Tuesday 1st July 2025
Blog Page 1706

Aung San Suu Kyi may visit ‘beloved Oxford’

0

Prime Minister David Cameron has invited Burma’s pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi to the United Kingdom in June to visit her “beloved Oxford.”

Despite reports on Wednesday morning from the BBC and The Guardian stating that the visit had been confirmed by both parties, a spokesperson from Downing Street told Cherwell that this had been “misreported”, and that the visit was still yet to be confirmed by Suu Kyi.

The visit, if it goes ahead, will be her first to the UK since being placed under house arrest in 1989.

Suu Kyi gained a degree in PPE from St Hugh’s College in 1969, where she is now an honorary fellow, and left her husband and children behind in 1988 to lead Burma’s pro-democracy moment against the military junta.

During the press conference, Suu Kyi described the fact that she could say “perhaps” to the invitation, rather than “thank you but sorry” as “great progress” and is currently considering the invitation subject to the timing of the Burmese parliament.

The Prime Minister’s invitation came as part of a series of messages in which he told her that her “courage for standing up for things you believe in has been inspirational.” He also emphasised the role that he hoped to play in Burma’s reforms, stating, “There is a real prospect for change and I’m very much committed to working with you and trying to help make sure that your country makes those changes.”

Nora Godkin and Ebba Lekvall, Co-Presidents and founders of the Oxford Burma Alliance (OBA), told Cherwell, “We hope Cameron’s invitation is a sign that the UK Government intends to maintain and strengthen its support for the pro-democracy movement in Burma,” and added that they hoped the “recent reforms” would be “irreversible.”

Further, the pair expressed a wish that, “If she is able to make the trip, we will be able to show Daw Suu that Oxford students are committed to supporting Burma and the Burmese people on their journey towards democracy and freedom.”

Sara Polakova, JCR president at St Hugh’s, told Cherwell, “To us, as free citizens and free individuals, it seems almost impossible that someone’s desire to change things for the better in their homeland that they love would be answered with such harsh limitation.”

She added, “We are very proud to have such a notable alumnus in our college community. Oxford and St.Hugh’s has changed the lives of every single one of us – it is a life challenge to walk in Aung San Suu Kyi’s footsteps and use this privilege of world-class education to change the lives of others.”

Although no details about the visit can be provided until it is confirmed, an Oxford University spokesperson informed Cherwell, “We would be delighted to welcome her back to the University at any time.”

Heartland Institute urges Oxford to cancel speaker

0

The Heartland Institute, a right-wing American think tank, has called on Oxford University to bar Dr Peter Gleick from speaking at the forthcoming Oxford Amnesty Lecture series.

These calls come as a result of Gleick’s role in using questionable tactics to uncover Heartland’s plans to discredit climate science earlier this year.

Amnesty told the Cherwell that although they have no role in who speaks at the series, they have raised the issue with the organising body and expect a decision to be made during this week. Dr Gleick was unable to comment on the matter.

Gleick, an environmentalist and prominent water expert, claims to have discovered documents earlier this year showing that the Heartland institute was planning to provide $100,000 to sway teaching in Kindergartens and “focus on providing curriculum that shows that the topic of climate change is controversial and uncertain.”

Dr Gleick is also mentioned directly in the documents, with Heartland claiming that, “Efforts at places such as Forbes are especially important now that they have begun to allow high-profile climate scientists (such as Gleick) to post warmist science essays that counter our own. This influential audience has usually been reliably anti-climate and it is important to keep opposing voices out.”

The Heartland Institute, however, accuses Gleick of forgery, commenting, “The document is a fake created by Gleick or a co-conspirator, but Gleick has yet to confess to writing it and has not asked his allies in the environmental movement to take it down from their Web sites.”

However, Gleick said in a statement, ‘I made no changes or alterations of any kind to any of the Heartland Institute documents or to the original anonymous communication.’

