Friday 27th June 2025
Blog Page 1555

OUSU Shortlisted for Sexual Health Award

0

Oxford University Student Union has been shortlisted for the UK Adult Sexual Health Project of the Year by the UK Sexual Health Awards.

The Health Awards are hosted by the sexual health charities Brook and FPA and are designed to reward bodies which demonstrate the best, most creative and innovative work in the field of sexual health.

The eventual winner will be presented with the award at the UK Sexual Health Awards ceremony and dinner on Thursday 14 March at The Troxy, an art deco theatre and concert venue in London. Comedienne Kate Smurthwaite will host the evening, and the UK Sexual Health Awards tweeted, “We’re excited to announce that the brilliant @Cruella1 [Smurthwaite] will be our host at @SHUKAwards!”

Brook shortlisted OUSU’s Sexual Consent Workshops for the UK Adult Sexual Health Project of the Year. The workshops have created discussion amongst undergraduates and post-graduates, and sports teams are also able to contribute, with a version for under 18s which is used in local schools.

The workshops allow young people to discuss what they believe sexual consent to be and the myths surrounding sexual consent and abuse. In the past year, over fifty-one individuals were trained as facilitators to hold discussions throughout the Oxford Colleges and sports teams. 

Suzanne Holsomback, Vice President of Oxford University Student Union, said, “It is a great honour to be recognised by Brook for the work Oxford University Student Union (OUSU) has done on sexual consent in the Oxford colleges and throughout the University.

“OUSU is committed to creating an environment where consent is discussed, understood, and practiced. We desire for the University of Oxford to become a place where students respect themselves and each other by communicating consent, but more importantly, we hope that through these discussions, students will challenge the culture that perpetuates sexual consent and sexual abuse myths.”

On hearing about OUSU’s nomination, Keble’s Michaelmas 2013 Fresher’s Week President Emma Alexander said, “I’m pleased to see OUSU has been nominated for this award, and it’s a good example of the great work they do that perhaps isn’t well recognised by the student body.”

As well as the award for Sexual Health Project of the Year, there are six other categories in the UK Sexual Health Awards. These include Sexual Health Professional of the Year, the JLS Young Person of the Year and the Rosemary Goodchild Award for excellence in sexual health journalism. An award for Lifetime Achievement in sexual health will also be presented. 

OUSU votes against NUS quotas

0

The motion stated that “All delegations to [NUS] National Conference must include at least 50% women, rounded down. Where a union is only entitled to send one delegate and this delegate is not a woman, the union’s free observer place must be taken by a woman.”

In a straw poll taken after the discussion 17 voted in favour, 44 were against, and 11 abstained. The poll is non-binding, meaning that OUSU’s seven NUS delegates can vote according to their own will on this motion when it is brought before NUS’ April 2013 conference.

OUSU currently sends seven delegates to NUS’ annual conference.Five delegates are elected in Michaelmas, and the OUSU President and President-elect are ex officio selected as the final two delegates. The motion would mandate that of Oxford’s five elected delegates, at least three would have to be female, in order to ensure that three of the seven total delegates are female.

The 2013 OUSU delegation to NUS conference consists of three elected women, two elected men, President David Townsend and President-elect Tom Rutland.

The motion was opposed by OUSU Vice President for Women Suzanne Holsomback, who described the motion as “insulting and patronising.” She told Cherwell that whilst the motion “address[es] symptoms of gender inequality and imbalance, it does not tackle the root of the problem.

“The roots lie at the individual student union level and it needs to be addressed at that level. We need to examine what barriers block women running for high level position or seeing themselves in positions of power. Exploring this will create the interventions that will address the root problem. We all want the best delegates go to the NUS Conference and not just the women near by that can fill quotas.” 

Wadhamite Emily Cousens supported the motion, pointing to the results of Scandinavian countries with similar ‘top down’ approaches. She added that it is patronizing to women to say that good quality candidates would not emerge from a quota system. An opponent of the motion countered that OUSU should not seek seven good quality delegates, but the best seven available.

