Wednesday 15th July 2026
Blog Page 1259

St. Catz grant JCR financial independence

0

St Catherine’s College has provisionally agreed to allow the JCR to be financially autonomous after a financial committee meeting on Tuesday.

Whilst St Catz JCR has recently resolved to change the constitution to allow for its independence, up until Tuesday the College had retained control over JCR finances.

The JCR has a funding system whereby students pay a levy through their battels, which includes money for both the JCR budget and for clubs and societies. However, the College had previously not agreed to allow the JCR full control over this budget up until the provisional agreement on Tuesday.

Without this financial independence, the JCR finances would have been organised using the current arrangements of the clubs and societies system. Under this system, students who are members of a club or society foot the bill of any society expenses themselves, and the College later reimburses them.

Some students have seen this as problematic because expenses can reach several hundred pounds and the College can take up to a month or longer to pay students the money.

St Catz JCR passed a contract in a motion on the 30th of May detailing the steps that it aimed to take towards financial independence. This has now been approved by the College.

The contract included an agreement over a period of consultation and discussion for the JCR to engage with the College in formulating a plan to implement the decision of independence.

The contract lays out several practical matters that need to be seen to before financial independence is fully put into practice.

The JCR noted that before independence could occur, College would have to update its internal governance policies. It also noted that any path to financial independence would have to include appropriate amendments to the College’s constitutional and regulatory arrangements regarding JCR matters.

Part of the contract also aimed to settle an agreed package of measures to restore the College’s confidence in the JCR’s financial autonomy.

These include certain regulations regarding the arrangements surrounding the JCR debit card, the role of the Treasurer and of college oversight. The contract has been provisionally accepted “with some tweaks”.

During this period of consultation, the JCR will be aided by several other colleges who have agreed to provide interest-free loans so that the JCR Committee can continue offering its usual services.

JCR Treasurer Saleem Akhtar told Cherwell, “A lot of progress has been made with regards to the financial situation at Catz. Discussions have been had between the JCR Executive Committee and members of the Finance Committee (FC) for the College and these have concluded with a joint proposal (agreed upon by the Exec and select members of the FC) being brought to the FC. We were given five minutes to present our proposal and were asked questions on some of the intricacies of it.

“We have since heard that, with a few tweaks, the FC will agreed to recommend our proposal to the College. The proposal, should it be accepted, will reinstitute our financial autonomy and will increase oversight from the College’s point of view of the JCR’s Finances. The proposal was contingent on the JCR agreeing to have a minimum discussion period (in the order of months) before we can codify our legal independence into our constitution. It will be a great day for student activism should the proposal be accepted, and we’re hopeful that it will be.”

St Catherine’s College did not respond to Cherwell’s request for comment.

In Defence Of: Spring Breakers

0

Selena Gomez. Vanessa Hudgens. Harmony Korine. Any of the above three names attached to a film ought to scream “awful” to any fan of ‘high’ cinema, and perhaps rightly so. Yet in a weirdly compulsive match, the combination worked wonders with James Franco to bring audiences a terrifying, bubblegum-pop feature that marked the death of sugar-coated depictions of teens and brought about a watershed in recognition of the destructive, murderous tendencies of girls who more closely resembled Pussy Riot than anyone out of High School Musical.

Featuring landmark creepy performances from Gucci Mane, the ATL Twins and Franco, doing his best to imitate southern rapper Dangeruss (not Riff Raff), Spring Breakers gave director Korine a chance to play with the pink-yellow cinematography which defines the film visually; blood-red spring sunsets, neon green bikinis, and the girls’ lurid pink balaclavas combine in a disturbingly beautiful scene in which Franco’s Alien and his teenage posse brutalise rival drug dealers to the maudlin strains of Britney Spears’ ‘Everytime’. It’s impossible not to draw comparisons with the ‘Singing in the Rain’ ultraviolence scene from Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange. The film’s visual stylisation, overstated and exaggerated to an almost dreamlike state, is arguably its strongest point.

For a film about extreme consumption and the excesses of youth, Spring Breakers does well to avoid criticising the girls as they tear through strip clubs and drug mansions. Instead, we are shown a type of happy vulgarity that allows us to make up our own minds about the crimes they commit. The modern teenage girl, according to Spring Breakers, is more than capable of looking after herself.

Cinema: dead as a dodo?