Gleick admitted using a false name to obtain the confidential documents from the institute, and apologised publicly in February, writing in the Huffington Post, “My judgment was blinded by my frustration with the ongoing efforts – often anonymous, well-funded and co-ordinated – to attack climate science.”

The Heartland Institute, however, considers Gleick’s apology insufficient, and the Institute’s president, Joseph Blast, commented in a statement, “All scientists should be outraged that Oxford University should honor Gleick with a guest lecture. The actions Gleick has admitted to having taken… all make him unqualified to speak to students or as a scientist.

“The oldest university in the English-speaking world should be ashamed to associate itself with him,” Blast said. “John Locke, Linus Pauling, and Edwin Hubble must be spinning in their graves.”

Many students expressed the view that, although Gleick’s tactics were not ideal, the result vindicated the means. Luke Hughes, a student at Merton and the founder of Think Climate commented, “Yes, I absolutely think he should be allowed to speak. Regardless of whether or not what he did was right, he should still be allowed to speak about his important research.”

He added, “Although Peter Gleick could have been more open about it, considering the information that he found, I don’t think the Heartland Institute can really take the moral high ground.”

Some students were vexed by the aggressiveness of the Heartland Institute, with Isra Hale, a student at St Hugh’s, stating, “Of course he should be able to speak. For one, the Heartland affair should have nothing to do with the lecture series, and it would be a travesty for freedom of speech if he were to be prevented from giving his lecture. We can make our own minds up about the matter” before adding, “Given what was uncovered, I don’t understand how can they can be so vocal in their demands. It all seems very hypocritical to me.”

Others expressed concern that climate science was becoming overly politicised. Whilst OCA declined to comment, Tom Rutherford of OULC commented, “The teaching of the issue of climate science, and science more generally, should be based upon facts and credible theories, and not on the views of pressure groups who have a direct interest in distorting the evidence for climate change.”

The Two Gentlemen of Verona: Actor’s blog 3

0

Stephen Hyde plays Launce, the servant of the romantic lead Proteus. His toy dog (which he passionately believes is real) is his constant companion. Here, he relates their vacation adventures….

Good greetings, readers of this ‘blog’. How now etc. My name is Stephen – no, that’s wrong – my name is Launce… yes, that’s right; I am not myself – no, I am myself – no, that cannot be so either – yes, it is so, it is so, I am myself and I am Launce. A servant. To Proteus (a vengeance on him!)

Over the Eastertide celebrations, me and Crab – that’s my dog – have had an abundance of expeditions, one in particular which we would fain share with you in this article; though it be, look you, the most shocking ordeal though ever heardest. There ‘tis!

Now, ‘twas the week before Easter and Crab and I were on the terrace, enjoying cups of warm herbal tea and playing a game of cribbage (or ‘crabbage’ as Crab will have it known!), this being our wont of a long sunny afternoon in April. Now, we had not been there – bless the mark! – a pissing while, but the sky started groaning and the wind started howling and the trees started moaning and the dog started growling, and a torrent of rain drove me and my currish companion away from our garden paradise.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%5233%%[/mm-hide-text]

Well, we bolted as fast as our six legs could carry us, desperately fleeing the cyclone that pursued us; until we happened upon an old farmhouse owned by an old dame called Daphne and her casual lover, Winston. Now, go I to the old lady who owned the farm: ‘Woman’ quoth I, ‘what dwelling is this that me and my canine comrade have happened upon?’ ‘Me ‘ouse’ quoth she, ‘are you lost?’ ‘Nay’, quoth I, ‘I am Launce, and this is Dog, my crab – nay, nay, this is Crab, ay, and he is my dog’ ‘Ye must join us for some tea, lad’ quoth Winston, who I thought to be the fattest-bodied man that ever lived.

Well, we conversed on in a similar vein and they gave me liquor and I drank merrily; but as we gaily scoffed and quaffed, friends, Crab thrust himself into the company of a rather vicious breed of dog, called Brandy the Terrier. Well, Crab was so afraid (mark the look of anguish on his furry face) that he could not help but make water in the middle of the carpet!