OUSU President-elect Tom Rutland supported the motion, saying that female representation was vital when the NUS considered issues such as abortion rights. 

40% of delegates at the last NUS conference were female. Jack Matthews, a student at University College, said that the number “not good enough, but it hardly constitutes a chronic failure.”

A Somervillian stated that she was “not opposed to positive discrimination itself but to the restrictions this motion would place on a democratic vote”. She remarked that “it flies in the face of democracy to use quotas to restrict a popular vote”.

Top Ten Things Not to Do on Mother’s Day

0

1. Don’t buy the wrong card

This may seem obvious, but this writer’s grandmother was given a sympathy card for Mothers’ Day. As pretty as the flowers on the front of a card can be, suffice to say that it is the message inside that sets the tone (in this case morbid confusion). NB: tongue-in-cheek jokes about inheritance do not go a long way to alleviate the problem.

2.  Don’t use bad grammar in the card

It doesn’t matter how fantastically gushy your home-made card is, many mothers are liable to spit coffee (which you brought to her in bed) all over it if you get the apostrophe wrong. Apparently it’s the day of the mother, not a day for mothers. But you have to suck it up. You’ve got up at the crack of dawn to honour said parent with breakfast that you’ve invested time (and love!) into; it’s really not worth starting a domestic over one rogue apostrophe.

3. Don’t listen to any protestations

Ignore your mum when makes the predictable claim that ‘you don’t need to do anything special for me on Sunday.’ Whenever anyone says you don’t need to get them a present, do the opposite.

4. Don’t go OTT when trying to impress

In theory, making breakfast in bed for the woman who popped you out and reared you is just the right level of kindness display. However, it is a well-known fact that when it comes to culinary demonstrations, playing within one’s means is a must. There’s only so much burn you can get away with by calling it ‘chargrilled’ – stick to tea and toast.

5. Don’t be afraid to ask

You’re not failing by asking her what she wants for Mother’s Day. Yes, you could get her the flowers, the chocolate, the picture frame – but you had better be confident that she will appreciate it. If there’s even the tiniest hint of ‘they don’t last’, ‘I’m on a diet’ or ‘more clutter for the house’ then you’re heading into dangerous territory. If her mantra is ‘it’s the thought that counts’ then you have permission to get any of the above.

6. Don’t give a utilitarian present

If you’re thinking, ‘this year I’ll get her something practical, you know, something she’ll really use’ – just don’t. However well-meaning, the inevitable outcome of this great idea is a gift basket of anti-ageing serum, some Filofax refill pages and a new loose-leaf tea strainer that is guaranteed at best to underwhelm and most likely to offend.

7. Don’t give a novelty present

You might panic and in a fit of blind desperation, give your mum a present that describes itself as ‘novelty’ – for example, a washing-up brush shaped like a microphone, cow slippers that ‘moo’ when you walk or a fountain pen that is disguised as lipstick and is also a key-ring and a torch. Nothing draws more attention to the fact that you had no idea what to get her than a useless novelty gift.

8. Don’t mention fathers

If the egalitarian in you thinks it’s a good idea to thank Daddy as well, beat that thought down with a big metaphorical stick. Unless you want to hear a long and uncomfortable speech about the finer details of childbirth (tick off buzzwords including “tearing”, “fluid” and “stitches”) then if only for this one Sunday, forget that man ever existed.

9. Don’t confuse Mother’s Day with Father’s Day

Father’s Day is in June. Avoid mixing the two up. Gender confusion is not a good way to flatter your mum.

10Don’t get flowers from the petrol station

This is surely a cardinal sin on Mother’s Day. Nothing screams ‘I don’t love you’ more than wilting, brown-tinged flowers being throttled by lurid red cellophane. And if you leave the £1.99 sticker on, you really are up shit creek without a paddle – good luck salvaging that one. 

