Wednesday 8th July 2026
Blog Page 807

Music finalists raise concerns over ‘illegible’ exam paper

0

The Music Faculty has come under fire after printing an “unacceptable” mistake in a finals exam paper.

Cherwell understands that musical scores provided to candidates during the FHS Analysis exam were incorrectly photocopied, meaning they were almost illegible.

The Faculty only apologised for the mistake after several students raised concerns.

In a letter to the Music Faculty, one finalist wrote: “What happened during the exam, and the way the faculty is responding to this… is frankly unacceptable.”

The FHS Analysis exam is a three-hour unseen paper. Candidates are expected to analyse an unknown musical score provided by the Faculty during the exam. They are not allowed to listen to the piece, and their essays rely entirely on their examination of the printed score.

During the exam on 24th May, many candidates were allegedly given musical scores that had been incorrectly photocopied. The text of the score was “extremely small” and “extremely difficult to read”.

The candidates who had received these “illegible” scores continued with the exam, attempting to annotate the score and write their essays. The error was eventually realised, and after 30 minutes a larger-print score was issued to these students.

One student said that the misprint and half-hour delay made it “impossible to find time to finish.”

Concerns have been raised by finalists as to whether the Faculty can fairly evaluate all students, given only some were affected by the misprint.

Chair of Examiners Daniel Grimley was present during the exam. Six days later, Grimley sent an email to all Music finalists apologising for the problems. He explained that he was “fully aware of the situation” and had overseen “contingency plans we put in place” during the exam.

The University’s exam regulations say that evidence of a “serious problem in the original examination process” is required in order for the Proctors Office to authorise paper re-evaluation.

Grimley said in his email that the issue will be brought to the attention of the Examination Board and discussed with the Proctors Office.

The Music Faculty and the University have been contacted for comment.

Casual racism is endemic in Oxford

5

We set up Oxford’s first Mixed Heritage society this term for a wide range of reasons. Central to this was a desire to create a welcoming and inclusive space for people that may not feel that they fully ‘belong’ to other societies at Oxford. In a world in which being mixed heritage is becoming increasingly common, the ethos of the society is founded on optimism for the future. It provides those with mixed heritages a platform within Oxford’s racial discourse. Both these things are gaining considerable traction.

As someone who identifies as mixed heritage, growing up attempting to navigate places defined by white privilege came with its moments of uncertainty, self-questioning, and what I have come to call ‘casual racism’; instances of almost unconscious micro- aggression, largely from men, that resulted in my discomfort and a sense of displacement within my surroundings.

I came to Oxford in the confident knowledge that it would be a space of uninhibited tolerance in which I could celebrate my kaleidoscopic heritage with others. What baffles me is that certain white, entitled men feel the need to constantly assert what they believe to be their dominance in places like Oxford; places that should be a site for increased awareness and understanding of the multi-faceted nature of our peers and their backgrounds. What saddens me is that this is not a singular occurrence.

Upon speaking to other women of mixed heritages, these instances of seemingly ‘casual’ racism are a daily occurrence. There is an undeniable communal feeling of being exoticised by men who use language in order to demean, demonise, and fetishise mixed-race women. Being a young mixed-race or mixed-heritage individual requires finding an equilibrium between open-mindedness and vulnerability in disclosure of your identity, and maintaining a guard against potential prejudice. This balancing act is exhausting, and yet maddeningly inevitable. Of course, I fully acknowledge my privilege as being a mixed-heritage woman who can easily pass as white, but the fact that I endure this incessant micro-aggression and am made to feel uncomfortable about being mixed-heritage is telling of the environment we are fostering here at Oxford.

In the wake of the publication of Oxford’s admissions statistics, it seems more important than ever to confront these issues surrounding marginalisation head-on, with increased frankness and transparency. In her forward to the report, vice chancellor Louise Richardson maintains that “in these debates emotion often trumps evidence, the facts are often overlooked.”

However, it is impossible to neglect the importance of emotion within this discourse. As a female, mixed-heritage student who has been subject to instances of racial quips and more serious insults, I have the right to anger and disdain at how our university approaches, or indeed doesn’t approach, these cases of “casual racism” that are still so prevalent.

How can we encourage students from a range of backgrounds to apply when the news is fraught with instances of misogyny, classism, and racism in our Universities?

A glimmer of hope this week came from the statement made by the JCR Presidents’ Committee, which concluded that “There is a place for you here”. This message of optimism was a powerful one, and illustrated how the majority of the University’s student body share a vision of unity and equality.

However, while diversity and access are at the forefront of many University-wide initiatives and societies, it is clearly not enough and there is undeniably more to be done and over- come, as the Committee’s statement states. This is part of a much larger issue that we face as Oxford students who aim to see increased diversity within our colleges which, sadly, for the time being is still a dream.