0

The Multiplex is under threat. This is nothing new. Cinema audiences have been declining for decades, pretty much ever since the 40s in fact. After displacing the theatre as a centre for communal entertainment, the cinema has been forced to adapt, firstly by the advent of television, and more recently by that of the internet. Nowadays we see IMAX, 3D, and high frame rates extolled as wonders only available from the much vaunted ‘cinematic experience’. But what does all this mean, and is cinema really under threat?

What it means is that industry bean counters are feeling the pinch. No one values what they can get for free, and the explosion of piracy in the years since video streaming services became an online norm have not been kind to the industry. No longer is piracy a matter of stashing a badly printed DVD cover into your coat after haggling for it with a market trader of questionable morality. No, now piracy is easy – it’s in our living rooms, just a couple of clicks and barely a second thought away. And so people are staying at home and if they are not actually pirating, they are at least flicking through their mile-long Netflix queues.

How has the industry responded? The same way they did when television cannibalised its audience in the 50s – with gimmicks. 3D returned in a blaze of glory, championed by industry heavyweights Jeffrey Katzenberg and James Cameron, only for initial excitement to peter out, and revenues to steadily decline. Since 3D’s 2010 heyday, distributors have moved onto large for- mat screens such as IMAX to lure in the crowds. But these gimmicks only drive audiences to a certain type of film: big, events-driven spectacles, whose box office is inordinately front loaded on opening weekends, where studios, rather than distributors, pocket most of the money. And it means that mid-budget films are headed the way of the dodo, whilst would-be-indie-breakouts remain confined to the art house ghetto, relying on public funding to keep them on screens.

Adding value to the cinematic experience can sometimes be great. But what about the other way that distributors have offset falling revenues? Ramping up the ticket prices. This ill-advised policy has turned audiences off – cinema-going attendance has been in marked decline in recent years, hidden by artificially inflated revenues. What’s more, with chains now offering optional luxury seating (on top of ticket prices inching north of a tenner), the communal experience is being split between the haves and have nots. And when you can lose yourself in a film at home without distractions, it’s difficult to want to pay for glowing phone screens, and the ceaseless crunch of the perennially present popcorn, a reminder that you’re just another consumer to be extorted, whether that be at the ticket booth, or the concession stand.

Anyway, isn’t the cinematic experience the appreciation of film itself – the sharing of a heightened experience of emotion, thought and aesthetics straight from the mind of the director to that of the viewer? Why need this be a communal activity? The impact of first experiencing a film is not diluted doing so alone. Surely no one would argue that any great classic, be it from Bergman, Fellini, Ozu or Coppola, has been withered merely by distance from a release date?

Audiences want, and need, to support the things they love – films wouldn’t get made if no one paid to see them – but cinemas need to meet them in the middle. Lowering prices would bring the crowds back. The extinction that the ‘cinematic experience’ is facing is entirely of its own creation.

Review: Mad Max

0

★★★★★
Five stars

In my recent internet skulking, I’ve come to find that much of the fan conversation surrounding the new Mad Max film is dominated by mentions of age. Director George Miller (who also helmed the three previous entries in the post-apocalyptic car-western franchise) is rounding 70, and it’s been 30 years since the last entry, Beyond Thunderdome. ‘But does it feel like the old films?’ cry those yet to take the plunge.

It’s not an unfair question to ask, but it ultimately does the film a disservice. This is no mere imitation, no attempt to recapture the magic of the 80s; Mad Max: Fury Road has molten blood and gasoline coursing through its veins, and an iron heart to pump them. Miller is an uncompromising visionary, and this is the head-rattling, bone-crunching stuff of his visions. If ever it doesn’t feel like the old movies, it’s because the intensity and insanity have been turned up beyond belief – the result is incredibly fresh and, resoundingly, the best Mad Max film yet.

Fury Road is an exquisite cocktail of elements from earlier films in the series, running a split between the more story-heavy first entry, and the straight up action of the second. Though the film leans more towards the latter (the bulk is essentially one extended chase sequence, with a couple of detours here and there) it nonetheless presents us with some of the franchise’s richest characters, not least in Charlize Theron’s ‘Imperator Furiosa’. Furiosa is an inspired creation, equal parts warrior, mother and leader, which has led many to applaud Fury Road for its feminist bent. If this wasn’t exactly Miller’s explicit intention from the outset, it’s nonetheless extremely refreshing to see men and women so naturally and evenly integrated in a blockbuster of this kind – the rarity of this sort of treatment cannot be exaggerated.

