Monday 25th August 2025
Blog Page 1478

Why I’ve decided to go Back to School

0

I’m not going to lie, I had the best time of my life during my last two years of school at sixth form. My friendships got even stronger, I loved my lessons (maybe not Geography, odd that I then took that for my degree…) and had a great time as part of the Sixth Form Committee. But what I definitely lacked was more support as I chose where I wanted to apply for higher education. Being told by a certain Mr X, the Careers Adviser, not to apply to Oxford certainly didn’t put me off applying, but it could have done. I am so glad that I ignored his advice and am now working as part of my job at OUSU to support Target Schools and many of other great Access initiatives across the University.

So when about a month ago now Future First approached me and asked if I (OUSU really) wanted to partner with them for the Back to School Week I seized the opportunity (and with slightly more fervor in the knowledge that Cambridge had declined). The ‘Back to School’ campaign launched by social enterprise charity Future First, is aiming next week (the 12-19th October) to encourage more people to join their already 50,000 strong network of ex-pupils. Being part of this network means that you, whether you left school just this year or 10 years ago now, can return to your school, meet current pupils and talk to them about what you’ve done since you left school.

We can all be role models for school pupils, it doesn’t matter if they don’t want to go to Oxford or apply for higher education, it’s about inspiring students, raising aspirations and ensuring that pupils apply for what they want to do and aren’t put off by a lack of information or the wrong advice. Private schools are great at keeping up with old pupils and it’s time for us to make sure this happens in state schools too. And it doesn’t matter if you were privately educated or are an international student, you can sign up on their website too to keep in touch and get involved in local widening participation events in the Oxford area.

I’ve already been back to school a couple of times, once as a Royal Geographical Society Ambassador (how cool am I?) and a second time to chat to students who were thinking of making an application to Oxbridge and had loads of questions about which college/course/the social life etc. Now I want to be part of a bigger social movement. One that is growing fast and is making it’s way across national state schools. Future First and their campaign ‘Back to School’ week are meeting this challenge head on, ensuring that alumni networks are created and used effectively to support and inspire pupils.

I’ve been challenged as part of this partnership to get 1000 Oxford alumni, students and staff to sign up. But right now I’d like to challenge you.

If you want to get involved, and be a part of this social enterprise movement then sign up on their website by clicking here.

Lucie Dawkins’ cultural must-dos

0

BOOK – Saki: The Complete Short Stories (H.H. Munro)

Writing around the turn of the last century, Hector Hugh Munro’s short stories became so famous for their irreverent and dark humour, they earned their author the pen name ‘Saki’. These have always been a favourite of mine, but recently I’ve been revisiting them, and they never fail to reduce me to tears of laughter. From fictitious bishops to insidious felines, and murdered peacocks to charming werewolves, Saki’s macabre prose is excruciatingly funny. None of the stories is more than a few pages long, so I always tend to have a copy in my bag for whenever  I need a dull five minutes filling.

FILM – The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou

I love Wes Anderson’s quirky approach to filmmaking, with every shot packed with so many weird and wonderful details that you have to watch each film again and again before you catch all of it. The Life Aquatic, a fabulously bats story about a marine explorer going through a mid-life crisis with his crew of insecure and red-hatted mariners, I think is Anderson’s best. With an amazing cast, with Bill Murray, Cate Blanchett, Anjelica Huston, Owen Wilson and Michael Gambon, and a soundtrack of David Bowie sung in Portugese, everything about this film is wonderful.

MUSIC – Push The Sky Away (Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds)

Nick Cave really is the modern Renaissance man, whether he’s publishing novels, composing for the theatre, directing films, acting, or putting out great albums with any one of his bands. Drawing inspiration from Dante, gospel, jazz, garbage rock, and well, whatever takes his fancy really, Nick Cave, with the accompaniment of his Bad Seeds, always manages to create something totally unexpected and fab. Push The Sky Away is the band’s fifteenth album, and came out this year. They’re playing in the UK at the end of the month – tickets sold out months ago, but there’s a ballot going for eager beavers.

