition seven years prior, Grosvenor was the youngest artist ever to open the Proms. He’s proving to be quite an artist to watch, and his concerto performance was measured and pleasing, if not breathtaking. His encore was a slight letdown, but it was a comfortable Proms debut. The highlight of the evening, however, was the Glagolitic Mass. Sadly under-performed, the mass was given a superb rendition. On a similar note of under-performed brilliance, the critical acclaim for Stephen Hough’s recordings of the Saint-Saens piano concertos proved correct in Prom 23 with his performance of the fifth ‘Egyptian’ concerto, often neglected for the more popular second. Coupled with Beethoven’s Fourth Symphony and Liszt’s Dante Symphony, the first Prom was an exceptional concert.

 Other highlights in the season have included Mark Elder and the Halle Orchestra performing Sibelius, Bartók and Janáček; Oliver Knussen and the BBC Symphony Orchestra (the Berg with soloist Claire Booth a particular stand-out performance); the Human Planet Prom; and the Horrible Histories Prom (narrated by historical characters in the Horrible Histories series). The season’s best Prom, however, was surely the 29th: Gustavo Dudamel and the Simón Bolívar Youth Orchestra of Venezuela performing Mahler’s Second Symphony. The Prom once again showcased the international brilliance of this astounding youth orchestra, proving that classical music is still young, current and political. It was a joy to watch.

 The slight disappointments and the quite frankly bizarre were Proms 4 & 32, and Proms 24 & 25, respectively. Prom 4 offered us Havergal Brian’s ‘Gothic’ Symphony. Over 1000 performers played on an extended stage in this rendition of Brian’s First Symphony. The brass band were suitably bombastic, the singers phenomenal, but there may be a reason other than sheer numbers why this symphony – the largest ever composed – is so rarely performed, and it certainly did not inspire me to explore Brian’s other 31 symphonic offerings. Prom 32, Brahms Violin Concerto and Mahler’s Das klagende Lied appeared promising, but in the event was sadly lacklustre. Christian Tetzlaff perspired his way to triumph in the Brahms but the performance was somewhat unconvincing, lacking the effortless flow that the cantata requires. His encore, conversely, was inspired. Simple and confident, it appeared he had suddenly shed his nerves. Tenor Stuart Skelton and the BBC Singers stole the show in the Mahler, salvaging a fairly uninspired performance by the BBC Symphony Orchestra under Edward Gardner.

 Proms 24 & 25 were dedicated to the memory of Percy Grainger, described as ‘one of music’s great originals’. A brilliant pianist, sexual deviant, musical inventor, decided racist, and perennial eccentric, Grainger was one of classical music’s most fascinating characters. The museum dedicated to him in Melbourne contains collections of his erotic photographs (including his love of flagellism) and sexual implements alongside his ethnographic material and musical collections. The Proms were worth a listen, but it was a shame they didn’t programme his Suite on Danish Folksongs which Grainger performed himself at the Proms in 1948. 

 

Proms to watch:

 

        Prom 48, August 19th: Brahms and Schumann, mainly for the Schoenberg transcription of the Brahms. All to be performed by the sensational pianist Angela Hewitt.

Prom 51, August 22nd: An unusual programme; the new Volans Piano Concerto is set alongside Wagner, Liszt and Brahms under Jiri Belohlavek and the BBC Symphony Orchestra.

Prom 55, August 25th: Rinaldo by the Glyndebourne Festival Opera. Almost as old as the Proms itself, Glyndebourne was founded in 1934 amidst the turmoil of Hitler’s rise to power. Originally performing Mozart operas under Fritz Busch and Carl Ebert (who had fled Germany under Nazi rule), the opera company has since largely expanded, here presenting Handel’s Rinaldo with the Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment.

Prom 56, August 26th: Semyon Bychkov and the BBC Symphony Orchestra perform Strauss’ Burleske and Mahler’s Sixth Symphony. Bychkov conducted the Verdi Requiem superbly at the beginning of this Proms season. 

