Wednesday 25th June 2025
Blog Page 1642

Rugby Blues battle Leicester Tigers

0

The opportunity to watch Oxford’s Blues take on England’s most successful professional rugby team attracted an impressive crowd to Iffley Road on a rainy Monday night, but with both teams still shaking off early-season rustiness and the inclement conditions making handling difficult, the suspicion was always that this encounter might not be a treat for the spectators. So it proved, but there was still much wholehearted effort for the crowd to appreciate in an attritional clash.

I headed my scoresheet with the words ‘Ox’ and ‘Tigers’, and though the punning comparison was unwitting, in truth it was a fair harbinger of how the game would pan out. Both sides were impressively strong and committed, but Leicester’s superior pace and predatory skill would ultimately win the day.

If the greasy ball and the formidable opposition weren’t enough to worry Oxford, they were forced into two changes just before kick-off, with Henry Hughes and Cassian Bramham-Law unexpectedly summoned at left wing and outside-centre respectively.

The Blues’ season did not get off to an auspicious start, as scrum-half Sam Egerton’s kick-off failed to travel the requisite ten metres. From the scrum, the Tigers took possession on halfway and a searing break from their left wing took them deep into Oxford territory. A slightly shellshocked Oxford never seemed to recover, and with five minutes not yet played an overlap on the blindside was well finished by Leicester’s flanker to give them an early 5-0 lead.

Oxford’s restart was mishandled to give them a put-in at the scrum and a chance to establish a foothold in the game. Egerton had apparently recovered his kicking boots by now as he sent an excellent kick into the corner. But this promising position was squandered through ill-discipline as Oxford twice infringed at scrums, allowing the Tigers to clear their lines.

 The game was fragmented, as both teams struggled to go through the phases and the referee, employing the new ‘Crouch-touch-set’ command, officiated fastidiously at scrum-time, often blowing up before the ball had even been fed.

Captain James Harris at openside flanker was increasingly to the fore in this scrappy scenario, with one bullocking run into the Leicester 22 eventually leading to a penalty which Bramham-Law converted to reduce the arrears. Meanwhile, on the other flank, Oxford were soon forced to introduce another unplanned replacement in Mike Rickner.

Rickner wasted little time making an impact, soon receiving congratulations for an excellent piece of work at the ruck to win a penalty. With Oxford firmly encamped in the Leicester half and pressing for the score that would have given them the lead, however, Rickner’s next contribution was less propitious. A late tackle after the whistle had gone earnt him a ten-minute spell in the sin-bin.

Inevitably, Leicester made their numerical advantage tell, and a score before half-time seemed inevitable as they laid siege to the undermanned Oxford try-line. But their efforts were repelled by some heroic last-ditch tackling and when a turnover and clearance prompted the half-time whistle, it seemed the momentum was with Oxford.

Sadly that was not the case as shortly after the resumption a fearsome charge by the Tigers tighthead took Leicester within sight of the try-line and a couple of phases later they crossed in the corner for their second try.

A magnificent tap and run from Egerton offered Oxford brief respite from the Tigers’ increasing dominance, but on sixty minutes the Blues shipped a disastrous interception try as a stray pass in midfield was picked off by the Leicester inside-centre, and the score was duly converted.

That always looked likely to be the killer blow, both for the dispiriting manner of its concession and the fact that it took Leicester out of reach of a single score, and so it ultimately proved. But there was still consolation to be had for Oxford through the livewire Egerton, now establishing himself as the Blues’ outstanding performer with a series of searing breaks.

With the clock showing 81 minutes, the shaggy-locked scrum-half dummied and darted over from close range to give Oxford the try their endeavour surely merited.

This was perhaps an experimental Blues side, with the regular captain and vice-captain joining the injury absentees on the sidelines, but Oxford will take some important lessons with them for the coming season.

Their inability to regularly break the gain-line cost them crucial chances to turn possession and territory into points – they will look to their backs to attack with precision and invention to remedy this failing.

