Thursday 26th June 2025
Blog Page 1551

Oxford Dominate Henley Boat Races 2013

The results of the 2013 Henley Boat Races:

Lightweight Men’s Boat Race: Oxford bt Cambridge by 1 â…” lengths in 6:49.

Newton Women’s Boat Race: Oxford bt Cambridge by 1 ¾ lengths in 7:21.

Lightweight Women’s Boat Race: Oxford bt Cambridge by 4 ¾ lengths in 7:33

Newton Women’s Reserves Boat Race: Osiris (Oxford) bt Blondie (Cambridge) by 6 lengths in 7:41.

 

Oxford won four out of four varsity races on a windy day of racing set at the London 2012 venue Dorney Lake. The Oxford crews dealt better with the rough conditions, taking home wins that included the Newton Women’s Boat Race 2013 and the Lightweight Men’s and Women’s Boat Races.

In the final race of the day, the Lightweight Men’s Boat Race, Oxford’s lower cadence proved successful in the difficult water. Both crews got out of the blocks cleanly, with Oxford taking a slight lead by the 250m point. Rating 34 compared to Cambridge’s 39, they extended this to ¾ length by 500m. Cambridge made a push, holding Oxford’s speed and checking their advance for the middle of the race. But a confident Oxford crew maintained control, and with the crowds cheering them on they crossed the line 1 â…” lengths ahead.

Christian Proctor, cox for the Oxford crew, said, “Conditions were better than they had been earlier in the week actually. It was OK off the start but we got hit by a nasty gust at 250. The race went according to plan; we were actually happier with the start than normally. The guys did really well. The coach too – he prepared us really well for the conditions.”

Cambridge had the better start in the Newton Women’s Boat Race, taking a lead of a few seats after ten strokes. They extended the lead to half a length at the 250m mark, rating 35 strokes per minute to Oxford’s 31. However, Oxford’s longer rhythm proved more effective, as they started to hold their opponents speed. By 750m in, they began eat away at the Cambridge lead, and at the 1250m mark they drew level. Cambridge seemed less comfortable in the choppy water, and Oxford looked commanding as they raced past the crowds of supporters. Cambridge were unable to respond, and Oxford won by a margin of 1 ¾ lengths.

Mary Foord-Weston, who rowed at 3 in the Oxford crew this year and in last year’s losing Oxford crew, said, “It was pretty grim. We trained here throughout the week so we were used to the horrible winds. We weren’t surprised they got ahead off the start, we’re quite a small crew. Our real strength was our race rhythm once we got in into the middle section of the race. Once we crossed the line it took a minute to sink in, but then I was incredibly excited.”

Emily Day, who rowed at 7 in the Cambridge crew, said, “It was pretty windy – it was hard work off the start, but I think all the crews dealt with it pretty well. We had the race of our lives, we’re really proud of how we rowed. There’s nothing we could have done that we didn’t do, we left everything on the water. Thank you for a fantastic race.” 

Cambridge took an early advantage in the Lightweight Women’s Boat Race. However, after the first 100m Oxford began reeling in the slight Cambridge lead, and by 500m had just got their bows in front. While both crews maintained a rate of striking of 34, Oxford looked more stable and solid in the gusty cross-headwind. Oxford had a one length lead at the halfway mark, and the famous Dorney roar helped them extend to a final verdict of 4 ¾ lengths.

Conditions proved difficult for the Cambridge University Women’s Boat Club reserves, Blondie, who were still adjusting their boat when umpire Sir Matthew Pinsent started the crews. Their opponents from Oxford, Osiris, relaxed into the race and showed excellent rhythm, while Blondie rated slightly higher. By the 500m point, Osiris had built a lead of a ¼ length. Their more relaxed approach to dealing with the conditions then paid off, and they extended this to two and a half lengths at the halfway point. Blondie had too much work to do, and Osiris crossed the line well ahead.

A very cold umpire, Sir Matthew Pinsent, said, “The women’s lightweight race was close for the first 500 or so but the Women’s Boat Race had that chance of lead, which was great.