ART – Francis Bacon/Henry Moore: Flesh and Bone (The Ashmolean Museum)

Francis Bacon and particularly Henry Moore are two of my favourite artists, and the Ashmolean is currently hosting the work of both in one exhibition – bliss. Although working in different disciplines, the two artists drew on surprisingly similar influences, and the same themes can be traced in both their art. Flesh and bones were in fact key to Moore’s modelling process – he used to take bones and leftovers off his plate at the end of a meal and use them as a starting point for his maquettes. Getting to see how the two artists’ work developed separately but in parallel is very exciting.

Lucie Dawkins is directing the Ashmolean’s next Live Friday, ‘The Art of Theatre’, 25th October, 7-10.30pm. It’s a free evening of live theatre, music, workshops and tours, with bars in the crypt and on the roof, in association with OUDS.

Beauty Corner: The Natural Trio

0

Vinegar, honey, garlic: open up any recipe book and it’s almost certain that at least one will appear on the ingredients list. Don’t worry, I won’t go all Masterchef on you – this is a Beauty column after all. Instead, I’ll give you an insight into how these three items that can easily be found in your kitchen cupboard can be your new secret to looking gorgeous.

With new creams appearing on the market each week – from face creams, to eye creams, to I-don’t-even-know-what creams – there is no shortage of products to choose from when creating your beauty regime. The ‘golden ritual’ of cleanse, tone and moisturise has now become standard daily practice. Is this really necessary? It certainly can be time consuming and expensive!  I found myself wondering where they days went when a block of soap would suffice. I had heard rumours that vinegar, honey and garlic used to be considered nature’s secret weapons when it came to beauty. Old wives tales? I decided to investigate. After a little research I was surprised by the variety of uses these substances have. Following some experimentation (much to my poor cardi’s dismay – it was left with a lingering smell of vinegar and garlic) I have listed my favourites below:

Honey for rough skin
Said to delay ageing, keeping your skin looking young and fresh. Rub a little onto chapped hands, lips and feet every night before bed.

Vinegar hair cleanser
After washing my hair as normal, I rinsed it in a solution made up of diluted cider vinegar. My hair looked incredibly shiny – John Frieda eat your heart out.

Complexion cream using honey
Add a tablespoon of honey to a beaten egg-yolk and some corn-oil. Mix to a smooth paste and apply to your face using cotton wool. Leave for about 15 minutes before washing off with warm water.

The juice of a garlic clove for skin infections 
With its antibacterial properties, Garlic can also be used for treating acne.

Lavender vinegar for bath oil 
Simply add 150ml water to dilute the lavender vinegar before use. 

Who would have thought these cooking ingredients could have so many uses in the bathroom? If you have them in the cupboard then why not give it a go? Not only is it cheaper, it’s 100% natural. So natural, the honey-turned-face cream is good enough to eat.

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%8336%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

Should we be scared of the University of London?

0

There are certain assumptions built into British society. One of the most basic of them is that the country’s educational landscape is dominated by Oxford and Cambridge. The two are not only known as Britain’s oldest universities, but its best. University league tables continue to generally confirm this, with Oxford and Cambridge, often interchangeably, claiming the positions of first and second place in the UK. However, there does increasingly seem to be a widening field of competition between the top universities in the UK, which is especially reflected in world rankings.

Now, while not predicting a three way Boat Race any time soon. What appears to be happening is that the traditional two-way rivalry between Oxford and Cambridge is slowly becoming a three-way rivalry that includes some London-based universities, as the gap in quality narrows between them.

It is worth being specific about the London universities we are talking about here. They are University College London (UCL), Kings College London (KCL), the London School of Economics (LSE) and Imperial College London. The first three are all constituent colleges of the University of London, while Imperial left the body and became independent in July 2007.