Catz go 2-up over Lincoln

0

Monday saw the long anticipated kickoff of the JCR Premier Division Season. After three successive promotions, Lincoln’s first taste of top flight action since 2008 was a match-up with St. Catz, who took 3rd spot in the league last year ahead of Cuppers winners Worcester.

Match day dawned to showers of rain, but following the weekend’s clement weather, pitch conditions were good at Lincoln’s sports ground and the game went ahead.

St. Catz started strongly, winning the midfield battle, and captain Harry Whittle’s pace caused problems for Lincoln’s defence. An early penalty, conceded by Lincoln captain Alec Gower, provided an opportunity for Catz to open the scoring.

Ultimately, the strike passed just over the crossbar, triggering audible sounds of relief from the Lincoln players, but the pressure from Catz did not let off and Lincoln keeper Rob Kelly was called into action for a couple of fine stops. It wasn’t long, however, before they had another chance. Several successive corners were desperately scrambled clear by Lincoln, until Whittle converted in the 25th minute.

After the goal, the game opened out somewhat, with Lincoln pushing forward and Catz countering. Lincoln freshers Simon Vart and Fergus Morgan debuted in midfield, with Morgan providing pace down the left flank, and having his very own penalty appeal around the 35th minute. Catz continued to create chances, with more saves from Kelly and a goal line clearance from Lincoln winger Alex West preventing the gap from doubling.

Lincoln had several set piece opportunities, from free kicks, corners and long throws, but failed to convert before the interval. The score at half time stood at 1-0, with both sides very much in contention.

Catz had a dream start to the second half, Whittle slotting a ball through for Joe Davies, who finished in style. Lincoln didn’t let the 2 goal deficit defeat them, and competed fiercely. Sam Townsend and Nathan Riddell linked well in midfield, along with fresher Alex Wilson who replaced West in the 60th minute. Catz midfielder Tom Larkin carried momentum in attack, spreading the Lincoln defence with some neat playmaking, and a solid performance from centre back Chris Rees provided a platform for Catz going forward.

More set piece chances came for Lincoln, yet the Catz defence was equal to them all, and keeper Joe Kidd maintained a clean sheet. Catz can be pleased for sealing a victory to start their campaign, but Lincoln showed that they can compete with the top sides.

A juicy start for what promises to be an exciting year for JCR football.

Smash It – Series II Episode I

0

Get your weekly sports fix with this swift 15-minute roundup of sports news and chat, complete with panel question feature. What are you waiting for? Get listening!

Oxford second in Times world rankings

0

Oxford University has been listed as number two in the Times Higher Education World Rankings performance table for 2012-13. The university drew with Stanford University, both gaining a score of 93.7. Oxford rose by two spots to secure this position, beating renowned universities such as Harvard, which slipped to fourth, and Cambridge, which dropped by one place to seventh position. California Institute of Technology retained its top spot, scoring 95.5. 

Commenting on the university’s success, Oxford’s Vice-Chancellor, Professor Andrew Hamilton, said, “We are delighted with this indicator of Oxford’s continued commitment to excellence in all areas of activity. World-class excellence cannot survive without proper funding, so we will continue to look to friends and alumni for support, as well as to argue for strong public funding of research and higher education. 

“It is particularly pleasing to have our world-leading medical science recognised. From fundamental science to treating patients, Oxford medicine is changing scientific understanding and changing human health– both locally, through our partnership with the Oxford University Hospitals Trust, and all over the world.”

The Times ranking body assesses over 700 universities across each of their ‘core missions’, using 13 calibrated performance indicators to generate a combined score. 90 per cent of this score is calculated through evaluating the quality of teaching, research and citations at each institution. Other factors considered include the international outlook of the university, represented by staff and students, and the industry income, which is used as a measure of its innovation.

The United States was the most successful country in the table, with 76 of its universities gaining a place in the top 200. Britain was the second most represented nation and France increased its presence on the list from consisting of five institutions to seven. 