The character of Max himself has seen something of an overhaul from the Mel Gibson trilogy. Tom Hardy is solid in the role, though he lacks something of Gibson’s tacit aura of sly wit. Where Gibson’s Max was a silent, unfeeling warrior, Hardy plays him as an animalistic mutterer, haunted by visions of his wife and child. These visions hark back to the character’s for- mative moments in the first Mad Max film, and do a fine job of setting the stage for those who haven’t seen it. Fury Road is just as enjoyable for newcomers who haven’t seen the original trilogy; this is neither a reboot nor a sequel but, in Miller’s words, an “episode”. The franchise has never been big on chronology and this is no exception, though series veterans will get a nostalgic kick out of the buggy, rig and muscle car designs.

And these machines are glorious. The extended action sequences which make up a significant portion of Fury Road are stunningly and outrageously choreographed, every bit the vehicular equal of The Raid or Oldboy’s martial arts mastery. The scenes are absolutely thrilling throughout, and Miller and co know exactly when to mix it up and throw in new ideas, so it never even begins to feel stale. The effects (largely practical, and you can tell) and imagination on display are uniformly breathtaking. See it on as big a screen as possible – the visceral joy of the visual experience is overwhelming.

Of the (appropriately thin) plot, I could mention the slight middle act sag, when we take a very necessary break from the fireworks. But the film is so fucking awesome (and it’s clear that everyone involved had as much fun as you will) that I struggled to care – Mad Max: Fury Road is the best film I’ve seen this year, and I can’t wait to go again.

Balliol Ball Pres candidate shocks with communist manifesto

0

Undergraduate Xavier Cohen has sparked debate after putting himself forward as a candidate for Balliol Ball President. His manifesto has been seen as tongue-in-cheek condemnation of Balliol Ball as a celebration of elitism.

The manifesto was written as a bid to become president of Balliol’s 2016 Ball Committee, following this year’s ‘Monte Carlo’ themed evening on Saturday 9th May. Cohen is running against one other candidate.

The manifesto proposed to “throw a jokes ‘ball’ with the theme of ‘Bourgeois Balliol Ball’”, following his pledge to “overthrow capitalism for socialism”.

However, the manifesto went on to raise some more serious points about the custom of balls in Oxford, stating, “Whether we admit it ourselves or not, deep down we get off on doing elite shit simply because it’s elite, and this eliteness is predicated on some being at the top (us), whilst others are crushed at the bottom.”

Cohen also expressed his frustration over the fact that his JCR neglected to involve students in the decision to hold the ball, saying, “In future, let’s also have a motion at a general meeting to decide if we actually have a ball in the coming year so that those who don’t want one at least have an opportunity to register their discontent,” adding somewhat tersely that this had led to him to having to “resort to angrily writing ball committee applications”.

Cohen told Cherwell, “Not so long ago, Balliol JCR didn’t hold balls on political grounds, and held a much less fancy ‘event’ instead. I ran for Ball President because… I find it frustrating that the JCR just assumes that we’ll have one without a vote.”

He also highlighted how balls and subfusc, though fun, could “reinforce a really quite nasty hierarchy”.

He added, “When success is defined by being high up in the social hierarchy, of course people want to be a part of something that is characterised in a significant way by it being at the top, especially when you’ve come from the bottom. Our very idea of what is cool and great is hugely marked by this hierarchy.”

Balliol’s Entz rep, Matthew Lynch, attended Balliol’s ‘Monte Carlo’ Ball but felt that Cohen had raised an important point for the College, commenting, “I had a great time at this year’s ball, but there needs to be an opportunity to discuss why it might be a problem, and for people to voice their concerns.

“Xav’s right, let’s think critically about the things that we do here. His manifesto is light-hearted and fun, but it’s got people thinking and talking, and might encourage a GM motion or vote to decide whether this is something that we should do, which I think would be a great idea.”

Mariya Lazarova, a Balliol second year, told Cherwell about this year’s ball, “As one of the ball committee members, the best thing for me was that so many people enjoyed themselves. We had attractions ranging from donutsto a free bar and casino, and I don’t think it was expensive considering what was on offer.”