Prom 58, August 28th: Mendelssohn’s Elijah. This expansive oratorio is performed by Paul McCreesh and no fewer than five choirs.

Prom 60, August 30th: Mozart Piano Concerto No. 25 and Bruckner’s Eighth Symphony. The soloist for the Mozart is David Fray, an upcoming French pianist who performs with refreshing clarity and if nothing else is extremely compelling to watch.

Prom 61, August 31st: world premiere of Graham Fitkin’s Cello Concerto, and Beethoven Symphony No. 9. With Yo-Yo Ma as soloist for the Fitkin, this should no doubt be an excellent concert.

Prom 64, September 2nd: Create your own Prom with the Budapest Festival Orchestra. This is probably a better Prom to attend than to tune in to on Radio 3, but the element of audience participation should be entertaining.

Prom 67, September 4th: Beethoven’s Missa Solemnis, conducted by Colin Davis. 

Prom 74: The Last Night of the Proms. This year Lang Lang is the headline act for the Last Night, performing Liszt’s First Piano Concerto as companion to Grosvenor’s performance of the Second Concerto on the First Night. Lang Lang’s rise to fame has been meteoric, and he has since become one of the best known names in classical music. Whether or not you like his interpretations are to your taste, he makes people want to watch him, and his performance here should sit well alongside the fireworks and festivities of the final night. The finale will include the obligatory ‘Land of Hope and Glory’, ‘Jerusalem’, ‘You’ll Never Walk Alone’, ‘Rule Britannia’. and the National Anthem. At least there’ll be Maxwell-Davies at the start to balance the night.

 

Review: Little Dragon – Ritual Union

0

Ritual Union comes off of a year of serial success for Gothenburg synthpop quartet Little Dragon: first came the collaboration with Damon Albarn on last year’s Gorillaz LP Plastic Beach, then contributions to TV on the Radio’s Dave Sitek’s solo Maximum Balloon release, and most recently a feature on SBTRKT’s eponymous breakthrough debut. It is fitting then, that this curious moment of ubiquity should be topped off with Little Dragon’s third LP, released this July. Backed by warm production and irresistible electronics, and topped by the soulful register of lead singer Yukimi Nagano, Little Dragon is certainly an outfit to be reckoned with. Their first two albums matched pitch-perfect instrumentation to irresistible R&B-influenced songwriting, and Ritual Union is equally masterful in this regard. ‘Brush The Heat’ is the perfect example of this combination, moodily pairing Nagano’s huskier tones with a tight snare, high-hat, and thumping synth groove.

If, then, there is a shift at all between Ritual Union and 2009’s Machine Dreams, it is in the atmosphere. The latter, true to its name, was jerky and often mechanistic; Ritual Union, instead is smooth and soulful, and all the more seductive as a result. Where Machine Dreams was flirty, Ritual Union is unabashedly sexual. The former hinted, the latter is explicit. There is no better voice for such an ambience than Nagano’s – perfectly mixed into the instrumentation – and her lyricism is equally suggestive. The album artwork would suggest that title track ‘Ritual Union’ refers to marriage, but the lyrics, with their allusions to sin and transgression, certainly hint at something else altogether. These double entendres are frequent in Ritual Union, complementing the production in building up the smouldering mood. Standout track ‘Precious’, a heady concoction of swirling synths, driving rhythm, and Nagano’s beckons – “precious, I can’t hold back” – is certainly a case-in-point. Ritual Union, then, is a welcome direction for Little Dragon, and one that will excite new and old devotees alike.  

Cherwell’s Fresher A – Z

0

Ball – colossally expensive outdoor piss-up, organised months in advance and attended by slick-haired black-tied nonces. You will do anything for a ticket. Balls are mostly held by colleges (for about £45 a throw) but the good ones can set you back more than £200. Nevertheless it’s absolutely worth going to at least one. There is sometimes a chocolate fountain: say no more.