Universities in China, Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea appear to have undergone a surge in their performance following huge investments into their top research universities. As a result, many US and British institutions are being challenged by Asian establishments, such as the University of Tokyo which ranked in the top 30 worldwide this year. A spokesperson for the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) surmised that the UK and US “face a severe loss of total position’ as despite still dominating the top 200 list, the proportion of their representation is decreasing.

Oxford academics happiest in UK, says survey

0

A recent survey shows that Oxford academics appear to be the happiest in the country.

The study, carried out by the UCU (University and College Union) identifies hidden stress levels amongst academics and academic-related staff. Completed by over 14,000 university employees, it reveals that staff from around 75 institutions, including Oxford Brookes University and Canterbury Christ Church University, are suffering from the strains of heavy workloads, time pressures and management issues.

According to the UCU survey the University of Oxford is amongst the institutions with the happiest staff, along with the universities of Brunel, Cardiff, Bath and Cambridge.

A spokesperson for the University stated, “One of the University’s overarching strategic objectives is to attract, develop and retain academic staff of the highest international calibre and make the University and its colleges employers of choice for all staff in the international, national and local environments, so hopefully Oxford’s staff are happier as a result.”

Although the University of Oxford is not amongst the institutions suffering from increased stress levels, a report by the Health and Safety Executive’s (HSE) found that academics throughout the country were experiencing higher levels of stress than employees working in other professions.

The well-being assessment in the HSE which is taken on a scale of one to five (five being the highest stress level), revealed that academics suffered from a stress level of 2.61, whereas the overall economy levelled at 3.52. Stress levels of university staff have worsened in the four years since the report.

Financial difficulties have become ever more apparent in the recent news of teaching and Lecturers’ Unions balloting members over a prospective strike due to the 1% pay offer from employers for the 2012-13 academic year.

Lecturers are currently voting on whether they are prepared to accept a fourth year of the below-inflation pay rise, the result of which could lead to industrial action.

UCU general secretary Sally Hunt said, “The result of all this pressure can only drive down standards for students.”

She continued, “With funding cuts, increased workloads and rising expectations from students and parents paying much more for their education, the situation is likely to become even worse.”

Following recent cuts, the Higher Education Statistics Agency revealed in its figures that there has been a 1.2% decrease in the total expenditure of staff costs between 2007/8 and 2010/11.

Academics are under pressure to gain research funding, whilst expectations of lecturers have been raised owing to the rise in tuition fees.

A second year Law student at Lincoln College commented, “If tutors are feeling the pressure of research funding and are having difficulties in receiving financial support, it could have an impact on their engagement with student teaching.”

Dr Digby Quested, a member of staff in the Oxford Department of Psychiatry, said, “Oxford comes high up in most global academic tables which gives most academics in Oxford credibility among peers.

He added, “This is not likely to change with the fee rise, but would slip if Oxford’s academic status changed. Money, while necessary, is not a major factor as long as they have broadly comparable levels to other academic centres.”

The University spokesperson stated that the Oxford “recognises that work-related stress is always a serious issue and wishes to maintain a positive and supportive working environment for all its staff, by providing guidance to managers on how to alleviate stress among the workforce and clear information on sources of support.”

Interview: The Proclaimers

0

As a Scot, it’s an understatement to say that I am familiar with the music of The Proclaimers. They’re a real part of our national culture, and anyone who spends any length of time in the country will come to know the lyrics of songs such as ‘Throw the ‘R’ Away’and ‘Let’s Get Married’ pretty well. The Proclaimers have gone from strength to strength over the past 25 years, gaining an international audience and an incredible reputation, as well as the creation of a stage show, Sunshine on Leith, based on their work which is now being made as a film.

However, talking to Charlie Reid (“the one that strums the guitar”),it becomes clear that the bespectacled brothers never got into the music industry in order to gain fame and fortune. It was a question of necessity. Whilst they and their contemporaries were unemployed, the Reid brothers used their gigs to stay off the dole. When they started out, they found that “there was a certain amount of insecurity generally,” which gave their releases a real sense of urgency and energy.