Balliol College was not available for comment. 

OUSU to keep NUS affiliation

OUSU has voted to remain affiliated to the NUS for the next academic year and not to have an additional referendum.

The motion, proposed at an extraordinary meeting of OUSU Council on Monday at Mansfield College, passed by 37 votes to four, with 13 abstentions. The motion was proposed by OUSU President Louis Trup and seconded by President-Elect Becky Howe.

Trup’s speech in proposition focused on having “a student voice at the highest level of power”. When asked to clarify what the motion meant by asking people to “not be too whiney about it”, he explained, “We need to complain about what NUS do, not about the affiliation… as in we should complain about things,” adding, “Come on, it’s a bit funny”.

Jack Matthews, VP for Graduates, spoke in opposition. He argued that the NUS is not supportive of OUSU’s work, stating, “When we have needed the NUS it has not been there… it has not been value for money.” Currently, the cost of affiliation to the NUS is £27,949.

Matthews also described how “uncomfortable” he felt in “a supposedly democratic setting” when the NUS National Conference applauded Margaret Thatcher’s death.

James Blythe, VP Access and Academic Affairs, stated that NUS had been almost useless in supporting him and that both money and time could be better spent should OUSU disaffiliate from the NUS.

However, Ruth Meredith, VP Charities & Community, and Anna Bradshaw, VP Women, both argued that NUS affiliation had been vital to their roles.

Reflecting on the outcome, OUSU President Louis Trup said to Cherwell, “I’m really glad OUSU has maintained its affiliation to the NUS. The NUS allows for students to be represented in decision making at a national level, which I believe is massively important given national issues students face such as visa issues for international students, tuition fees for undergraduates and disabled students’ allowances. The NUS isn’t perfect, but it gives students loads of good stuff, be that support with campaigns like fossil fuel divestment, liberation conferences or a discount card.”

Jack Matthews told Cherwell, “The NUS has turned its back on the concerns of ordinary students, and all attempts to open it up have been rebuffed. Indeed, less than 24 hrs after reaffiliation, the National Executive voted against proposals to give all students a vote in NUS elections. The NUS is broken, but those of us who have tried to fix it from within know it is an impossible task.

“Just as a worker must sometimes withdraw their labour, so too must we withdraw our affiliation to NUS – it is the only way to make them listen. The status quo will not do; students deserve a better NUS, one that is routed in their everyday interests, and this is why we must continue the fight for reform. Reform that will only come from disaffiliation.”

Top 5 Songs to piss off a finalist

0

1. ‘Always Look On The Bright Side of Life’ – Monty Python

Play them this, whilst simultaneously telling them, ‘It could be worse, you could be doing mods’.

2. ‘Harlem Shake’ – Baauer

I feel like a harlem shake in the Rad Cam right now might result in a mass murder.

3. ‘Crazy Frog’ – Axel F

To be honest, this will piss off anyone in the vicinity.

4. ‘Lazy Song’ – Bruno Mars

“Today I don’t feel like doing anything.” Because you’re a second year and they’re a finalist; yes, they get it.

5. ‘Zombie’ – The Cranberries

Play this through your headphones so loudly that you remind all the finalists around you how little sleep they’ve had.

Review: Gang Albanii – Królowie życia

0

Tearing up the Spotify Top 50 in Poland with a massive 10 per cent of the slots, this week I’m writing about Królowie zycia by the one and only, Gang Albanii. Haven’t heard of them? Well, neither had I until last Saturday. A quick Google search reveals two things: a) they have no English wiki page and there are no English language reviews of their album (making this a Cherwell exclusive I suppose) and b) that they are defined on rateyourmusic.com as falling under the genre of comedy rap.

Now, I have to confess, my Polish falls between sketchy and non-existent. Okay, so maybe it’s just non-existent. On that basis, I really can’t talk about the lyrics. However, I can safely say there is nothing comic about those filthy basslines. The underlying electro vibes fit well with the husky overtones of what I can only presume are unparalleled wordsmithery. Pushing the barriers of dubstep and grime, Albanii’s subject matter is possibly on the adult side, with songs like ‘Marihuana’ (banger) and ‘Napad na bank’ (Bank Robbery). Popek, one member of the group (who is actually quite famous and has collaborated with Big Narstie, JME, Krept and Konan etc) lives in London so with a bit of luck, maybe we’ll see them being dropped on another huge night at Cellar in the coming weeks. Regardless, get on Spotify and get listening.