Bodleian – very very very good library. Very good library. Contains every book printed in England since about 1700 and plenty else besides. Situated right in the middle of the town, it’s made up of two parts: the square bit (Main Quad) and the round bit (the Radcliffe Camera). The square bit is rather stuffy but staggeringly impressive, the round bit is just staggeringly impressive. And as of this October, a bonus feature:  there is now an underground passage linking the two which looks a bit like that scary corridor in the Ministry of Magic. Fit.

Bod Card (University of Oxford Card) – this identity card is your life and soul. Without it you cannot eat in hall or read in libraries, essentially meaning you cannot live or work. Perhaps cut a hole in it and wear it round your neck.

Bop – college party, usually arranged by the JCR, usually held in a club. In many ways organised reversions to childhood since they involve dressing up. Precise purpose unknown, but frequently held at the end of term, so presumably they have something to do with that.

Brideshead Revisited
– no.

Bullingdon Club – drinking society for the very wealthy. Like Puck, rarely heard and rarely seen. Unlike Puck, renowned for burning money in front of tramps. Former members include David and Boris, but we’re sure you knew that.

Cherwell – student-run weekly newspaper, available free from JCRs. The greatest organ of free speech in the history of the world. Smiter of evil, champion of freedom, hotbed of wit. A miracle.

Collections – scurrilously pointless College-run exams designed solely to ruin your holidays. Set at the beginning of term, you see, though it’s common not to get the results till fifth week or later. Helpful hint: you will usually be set last year’s mods/prelims paper.

College – what non-Oxbridge universities don’t have (except Durham, but they’re only pretending). A learning mall; a big, friendly, often old and conspicuous hive-mind. You live, eat, sleep and work here. It is your home away from home and – wipes tear – in a way it will always be your home. Actually, it’s more like being a branded heifer. Whenever you’re asked to identify yourself the first thing – the first thing – you must say is what college you go to. This will dog you for the rest of your life. But it’s worth it. After all, it has a bar.

College Family – two soon-to-be-second-years of the opposite sex who secretly fancy each other will ‘marry’ and produce ‘children’, viz. freshers. They will then helpfully show them the ropes/fornicate with them/become friends with them/completely ignore them, in roughly equal proportions.

Crew Date – our equivalent of those mass weddings they have in South Korea. A load of girls (eg. girls sporting team) and a load of boys (eg. boys sporting team: I think we may be seeing a pattern here, Watson) go to a curry restaurant to get lashed ‘n’ laid. Little more than an occasion to get wasted, because those are just so hard to come by in contemporary student culture.

Dons (Academics) – rarely called dons but emit a rather donnish air. Very clever, very earnest individuals who meisterplan your work and tutelage, usually providing it themselves. Absolutely never to be crossed, though always nice to outgun them.

Essay – an organisation with a monopoly of legitimate force over a given territory. Don’t get the reference? 2.2.

Famous People – lots of these. Academics are paid woefully so tend to flee for America as soon as they become famous. Gone are the days when Tolkien would give tutes in his rooms at Merton before turning round to write LOTR. However, you can still catch them occasionally. In any case each college has about ten billion celebrity alumni (five Cabinet ministers went to Magdalen alone) who occasionally turn up and do stuff. And if all else fails, there are the children of famous people who go to university here. Hob, and indeed nob, at your will.

Formal Hall – formal hall is what you invite friends to when you’re not quite sure if you want them to be your friend. High-quality food served at discount price in unbelievably impressive environment. Probably the best thing about going to Oxbridge other than tutes.

Fresher – you. Clueless and disdained. Often ‘pushy’ freshers immediately begin their remorseless ascent up the greasy pole, thus rendering everyone else even more disdainful of them. Most keep their heads down, sticking to the dictum of Manuel from Fawlty Towers: ‘I know nothing. I come from Barcelona.’ Though for Barcelona insert ‘some arbitrary village in Devon I’ve never head of’.

Future Spouse – will you find them? Don’t pretend you haven’t been thinking this.

G and D’s
– triptych of ice cream shops. Purveyors of finest quality bagels, paradoxically. Notorious hoster of first dates and awkward freshers’ meet-ups, and no more a major part of your life than the Mato Grosso. Still, worth visiting at least once.