That insecurity, however, has faded. The Proclaimers are older, wiser, and more secure in their lives than they were when they first started out. Proof of this is their new album, Like Comedy, which is by all accounts a fairly happy, if bittersweet, affair. As Reid says, “it sounds like a record made by people with an older viewpoint, which it is.” The title and the title track reflect the idea that even in tragic circumstances there is a comic element, and many of the songs are songs of contentment and devotion, rather than the angry and strident tone that they often took on in the past.

It’s a case of changing priorities. “The title track reflects a different view on life at 50 than we had at 25. The things that appeared to be really important don’t seem quite as important.” However, that is not to say that The Proclaimers have given up on their politics.

Charlie Reid remains committed to his socialist values, and the idea of an independent Scotland. Although he admits that any referendum is more likely to go the unionists’ way, he remains hopeful about the prospect of independence: “The union between Scotland and England of 1707 came to a crashing end with the election of the SNP. I don’t think it’s ever going to be quite the same again. I think there will either be an independent Scottish nation or a quasi-independent nation within a few years.”

However, Reid eschews the mainstream pro-independence arguments, castigating Alex Salmond for getting too friendly with business and for positing an independent Scotland more akin to Monaco than any northern European social democracy. He also disapproves of flag-waving patriotism and its flipside, anti-English sentiment. Indeed, he even refuses to be categorized as a nationalist. He sees himself as an internationalist who believes in responsibility and democracy. This political vision all comes back to a maxim to which Charlie has adhered since childhood: “You can’t complain then refuse to take responsibility yourself.” This attitude has been apparent in the band’s work ethic and vigorous touring schedule, and is one reason that they have built such a huge following.

There is no one quite like The Proclaimers. Between us, Reid and I found it difficult to come up with a genre that describes their music. The closest we got was Celtic Soul. They claim to be shaped by their influences; “early rock ’n’ roll, R&B, punk, New Wave, old British Pop music, the Hollies, The Beatles… country music as well.” To be honest, their music isn’t any particular genre. It’s just The Proclaimers, and it’s this which has endeared them to crowds for the last 25 years.

Interview: Stuart Broad

0

As a staunch supporter of Indian cricket, the prospect of meeting Stuart Broad, part of the bowling attack that have tormented India so successfully in recent times, was indeed an exciting one. I could ask him, for instance, what it was like to be hit for six sixes by Yuvraj Singh in the inaugural World T20 tournament, or why Kevin Pietersen was not on the plane headed for Sri Lanka last month: a move that would surely have improved England’s stock in the last few matches.

But my attitude changed when I finally did meet him. Stuart has been on tour, but not of the kind we, as cricket fans are used to. Instead of taking wickets he has been writing about them in his new book My World In Cricket out this week.

As I sat down to interview him, I was immediately struck by the humility and professionalism of his demeanour. There was no arrogance or ego that sadly attaches itself to many  international sportsmen these days. Instead, he was very approachable and willingly giving out autographs.

Hi Stuart, so first of all congratulations on the book, I read a few sections this morning. What inspired you to get involved with cricket in the first place?

I was born into a cricketing family. My old man played for England, Gloucestershire and Nottinghamshire, so I was always around on the cricketing grounds when I was younger. That’s where my enthusiasm for the game started. I was lucky to meet some incredible professionals when I was younger, like  Courtney Walsh. It just developed in my back garden. I watched it on TV and it was always just a hobby. I just played it for enjoyment; I never took it too seriously or felt under pressure. My family were brilliant with that. My mum just took me to games and watched: it was never an examination or evaluation: we enjoyed it and that was it. It was a relaxed environment to grow up in.

When you were playing domestic cricket, and got the call up to play for England, did you find that a big step up, especially when considered the pressure put on international players today?

I was still only 19 at the time. I went from playing crowds of 5,000 at Grace Road, Leicestershire to the 50,000 that winter. It was definitely a big step, but I learnt pretty quickly that you simply don’t build it up too much in your mind. At the end of the day whether you’re playing for England in Australia in front of 100,000 or playing for your league side on a Saturday morning, it doesn’t change which ball you bowl, it doesn’t change the skill you have to deliver. So ultimately, it’s about getting yourself in the mental place where you feel comfortable.