“I’ve definitely noticed the professionalism of the boat clubs going up. I’ve interacted with them during trial eights, had briefings this week and was at the weigh-in and their expectations are rising.” 

Downing College, Cambridge, triumphed over St John’s College, Oxford in the Intercollegiate Women’s Race. After a tight race that saw both crews still level at the halfway mark, it was Downing that maintained their form over the distance, winning by 1 length. Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge showed excellent class, beating Balliol College, Oxford by 7 lengths to give them their third consecutive win in the race.

Tom James, MBE, presented the winning Oxford presidents with the Francombe Cup for Victor Ludorum.

The Henley Boat Races will return to Henley-on-Thames next year, including for the final time the Newton Women’s Boat race before it moves to the tideway in 2015.

Travel Blog: Moscow in March

0

Yep, it’s cold at this time of year.

But that’s not why you should stay away from Moscow in March.

It’s an awful month to visit the Russian capital, famous for the Kremlin and Red Square. Moscow is currently struggling to emerge from a biting winter. Last time I visited, six years ago, it was winter proper. I didn’t get the relatively long hours of daylight that March affords you, but at least once I returned home I was able to capitalise on bragging rights about the temperatures I endured (“-25C? Phwoar”). To that extent winter is fine. But you should really visit in summer.

March, sadly, is caught between the two with little to recommend it. The temperature has inched close enough to zero for the ice to start thawing. And the consequences are gross: sludge, greyed by exhaust fumes, greases the pavements. It’s also dangerous. Chunks of ice that line rooftops and balconies start to disintegrate and tumble down onto the street below. It’ll rarely kill a man, but it’s bound to ruin some poor sod’s evening.

Moan over (or at least suspended for the time being).

Moscow is a sprawling metropolis and it has all the best features of one. Unlike St Petersburg, which is commonly characterised as Russian’s ‘European’ city, Moscow – provincial, gritty and industrious – feels distinctively otherworldly. Georgian cuisine (extraordinarily delicious) and Russian jazz are two evenings out that I’d recommend to those who have never visited countries within the former Soviet bloc before.

The menu of tourist attractions is impressive. Aside from the Kremlin and Kitai Gorod (a central area near Red Square) there’s plenty to keep you busy. The Pushkinskaya Art Gallery, the State History Museum and Gorky Park each easily consume half a day, and it’s a half-day well spent too.

By contrast, avoid the places that stink of cliché. The grandiloquently titled ‘Museum of the Soviet Union’ was as tacky, tired and tedious as its subject matter and the contents of its gift shop were so overpriced and shitty that I briefly entertained the possibility that the museum had seized upon a brilliant post-ironical metaphor. Unfortunately I don’t think it had: it was just overpriced and shitty.

Right – prices. Tickets for Moscow’s metro system – itself an experience not to be missed – are fantastically cheap (about 50p a journey anywhere on the map). Museum entry is also great value; a bit of eagerness with your Bod card will get you in on a dirt-cheap student tariff in most places.

The problem is that Russian cafes, restaurants and bars all understand the aforementioned government-subsidised largess as a licence to rip you off. Expect to pay close to 500 rubles (£10) for a latte and a hot sandwich, say, in a decent café. Street vendors will charge up to 100r for a soft drink. There are greasy spoons and, of course, value supermarkets to go to instead, but the fruit&veg from such places is invariably poor quality and the meat is of dubious authenticity.

There’s also the issue of being copped by the transit police who, as the notorious wheeze goes, will demand documents that they know you don’t have in order to ‘fine’ you extortionate sums. The government doesn’t issue a corruption price-list but the going rate can be quite high. Apparently though the practice – a tacitly sanctioned means by which law enforcement officials ‘top up’ their wages – is being cracked down on, but nonetheless attempting not to look like a clueless foreigner will serve you well.

I’d promised myself not to give Moscow a withering write-up and, darn it, I have done. Like any city break however, if you have the money, company and curiosity to enjoy Moscow, then you will.