Gowns – funny flappy black things worn to formals. People who get firsts in their prelim exams get vastly superior Voldemort-like ones. The aim of this is for them to be killed by jealous contemporaries who only got a 2.1, thus eliminating the less reproducible elements of the gene pool.  

Hack – somebody who seeks election to an office in a University or college society or organisation, and who does this by going around meeting as many people as possible in an attempt to get their name ‘out there’ and solicit votes. They will appear friendly at first but are without exception the most unutterable cockends in the entire University. Avoid.

iPlayer – God and Satan rolled into one happy, licence-fee-funded website. Will destroy your degree just as it will enrich your existence. Unless, of course, you only watch EastEnders.

JCR (Junior Common Room) – your college’s student union for undergraduates. Approximately as interesting as it sounds. But there are some advantages: they give out cake and sometimes even alcohol!

Kebab Van – although held in scathing contempt by many, let me just say that these are actually really good. They are plentiful, staffed by nice people, provide adequate food at nugatory cost, and are open till four in the morning. Should you choose to subsist on them however you may find yourself breaking out all pimply.

Labs
– things which command, dominate, and generally ruin a scientist’s day. Humanities students will take the piss out of you, telling you they can lie in bed till 4pm and then only read one page before going out drinking. This outrageous stereotype is 100% accurate.

Lashmolean – no obvious meaning. Presumably relates to one or more of the following: Ashmolean, the pretty museum on St Giles; lash, going out on the, meaning to get drunk; and punning, tendency of Oxford students to make excessive use of.

LawSoc – one of the many University societies catering for those who wish to sell their souls. Worth a mention because of the gloriously alcoholic events hosted approximately three times a term completely free of charge – once you’ve forked out the joining fee.

Lectures – worthless, irrelevant chicanery attended by fanatics and conducted by harmless, tweedy old gubbins. The annoying thing with lectures is that good lecturers are very rare, but their lectures are extravagantly superior to the normal ones- so much so that it’s almost worth going to them. Almost. Incidentally science students have to go anyway and their lectures are even more boring. Another notch on the humanities’ bedpost.

Library – Oxford has a higher concentration of libraries than any other city on earth. Practically for certain, you will only ever visit three: your college library, your faculty library, and the Bodleian. In fact, why aren’t you there now? Off you trot.

Long Vac – from the Ponce vac, meaning ‘holiday’, and long, meaning ‘summer’. Three months (and a bit) in which you will usually work for minus money in some godawful bank or chambers or somesuch. Its vast length, however, means you can travel to foreign countries and walk about in them, and also use the time to get some solid reading done.

May Day – absolutely ludicrous Ox-trad twaddle in which you assemble on Magdalen Bridge on 1st May at 5am to listen to children sing from the top of Magdalen tower. That’s it. Seriously.

Mods (also known as Prelims) exams everybody sits at some point in first year. You only need to scrape a paltry 40% to proceed to second year, so don’t worry too much. Yet, anyway.

Michaelmas, Hilary and Trinity – the names of terms, each of eight weeks, unchanged since the sixteenth century. People at other universities will take the piss out of you for this.

OUSU (Oxford University Students Union) – what it says on the tin, pronounced ow-zoo. 12% of you will vote in its annual elections. Other than that it will have nothing to do with you and you, we fervently hope, will have nothing to do with it.

Oxford Union Society – a debating society BUT you will mostly know it for its superb bar. Also has a beautiful library and termly balls which are not half bad at all. The downsides are enormous though: gigantic cost of entry. More notably, it contains the most repulsive examples of hacks to be found outside Westminster. Thankfully, they don’t stay outside Westminster for long and, hey, you can ignore them.

Park End (also known as Shark End) – the easiest place to pull of an evening. If by pull you mean vom, horribly.

Plays – regular and usually terrible, but provide ample opportunity to creep the boards. Rather competitive though. Our advice is to merely watch them, or maybe run them in your third year.

Postgraduates – astonishingly quiet lot even though they are nearly half the university. Presumably they spend most of their time working – perish the thought. Make friends with them. Be taught by them. Or hey, you know what? Go out with them. They’re yours for the taking.