The increasing challenge, presented by London universities, was reflected in the QS World University Rankings, published last month. The rankings placed both UCL and Imperial above Oxford. The question therefore arises could these London universities soon overtake Oxford and Cambridge? This seems unlikely at the moment. 

One study does not provide enough evidence to establish the existence of a trend. However, the recent Times Higher Education rankings reached some similar results. This is represents a break from the past, since previously Oxford and Cambridge could rely on their reputations, if not of overwhelming superiority then of substantial superiority, to attract the most talented students. Now, they must compete for them.

‘Oxbridge’ and the London universities come from two starkly different traditions. The amazing longevity of Oxford (founded in 1116) and Cambridge (founded in 1209) seems to hold much of the secret to their success. Both have a tradition of excellence, quite literally over hundreds of years. In fact almost no other educational institutions, in the world, have had as much time, as Oxford or Cambridge, to perfect teaching methods. Finally, the distinctive tutorial system (or ‘supervisions’ if you like) is often seen as the key to the educational success of both universities.

The London universities under discussion bear a very different profile. They are comparative upstarts, as they were all founded in the 19th century. They were established with a strong Victorian ethos different to that of Oxford and Cambridge. No doubt, the London universities also draw vitality from the city of London itself. London has an intimidating number of libraries, which makes it a natural powerhouse of learning. Furthermore, the diversity of London and its status as one of the global capitals of the world makes it a centre of debate, which naturally attracts an international body of both students and staff.

However, the whole concept of university league tables is rather subjective and worthy of some scepticism. The result depends on the criteria, which one believes makes a ‘great’ university. Even the weighting of different criteria can lead to radically different outcomes. In addition, there seems to be an inbuilt bias in favour of English-speaking countries in the world rankings, as there is a rather suspicious predominance of American universities on the lists. For example, the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, was the only non-British European university to be in the top 20 of the Times Higher Education rankings. 

What does seem true is there are smaller differences between the top universities, in the UK, and that Oxford and Cambridge are no longer just competing against each other nationally. Oxford and Cambridge have for a long time been competing with other universities on an international scale, this is now increasingly becoming the case on a national scale too. Past success is no longer the harbinger of future success. League tables act as a warning against complacency in an increasingly competitive environment. British universities are one of the things the country can be proud of and, if you can bear to use the phrase, is an area where Britain continues ‘to punch above its weight’. If there are more universities capable of providing an education closer to that, which Oxford and Cambridge do, then that is surely a good thing.

Is Oxford intimidating for freshers?

0

YES:

First of all, University itself is filled with new challenges and experiences, new people and new rules. Even for second years who are helping, Fresher’s week is a mixture of nervous energy and excitement, and from experience, it’s also tumultuous. After being looked after for so long by our parents, stepping out into independence can be a big sigh of relief – followed quickly by panic.The realization that we are now “adults”, responsible for our own households and finances, our own meals and shopping and goodness knows what else, can be a bit of a cold shower. The jump from high school to college is relatively minor in comparison to the jump to University.

Upon arriving here we know relatively few people, if any, and we’re essentially living with strangers for a few days until we get to know them. While we rapidly make friends and learn who the people in our homes are, being by oneself for the first time can be intimidating. And that’s just attending university in general. The University of Oxford is amongst the best in the world – surveys and rankings regularly place Oxford in the top ten, if not the top five. In fact, Oxford was tied second place with Harvard on the Times Higher Education ranking this year, trailing closely behind the California Institute of Technology. Such a high-ranking university immediately illicits fear and apprehension in even the most fearsome of freshers.

While Fresher’s week may not seem too intimidating, the prospect of your first essay and first tutorial is nerve-wracking. To be in a room with someone who is a world-renowned expert in their field, to have your work criticized by someone who probably wrote the book on the subject, and to be expected to defend oneself, is pretty intimidating. I know that for my first tutorials, I was scared – I had never had to defend myself so vocally or quickly before. And the expected workload, the jump from reading perhaps a few chapters a week as homework to reading books for only one essay, is a massive challenge. Confronted with an enormous reading list on the first week, so endless it fills you with a dull, aching sort of dread, is enough to instill fear into the hearts of nervous freshers.