So how do you get to that zone where you can feel focused?

I have a lot of routines which I go through every match. They make me feel like I’m at home whether I’m in front of an Australian crowd screaming to kill me or in front of a home crowd; it just makes me feel ready to deliver my skill every time. That’s what’s important to a cricketer.

You talk about this idea in your book, particularly during your time on the India tour of 2009. The crowds over there can often be passionate and intense; what was your experience of this?

It really is a big test as a cricketer to keep your mind clear when you are playing on the sub-continent. The crowds are so passionate about their own players: I’ll never forget when I bowled Sachin Tendulkar out at Bangalore in front of a crowd of 40,000 people. Before that ball, I couldn’t even think straight and when I went back down to fine leg, I saw the crowd were booing and hissing me, because I had bowled their hero out! I was only 21 at the time and that was quite a realisation to me. I thought “Wow, these crowds are so impassioned by their cricket”, and that’s why India is always an exciting place for me to tour. We are hugely fortunate that we have 12 weeks coming up out there with the Test series coming up.

What was it like out in Sri Lanka for the T20 World Cup and how would you evaluate your performance there?

We are obviously disappointed that we weren’t able to retain our crown from the 2010 World Cup as it was something we really wanted to do. But if you don’t learn from your experiences, you get nothing from them. We did have a young side while playing the tournament, mostly 22 to 23 year olds, so the next time we do go to a World Cup they will be 26 and 27 year olds ready to exhibit their skills on the world stage. We had some fantastic individual performances during the Cup, and we made some basic errors which cost us. But it given the format of T20, it was such a tight tournament with about six teams that could have won it on their day. So it was really hard to pick a favourite and I actually think that made it more exciting.

As captain of a T20 team, did you find it particularly difficult to lead the team given the fluidity of the format?

You can’t plan for it. You have to always think on your feet, so if one bowler gets hit around the park you have to switch it around and understand what the batsman is feeling. This is why I love captaining the format and I am sure all captains regardless of level will enjoy the format.

Given your upcoming tour in India, where pitches will play very differently from here in England, how is the team looking to adapt to the conditions?

We are very fortunate to have a month of practice matches in India before the official tour starts, so we have a lot of time to get use the conditions. But I think we as individuals have to take responsibility for our actions. For instance, we will look at how we play the spin bowling, and how we are going to bowl. Obviously if we do all these things, we will be in a strong position going into the series. We know the wickets are going to turn in India but we still have to put runs on the boards and we have the talent to do that.

As I left the book-signing, I couldn’t help but think that Stuart was very much what more sportsmen should be like today: passionate and fiery on the pitch, but thoughtful, dignified and articulate. With the India series fast approaching, England have a serious challenge ahead of them, namely, adapting to the slow turning wickets of the subcontinent: a problem for England in the past which Stuart alluded to. Having said that, with adequate preparation and men like Stuart Broad in the changing room, India will certainly have a challenge on their hands in the months to come.