Punting – you will probably not get to experience this until Trinity. Use a metal pole. Stand at the right end. (The sloped one – only Tabs stand at the other end and we wouldn’t want to be like them now, would we?) Empty your pockets. Place pole vertically downwards. Push. Remove. Repeat. Don’t use the paddle, it’s deceptively useless. Don’t rock the boat. Don’t put your fingers outside the boat (the duck are vicious.) And absolutely, unequivocally, always bring food and alcohol.

Rah – a posh person who speaks as ponceily as they dress. Frequent Christ Church, Brasenose, Oriel etc.

Rahdar – the public school network which enables all rahs to know each other. Get ready to learn so much about London public schools you could swear your Leavers’ hoodie actually reads ‘St Paul’s’.

Real World – the thing that flits by the windows of the car when you go home. Make sure to govern it sensibly.

Rower – wears stash. No other discernable function.

Scouts – people who come into your rooms to clean them. Theoretically. Their real function is to chase out the marauding hordes of one night stands before 10am so as not to scare the midday tourists. (Honestly, they have the keys to your room. Instances of catching someone in a state of undress are not unknown.)

Stash – branded clothing. Cool: college hoodies, college scarves, sport club hoodies. Passable: freshers’ T-shirts, sixth form leavers’ hoodies. Uncool: anything branded with ‘University of Oxford’, since this is worn solely by people who don’t go here. Also, rowing blazers are a no-no except after eight after Eights, and even then only by tossers.

Student Journalist – a writer of journalism; a harmless drudge.

Sub-fusc – white tie worn with academic dress, proffered to the plebs during exam time and matriculation. Surprising fact: you are not allowed to go to the toilet whilst wearing it.

Summer Eights – something to do with rowing. I think it’s in Trinity. I don’t understand it and I’m buggered if I’m going to try learning now.

The Covered Market Welcomes The Freshers – you will see this banner. Not-so-secret fact: they keep it up all year round. Don’t let that put you off, though, the Covered Market has a brilliant cookie stall. Plus! A butcher’s shop.

The Other Place – it’s basically the same as here and anyone who genuinely thinks otherwise is an idiot. Get the fuck over it.

Time Zone – it is a little known fact that the University of Oxford has its own time zone, set five minutes behind real time. This is why all lectures begin at five past the hour. I don’t know how I can convince you this is true, but it is.

Tutes (tutorials)
– you will expectorate and expostulate, in expectation of expertation. Usually involves reading out an essay or solving a problem sheet. Then off you go only to do it all again the next week. The best educational system in the history of the world, incidentally. Take them not for granted.

Tutor – a person who expects you to be able to have a serious argument with them about a subject you have spent one week reading about which they’ve spent their entire life reading about. Surprisingly, you might win sometimes.

University – the thing you tell Daddy’s friends you go to. Otherwise a mysterious institution with no impact on your life, until Finals when it becomes the arbiter of what happens to it.

Weekends – Rebecca Black may have looked forward to them. But you won’t. Weekends are boring, and you can’t even do work because you’ll be too hungover. Best to go home.

Oxford dons in autism spat

0

Two Oxford professors have been engaged in a high-profile disagreement about the causes of autism.

The row started after Baroness Susan Greenfield, Professor of Synaptic Pharmacology at Lincoln College and former director of the Royal Institution, suggested in an interview with the New Scientist that increasing use of the internet and electronic devices could be linked to autism in young people.

Greenfield claimed that this was likely to be a factor in the rising rates of autism diagnosis. She told Cherwell, “it is hard to see how obsessive cyber activities could not be having some impact on the brain, because the human brain has evolved to adapt to its environment”.

However Dorothy Bishop, a Professor of Neuropsychology at St John’s, has publicly attacked Greenfield’s suggestions, dismissing them in an open letter to her colleague as “illogical garbage”. Speaking to Cherwell, she said: “The specific problem concerns her [Baroness Greenfield] repeatedly mentioning autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) in connection with her concerns about dangers of internet use”.