And not even a skype session with your friends from home – an exercise designed to momentarily transport yourself outside the Oxford bubble – reminds you sharply of how much work you have, and how little your friends are doing. Facebook photos of them partying while you are well into your third essay rubs salt into a fresher’s over-worked wounds.

Oxford, as a whole, is intimidating for everyone and embodies the most impossible paradox – It is the one place where probably everyone in the room is cleverer than you, and it is one of the few places where you are expected to be the cleverest person in the room. While most freshers probably enjoyed coming top in their class throughout school and Sixth Form, you quickly become accustomed to an environment where you no longer come out on top on every occasion. Oxford is a lesson in failure as much as success. While you grow used to it over time, and it becomes normal, the feeling of intimidation never really leaves you. But, if it makes you feel better, everybody will be feeling in the same, everybody has some adjustment issue.

Jack Davies 

NO: 

No. As only a handful of places in the UK where red chinos can be worn with impunity, I can categorically state that Oxford is not intimidating.

The university can try all it likes to force you to adhere to its draconian traditions but you still live in a world of Ginsters, Wrigley’s Extra and Alan Carr. While a “Provost” or a “Warden” or a “Gate Keeper” talks Latin at you before you can eat your dinner because it’s really important, remember that somewhere out there E4 is still showing repeats of The Big Bang Theory and E4+1 is still showing repeats of The Big Bang Theory.

If you didn’t feel gut-punched when you opened your parcel from Ede and Ravenscroft and felt the quality of your new gown, I’d wager that your Bridesheaded preconceptions were shattered at some point this week. Around Tuesday or Wednesday, you probably realised that what Waugh didn’t tell you was that when a drunk fresher vomits through your window, you’ll probably end up dragging them back to their college while they whine about how “me and Jonathon can actually make the long-distance thing work, actually” because they can “get with other people, but nothing more”. Eighteen year olds at Oxford are still eighteen year olds.

Mummy and Daddy might have abandoned you to “face the real world” but rest assured you won’t be facing it here. A team of scouts will clean your kitchen, hoover your room and empty your bin all so you can finish that Medieval commentary so salient to the future of mankind. The biggest inconvenience you’ll face is the social embarrassment when they come into your room wearing a protective masks because the beans on toast near your laptop is really starting to smell.

The university removes every obstacle from your life to ensure that you can (though you won’t) work every minute for the next three years. Your intellect will grow while your common sense rots away to the point when the most inconsequential problem seems insurmountable. The “Essay Crisis” is a great example. At three in the morning when you just don’t have time to finish that problem sheet for your 10am tute, you’ll definitely be able to heighten your productivity by bemoaning your plight on four different social media platforms, while Oxford’s homeless sit shivering on Cornmarket. “Losing my essay crisis V!!!!!!!! #Pro-at-crastination!#”

If you spent your summer watching Newsnight for fear of seeming stupid when sparring with some intellectual dynamo between the hors d’oeuvres and the fish course at Freshers’ formal, you needn’t have bothered. Your future Nobel Prize winners will probably be chewing face at Park End in second week and have blown their loan by fourth.

Will Railton 

Preview of Maria Stuarda

0

In the one corner, Elizabeth I – the doyenne of British monarchs. In the other, Mary Stuart – Queen of Scots, the shadow that plagued Elizabeth most of all. At the centre of this opera – an imagined meeting between the two, which begins in frosty politeness before exploding into poker-wielding, name-calling soprano pyrotechnics. It is a great shame that the rest of the music is less inspiring, falling at the least provocation into four-square oom-pa-pa-pa ditties which fail at expressing anything much of note. The second act of this production, despite the presence of two – TWO – deaths succeeds in being incredibly boring, culminating in a twenty-minute paean to Mary’s status as a noble Catholic martyr which, despite being beautifully sung by Judith Howarth (in the title role) and WNO’s ever-fantastic chorus, succeeds in perplexing the audience member given that in the first act Mary seems to spend most of her time attempting to manipulate and/or seduce Leicester (sung by Bruce Sledge) before calling the queen a ‘bastard whore’.