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%5234%%[/mm-hide-text]

Nay I’ll be sworn, the laymen and I had not been dining more than a matter of minutes before the whole room smelt him. ‘What the bleedin’ hell?’ says Daphne: ‘****!’ says Winston: ‘I’ll not stand for this!’ he bellowed.

Well, I knew that the sheer weight of Winston standing on Crab was likely to crush him beyond death, so quoth I: ‘’Twas not Crab who has committed this offence, friends, ‘twas I…’ Well, Winston seemed no more contented by this version of events than the first: thence followed a string of offensive dialect I do not wish to recount and he made us no more ado, but chased us from his farm, brandishing the vilest implement thou ever didst see on a farm.

For obvious reasons, the farmer’s lover could not pursue us further than the gate, but Brandy the Terrier bounded after me and Crab, both of us as scared witless as wood women[1]. By now, the rain had ceased, but the ground was wet, and I tripped and fell and Brandy the Terrier fell and tripped, but nimble Crab bounded on, jumped onto a wall, and into the branches of a tree. Well, hours passed, and it seemed that Brandy the Terrier was so exhausted that he had passed out, or was simply dead, but Crab remained in the branches of that indigenous tree, stubbornly clinging on for dear life.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%5235%%[/mm-hide-text]

Oh, ‘tis a terrible thing when a cur will not do as he’s bloody well told! ‘Twas not for want of trying that the dog would not come down; see how I chide him! In the end, getting the fiend down involved a ladder, some bate, and a surly neighbour called Derek, who I had to pay several silver coins for his troubles. How many masters would do that for his servant? Markest thou this: my dog Crab is the most fiendish, heartless cur that either breathed air. He always plays the villain, so I always play the fool.

 

Stephen Hyde is playing ‘Launce’ in Barbarian Productions’ The Two Gentlemen of Verona, to be performed May 2nd-5th in Christ Church Cathedral Gardens. Tune in soon for more thrilling adventures of cast and crew, for more information about Two Gents visit their website, www.barbarian-productions.com, or follow them on twitter @twogentsox

 


[1] Wood women – ‘women who are insane’ or simply ‘women’

Films on Friday #1 ‘Herman and Harold: The Art Collector’

0

‘Herman and Harold: The Art Collector’, the latest in a series of the duo’s adventures, is the result of many hours of careful work; if you would like to find out more about Richard’s creative process, take a look at the website www.hermanandharold.co.uk (http://users.ox.ac.uk/~linc2943/handh/index.html

Keep an eye out for a new short film every Friday and vote for your favourite at the end of term. Every film is completely student-produced and the competition will showcase the wide range of talent and creativity amongst our budding filmmakers. 

If you would like to enter ‘Films on Friday’, or have any questions about the competition, contact [email protected] The seven best entries will be broadcast on the website on Fridays and the winner will recieve a free membership to the Phoenix Picture House in Jericho, giving you loads of great benefits including free tickets and and programmes, discounts on food and drink and money off at resatuarants around Oxford. (See here for more details: http://www.picturehouses.co.uk/cinema/Phoenix_Picturehouse/Picturehouse_Membership/

Even more excitingly, we can offer you an exclusive opportunity to have your work screened at the Picture House cinema. For this chance and to feature on a website with over 40,000 hits a week, get your entries in by Wednesday of 2nd week. Whether its comedy, drama, animation, documentary or anything else you can come up with, don’t miss this opportunity to show off your work!  

Working Titles

0

Many of our best-loved books and novels didn’t always go by their now famous names.