Just don’t go in March.

Review: Broken

0

Broken explores the relationships both within and between three families living in adjacent houses in an unnamed north London suburb: depicting a picture of dead-end Britain seen through the eyes of twelve year old Skunk (Eloise Lawrence). Each of these families are struggling to respond to their own issues– whether divorce, death of a loved one, or mental illness. However, it is the conflict between these families, provoked by the troublesome Oswalds, which is the focus of the film.  

It is difficult to dispute the fact that Broken is a well-made film. The cinematography is very well done and manages to subtly highlight the juxtaposition of the innocent Skunk with the violence and lies that surround her – adding comic details which are appropriate for seeing the world through the eyes of a twelve year old and help break up the often bleak tension of the narrative.

The cast are pretty faultless; each actor develops their role well, and the stereotypical nature of characters such as Mr. Oswald is a fault of the screenwriting rather than anything else. Above all, this film should be watched for newcomer Eloise Lawrence’s excellent performance as Skunk, who she portrays convincingly as kind, trusting and without agenda. Indeed, the scenes between Skunk and her ‘boyfriend’ Dillon in the countryside by a nearby scrap-yard were some of my favourites of the film, offering a kind of escapism from the tension of the central plot.   

However, it is the overwhelming and, by the end, overdone drama and tension that ultimately dominate the storyline of Broken, making it very difficult to come away feeling anything but drained. The initial point of high tension, with Mr Oswald violently attacking Rick Buckley for seemingly no reason, is an effective and attention-grabbing opening to the film. However, as the narrative continues, the amount of drama and tension escalates and eventually reaches unrealistic levels. In a film that is at least on some level meant to be a realist-style examination of troubled modern British suburban life, it arguably ends in melodrama, trying to cram far too much into ninety one minutes. 

Brent is Back

0

“It’s a good cause [Comic Relief]…..I just don’t want to have to join in with someone else’s idea of wackiness. It’s the wackiness I can’t stand.”
Tim Canterbury, Episode 5, Series 2, The Office

After 10 years of saying he would never bring back The Office or David Brent, Ricky Gervais did ten minutes of Brent, and a video for his character’s political reggae song ‘Equality Street’, for BBC’s Comic Relief on 15th March. The laugh, the look-to-the-camera, the attempt to be 15 years younger – the Brentisms were all there for everyone to enjoy.

There was a huge amount to hold sacred in The Office and David Brent, mainly because we were originally left with only twelve episodes and a special. A friend described to me how the ending’s strength owed a lot to the viewer being able to make up their own mind about what would follow, just as with The Sopranos. Would Tim and Dawn stay at Wernham Hogg? Would Gareth continue to be the boss? Part of us really believed Brent had found a long-term partner in Carol, his Christmas party date; he wanted to try her Thai food, and she laughed when his jokes weren’t funny.

Now we’re told exactly where he is and what he’s doing. But Brent would not have lost weight and got into shape, or got a tan, as Gervais has. If you’re going to do one of the greatest characters in television, do him properly. And as we are treated to the full meaning of his song ‘The Serpent That Guards The Gates Of Hell’, we learn Brent had a fiancée who cheated on him, and we’re suddenly meant to believe that Brent had been through a failed engagement pre-Office, which doesn’t really fit with what we had previously seen of him.

Gervais had been developing his ‘Seedy Boss’ character since the mid-1990s, and with Stephen Merchant he spent years writing and perfecting the character into the finished article of David Brent. They spent three years casting the supporting characters, just to surround him with the perfect team. This ten-minute sketch, on the other hand, was clearly hashed together at the last minute in no time at all, with what seems like no contribution from Merchant, whose input to both The Office and Extras should never be underestimated.

And all for Comic Relief, an institution that does great charity work but, in comedic terms, is an expert in the lowest common denominator. It has Michael MacIntyre observing us into oblivion, and lauds James Corden as a comedy icon. Nick Grimshaw getting into a bathtub full of beans is surely the best indicator of the level at which the organisation aims. Why is Gervais even associating with this institution, let alone in the form of his best and most prized creation?