We have a long way to go with regards to the university’s accessibility for those under- represented here; a sure way to catalyse it how- ever is to tackle the problem closer to home, and confront the pervading marginalization that current students encounter every day. It is of paramount importance that we continue to strive for awareness and open-mindedness, but simultaneously also to call these people out when necessary.

The time for upholding and perpetuating this outdated mentality is over.

Surviving on Chips, Cheese and MSGs

0

It’s that time of the year again: birds are singing, the sun is shining, and every hallowed corridor of the University of Oxford reeks of chip fat, decomposing kebab meat, and despair. Welcome to exam season, and the eating habits that accompany it.

Oh, there are some who have it all: catch them flicking through colour-coded flashcards on the quad with their perfectly manicured salads of succulent cucumber and dulcet pear, balanced by a homemade vinaigrette as sharp as their tutorial repartée.

Or perhaps striding past the dreaming spires, resplendent in their Lycra like the cast of a Village People music video scripted by Evelyn Waugh and sipping demurely from whey protein and coconut milk smoothies. To these people, not only the body but the mind is a temple, lovingly and strategically nourished with a level of self-discipline and logic unknown to lesser mortals who still can’t utter the words ‘nut butter’ with a straight face.

Lingering just below them in this great chain of being are the moderates, who are organised enough to show up to hall at least twice a day, but supplement this flow of lurid sweet and sour pork and quick-cook rice with the occasional takeout order, perhaps as a reward for surviving a particularly strenuous revision session. There is a method to their caloric madness: they will sometimes go as far as ordering a vegetable side dish along with whatever chilli-sluiced concoction the local kebab joint has crafted exclusively for stress-numbed student tastebuds. They have the presence of mind to put food waste in an outside bin so the odour of garlic and misery will dissipate by morning.

Finally, at the shady underbelly of exam season life, there are those who occupy the dietary equivalent of the post-apocalyptic wasteland a place of chaos and animalism, characterised by too much oil and not enough water, where a typical mid-morning snack is whipped cream sprayed directly into the mouth while shouting ‘witness me’.

These are the people who skewer their Hassan’s boxes on railings like so many severed heads, as they rip flesh from chicken wings with incisors that haven’t been grazed by a toothbrush in weeks. Every surface has absorbed the flavours of hundreds of meals, and now breathes them moistly back in the face of anyone who dares enter when temperatures rise above 16 degrees. Scouts crack open their doors, grab their bin bags, and flee, wondering how anyone can live like this.

The answer is a need for fuel, and lots of it: when caffeine immunity develops, the only other option is to cram one’s body with enough salt, sugar and MSG to make sleep impossible and an overgrown food baby inevitable, taking up nightly occupation in half the space of a single bed.

Oxford struggles to retain academics after Brexit vote

1

The number of Oxford academics from the European Union decreased in the year following Brexit, according to new Higher Education Standards Agency (Hesa) figures.

Only the University of Kent (70) lost more EU academics than Oxford (55) in 2016-17.
However, the University’s own figures suggest that the decline was much smaller. A spokesperson told Cherwell that the total number of EU academics has declined by only twelve since last year’s referendum.

The news comes as Oxford chancellor Chris Patten said that the country is “obsessed with this astonishing act of self-harm.”

Hesa’s figures claim that Oxford lost 3.1% of its EU academics in the 2016-17 academic year, the third-biggest decline of any university, behind the University of Birmingham (4.5%) and the University of Kent (15.4%).

A University spokesperson told Cherwell: “Oxford is an international University.

“Since the referendum we have made it clear we will continue to be a welcoming home for staff and students from the EU. The status of colleagues from other parts of the EU has been a major concern for the University and we have called for clear commitments on this issue to reassure staff and students who are already here or hoping to join us.

“The University will continue to call for a free flow of academic talent to and from the EU in the final Brexit settlement.”

Lord Patten told Cherwell on Wednesday that “Oxford is part of the serious collateral damage that is done to this country. We get more research funding from Europe than any other university in Europe,” he said.

“What happens to that academic collaboration, that flow of funds, upon which we do very well is important in the future. I think we’ll manage to get around it because we’re so important to Europe, because it’s so important to us in Britain. I think it’s a point that the Chancellor of the Exchequer understands perfectly well.”

Lord Patten said that the country is “obsessed with this astonishing act of self-harm.”

“How can you, if you’re in another European country, separate yourself in any way from Life Sciences at Oxford, which is the best in the world? Unless the government sees sense, we are going to lose people.”

In April 2016, the University issued a statement in support of the UK’s membership of the European Union.