Rudolf Frey’s direction is quite poor – even in Donizetti’s typically ecstatic love duets, the singers essentially stand at opposite ends of the stage doing Expressive Opera Hands before crossing and doing the same thing to the other half of the audience. WNO’s chorus are now well-practised in standing around looking political. For some reason Lord Cecil begins the second act draped over the edge of a ditch in Elizabeth’s apartment – her wonderfully unconvincing slap in the first act is also worthy of mention.
The costumes are mostly quite ugly, Elizabeth’s in particular. Starting the action she sports a singularly hideous binbag-dress before getting kitted up in the sartorial love-child of a hearth brush and an IKEA chandelier. Mary, of course, starts in a kilt, is given the black shiny plastic treatment, and in the final scene removes her coat to reveal a copper breastplate replete with Stephen-Fry-Blackadder-II-style shiny nipples.

All in all, it’s a wonder that any of the cast can muster the conviction and energy to even try. Thankfully they do, and the result does not disappoint. Howarth excels, with a shining tone and a phenomenal top register. Adina Netescu, as Elizabeth, is a little harsh at times but is otherwise very much on top of Donizetti’s score. The male leads sing beautifully and generally characterise well – Alastair Miles as Talbot fits and plays the ‘stiff courtier’ with an appreciable naturalness. Sledge is occasionally a little too puritan for the ‘ardent lover’, but then, what can you do when the music isn’t very good and all the scene changes take seven minutes?

The orchestra, as usual, sound fantastic, and Graeme Jenkins’ conducting manages to keep the stage and the pit in the same place, most of the time.

Preview of Anna Bolena

0

Anne Boleyn has long been a fascination to authors, playwrights, composers and audiences alike. It is in conjunction with Donizetti’s two other Tudor operas, Maria Stuarda and Roberto Devereux that WNO bring Anna Bolena to Oxford this season. The opera charts the last few days of Henry VIII’s second wife, from her arrest to the day of her execution. While there is no mention of it in the synopsis, this production would appear to open with the birth of Elizabeth (on a revolving stage), an incident which we then hear suspiciously little about.

Despite the company’s best efforts, it is difficult to maintain interest in an opera that consists essentially of one-dimensional characters standing around singing very similar tunes all about their feelings. The orchestra, directed enthusiastically but somewhat manically by Daniele Rustioni, attempt to make some sense of the slightly piecemeal overture and after that are relegated, in typical bel canto fashion, to providing similar-sounding accompaniments to the vocal fireworks. The singing, by and large, is fantastic, Katharine Goeldner’s Jane Seymour a well-cast foil to Serena Farnocchia’s Anna. Both are very much on top of anything Donizetti throws their way. In the trouser role of Mark Smeaton, Faith Sherman stands out with a wonderfully expressive and shining tone. She and Robert McPherson, in the role of Lord Percy, Anna’s supposed lover, valiantly attempt to act their parts convincingly despite the fact that their characters spend all their time being desperately in love in that operatic way that means they are unable to do anything that isn’t deeply stupid.

Alistair Miles is a superb Henry VIII, displaying great vocal control, power and expressivity. WNO’s chorus, as usual, sound great and do their best to make standing around in clumps and occasionally wearing bits of chainmail interesting. While the set design brings some handsome darkness to the proceedings, it does occasionally, along with the slightly pedestrian direction, detract from the potential spectacle of the chorus and ensemble scenes. In short, Anna Bolena is a noble effort from all concerned but one which suffers, in the end, from the opera being not one of the greats.