Bishop denies that autism could be caused by behavioral factors such as spending time on the internet.  Quoting the American Psychiatric Association’s description of the condition, she said, “Autism spectrum disorder is a neurodevelopmental disorder and must be present from infancy or early childhood, but may not be detected until later because of minimal social demands and support from parents or caregivers in early years.”

She also criticised the forum in which Greenfield chose to express her views, commenting, “Greenfield is always billed in the media as a ‘top scientist’ but has stopped behaving like a scientist. Her theorising on digital technology does not appear in peer-reviewed journals; this is a great shame, as peer review is vital to ensure that one’s ideas are scholarly, balanced and plausible.”

Greenfield has sought to defend her comments against Bishop’s criticism. In a statement to Cherwell, she implied that her theories had been exaggerated in media reports. She said, “Inevitably, the nuances that I wished to bring out have been the casualty of an edited interview that was in any case relatively brief, given that we were ranging over many broad issues.”

The National Autistic Society, a leading UK autism charity, refused to be drawn into the dispute. Amanda Batten, Director of External Affairs, said, “The causes of autism are still being investigated… There is evidence to suggest both genetic and physical factors have a role to play”.

Neither the Faculty of Pharmacology nor the University responded to a request for a comment on the matter.

Oxford student, 24, dies in holiday accident

0

An Oxford student has died after a tragic accident in southwest France on Wednesday afternoon. His two friends, also from Oxford, tried but were unable to save him.

The victim was 24 year old American Kojo Owusu Minta, who was Vice-President of the St Hilda’s College MCR last academic year. He had just completed an MPhil in History at St Hilda’s and was due to begin a DPhil at Lincoln in Michaelmas.  

The three students were part of a group of a dozen Americans and Britons staying at a cottage in a nearby village. They had spent the day on the banks of the Gave d’Oleron near Dognen in the Pyrenees-Atlantiques, when Minta lost his footing and was swept away by the current.

His two friends were unable to catch up with the current and soon lost sight of him. After another British tourist on the other side of the river alerted the emergency services, he was located downstream by a rescue helicopter.

A fire department doctor attempted for over an hour to resuscitate him but was unsuccessful.

The tragedy is said to have shaken the small town of Dognen, as the area of the river is reportedly popular for swimming with tourists and locals alike. The site is generally considered safe, with no previous history of accidents.

Dr Georgina Paul, Tutor for Graduates at St Hilda’s, told Cherwell this week: ‘The College is feeling the loss of Kojo Minta very sorely. He was a man of style and panache, a great personality in the College community, and it is impossible to comprehend how someone so dynamic could have had his life cut short in this way.

‘But he was also a man of quiet good works and deep convictions, and I think all of us are feeling the strength of that legacy: his love of the Bible and of Milton, his work not just for the College, but for the University’s Race Equality Steering Group, and with the African Books Collective amongst other activities.

‘He had just attained a Distinction in his History MPhil and had the funding to continue on to his DPhil. His supervisors have written to me of his academic promise and energy and their shock, too, at his loss. This tragic accident has robbed the University of a talented mind as well as taking from all of us a very fine and special man. Kojo will for ever be remembered at St Hilda’s.’

A memorial webpage in honour of Kojo Owusu Minta can be found here:  http://www.forevermissed.com/kojo-minta.

Britain and Ireland in colour

0

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3851%%[/mm-hide-text]

Brighton Pier

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3852%%[/mm-hide-text]

Brighton beach

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3846%%[/mm-hide-text]

Richmond Park, London

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3847%%[/mm-hide-text]

Ducks in Richmond Park, London

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3855%%[/mm-hide-text]
Damselfly in Richmond Park, London. 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3854%%[/mm-hide-text]

Brownstone Beach, Ireland

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3849%%[/mm-hide-text]
Derryrush, Ireland at sunset 
[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3853%%[/mm-hide-text]
Derryrush, Ireland at midnight

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3848%%[/mm-hide-text]

Worcester College, Oxford

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3850%%[/mm-hide-text]

Bird on a bike in Oxford

An American parable

0

I have seen The Social Network seven times now, and I’m still astounded by how I remain hungry for more viewings, eager to immerse myself once again in the richness of the world it portrays. I still insist it was the best film of 2010, and, There Will Be Blood aside, it might well be the best film since the 90s. I also don’t accept in the slightest that this is just a ‘moment’ which resonates with my generation in particular, and this is a point worth dwelling on. I think the film will persist for some time, for reasons to now be explored.