The statement read: “The mobility that EU membership affords, which enables staff and students from across the EU to come to Oxford, and Oxford staff and students to work and study in Europe, is central to our strategic plan.”

Top universities “have to develop even more enthusiastically than [they] have in the past, our relationship with other universities in Europe and beyond” Lord Patten said.

“We also have to be very assertive in speaking up for ourselves as an important part of liberal democracy. We have to stand up for things which should really be hallmarks of a university, like freedom of speech and freedom of research.”

The latest statistics come after it was announced last week that one of Oxford “brightest” new recruits was forced to leave her post and return to China, after the Home Office declined a visa for her 22-month-old baby.

Fengying Liu, a postdoctoral researcher in pathology, was recruited to Oxford’s Sir William Dunn School of Pathology in October last year after completing her PhD in Germany, where she lived with her husband and child.

On being offered the Oxford position, she moved to the UK without her husband and daughter, having made the decision to apply for their visas separately to make the costs more manageable.

However, a technicality in UK immigration law that requires parents to seek visas together with their children meant that the separate application for Dr Liu’s baby was refused.

Earlier this month, vice chancellor Louise Richardson condemned current government Brexit proposals, warning that the UK is set to miss out on billions of EU research funding.

The “pay-as-you-go” proposals risk an “enormous loss” to research, she said. warning that the UK could lose its reputation in the scientific community if it cut ties with the EU.

Spotlight: Donald Glover

1

Childish Gambino’s new music video for one of his latest songs, ‘This is America’, received 100 million views on YouTube in its first week. That makes it the third most popular video he’s ever uploaded, behind the official uploads of ‘3005’ (which it will overtake by the time this article is printed) and the absolutely iconic ‘Redbone’.

It’s the beginning of what’s set to be a huge year for Donald Glover, who aside from his work as Childish Gambino, is about to hit our cinema screens as a young Lando Calrissian in the upcoming Han Solo-centered Star Wars spin-off, and star as Simba in Disney’s live-action retelling of The Lion King next year.

All of this mainstream exposure and popularity seems to be a cosmic reward for Glover’s success in other areas, as many of the highlights of his career so far have done. After writing for a season of 30 Rock, spending 5 seasons as fan-favourite character Troy Barnes on Community, and a promising stand-up special (which is on YouTube, and well worth checking out), he finally won Golden Globes and Emmys last year for his work on the incredible hip-hop comedy-drama Atlanta, which he created, writes, directs and stars in. It is clear that Glover seems to be outstandingly talented at everything he tries his hand at.

Gambino’s lyrics and videos have always been far more poignant and thoughtful than Glover’s comic persona would lead you to believe, but ‘This is America’ is exceptional even by Gambino’s standards. The music video, directed by Hiro Murai (a regular collaborator of Glover’s who has directed most episodes of Atlanta), is a miasma of shocking imagery deconstructing gun culture, race relations, and public perceptions of fame that, like the best music videos throughout history, takes an already powerful song and deepens its impact in indelible fashion.

The music itself, cooked up by Glover and his regular collaborator Ludwig Görannsson (composer of the incredible Black Panther score), combines African choral sounds with trap stylings to intoxicating effect. But this musical style necessitates a certain amount of lyrical repetition which would limit the reach of the song’s targets without the music videos visual allusions to Jim Crow, the Charleston massacre, and invocations of recent popular dance trends which have inspired thousands of deconstructive hot takes online. It grounds the lyrics in contemporary issues, begging the viewer to sit up and witness a powerful African-American voice which has scarcely been so well-articulated in such a popular medium.

Of course, no-one’s hot streaks last forever, but even Glover seems to take his hiccups in his stride. Although his recent attempts to bring an animated Deadpool series to the small screen fell through, he managed to channel his disappointment and anger into a hilarious fake script. And the upcoming album seems to combine the best of his soul-stirring Awaken, My Love-era songwriting with the social awareness of his most enduring work on Atlanta, hopefully bringing fans back to the fold who were disappointed by the lack of rap on his last album. Donald Glover’s never risen higher – long may he and Gambino reign.

Ucas hits back at ‘racial profiling’ claims

1

Ucas has pledged to reach out to representatives of ethnic minority groups following allegations of “racial profiling”.

The news comes after figures released under Freedom of Information rules revealed that black students are 22 times more likely than their white counterparts to have their university applications flagged for possible fraud by the admissions service.

The data showed that between 2013 and 2017, 52% of applications investigated for potential fraud were made by black students, despite them representing only 9% of total applications.

By comparison, just 19% of applications made by white students were flagged, even though they made up 73% of total applicants. Asian students made up 16% of flagged applicants, while representing 11% of total applicants.

This means that while one in every 102 black applicants is investigated for fraud, only one in every 2,146 white applicants is flagged by Ucas’ system.