Hipster Hunt

0

Nathan and Jaehyuk say:

“Inspired by a conversation with the Cherwell photo section about prototypical English hipsters, we set out to find them. We searched charity stores and the Ruskin school, but alas found no hipsters. Instead, we met some of the colorful personalities that roam Oxford, complete with unique looks and stories. We are still looking for hipsters though so if anyone emerges from the Oxford underground let us know.”

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7095%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7096%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7097%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7098%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7099%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7100%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7101%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7102%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7103%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7104%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7105%%[/mm-hide-text]

Scott Mills gives LGBT talk at St Anne’s

0

BBC Radio 1 DJ Scott Mills delivered a talk on Thursday evening at St Anne’s on the dangers faced by gay men and women in Uganda.

The 38-year-old radio personality was invited by Exeter LGBTQ Society to speak to students about his 2011 documentary The World’s Worst Place to Be Gay?, which won an award from Stonewall, the UK’s largest LGB rights organisation.

The talk was held at St Anne’s after Exeter LGBTQ Society had to rearrange the venue at short notice.

Mills, who is himself gay, insisted his sexuality was “not a big deal”, saying, “I don’t really ever want it to define me.” Nevertheless, he is no less passionate about his achievement. He continued, “I would do it all again tomorrow. I am really proud of what we did out there.”

Filmed in a week in late 2010, the BBC Three documentary exposed the endemic nature of anti-gay attitudes in Uganda, where it is illegal to be homosexual.

An ongoing anti-homosexuality bill in the small African state seeks to increase the level of punishment imposed on gay citizens. It has attracted widespread international condemnation, with US President Barack Obama describing it as “odious”.

In the capital city of Kampala, Mills met gay campaigners such as Frank Mugisha, and described his futile search for pro-gay voices in the community – which are practically non-existent in Uganda’s deeply conservative social and religious culture.

Mills also met highly vocal Ugandan figures, such as anti-gay preacher Solomon Male and the proposer of the latest bill, MP David Bahati. The politician attempted to arrest Mills after an interview for the documentary. “It did feel as though we were in some film. I’ve never been that scared,” he recalled. “He told our fixer that he was going to search every hotel in Kampala, seize the tapes, and arrest us.”

On Uganda’s future, Mills was pessimistic. He was sceptical of any viewership of the documentary in the country, and noted how, shortly after filming, one gay contributor was beaten violently to death with a hammer. He commented, “It was really scary at times, and actually quite depressing, because it doesn’t look like it’s going to get better any time soon.”

He did, nonetheless, affirm that the experience left him feeling “very lucky” by comparison.

As well as the film, Mills took questions regarding his career in radio. Talking about casual homophobia in the media, Mills defended BBC colleague Chris Moyles, who was criticised for using “gay” as a derogatory term live on air in 2006. “I know Chris very well, and I know it’s a cliché thing to say, but he loves the gays,” he remarked. “I remember the press calling me that day going: ‘Your friend’s a homophobe!’ and I was like, ‘He’s not.’ But he was right to apologise.”

Audience members were very positive about Scott Mills’ appearance. Fourth year St Anne’s linguist George Hicks thought the presenter was “very well informed” and noted, “He was obviously committed to portraying the situation in Uganda accurately and sensitively.”

Second year musician Toby Huelin found the talk “insightful”, commenting, “Scott is the jewel of Radio 1 and it’s fantastic that he is using his media power to highlight the horrendous treatment of gay people in Uganda. It is shocking to think that everything he describes is happening now – in 2013.”

Hannah Smith, a second year linguist at St Anne’s, agreed. “It was very different to see him speaking in person on a very serious topic, but his passion and honesty were really inspiring,” she said. “It was great to see another side to him and hear his views on homosexuality – I’ll be listening to his innuendo bingo and other work in a different light after that.”