Writers write books. Publishers sell them. As anyone working at a publication with any sort of top-down structure will be sure to warn you, what you think is comedy stand-up of the century can often leave editors scratching around for other people’s eyes to gouge, having torn out their own. Where one person sees a Dickens, another person doesn’t see the e, n, or s. The same thing can end up happening with the title you choose for your opus. Choosing a name for your paperback baby is a lot like choosing a name for a real one. (Admittedly not the voice of experience.) ‘Shaniqua’ might mean ‘ornithologically intriguing’ in a rare dialect of Tongan, but some people might just not get it. Often editors, or authors themselves late in the day, suddenly come up with something that clicks. In some cases in the annals of literary history, ‘thank goodness that happened’ is probably the right reaction.

Harry Potter and the Doomspell Tournament

(Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire)

The late 1990s – years when Tony Blair was still ‘Tony’, the centre-parting ruled supreme, and most of us were still defacing clean surfaces with a crayon. And also the days when sauntering into primary school with the latest gargantuan JK Rowling tucked under your little arm made you the most fashionable pre-teen this side of the local main road. (‘I read half of it yesterday. So and so dies.’) In this fourth volume, as any diligent geek will recall, Daniel Radcliffe and his chums somehow get tickets to a high-profile quadrennial international sporting event not in London, host a French and Bulgarian exchange at school, and take part in an intercollegiate competition that makes winning Cuppers look somehow anticlimactic in comparison. No more happy fascination with twee levitation and confectionary that breaks health and safety regulations. It wasn’t a doddle to write – at one point Rowling was halfway through the draft before realising a ‘huge gaping hole in the middle of the plot’. She had planned to go with Doomspell Tournament as the noun to go into the familiar formulaic title; the working title was then leaked. She changed Doomspell to Triwizard before changing it completely to Goblet of Fire, which sounds Grail-arific but is actually eminently attainable if you’re really particular about how you like your crème brûlée served.

Trimalchio in West Egg

(The Great Gatsby)

F. Scott Fitzgerald was not short of ideas when it came to naming his semi-autobiographical story of a man who is rejected by his dream gal and then hopes to impress her with his millions (we’ve heard it all before, Cee Lo). Gatsby; Among Ash-Heaps and Millionaires; Trimalchio; Trimalchio in West Egg; On the Road to West Egg; Under the Red, White, and Blue; Gold-Hatted Gatsby and The High-Bouncing Lover were all considered by Fitzgerald at various stages of writing and publication, although his eggy reference to the debauched character from Latin fiction was his personal favourite. His editor, conscious that this was probably going to go over the most heads of most people without a Classics degree (i.e. the general American public with the purses and wallets to buy the book), advised him to go with The Great Gatsby. Fitzgerald reluctantly agreed, and his dissatisfaction was apparent when, a month before publication, he tried unsuccessfully to get it changed back to Under the Red, White, and Blue. ‘The title is only fair, rather bad than good,’ he grumbled.

The Last Man in Europe

(Nineteen Eighty-Four)

Eric Blair, better known by his pseudonym George Orwell, wrote most of 1984 during the harsh winter of 1947-8 in a thinly furnished abode on the Scottish island of Jura. It almost killed him. Orwell had planned to call his dystopian masterpiece The Last Man in Europe, but was never really sure about the name. His editor, Fred Warburg, persuaded him to go with his alternative idea, the more commercially pitch-able 1984, although no one can be quite certain as to why exactly he came to select this iconic date.

Catch-[pickanumberanynumber]

(Catch-22)

Not many book titles end up as nouns. But Joseph Heller’s 1961 classic provides the now enshrined term which is used to describe awkwardly binding, lose-lose situations. The published title refers to a military regulation (‘Catch-22’) in the novel, which states that being concerned for one’s safety is a sign of sanity – when, in the predicament the pilot characters find themselves in, flying suicidal missions would be insane, yet to claim insanity and to ask not to would demonstrate ‘Catch-22’ and prove otherwise, so you would have to fly more (suicidal) missions. Because of what the ‘catch’ actually was – a listed rule – the name was to some extent arbitrary. Heller had suggested three different numbers before coming to an agreement. The initial offering of Catch-11 was actually fine – had some goddam film called Ocean’s Eleven not been released just a year before. Catch-17 also risked being confused with a film, this time POW camp drama Stalag 17; and Heller’s editor just didn’t like the number 14. Eventually they went with 22, which was considered suitably similar to Heller’s original title.