Of course the new segment had lots of funny moments – Brent is the funniest character in British comedy after all. But none of the jokes were new: shouting ‘Charlie’ to the pensioner in the pub and getting no reply just as he shouted ‘Taffy’ to Glyn in the warehouse; shouting outdated, awkward show catchphrases such as “Feck” and ‘Arse’ (Father Ted) just as he did The Muppets’ catchphrases to Dawn; getting out the car and trying to look sophisticated as he holds cleaning products, just as he did in the Christmas Special.

He even reused “sue me”. All these things together have brought Brent closer and closer to a catchphrase character the like of which Gervais demonized in his Extras’ creation, Ray ‘Are You Havin’ A Laugh?’ Stokes. How could you improve on The Office’s reputation? Certainly not by making the same jokes again, ten years on, all for the enjoyment of the BBC1 Friday night crowd.

Brent was funny because of his relation to the other Office characters, and, even when he had been fired in the specials, he spent much of it in the office (tragically), his natural comic environment. The monstrosity of the character Brent put on for the cameras was painstakingly obvious, but the characters (Tim, Dawn etc) couldn’t say so because he was their boss and they had to respect him – they could only let the camera know what they really thought with a simple look of bemusement.

But the studio manager in the new sketch is making explicit Brent’s buffoonery by calling him the “middle aged man in a polyester suit”. He says “horrendous, absolutely horrendous’” to end the sketch, which The Office, written properly (with Merchant), would have left obvious but unsaid. Lower levels of subtlety and sophistication were required, as heaven forbid the Comic Relief crowd might be at risk of not understanding the joke.

The YouTube video of the sketch ends with “Click To Subscribe For More Ricky Gervais”, making clear his quest for as much exposure and as many hits as possible. Gervais asked Twitter whether they’d want a series of free YouTube sing-a-long tutorials with Brent, going through his favourite songs. Of course, the overwhelming response was positive, and now Gervais has agreed to do them, with ‘Freelove Freeway’ the subject of Episode One. The Brent character is dying a death of a thousand YouTube hits, reduced to nothing but a meme, to stand alongside the Sneezing Panda and Charlie Bit My Finger, ruined by over-use.

Gervais realizes each project he does is popular, and this self-awareness doesn’t help – his first two presentations of the Golden Globes were hilarious, but the third time he just knew he was funny. Unlike Daniel Kitson or Stewart Lee, he doesn’t curb this popularity to retain a cult following and a critically pure status, but he pushes for more exposure, more hits, until we are all retweeting him in unison.

A parody Chris Finch twitter account last week tweeted to Gervais “Brent you fat bastard it’s yer good friend Chris Finch” to which Gervais replied “I thought I told you to fuck off”. In sending that line to his four millions followers, ripe for trending and being made into a hashtag, Gervais is trivialising one of the greatest lines in television.

The YouTube videos will bring us to a sadder and sadder saturation of Brent, just as with the animated shows of Gervais, Merchant and Karl Pilkington’s podcasts and audiobooks for Channel 4. We didn’t need a cartoon monkey on a screen to find Karl Pilkington’s Monkey News funny. And we don’t need Brent saying “Guilty, sue me” again, ten years on, to laugh at it. It was Comic Relief wackiness, and as with a lot of things, this is an issue on which we should stand with Tim Canterbury.

Review: Welcome to the Punch

0

Every now and again a film comes out that sounds good, looks good and has a solid idea, but somehow doesn’t quite manage to translate onto the big screen. Welcome to the Punch clearly has the essentials of an action thriller: pace, suspense, a smattering of chase scenes and some cockney geezers to carry it off. So why is it still lacking?