Postcard from Nantes

0

Dear Cherwell,

I hope this postcard finds you in the best of spirits. How was the summer internship at the Telegraph? I’ve got a few minutes spare so I thought I’d drop you a quick line to let you know how I’m doing on my year abroad. I do it ‘cos I care, you see.

It’s two months now since I waved goodbye to the eternal mediocrity of Derby, kicked my two 20kg suitcases through the departure lounge of Liverpool airport, bought a ridiculously overpriced Eat Natural bar at 30,000 feet and eventually rocked up in the delightful, industrial environs of Nantes. Don’t worry, I’d never heard of the place either. Turns out it’s the sixth biggest city in France, and it’s the European Green Capital for 2013. Oh, and they also have a 40 foot mechanical elephant that rides around an ex-shipyard all day squirting water at people. So there.

Nantes is actually a pretty cool city. Too cool in places – and I don’t just mean the weather. By day, tourists gawp at the contemporary art installations tucked away on every street corner. At sunset the city comes alive; its late night cafés and bars packed to the rafters with patrons so hipster it hurts. A former banana warehouse, transformed in the midnoughties into a gleaming strip of shiny new bars, clubs and restaurants, is an iridescent beacon of urban regeneration perched on the grubby banks of the Loire. Nantes’s industrial heritage continues to make its presence felt in every corner of the city. The old biscuit factory still stands defiantly against a backdrop of grey sky, its tower disguised as a Fabergé egg. Today Kraft Foods produces the pillow-shaped Petit Beurres, and the vast premises left behind is a national centre for music and the arts. The Machines de l’Île, home to an enormous nautical carousel as well as the aforementioned robotic pachyderm, is a veritable shrine to the golden age of engineering. Drawing inspiration from Jules Verne and da Vinci, this merry-go-round invites you to straddle steampunk seahorses and sit astride sinister squid as it completes its eerie rotation to a soundtrack worthy of a Tim Burton film. The exposed valves and pistons form a vital part of the aesthetic, and the overall result is a sublime feat of macabre marine mechanics.

But let’s get down to the nitty-gritty. A year abroad isn’t just a holiday. There’s work to be done. For me, this means that from 9 to 7, Monday to Friday, I can be found in the offices of EuradioNantes, a radio station specialising in European affairs. Along with nine other interns from around Europe, I’m here to take part in the biannual broadcast journalist training scheme. My job is to present the daily English language shows. This mainly involves talking animatedly about local festivals, interviewing obscure Italian indie bands, and trying to muster interest in the latest EU agricultural reforms. It sounds fun. And sometimes it is. Sometimes it makes Oxford look as easy as tarte aux pommes. I’m waiting for the day when I come home and have the energy to do more than just feed myself and sleep.

At the weekends it livens up a bit. Saturdays are invariably spent having a breakdown in Carrefour over the lack of sausages, peanut butter, golden syrup and/ or proper houmous. On Sundays, in a desperate attempt to curb the creeping homesickness, I fi nd myself watching Strictly Come Dancing on iPlayer. I still skip the bits with Bruce in, of course. There’s life in me yet. In my darkest hours, I think of how I could have bagged myself a juicy little British Council teaching job. How I could have been sunning myself in some backwater village in Provence, occasionally popping into the local school to point at a few laminated posters of farm animals. And been paid double my current wage for the privilege. But frankly, I would have hated it. For now, Nantes will have to do.

Wish you were here!

Sophie

xx

Interview: Jacqueline Wilson

1

It is January 2nd 2001. With my fluffy Tracy Beaker gel-pen, wearing Tracy Beaker socks under Sketchers trainers (the sort that light up as you walk – never been prouder of a piece of clothing, never will), I am filling in the ‘My Hopes and Dreams’ page of my Tracy Beaker Diary. There, between ‘beat Anna Murray at swimming races’ and ‘pink Tamagotchi’ I write: ‘meet Jacqueline Wilson’. To me, she is the last word in literary genius.