Most of Jane Austen’s titles

(Various)

Writing in an era when that handsome devil was more likely to marry your sister after a night on the dance floor than ask for your (house) number, and your cousin’s life was the closest thing to a Gossip Girl box set, old Jane no doubt had the sort of wits that would put Mills & Boon out of business. Curiously, she had a penchant for straightforwardly naming her stories after her characters: Elinor and Marianne was the initial title for Sense and Sensibility, The Elliots was her preference for Persuasion, and Susan (whom she subsequently renamed Catherine Moreland) was her first choice for what was later posthumously tweaked to Northanger Abbey by her brother, Henry.  The well-known exception to this pattern is First Impressions, which went on to become one of the most famous depictions of Colin Firth ever, Pride and Prejudice. At least she had her way with Emma, which, as English students have frequently insisted, is slightly better than Take Me Out.

The Dead Un-Dead

(Dracula)

Bram Stoker was going to call his snuggly bedtime favourite The Dead Un-Dead and was still set on calling it The Un-Dead just a few weeks before publication. The revision is a bit less B-movie, though Dracula himself only turns up in a tiny section of the novel, and rest of it is about why it’s generally a bad idea to export legal services to Romania. Stoker’s main antagonist had at first been given the cleverly unsuspecting title of ‘Count Wampyr’, but after reading a book about the history of Wallachia, he came up with the infamous name, based on the notoriously Vicious aristo-Lad Vlad (the Impaler), whose descendants’ family name was based on the Romanian for ‘son of the dragon, or devil’.

Travels into Several Remote Nations of the World, in Four Parts

(Gulliver’s Travels)

Jonathan Swift’s satire of traveller’s tales is right up there with The Borrowers and the Smurfs in Classic Representations of Tiny Imaginary People. Originally published in 1726 with the standard 18th-century-mouthful for a title, it was amended nine years later with a more concise description. Swift titles each ‘part’ of the book with ‘A Voyage to [a made-up, fantastical place]’ although in what has to be a tremendously calculated piss-take Part III is entitled ‘A Voyage to Laputa, Balnibarbi, Luggnagg, Glubbdubdrib,… and Japan’.

Forks

(Twilight)

Mormon fantasy-writer Stephanie Meyer has won her awkward chair next to Jane Austen in the next life with her bestselling, blood-sapping, testosterone-sapping guide to small-town American reality for newcomers to puberty. One thing the two authors can see eye-to-eye on: being a tad vapid in choice of book title. Reading excitedly through FAQs on Meyer’s website – taking care not to be distracted too much by arresting conundrums like ‘…you described Bella’s prom dress in so much detail. Do you have a picture of it?’ – acolytes are told quite bluntly by Meyer: ‘I called it Forks for lack of a better idea’. Disappointingly, this is nothing to do with cutlery. Connoisseurs of humane letters will reliably inform you that the novel itself is set in the city of Forks in the US State of Washington. Forks apparently likes to pride itself on being the ‘Logging Capital of the World’, which can’t be good news for forest-squatting anthropomorphs who flatly refuse to come out on a nice day. Meyer pooled ideas with her editor for ‘words with atmosphere’ to use as a better title, eventually settling on ‘twilight’. Not that not naming it after an actual place invites much certainty about how slightly detached the whole thing might possibly be from real life – the last question on the FAQs being: ‘Is Twilight autobiographical?’ No, says Meyer, it’s a work of fiction. Glad we ironed that one out.

Something That Happened

(Of Mice and Men)

John Steinbeck’s gift of concision makes his fast-paced Californian ranch tragedy a staple of modern American fiction and deliveries of AQA examination materials.  Steinbeck tended to work on his novels under no-frills, to-the-point titles (such as The Salinas Valley for what became East of Eden) before then settling on something more meaningful once he had finished.