The movie starts by plunging the audience into the world of Max Lewinsky (James McAvoy), for whom things aren’t going too well. He goes it alone in his pursuit for justice and winds up on the floor of a tunnel, having received a bullet in the leg from the mysterious Jacob Sternwood (Mark Strong of Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, Sherlock Holmes). So far so good. We then meet Sarah (Andrea Riseborough of Made In Dagenham, W.E.), who adds a touch of comedy to proceedings, showing clear disdain for Lewinsky’s disillusionment with his work for the police. In the course of all this we meet Daniel Mays (yet another Made In Dagenham alumni) who plays Nathan, a corrupt police officer embroiled in…well actually it’s not that clear what he’s embroiled in. It’s from here that things start to go awry.

From the very beginning we’re geared to hate Sternwood, who ruthlessly shoots poor Lewinsky, however the focus shifts to the point where we see the two adversaries collaborate with little trouble. Sternwood’s son Ruan turns up (albeit briefly to try to help make the plot at least semi-intelligible), then Riseborough’s character breathes her last in a storage container at the rather brutal hands of Warnes. Warnes appears to be a key player in the mess of plot lines and unexplained events, however his lack of screen time at the beginning of the movie fails to convey this. To top all this off, neither the police nor the various unsavoury characters in Sternwood’s circle seem to be able to shoot. As a result, we experience extended shoot-out scenes, disconnected dialogue and James McAvoy running around quite happily, despite supposedly sustaining a leg wound in scene one and a further shot to the arm later on.

The main problem is whilst on paper this movie is packed with ingredients set to induce cinemagoers to perch on the edges of their seats, ironically, it lacks punch. McAvoy is obsessed and consumed by a vendetta, we get that, the policemen are all corrupt because they’re aiding an election bid, we get that, but what we don’t get is anything new. There are no surprises, just a different combination of well-used elements. It’s a disappointing turn from McAvoy and Strong who are both involved with huge movies set to hit our screens: the next X-Men instalment is in pre-production for McAvoy and Strong is currently filming Before I Go To Sleep alongside Colin Firth and Nicole Kidman. Hopefully these projects will be more successful, as despite the good intentions of those behind Welcome to the Punch, it’s a far cry from the knock-out that was promised.

3 stars

St Hugh’s settle court case over "selecting by wealth"

0

A joint statement by Shannon and St Hugh’s said, “St Hugh’s College and Damien Shannon are pleased to announce that they have resolved the dispute between them, and that the Court proceedings in Manchester County Court are at an end with immediate effect.”

In the agreement announced tonight, Shannon will take up his place in Michaelmas. The university has also agreed to review the Financial Guarantee Policy, which ruled that Shannon did not have sufficient funds to live in Oxford, such that he could not study at the university.

The St Hugh’s statement promised a university wide review into the fairness and practicality of graduate funding. “On completion of the review” it said, “recommendations will be put to the University’s Council and the Conference of Colleges for consideration. It is anticipated that the process will be completed by September 2013.”

A source at St Hugh’s told Cherwell that Dame Elish Angiolini, Principal of St Hugh’s, had questioned the merits of the financial guarantee system and whether there should be other options when funding isn’t available.

Shannon was unable to take up his offer last year after the university found he did not have £12,900 living costs. He was suing the college for “selecting students on the basis of wealth, and excluding those not in possession of it.”

In an email to students, St Hugh’s College stated that, “St Hugh’s College and the History Faculty of the University of Oxford have jointly made available to Mr Shannon a place on the one year MSc in Economic and Social History, the course for which he originally applied. Both parties have agreed to pay their own costs and no moneys have changed hands.”

David Messling, OUSU Vice-President for Access and Academic Affairs, told Cherwell, “This is a positive development, and it’s heartening that all involved have recognised the unjustifiable nature of the Financial Guarantee policy as it stands. OUSU, working with MCRs, are closely involved in the review of the Financial Guarantee to ensure that any future policy will not act as a disproportionate and unfair barrier to graduate study.”

He continued, “This case has shone even more light on the issues of postgraduate access – some of the answers are to be found here in Oxford, but many are on a national level where there is mounting need for means-based postgraduate financial support.”

 

 

Debate: What will Hugo Chavez’s legacy be?