s a staunch supporter of Indian
cricket, the prospect of meeting
Stuart Broad, part of the bowling
attack that have tormented India
so successfully in recent times,
was indeed an exciting one. I
could ask him, for instance, what
it was like to be hit for six sixes by Yuvraj Singh
in the inaugural World T20 tournament, or why
Kevin Pietersen was not on the plane headed for
Sri Lanka last month: a move that would surely
have improved England’s stock in the last few
matches.
But my attitude changed when I finally did
meet him. Stuart has been on tour, but not of
the kind we, as cricket fans are used to. Instead
of taking wickets he has been writing about
them in his new book My World In Cricket out
this week.
As I sat down to interview him, I was immediately
struck by the humility and professionalism
of his demeanour. There was no arrogance
or ego that sadly attaches itself to many international
sportsmen these days. Instead, he was
very approachable and willingly giving out autographs.
Hi Stuart, so first of all congratulations on
the book, I read a few sections this morning.
What inspired you to get involved with cricket
in the first place?
I was born into a cricketing family. My old
man played for England, Gloucestershire and
Nottinghamshire, so I was always around on the
cricketing grounds when I was younger. That’s
where my enthusiasm for the game started. I
was lucky to meet some incredible professionals
when I was younger, like Sir Courtney Walsh.
It just developed in my back garden. I watched
it on TV and it was always just a hobby. I just
played it for enjoyment; I never took it too seriously
or felt under pressure. My family were
brilliant with that. My mum just took me to
games and watched: it was never an examination
or evaluation: we enjoyed it and that was
it. It was a relaxed environment to grow up in.
When you were playing domestic cricket,
and got the call up to play for England, did
you find that a big step up, especially when
considered the pressure put on international
players today?
I was still only 19 at the time. I went from
playing crowds of 5,000 at Grace Road, Leicestershire
to the 50,000 that winter. It was definitely
a big step, but I learnt pretty quickly that
you simply don’t build it up too much in your
mind. At the end of the day whether you’re playing
for England in Australia in front of 100,000
or playing for your league side on a Saturday
morning, it doesn’t change which ball you
bowl, it doesn’t change the skill you have to deliver.
So ultimately, it’s about getting yourself in
the mental place where you feel comfortable.
So how do you get to that zone where you can
feel focused?
I have a lot of routines which I go through
every match. They make me feel like I’m at
home whether I’m in front of an Australian
crowd screaming to kill me or in front of a home
crowd; it just makes me feel ready to deliver my
skill every time. That’s what’s important
to a cricketer.
You talk about this idea in
your book, particularly
during your time on
the India tour of 2009.
The crowds over there
can often be passionate
and intense; what
was your experience of
this?
It really is a big test as
a cricketer to keep your
mind clear when you are
playing on the sub-continent.
The crowds are so
passionate about their own
players: I’ll never forget when
I bowled Sachin Tendulkar
out at Bangalore in
front of a crowd of
40,000 people.
Before that ball,
I couldn’t
even think straight and when I went back down
to fine leg, I saw the crowd were booing and
hissing me, because I had bowled their hero
out!
I was only 21 at the time and that was quite a
realisation to me. I thought “Wow, these crowds
are so impassioned by their cricket”, and that’s
why India is always an exciting place for me to
tour. We are hugely fortunate that we have 12
weeks coming up out there with the Test series
coming up.
What was it like out in Sri Lanka for the T20
World Cup and how would you evaluate your
performance there?
We are obviously disappointed that we
weren’t able to retain our crown from the
2010 World Cup as it was something we really
wanted to do. But if you don’t learn
from your experiences, you get nothing
from them. We did have a young side
while playing the tournament, mostly
22 to 23 year olds, so the next time we
do go to a World Cup they will be
26 and 27 year olds ready to exhibit
their skills on the world stage.
We had some fantastic individual
performances during the Cup, and
we made some basic errors which
cost us. But it given the format of
T20, it was such a tight tournament
with about six teams
that could have won
it on their day.
So it was
r e –
ally
hard to pick a favourite and I actually think that
made it more exciting.
As captain of a T20 team, did you find it particularly
difficult to lead the team given the
fluidity of the format?
You can’t plan for it. You have to always think
on your feet, so if one bowler gets hit around
the park you have to switch it around and understand
what the batsman is feeling. This is
why I love captaining the format and I am sure
all captains regardless of level will enjoy the
format.
Given your upcoming tour in India, where
pitches will play very differently from here in
England, how is the team looking to adapt to
the conditions?
We are very fortunate to have a month of
practice matches in India before the official
tour starts, so we have a lot of time to get use
the conditions. But I think we as individuals
have to take responsibility for our actions. For
instance, we will look at how we play the spin
bowling, and how we are going to bowl. Obviously
if we do all these things, we will be in a
strong position going into the series. We know
the wickets are going to turn in India but we
still have to put runs on the boards and we have
the talent to do that.
As I left the book-signing, I couldn’t help but
think that Stuart was very much what more
sportsmen should be like today: passionate and
fiery on the pitch, but thoughtful, dignified and
articulate. With the India series fast approaching,
England have a serious challenge ahead
of them, namely, adapting to the slow turning
wickets of the subcontinent: a problem for England
in the past which Stuart alluded to. Having
said that, with adequate preparation and men
like Stuart Broad in the changing room, India
will certainly have a challenge on their hands
in the months to come.