Four and a Half Years of Struggle Against Lies, Stupidity and Cowardice

(My Struggle/Mein Kampf)

Godwin’s Law – where would cheap comedy be without it? As history GCSE aficionados will spew forth from rote memory, Adolf climbed onto a pub table in Munich in 1923, ranted, caused a smidgen of kerfuffle, and then swagga’ed down the street into open gunfire, casual. In lieu of capacity to not be a nutcase, Adolf enjoyed some quality time behind bars with some other fellow nutters, during which time he cranked out a hefty volume which was similar to War and Peace only in the sense you can’t read it without going ‘how much of this is there left? Oh, ****.’ What to call this brilliant drivel? Max Amann, Hitler’s editor, considered the manuscript, and reckoned that he definitely wasn’t going to try selling anything called Viereinhalb Jahre (des Kampfes) gegen Lüge, Dummheit und Feigheit (Four and a Half Years (of Struggle) Against Lies, Stupidity and Cowardice), which Adolf had put to him after quite evidently setting aside a couple of less subtle alternatives. Running with this would probably leave the royalties as big as the font size. Amann’s pithy Mein Kampf was a shrewd alternative, and Adolf’s meisterwerk was a hit for a while. But there isn’t a Penguin Modern Classics edition of it on Amazon, so I’m guessing this guy was a bit of a one-hit wonder?

… and finally:

A Week With Willi Worm

(The Very Hungry Caterpillar)

Published in 1969, Eric Carle’s iconic green obesity victim has done a timeless favour for little critters on the undersides of leaves everywhere. Three generations have grown up with the holey progress of this ‘food larva’ as he munches his way from egg to butterfly, but surprisingly the humble caterpillar was not Carle’s original inspiration. ‘One day I was punching holes with a hole puncher into a stack of paper, and I thought of a bookworm and so I created a story called A Week with Willi the Worm.’ In a decisive blow to worms and wormy aspiring thesps, Carle’s editor decided that Willi just wasn’t the sort of star protagonist that would woo the mass market. So Willi was wriggled away with his tail between his legs. ‘Then my editor suggested a caterpillar instead and I said ‘Butterfly!’ That’s how it began,’ explains Carle. That’s right children, trisyllabic interjections win publishing contracts.

Oh my Cod there’s a new sushi plaice in town!

I have to declare my biases. I am a big fan of the Missing Bean. They make great coffee, great cake and it’s one regular latte’s walk from the Rad Cam. So when a barista revealed that they had opened a sushi restaurant in the covered market my reaction was initially one of ecstasy – I love sushi and could now markedly increase the amount of time I spend in Missing Bean affiliated establishments. However, coffee and raw fish are not exactly a match made in heaven. I had vivid images of avant-garde fillets of fish marinating in cappuccinos, or of California rolls served up with my mocha, like one of those little burnt sugar biscuits.      

Anxious for the oppor-tuna-ty to try it for myself, the blonde and I (avid readers of restaurant reviews will appreciate the reference) ventured out of our respective libraries in search of lunch. We’re Finalists (with a capital F), and so not only have our entire identities been subsumed beneath the behemoth that is revision, we also take our pleasures where we can. My drug of choice is food (and coffee, but that is literally a drug and so is ill-suited to the metaphor). 

Sooshe (it’s fun to say, try it) is located in the covered market, reassuringly next to the fishmongers. They give you the option to either take  your food away or sit at the bar. I had had the take away the week before: five pounds for a box of freshly made rolls that I ate in the sunshine – exam-appropriate bliss.

The blonde and I opted to sit at the bar. We were provided with blankets! The covered market is chilly so this was much appreciated. The sit in menu differs slightly from the take away options. For one, it’s more extensive with things like miso soup and edamame. It’s also made fresh in front of your eyes – deftly and neatly.

As I said, food is my current vice, so we opted to have pretty much everything. And let me tell you, we devoured it. I’m sure classier diners would have left the decorative cucumber, or the carrot cut into a butterfly, but nothing was safe. Our greed knew no bounds.