0

Joseph Miles – Chavez’s legacy will be one of corruption

I do have sympathy for Chavez. The US has a long history of intervening in countries in order to install leaders in Latin America that are favourable to their policy aims. Chavez’s desire to keep his country staunchly independent from a US plutocracy would have been admirable had he not set Venezuela on the path to being governed by a cult of personality.

Under Chavez’s presidency, he abolished term limits for the president and he also ensured a law was passed that would enable the president to seize dictatorial powers for up to 18 months. Most seriously, Chavez’s Health and Social Minister Roger Capella abused a list of voters who had petitioned for a recall of the President in order to deny dissenters jobs. It is true that Chavez made a public statement calling for the list to be buried, but only after he had first called for its widespread use- ostensibly for catching “illegal immigrants”.

What is clear is that, like all autocrats, Chavez could not conceive of the country functioning without him. He may have justified his executive abuses, as his supporters in the West did and still do, by arguing that these were mere bourgeoisie rights when people were starving. 

Chavez understood his country as revolving around him to such an extent that  he forgot that there would be a Venezuelan people long after there would be a Chavez. His blindness to his own mortality and conviction that he alone knew what the Venezuelans needed means that his successor will come into a position with almost unrivalled power in the democratic world, which guarantees a bitter struggle for the presidency before we know whether Chavez’s replacement has his ostensibly good intentions. If they do not, I fear that it may be too late for resistance.

 

Charlotte Cooper Beglin – Chavez improved the lives of the poor and delivered.

Chávez wasn’t perfect. He took steps to cement his power, supported dictators such as Gaddafi and Assad, and silenced some opposition. However, all too often these less than edifying facts have been used by Western critics to condemn him as a dangerous dictator, and to write off what’s happened in Venezuela since he came to power in 1998.

What rulers and governments are flawless? The United States, perhaps his fiercest opponent, has far from a spotless record on human rights and democratic values – indeed through the CIA the US attempted to overthrow the democratically elected Chavez. Add to that record drone attacks, immigration detention and the death penalty and you realise that Western condemnation of Chavez’s Venezuela is somewhat hypocritical.

Chavez was a democrat. Look at participation, for example; Chávez led a huge drive to register the poor to vote, and was recently elected with a 54-63% majority, in elections that got a massive turnouts (over 80%) and was praised as unscrupulously fair ex-US president Jimmy Carter.

He was no mere autocrat, and recognising his abuses shouldn’t prevent us from celebrating his achievements. His legacy is one thing that is remarkable and refreshing about Chavez; he cared about the poor- passionately cared, prioritised them, and took real measures to improve their lives. A list of his reforms reads like a compassionate socialist agenda: free healthcare, the doubling of education spending, rights for women and indigenous peoples, literacy campaigns, college enrolment drives, workers’ cooperatives…

More than that, he achieved results. In his first decade of rule GDP doubled, while infant mortality and unemployment halved. Extreme poverty has more than halved since 1998 and millions were given access to healthcare for the first time. We shouldn’t have to divide history into “heroes” and “villains”, but while Chavez wasn’t a simple hero, there’s a lot there lot there that we can look to for inspiration of how a government might work more in favour of its people. Oh, and once he called George Bush “a donkey” on air. That must count for something.

 

Redundancies expected at Oxford University Press

0

Oxford University Press is expected to announce redundancies as part of an overhaul of the English Language Teaching (ELT) division. OUP could not confirm how many jobs are expected to be lost in the process.

OUP spokesperson Dan Selinger told Cherwell the review “was designed to assess the external competitive environment, and to explore ways in which the ELT Division can continue to meet the changing needs of teachers and learners across the world.”

OUP are currently engaged in a consultation period regarding the redundancies, and the reorganisation process began in late February.

Selinger continued, “New roles will be created, others may change, and some current roles will no longer exist.”

OUP communications director Rachel Goode said that the redundancies are part of a modernisation procedure. She told the Oxford Mail, “our current structure within ELT dates back to the 1990s. We need to change in order to respond to the changing demands of our customers.”