I did initially perceive the film, then, in a way that was hospitable to this sort of criticism: it’s about the founding of a website that has quietly integrated itself into our lives to an extent we should stop and appreciate, and the moments and lines that stood out in the film were the opening scene, with its array of communication problems; the final scene, and its disturbingly honest and representative screen-staring; the scene where Mark’s friend asks him if a girl is single, and he sarcastically replies that people don’t go around with signs indicative of their relationship status, before sprinting off to edit Facebook’s HTML; when the Winklevosses realise Mark had been lying to them – or, more accurately, their email accounts. Together, these moments that are so telling about the way we’ve come to contact one another, came to constitute my impression of the film, and it’s easy to suggest that if social networking goes the same way as any other modern craze – or, conversely, if it becomes so natural that people cannot comprehend life without it – either way, the film’s hip humour and power could disintegrate.

One vital reason that this is nonsense, of course, is the fact that a film’s showing a world we cannot relate to is no indication whatsoever that it won’t be totally enthralling – how else to explain our obsession with the world of crime that few movie-goers will barely get anywhere near to? Then when you add in the fact that as a piece of art the film is just flawless, possessing one of the most distinctive and coherent mise-en-scènes that we’ve seen in years, The Social Network‘s status is starting to look safe as a viable candidate to stand the tests of time.

There’s one final consideration, though, that I think will ensure its greatness. If you recall the night club scene, you’ll remember that after a lengthy story about the founder of Victoria’s Secret that sold out a year too soon and committed suicide, Mark, perplexed, asks if it was intended as a parable. I think the whole film is a parable. I think it is best seen as one huge gushing love-letter to America as an idea, and as the nation of innovation, liberty, prosperity. And this holds true whether it was Fincher’s conscious intention or not. Perhaps you can only see the film in this way if you’re not American, but I suspect if you’re a citizen you get the equally wonderful sensation of pride instead. It’s simply impossible not to watch these undergraduates carve out a vision that has reached over 500 million people without knowing they’re adding themselves to a long line of innovators stretching from Howard Hughes to Bill Gates. You know it could only have happened in America. You know Harvard looks like a university where the air is just that little bit fresher and freer to breathe, and you know Sean Parker could never be British, and nowhere else in the world could twenty-something nobodies drop out of college and be made billionaires in a matter of years.

For me, at least, I think this is the final source of the film’s almost magical appeal: awe at a world and lifestyle we’re lucky just to watch and be aware of, even if it’s impossibly distant. As Eduardo casually hops from Manhattan to California, The Social Network grows into a 2 hour paean to the USA. Ironically unoriginal, but something tells me that if people remain sane, this will continue to engross and inspire for a long time to come.

Get smart!

0

I’m one of the last people I know to actually get a smartphone, having survived with a Sony Ericsson that cost me about £15 three years ago when I bought it as a ‘temporary’ phone. This means that I’ve been part of the ever dwindling group of people that can always fall back on my phone for cheap laughs if a conversation is going badly. Having finally upgraded my phone to join the Blackberry/iPhone-wielding masses I’ve found my life has changed for both better and for worse.

Any question or argument can now be solved in about five minutes (providing I have 3G signal), instead of spending hours wondering or debating. In the past two weeks of iPhone ownership I’ve used it to answer more standard questions, such as the name of the song used at the start of Reservoir Dogs (Little Green Bag), to slightly more off-kilter topics such as whether anyone has ever survived a plane crash into the sea (the answer is yes, which I hope reassures you if you are flying abroad this summer). This does tend to ruin conversation though; it’s always a bit depressing when your anecdote about how planes only come with a procedure for crashing at sea to make passengers feel better is ruined by someone who is on the internet as you speak, finding the one example of a European flight from the 1960s that did actually manage to land safely. 