Dispute over Poptarts move

0

The owner of Baby Love has strongly denied claims that Poptarts, the popular gay night, is to move to another club.

Sam Brandon, a long-time DJ at Poptarts and event promoter, has announced that he is leaving the club and is setting up a gay night at Plush.

In an email circulated among students of the LGBTQ society, Brandon wrote, “I am writing to you to inform you that Poptarts will no longer be running at Baby Love Bar due to increasing security threats upon the LGBTQ customers. It is clear that Baby Love Bar cannot support our mission of a safe night out and it is time to move to a venue that share our values.”

He claimed that there has been “a longstanding issue of homophobic abuse directed at clubbers” and also alleged that there has been “a decline in the attitudes of the staff with regards to who is let in.”

Brandon specifically highlighted a recent event, in which he claimed that a man was allowed into the club for three hours despite making multiple homophobic comments and acting violently towards others.

However, CCTV footage viewed by Cherwell shows that the man was in the club for less than thirty minutes under the supervision of security. The owner of Baby Love has added that any such abusive behaviour is not tolerated, and that the man is now barred. He also “strongly refutes” claims that the issue of homophobic abuse has been pertinent, with one member of security commenting, “I’ve been working here for four and a half years and no one’s complained to me about homophobic behaviour.”

The owner also denied Brandon’s claim that Poptarts would be moving, telling Cherwell, “I’ve been running this night for eternity. We will continue Poptarts at Baby Love as we have a responsibility towards the LGBTQ community in Oxford.”

Jack Powell, a third year at Wadham, responded to the claim that Poptarts would be moving, saying, “I think this is a tragedy for LGBTQ students in Oxford. I never felt more comfortable in my own sexual identity than when I could dance to Britney is such an easygoing place.”

A summer of extremism: from Lebanon

0

This summer may not have been the ideal time to do an internship in a Western embassy in the Middle East. Since ‘The Innocence of Muslims’ appeared on the internet, the whole region has erupted in anger, and the brunt of this has been levelled at symbols of the West – most notably embassies.  

The tragic death of the US Ambassador to Libya, along with 3 other US officials, signalled the beginning of a deadly wave of fury that has spanned the entire Islamic world from Indonesia to Morocco, resulting in the deaths of dozens and hundreds of injuries.

In Lebanon, where I have lived for a year, the elusive leader of the Shia militant group Hezbollah, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, called for protests up and down the country against what he called the ‘greatest insult’ to Islam the world has ever seen. The largest saw tens of thousands of angry Hezbollah sympathisers taking to the streets in the capital, Beirut, calling for ‘Death to America’ (the country where the offending film was produced), ‘Death to Israel’ (of course) and, somewhat more puzzlingly, ‘Death to Germany’.

Sadly, Lebanon was not spared the deadly violence and in the northern city of Tripoli, fatal clashes broke out around government buildings after a branch of KFC was set on fire and vandalised.

Given the circumstances, I should probably have been worrying for my life, and yet paradoxically, the local press heralded a new period of religious tolerance in the country.

Quite unrelated to the protests against the film, this ‘new era’ of improved Muslim-Christian relations was proclaimed after the Pope’s ‘Peace Mission’ to the Middle East. The mood in Beirut was electric as hundreds of thousands of worshippers swarmed to the sea front in the hope of catching a glimpse of the Pope-mobile. Some entered into what can only be described as a religious frenzy, laughing and swaying about and whilst muttering hymns.

But what made this visit so significant for Lebanon was not the effect it had on the Christian minority, but rather the Muslim population.

‘I’m so happy he’s here!’ shouted Ibrahim, a Muslim grocer who had travelled down from his small village above Beirut for the occasion. ‘Look how happy everyone is  – it has proved what Lebanon is about.’