According to the OUP website, the ELT section is “responding well” to recent demand for digital resources. It states that all its courses “now include integrated digital components, and a growing number of its titles are available as apps for iPhone, iPad, and Android devices.”

OUP is a department of the University of Oxford and has branches on every continent. It is reportedly the largest university press in the world; it produced more than 3500 academic titles last year, and employs around 6000 people globally.

OUP posted £106 million in net, post-tax profits for the 2012 financial year, down from £112.2 million in 2011 but a significant improvement on the 2010 figure of £90.4 million. In 2012, it contributed £54 million for the university finances.

The confirmation of job losses comes as Oxford and Cambridge university presses and publishers Taylor & Francis face controversy over efforts to sue Delhi University for producing ‘course packs’ using extracts from their publications. 309 academics have signed an open letter to the publishers expressing concern at the move.

According to Indian newspaper The Hindu, the letter stated that “we would like to place on record our distress at this act of the publishers, as we recognize the fact that in a country like India marked by sharp economic inequalities, it is often not possible for every student to obtain a personal copy of a book.”

Thomas Metcalf, Emeritus Professor at the University of California, and an academic whose work has been reproduced in Delhi, wrote he is “happy to accept smaller royalties on sales of my books to widen the audience, especially in a developing country such as India”.

The Publisher’s Association has acknowledged that course packs like those reproduced in Delhi play an important role in providing affordable study materials to students in less developed countries. It expressed its desire for legal copies to be obtained from the Indian Reprographic Rights Organization, where a copyright tariff is levied.

In a statement, the Association said “it is vital that those creating coursepacks act within the legal framework which supports the production of high quality educational content. Through this court case we have sought to challenge the illegal duplication of copyrighted materials for sale by a commercial photocopying shop.”

One first-year historian said, “It seems ridiculous that a profitable company is going to have to lay off staff, when its top brass are almost certainly on fairly large salaries. These will simply be more bodies to add to the mass of skilled workers who will now find themselves jobless.”

Review: Wiley – The Ascent

0

★★★☆☆
Three Stars

Wiley may be known as “the Godfather of Grime”, but it’s a certain Dizzee Rascal who has had the biggest impact on the genre, an impact evident on Wiley’s latest album, ‘The Ascent’. Grime is a genre with notably humble origins. Pirate radio, homemade mixtapes and beats made on PlayStations  its roots couldn’t be any more underground. Going from ‘I Luv U’ to ‘Dance Wiv Me’, Dizzee was the first to cross over to the mainstream, creating a career template for ambitious grime MCs everywhere. Wiley, Tinie Tempah and Tinchy Stryder all followed suit. Of course, accusations of “selling out” will follow them for the rest of their careers, but it’s hard to condemn them for wanting a slice of the big time. Putting grime’s internal politics to one side, the important thing is whether the music is good, right?

While he is clearly aiming for chart success with ‘The Ascent’, it’s also clear that Wiley wants to maintain his position at the top of the grime game. The first three tracks are an energetic and promising start, culminating in ‘Skillzone’, a straight up banger with Wiley and seven other MCs showing off their impressive rap tekkers.

Unfortunately when Wiley heads into chart-friendly territory, things often get a bit, well, rubbish. That’s not to say Wiley can’t pull it off; he can. ‘Heatwave’ is a perfect example of precisely how to do chart friendly music well. Uplifting strings and hand claps accompany a catchy vocal hook, which then drops into an outrageously bouncy bassline. It’s fun, unique and enjoyable, the kind of song that makes Park End more than just bearable.

However this is in stark contrast with ‘Lights On’. Generic, boring and extremely forgettable, it’s everything that’s wrong with current chart dance music. I’m talking sub-Guetta levels of quality here. Listening to it, I can almost feel the carpet, sticky from spilt VKs. I can almost smell the mix of sweat, farts and Lynx Africa. It’s not just this song. ‘Reload’ is a similarly uninteresting drum and bass tune. ‘Hands In The Air’ has some slightly more interesting production elements, but the main chorus is still pretty dull.