The last of the Beat poets

0

What do you do with a poet who has outlived his movement? Kerouac, Cassady and Spicer drank themselves to death; Ginsberg and Burroughs made the rickety leap to poet-celebrity. The San Francisco born poet Gary Snyder has survived in part by lingering in the calmer peripheries of the chaotic Beat Generation. He may have been immortalised in Kerouac’s 1958 novel The Dharma Bums, but he has always seemed separate from that break-neck, self-destructive style of living and writing. One of his most famous poems, 1969’s ‘Riprap’, has none of their frenetic urban energy. It begins, “Lay down these words / Before your mind like rocks.”

Snyder’s latest collection, This Present Moment, carries on that stillness. In a poem entitled ‘Wildfire News’, he writes “I have to slow down my mind / Slow down my mind.” 

Snyder’s poetry has an air of calm accumulation; adjectives, places, elements of the natural world are layered in his thin stanzas. For Snyder, observing and accumulating aspects of the world around him is a way into knowing and understanding them, feeling his way around them in his open, conversational tone. In ‘How to Know Birds’, Snyder compiles deft little lists of identifi- able features, “Size, speed, sorts of flight / Quirks. Tail flicks, wing-shakes, bobbing.” Elsewhere in this collection, terms and tribal names act as a guiding thread, a line to follow “from one end of Kerala to the other”, as he writes in ‘Polyandry’.

The emphasis on the immediate and the ephemeral, the ‘present moment’ of the title, is visible in the slight, fragmentary stanzas of ‘Seven Brief Poems from Italia’. As with much of Snyder’s poetry, these bear the influence of Japan’s haiku form, filtered through the Imagists of the twentieth century. His poems thrive in the pared-back clarity of these images, the brittle rhythms of ‘Gnarly’ and the unobtrusive peaceful moments locked into his scenes of nature.

This Present Moment extends its reach beyond Snyder’s Sierra Nevada home to take in Kyoto, Paris, the Kalahari Desert and the shrine at Delphi. A glance at Snyder’s acknowledgements is enough to gain a sense of his global presence, yet his poetry remains rooted in the intimacy of human connections. A poem entitled, ‘The Earth’s Wild Places’, begins, “Your eyes, your mouth and hands, / the public highways.”

As Snyder reaches the latter part of his life – he turned 85 in May of this year – it was inevitable that he would come to dwell on memory and mortality. ‘Go Now’, the final poem in the collection, details the strange suddenness of even a long-expected death. “She watched the small nesting birds / in the tree just outside. / Then she died.” This Present Moment may be one of Snyder’s final collections. If so, he has left us on a characteristically subtle, skilful and luminous note.

Review: A$AP Rocky – AT.LONG.LAST.A$AP

0

A$AP Rocky’s sophomore was always going to be different; the only question was the extent to which A$AP Mob’s star member would switch things up. The psychedelic production of Live.Love.A$AP and Long.Live.A$AP is still around but here it’s married to soulful sung hooks and flourishes of guitar and piano. In opener ‘Holy Ghost’, these complement Rocky’s Southern style; appearances on the record by Juicy J, UGK and Lil Wayne attest to the debt Rocky owes Southern hip-hop. Meanwhile, ‘Everyday’ features a 1970 vocal sample of Rod Stewart, while on ‘L$D’ he surprises by, well, singing.

Happily, Rocky’s irresistible flow remains, both lazy but compelling at once. Mid-album trio ‘JD’, ‘Lord Pretty Flacko Jodye 2’ and ‘Electric Body’ offer trap beats that sound as if Rocky remembered to chuck in some run-of-the-mill gangsta rap as an afterthought – ‘LPFJ2’ has the most menacing beat you’ll hear in 2015 and ScHoolboy Q helps by killing his verse on ‘Electric Body’. As for features, M.I.A. and Future disappoint on ‘Fine Whine’, though Wayne, Kanye and Mos Def are proof, if any was still needed, that Rocky is well and truly part of hip-hop canon. Ultimately, A.L.L.A. offers a fulfilling balance of familiar A$AP Rocky and experimentation. Harlem’s Pretty Flacko has stepped it up and is heading for greatness.