Of course the internet can be used for more than just fact finding (not that I really need to tell you, as I’m pretty sure if you’re reading this you are well acquainted with it). I now no longer have to try and remember my transport arrangements/appointments/cinema times or write long lists of them. Recently, pre-iPhone, I got the train back from London and suddenly realised that I had absolutely no idea where to change or at what times. I panicked and had to ask the woman opposite me to plan my route home on hers and, while she was very helpful, her look of surprise when I showed her my phone said it all.

The iPhone also helps me to get my Facebook fix, like the junkie I am, on the move as opposed to having to rely on my desktop or laptop, which both come with the significant ‘disadvantage’ of not letting my check Facebook at any second of the day. Facebook has now become completely portable for me. I can check in so that everyone knows I’m sat in KFC Oxford (normally the sign of an essay crisis); I can respond to those Varsity Events invitations as soon as they come in, just so that I can be one of the first down to attend Blues at Camera (which, as always, is likely to be as rammed as a promiscuous ewe); I can see what pictures I’m tagged in immediately, although I have now experienced the horror of finding myself tagged in a photo from Park End that I can’t even remember being taken but which I am unable to de-tag until I run back to my desktop. I can even add people mere seconds after meeting them as opposed to having to wait until I get back to my computer (by which time there’s always the danger they may have forgotten me and may not return my all-important friend request).

Unfortunately, when my virtual friends are so close, where is the incentive to talk to the ones that are sat next to me? How can I see their tagged photos and who has written on their wall in face-to-face conversation? I’ve been in conversations and looked up from my iPhone to realise that I’ve not listened to a single thing said in the conversation or, even worse, that everyone has realised this and has cast me out, like some sort of electronic leper. Even if nothing has changed on Facebook in the last five minutes, there’s always the random article button on Wikipedia or YouTube. This wasn’t a problem with my Sony Ericsson, which only offered the choice of playing Snake or reorganising my contacts as sources of procrastination (please don’t judge me, you have to be inventive when you’ve only got WAP and Snake gets boring pretty quickly, although it’s safe to say I got pretty good at it).

The iPhone also hasn’t exactly done wonders for my self-confidence. I’ve always known that my hands aren’t exactly slender and that I don’t quite have the hand-eye co-ordination of a fighter pilot but this was confirmed when I started using the touch-screen phone. I’ve found the keyboard almost impossible to use, leaving my texts looking like they’ve been composed after a heavy night at Park End unless I turn the phone sideways to make the keys that all-important bit bigger. The disadvantage of this is that you quickly realise almost nobody actually uses the iPhone like this and people start to double-take when you use it this way.

Another thing I’ve found is that now I have a phone that is actually worth something I’m permanently worried that something may happen to it, with a feeling I imagine is pretty similar to parents worrying about their children. Waking up in the morning after a night out involves now not just wondering what happened last night and who I have to apologise to but also frantically checking the pockets of my jeans (which I nearly always wake up in – classy, I know) and any flat surface where I may have carefully placed my iPhone. Equally, dropping my phone results in a feeling of pure terror as I wonder just how many pieces the screen will be in when I pick it back up again. The worse thing that happened with my Sony Ericsson was that the 2 and 5 keys would stop working. That was easily be solved by just dropping it again or hitting it against a nearby table.

Of course, one of the biggest advantages is that I can now play Angry Birds. Need I say more?

Lionhead – A Radio Play

0

Cast:

Rolf : Ed Chalk (Brasenose)

David: Alex Bowles (Mansfield)

Polly: Hannah Roberts (Hertford)

Creative:

Director: Will Maynard (Oriel)

Writer: Xenia Elsaesser (St Anne’s)

 

This radio play was written, rehearsed and recorded within 24 hours, as part of OUDS’ 24hour theatre festival in 2009. The cast have all since graduated.