Exeter’s LGBT rep Adam Ward, who organised the event, stated, “Scott is deservedly praised for his fantastic radio work and his brilliant contributions to Eurovision, but listening to his insights on the serious problems confronting LGBT individuals in Uganda was particularly rewarding. I’m sure his well-attended talk will make many reflect on the wider struggle for LGBT individuals in the world and appreciate that even though more can be done, we are fortunate to live in a much more welcoming society.”

Review: Eight

0

★★★★☆
Four Stars

The stage at the Burton Taylor Studio provides a strange sort of welcome for this piece of art: we are confronted with a single chair, and translucent sheets hanging from the rafters. While being strangely powerful, the minimal set confers the challenge of turning script into spectacle completely onto the actors, and they do a marvellous job. Audiences on Tuesday and Wednesday have been treated to a set of four monologues, the Eight being made up by a further four monologues on the following two days. Saturday seems to be the climax, as the best four will be performed in a BT slot which surprisingly is yet to sell out.

The characters of Eight, as incredible as some of them are, are extraordinarily convincing. Even Miles (David Shields), perhaps the most absurd character, manages to convince us in large part thanks to his actor’s portrayal. At first we see the big-headed banker full of bravado, but something is being hidden. As he talks about his experience on the number 30 London bus on 7th July 2005, and his life subsequently, the mask is gradually removed; his loss of social identity becomes apparent and we are left wondering whether he will regain it.

The performances keep getting better. Miles is followed by the entertaining and humorous Millie (Alice Porter), a high-class prostitute who harks back to a bygone Great British era with a philosophy that frequently borders on misogyny. Whilst the previous monologue contained humour amongst darkness, with Millie it feels like a stand-up, albeit with a twist near the end when we realise that perhaps the character is not as happy with their existence as previously thought. It is a shame that in Millie’s monologue the climax is too short, leaving us begging for more which does not come.

But the swift end to one monologue pre-empts the rollercoaster of the next, as we head straight into the dark, troubled world of Mona (Millie Chapman). She is a character trapped, depressed, and mysterious. Chapman’s portrayal conveys the mental anguish perfectly, with impressive and convincing changes in speed, and a physical performance which held the audience silent, still, and sinisterly addicted. Mona makes for uncomfortable viewing.

The subject matter gets no more light-hearted with the final monologue. André (Christopher Adams) arrives at his art studio in the morning to find his boyfriend hanging from above. Again, the subject matter is serious, but Adams’ performance allows us to laugh at the strange, twisted humour of his character. The audience are not sure what to think, and not sure whether to laugh, but from this they hang on to every word.

André’s monologue is different from the others in that it includes a wider social commentary, but like Miles, Millie, and Mona, we are kept interested by characters that are never as they first seem. Characters whose initial confidence slowly ebbs away, and who come to conclusions neither we nor the audience were expecting. Thursday and Friday, with its different set of monologues, ought to be successful in a similar vein. And Saturday might just be a five-star performance. I am tempted to return.

IRSoc rescind Galloway invitation

0

OXFORD International Relations Society has “withdrawn an invitation” to George Galloway, following the Respect MP’s controversial behaviour in Oxford last week.

On Monday the President-Elect of the Oxford International Relations Society, Alex Harries, sent a letter to Galloway’s office informing him that he was no longer welcome to address the society because of his refusal to debate Israelis. 

Galloway had been asked by Harries in December to give a talk and he accepted the invitation shortly afterwards. In a press statement Harries said that although “the Society was very much looking forward to hearing him speak”, its members “value [the] ideals of free speech and honest, open intellectual enquiry and engagement.”

He continued, “It is not possible for us to grant a platform to a speaker who would, under certain circumstances, refuse to participate in the core activities of our society, or who would only do so if we undermine our fundamental purpose.”