The miso soup was a surprise favourite. It’s rarely anything more than slightly warm water, but this had real depth of flavour and quite the steal for only £1.50. The edamame were also above par – sesame seeds really adding to the whole experience – although the lemon juice might affront purists. We also had wasabi peas, which I love if only because I like the feeling in my nose when you eat too many too quickly.

Then there was the sushi. It was brill-iant. We had tuna and salmon sashimi, eel nigiri, rainbow rolls and tobiko rolls. Sashimi is usually my favourite. I like it when you can really tell you’re eating raw fish. But in this case the really excellent rolls surpassed the sashimi. Rainbow rolls are California rolls with sashimi and avocado wrapped around them. These were made extra-special with the addition of seaweed and sesame seeds.  Tobiko rolls are California rolls with tobiko (flying fish roe) and they were my favourite – great texture.

While Sooshe is not exactly a cheap eat – it is sushi after all – it was very reasonably priced and the take away options are no more extravagant than any other student lunchtime favourites. It’s only a fledgling (the overall name for a baby fish is a ‘fry’ in case you are wondering) operation, but already its product and service is finely tuned. After all, anyone who has attempted to intimidate people into vacating seats at the Missing Bean will hardly be surprised at its success.

Sooshe is open 11:30-17:00 Monday-Saturday

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%5208%%[/mm-hide-text]

Oxford encourages Indian students

0

Oxford University is encouraging potential Indian students not to be put off by changes to Visa regulations that mean fewer international students will be able to stay in the country after graduating.

The new rules mean that only those who have found work with a recognised employer will be allowed to stay on in the country after finishing their courses.

There are 350 Indian students currently studying at Oxford, and most of them are post graduates. The immigration minister Damian Green estimates that around 70,000 fewer student visas would be issued next year due to the recent changes.

Arghya Sengupta, president of Oxford’s 150 year old Indian Society, described the changes as “too drastic,” criticising what he sees as the “intellectually lazy approach” of “a blanket ban.” He suggested that “a more targeted immigration policy is desirable” and argued that Indian students “contribute to the British economy rather than hinder it”.

Students from outside the EU bring 9 billion pounds to the British economy each year as well as much needed revenue to universities. Sengupta added that he believed that the new policy means “several Indian students will re-assess their options regarding joining a British university”.

A spokesperson for Oxford University stated that the issue is one that affects all international students, not just Indians. The spokesperson said, “We would certainly encourage international students to continue to apply” and added that the University is confident that “students will continue to see the high value of an Oxford education.”

Despite the fact that international students will find it more difficult to find work in the UK, the spokesperson stressed the fact that “the high-level skills and knowledge students obtain at Oxford will give graduates a head start in any country.”

Prajwal Parajuly, an Indian student echoed this more positive outlook as “the kind of students” Oxford attracts would not be “discouraged to apply simply because of changes in the visa rules”.

Other universities are also worried about the changes. Umbrella group Universities UK commented, ‘We think some legitimate students may be being put off by the changes,” yet warned, “The message must be that the UK remains open to legitimate international students.”

Miss Representation to be screened

0

OUSU is to show the 2011 American documentary film Miss Representation in Exam Schools on Saturday. The screening will be accompanied by the launch of the Lead for Equality network, described as “a collection of students who want to make steps towards political equality, together.”

Several stalls representing Oxford’s various political groups will also form part of the event. The film at the centre of the afternoon is said to concern “how mainstream media contribute to the under-representation of women in influential positions by circulating limited and often disparaging portrayals of women.” It features interviews with high profile names, such as Condolezza Rice and TV personality Lisa Ling.

An advert for the event stated, “This is where change starts. Join us and be educated, inspired, motivated, and challenged on the issue of political equality in representation – in Oxford University and beyond. “This documentary is guaranteed to widen eyes. Think Michael Moore, think Morgan Spurlock, then times by ten: ‘Miss Representation’ is a comprehensive and demonstrative exploration of why the fight for equality is sill far from over,” it continued.