And he was exactly right. Somehow the German octogenarian had brought people together, regardless of their religion or sect, proving the incredible coexistence that Lebanon has been famous for.

Whilst the rest of the region was burning, Hezbollah remained silent. Realising the significance of the Pope’s visit, and the danger of anti-West protests turning into anti-Christian ones, Nasrallah judged the situation perfectly and released a statement welcoming the Pope to Lebanon.

Then, a week later, after the Pope was safely back in the Vatican, he knew that a formal reaction to the film was expected of him, and so he gave a fiery speech calling for protests across the country. As is often the case with Hezbollah protests, they proved to be well-controlled and peaceful. Indeed, the only injuries recorded were the result of celebratory gunfire.

Lebanon has had a tough summer. With war waging across the border in Syria, the country was beset by a spate of kidnappings, dozens were killed in clashes in the North, and angry protesters caused havoc by continuously blocking roads with burning tyres.

But, contrary to what the media may make out, it is not inevitable that Lebanon will succumb to the violence that has shaken the rest of the Muslim world, and that which is devastating Syria. The tiny country has shown an incredible resilience and is still basking in the honey-moon of optimism that followed the Pope’s visit.

I never felt remotely unsafe being in the British Embassy in Beirut, or in the city more generally. Instead, whilst protests may have been staged across the country, I trusted that the authorities had the power to contain the anger, and channel it away from the sectarian lines that marble Lebanese society. Whilst these leaders agree that peace is better than war, Lebanon will hold on and weather the storm.

Hunt should keep his opinions to himself

0

Jeremy Hunt, the recently appointed Health Minister, has an infamous mouth. In 2010, it yakked about football hooliganism causing the Hillsborough tragedy and later had to apologise to the victims’ families. In 2011, it congratulated James Murdoch on the progress of News Corp’s takeover bid for BSkyB. Now it’s off on another rant and the consequences for the nation’s health could be dire.

“I don’t want a fat tax. I like my Coca Cola and crisps,” Mr Hunt told the Times last week- end. As for the abortion limit, he deems twelve weeks to be “the right point for it.” These remarks – the first a flippant quip, the second a personal moral conviction – are not only medically uninformed. They reveal a Health Minister dangerously removed from the population for whose healthcare he is responsible.

Let’s begin with Mr Hunt’s desire to see the abortion limit reduced from 24 weeks. Doc- tors are unanimous about the negative impact this reduction would have on women’s health. Only nine per cent of abortions take place after twelve weeks. These tend to be the most vulner- able or complex cases: young girls who either didn’t realize they were pregnant or were previously too afraid too act, as well as those with scans revealing severe foetal abnormalities. A 12-week limit would greatly reduce the ability of tests to pick up on conditions like Down’s syndrome. The spokeswoman for the Royal Col- lege of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, summarizes the government’s contradiction well: “Politicians talk about putting patients at the centre… How is the woman at the centre of her healthcare with something like this?”

Less noise has been made about the health consequences of Mr Hunt’s anti-fat-tax joke, yet they could be equally adverse. The health secretary’s refusal to consider taxation of sugary and fatty foods is a bad omen for the trajectory of obesity in the UK.

Evidence shows that if you want people to stop doing things that are bad for them, taxation is the answer. A ten per cent increase in tobacco prices, for example, cuts cigarette consumption by about five per cent. Britain is now the fattest country in Europe. A fat tax should not be excluded from the discussion of how to tackle our obesity epidemic.

The most worrying part of Mr Hunt’s comments, however, was how out of touch they proved him to be. The proposed abortion limit reduction demonstrates a lack of understanding of women’s health needs and the reality of women’s lives. Similarly Mr Hunt fails to understand that a tax on junk food is not designed to help muesli-munching politicians like himself, but poorer Britons who opt for unhealthy food because it is cheap. This group is the most at risk from obesity.

As well as his partiality for fizzy drinks and salty snacks, Hunt reveals that he had a “moment of shock” when he became Health Minister. Most of the country did too. He would be wise to remember that next time he opens that mouth.