Galloway had accepted an invitation to speak to the society on the 29th April, in Trinity Term. The precise topic had yet to be agreed. Harries told Cherwell that “in light of [last] Wednesday’s events it is inevitable that Israeli students would seek to attend our planned event in April.

“We cannot and will not refuse entry to our events to students of any nationality (Israeli or otherwise) and we would not stop them from seeking to debate with Mr Galloway in our Q&A session.” IRSoc’s serving President, Michael Coombs, endorsed the statement. 

Galloway made plain his refusal to engage with Israeli citizens after walking out of a debate with Eylon Aslan-Levy last Wednesday, upon learning of the Brasenose student’s nationality. Galloway branded Israel an “apartheid state” in a statement following the debate. However his fierce advocacy of the Israel boycott movement has led several students to accuse the MP of “racism”.

Hertford Finalists curse sewage

‘FINALISTS’ FLING’ at Hertford had to be cancelled hours before it was due to take place on Tuesday, after the drainage system under the college overflowed, forcing sewage into the kitchen.
 
The black tie dinner, designed for Finalists to enjoy a stress-free evening before the ‘onslaught’ of exams, has been postponed until next week, following a decision by the Home Bursar to close the kitchen until it had been professionally cleaned.
 
The JCR Secretary sent out an urgent email to students which read, “I am incredibly sorry to report that I have just been called into a meeting with the Home Bursar and the head of catering, who have told me that Finalists Fling tonight will have to be CANCELLED.
 
“Apparently the drainage system under college has overflowed forcing sewage into the kitchen, and Beau [the Home Bursar] has made the Health and Safety decision that the kitchen cannot be used until it has been professionally cleaned. I have provisionally rearranged it for NEXT TUESDAY. Beau has said he will talk to the bursar about getting us free wine for the rearranged fling to apologise for this catastrophe.”
 
It was later confirmed that, to compensate for the cancelled dinner, attendees at the rescheduled event will be given half a bottle of wine each.
 
One third-year lawyer commented, “I was gutted that it was cancelled but Hertford are offering us free wine to make up for it so it’s turned out pretty well.”
 
The ‘@whatisinhall’ Twitter account later tweeted, “For those of you who haven’t heard, Finalists’ Fling has been cancelled due to flooded drains in the kitchens.” Students were able to observe through the kitchen windows that the floor was indeed awash.
 
Andy Turner, a third-year mathematician who organised the dinner, told Cherwell, “Finalists Fling being cancelled was a real waste. The whole mishap was a huge drain on everyone’s time and enthusiasm. “The incident stinks of a conspiracy planned by the college’s main rival in food provision, the ATS. The meal has been rearranged to next week, when hopefully the funnel continue unabated, with the addition of complementary wine flushing any hopes of a quiet night down the toilet.”
 
Some students questioned when the incident had occurred. Third-year historian Callum Pirie joked, “We were beginning to wonder why the food had started tasting funny. We thought it was the horse meat.”
 
In an email to Turner which was posted on the JCR Facebook group, Hertford’s catering manager addressed students’ concerns: “Please let me assure you that lunch today was not affected, and all food was prepared and cooked before the problem in the kitchen began. The council are currently working on the drains, and a professional deep clean company are due to clean the kitchen this evening. Meaning that service should resume to normal starting with breakfast tomorrow morning.”
 
Later in the evening, the kitchen was successfully cleaned, with college hall reopening the next day.
 
A third-year engineer, Tom Oakley, sought to make the best of the postponement. “My Mother always taught me that when the kitchen’s
knee-deep in shit, you’ve got to cancel dinner – so although I was disappointed, I entirely understood Hertford’s decision. I managed to
stave off disappointment by making a delicious dinner of pan-fried duck breasts with raspberry sauce, baby leaf salad and sautéed carrots. And then I went to the pub.”
 
However, not all students were able to see the funny side of the situation. Third-year mathematician Adrian Clayton told Cherwell, “It’s too traumatic an incident for me to think up any sewage based puns.”