Wiley is known as one of grime’s greatest MCs, and while his skill and technique is as impressive as ever on the album, the lyrical content falls flat. There isn’t enough of his trademark wit and wordplay, and a bit too much of “let’s go out, drink, find some girls, and have a good time”.

It’s not all so bad though. ‘My Heart’ is a reasonably enjoyable pop tune with a shuffling beat and melodic piano, featuring the omnipresent Emeli Sande and US rapper French Montana. On ‘Humble Pie’, Wiley is at his most personal and reflective, a downbeat and absorbing end to the album.

Overall, ‘The Ascent’ is a fairly average album, but Wiley is capable of so much better. His recent Step Freestyles 1-20, released as two free mixtapes, show Wiley at his brilliant best  funny, engaging, exhilarating and hooking up with the most innovative producers around. In the main, the attempts at mainstream appeal on ‘The Ascent’ smack of desperation. Call me a purist but I can’t help feeling that he could find more lasting success by bringing classic grime back to the forefront.

Review: Stornoway – Tales from Terra Firma

0

★★★★★


Five Stars

In an interview with Cherwell last term Brian Briggs, Stornoway’s lead singer, promised a more mature second album “about growing up” and with an extra sense of escapism, where the band name “seems to fit even better, [compared to first album ‘Beachcomber’s Windowsill’] in a more remote and slightly wilder place.” Bold claims from the frontman of the Oxford based band, but ones that are most definitely met.

From the opening whirling organ chords and the loose and slightly psychedelic drum groove of ‘You Take Me As I Am,’ — outlining Briggs’ wedding day and reminiscent, for myself at least, of Bruce Springsteen’s second offering The Wild, the Innocent and the E Street Shuffle — the album instantly implements the sense of escapism Briggs alluded to at the band’s homecoming show at the Oxford Town Hall on February 15th.   

Jonathan Quin, the keyboard player/multi-instrumentalist for the band and ex-Oxford postgraduate music student, creates complex yet seemingly infectious arrangements to accompany Briggs’s heartfelt delivery of his sincere lyrical content which effortlessly floats above the musical texture, never dominating yet somehow also never intruded upon. The chorus of the first single, ‘Knock Me On the Head’ showcases these infectious arrangements in all their glory with the syncopated musical undercurrents being supplemented by four-part vocal harmony that is in direct contrast to the driving, and almost motoric, verse keyboard synth and drum accompaniment.

Stornoway are a band firmly rooted in Oxford, with Briggs and Quin having met at Wolfson College during their time as postgraduates there. Briggs was researching bird activity on the Thames whilst Quin was interested in Russian folk song. They spoke of “zorbing through Cowley” during their first album and subsequent hit single. Whilst there are no obvious direct references to Oxford in Tales from Terra Firma, song titles such as the stripped back and acoustic ‘The Great Procrastinator’ (performed on the balcony of the town hall on February 15th) with lyrics such as “I’m a scientist with far too many metaphors and far too little data to conclude in time” seem to coincide with the predicaments and day-to-day life of the Oxford student particularly well!  

Although, as previously mentioned, the complex and stylistically interwoven arrangements of earlier tracks such as ‘You Take Me As I Am’ and another infectious pop-hit ‘The Bigger Picture’ are particularly enjoyable, and induce a certain amount of uncontrollable foot-stomping and embarrassing head-bobbing, the stand-out track award for me would definitely go to the final offering of ‘November Song.’ A simple folk tune comparable to some early Bob Dylan or Simon & Garfunkel perhaps, it offers the perfect closure to a great album with pure simplicity. Sang microphone and amp-less live, the silence throughout the crowd on each performance speaks volumes (link below) and for me, perhaps, it is the memory of the Town Hall on that February night and the sense of electricity that was present during ‘November Song’ which leads to my claiming that a simple folk-song, the dregs of the album if you like, is a “stand-out track.” Nonetheless, it offers the perfect reflective end to an escapist and reflective album, ambitious as a second offering but completely justified without falling into the “second album trap.” Definitely worth a listen.