The film premiered at the 2011 Sundance Film Festival, and has reportedly led to “an important and high profile education campaign in the US.”

Saturday’s event starts at 1:15pm, and tickets cost £4.

Ancient Vatican texts to be shared online

0

A new collaboration between the Bodleian and Vatican libraries will see 1.5 million pages of treasured ancient texts brought into the 21st century.

The new four-year project, funded by a £2 million award from the Polonsky foundation, will make texts freely available online to the general public and researchers. Online material is set to include manuscripts from Homer and Plato, and what is believed to be the earliest Hebrew codex.

Sarah Thomas, Bodley’s librarian, said that the digitisation project would “transcend the limitations of time and space” and would allow scholars to “interrogate the texts with fresh approaches” by bringing together texts that have previously been dispersed.

Dr Leonard Polonsky, founder of the Polonsky Foundation that has supported the Bodleian’s previous digitisation projects, explained that “21st century technology provides the opportunity for collaborations between cultural institutions in the way they manage and make available the knowledge and expertise they hold.”

Monsignor Cesare Pasini, the Prefect of the Vatican Library, also recognised the importance of increasing the accessibility of key texts, saying that with the joint initiative, “Two Libraries will continue to accomplish their mission for the benefit of science and culture.”

Diarmaid MacCulloch, Professor of the History of the Church at St Cross College told Cherwell, “It’s always good to see custodians of precious manuscripts making primary sources widely available for general readers beyond the specialists in universities and to see two of the world’s greatest and oldest libraries co-operating as Bodley and the Vatican have done, is particularly cheering’.

Students have also backed the view that the digitisation project would prove beneficial to everybody and not just specialists. Becky Jowsey, 1st year Philosophy and Theology student at Keble College, said that the collaboration could help solve problems caused by differing textual interpretations, adding that ‘by giving people access to the original texts in an easy-to-use, familiar digital format, we give people the tools to turn negative disagreement into positive dialogue by giving them new resources’.

Jack Andrews, 2nd year Theology student at Mansfield College warned Cherwell that the project ‘may not be as revealing as Dan Brown fans would like to imagine’ although ‘it will be very interesting to see what new approaches to ancient texts emerge as a result.’

 

Oxford student to carry Olympic torch

0

A student campaigner, who set up a charity to deal with eating disorders, has been chosen to carry the Olympic Torch through part of Oxford. Nicola Byrom, a 24 year old PHD student, began the charity ‘Student Run Self Help’ (SRSH) which helps those with eating disorders by “enabling to run safe and effective self help groups” within their universities.

Byrom suffered from an eating disorder herself, and “following work running a self help group for B-eat, was keen to develop a system to engage university students in running self help groups”, the website of SRSH explains.

Set up in 2009, the charity now operates at 14 universities throughout Britain, it has helped a total of 200 students within the last year. Byrom is one of only 3 people from Oxford University to be put forward for nomination, and on a national level, she will be one of 8000 carefully selected individuals. The bearers are chosen to carry the Olympic torch because of their inspirational work in their chosen field.

On the 9th July Nicola will be fulfilling 300 metres of the torch’s seventy day long itinerary across Britain, starting at Land’s End and ending in the Olympic Stadium. It is hoped that the Olympic Flame will come within ten miles of the 95% of people in the UK, Isle of Man, Guernsey and Jersey, celebrating the achievements of individuals such as Byrom in their local area.

“It’s great to see the Olympics being used to highlight issues that affect the world at large, as well as ways in which to tackle them” said Hugh Jeffery, a student at Wadham.

Cameron Cook (Lincoln College) also supported the University’s decision to use its prestige to bring such issues to the fore, both within the University itself and in the wider public sphere.

For more information about Student Run Self Help visit:

http://studentrunselfhelp.weebly.com/who-are-we.html