Skip to 2013: I am talking to Wilson on the phone, and the experience is living up to every seven-year-old expectation. She gives elegant, articulate answers, using the word ‘lovely’ at least nine times over the course of the interview and in the process demonstrating how ‘lovely’ she herself seems. At the end of our call she recommends me books (Meg Wolitzer’s The Interestings, if you’re interested), asks me what I want to do when I grow up and tells me how much she enjoyed my questions. I feel like high-fiving my Inner Child.

Wilson’s works sell in their millions. With the exception of JK Rowling, she is the UK’s most prolific children’s author, appointed Children’s Laureate in 2005 and made a Dame three years later. Her books have been adapted for stage and screen and her Nick Sharrat-drawn characters have adorned the usual collection of Paperchase pencil cases, M&S underwear and Argos lunch boxes. There exist at least three spoof Tracy Beaker Twitter accounts.

Her distinctive brand of fiction bases its plots in ‘real-life’ issues, addressing everything from estranged dads to evil stepmothers, bullying best friends to acrimonious divorces. She’s killed off mums, dads, sisters, cats, friends and hamsters. It’s social realism for the Biker Grove generation, with Wilson as a kind of Elizabeth Gaskell-for-kids (a comparison she appreciates – ‘I love Elizabeth Gaskell!’). She tells me she has always been interested in everyday difficulties – ‘even as a child I would purloin my mum’s magazines to turn to the Problem Page’ – and grew tired of the ‘slightly bland’ kids’ books of her childhood in the 50s and early 60s. ‘They presented a safe, middle class life that wasn’t quite what I, certainly, had experienced. I was sure a lot of children would want a book in which mums and dads sometimes quarrelled, or there were money problems.’

With her last book easily topping best-seller lists, she was evidently right about the children. It’s adults that have proved a trickier audience – the parents and teachers who, whether through honest concern or literary snobbery, have persistently judged her works ‘too grown-up’ and upsetting for their target market. Wilson’s response to her critics is diplomatic – she’ll listen if they’ve actually read her novels, but not if they’re just reacting to her reputation as ‘that dreadful Jacqueline Wilson with her books about drugs and sex’.

‘I will say my books can make children cry. But when I reply to the children who’ve written telling me, “Such-and-such made us howl” with, “I’m so sorry”, they reply “Oh, but we liked it!”’

She laughs. ‘Hopefully I’m not traumatising children!’

A Jacqueline Wilson book rarely simply makes the reader cry, however. Challenging themes are treated with childlike good-humour and optimism, with laughter as well as tears. She’s also created some of the most intelligent and interesting female characters in contemporary children’s literature, from bookworm Garnett in Double Act to Tracy Beaker kicking butt. The best girl characters in kids’ fiction are always the least ‘feminine’ and domesticated – Jo in Little Women; George in Famous Five – but Wilson’s are always totally varied and individual, whether they’re naughty or ambitious, shy, clever or funny. Would she call herself a feminist?

‘I think I am a feminist, and I was concerned to find many young readers today who aren’t. At the end of the third Hetty Feather book, for example, she goes off to become a circus ringmaster, which I thought for a restless, ambitious girl like Hetty was a lovely, swashbuckling thing to do. But many readers wrote in upset, saying they’d simply wanted her to settle down and marry the sweet-but-slightly-ordinary boy Jem who’d been brought up with her.

‘It’s touching that girls are such romantic souls, but the idea of Hetty having a career and exciting life didn’t seem to interest them. But I’m working on this.’

Writing books that touch on such sensitive subjects, it’s inevitable Wilson receives thousands of letters from children who’ve found comfort in her characters. She tells me that, though it can be overwhelming, it’s a ‘privilege’ to hear from so many of her readers and be frequently recognised by her legions of fans.

 ‘To hear giggles when you walk down the street – ‘It’s her!’ ‘No it isn’t!’ – and then the tentative tap at my arm and ‘Are you Jacqueline Wilson?’. It’s what every sixty-year old woman would want –

‘It’s lovely!’