The service has pledged to reach out to representative organisations to “strengthen the voices of black, Asian and minority ethnic students in our decision-making and processes.”

They also said they had made enhancements to its fraud detection process to reduce the risk of “false positives”.

New colleges would improve Oxford’s access problem

2

Britain is a magnificent country, and one which, as a foreigner, I have quickly learned to love. Britain is a country that is generally very tolerant of racial and religious differences, which offers a high quality of life to its citizens, and which is mercifully free of crime, corruption, and ethno-linguistic tension. Britain is, in short, a wonderful place to live. All countries must have their Achilles’ heel though, and there can be no doubt what the UK’s is.

This country has the lowest level of intergenerational social mobility in the developed Western world, lower even than that of the United States. A child born in Canada or Australia (societies which in most other respects are all but identical to this one) has more than double the chance British children have of earning more than their parents. It should be noted that the acute problem isn’t actually the level of inequality or the percentage of the population living in poverty, neither of which are notably worse than other OECD economies.

The problem is the fact that the poverty which does exist is inescapable. Social mobility is the one great embarrassment of an otherwise gleamingly successful country, and it needs to be improved as a matter of urgency. As such, the Higher Education Policy Institute’s recent suggestion that Oxford increase its number of colleges should be welcomed. Contrary to many of the misconceptions about this suggestion, these additional colleges would not be specifcally earmarked for students from access backgrounds. The point of their addition would just be to increase the number of undergraduate places at this institution, in line with action from other universities across the country. This would bolster students’ chances of both applying to the university and of being accepted.

What’s more, there is an enormously important symbolism in the addition of new colleges. Oxford has (rightly or wrongly) a continued international reputation as a symbol of the rigidity of the British class system. New colleges would demonstrate that the University is open to change, and is willing to alter the feeling of exclusion that its commitment to tradition can evoke. More colleges mean more students, which means more societies, more ideas, more scope for experimentation. New colleges would make Oxford a more diverse and a more exciting place and the idea should be wholeheartedly embraced.

Cracking down on drug use is misguided

0

The renewed effort by Thames Valley Police to combat the selling of drugs may be admirable in its aims, but it follows in a tradition of failed drug policy that will do little to help those people most affected.

The focus on the supply-side of drugs has long been the norm, and has attracted public support because drug dealers seldom appear characters to be empathised with. In truth, simply trying to clamp down on the selling of drugs is not only ineffective, but also misses what should be the point of drug policy in the modern world.

Those who abuse drugs are likely to be members of some of the most disadvantaged groups in our city and country. In Oxford, it’s hard to ignore the huge growth of homelessness, a population who are more susceptible to the use of opiates and other devastating drugs.

Such groups are already alienated from wider society and face often unimaginable hardship. Clamping down even further will only sow distrust in those who use drugs in order to cope with their difficult situation. This is exactly what we need to prevent. These people need to be given help – temporary housing, adult education, and so on. Instead, funds are being diverted to focus on drug use, which is a consequence of these underlying issues. Given how much money can be made from the trade, and how addictive certain drugs can be, are we really to believe that additional policing will prevent drug dealing?

One should remember that drug dealers are not always the monster caricature we imagine.
They too are people trying to survive in dire socioeconomic conditions. Given the size of the drug market – the UN estimated the global drug to be worth over $300bn back in 2005 – additional action by the police is not going to dissuade a drug dealer who can potentially make thousands with no real employment alternatives.

Of course, not all the proposals by TVP are harmful. Support for children at risk of being groomed to traffic drugs is badly needed, but one must ask why the child would get involved in the first place. Could it be that the education offered to them, and the employment opportunities later, are lacking?

Until more life choices are offered, a flashy drug dealer is going to remain more convincing than a police constable to many. Given how desperate many users and dealers are, we should acknowledge that policing alone will not end this harmful trade. Focusing on drugs takes away from the underlying failures of our society to deal with unemployment, homelessness, poverty, and other social vices. Until we take a hard look at our failures, drug busts and pushing drug users further to the peripheries will do nothing to help our city and country prosper.

Disabled characters must no longer be the villains

0

When Cerrie Burnell was hired in 2009 to be a presenter for CBeebies there was a flurry of parents filing official complaints to the BBC to oppose this being “allowed” on their television screens. They argued that their children would be frightened and “freaked out” by Cerrie. Why? Because Cerrie’s lower right arm is missing.

What led to such a reaction? The dehumanisation of Cerrie in this manner, as something “freaky” or to be “feared”, is an attitude that is still widely prevalent to this day, and has historical roots in the ableist treatment of those with disabilities and disfigurements throughout history.

In the 20th and 19th century freak shows involved those with disabilities, disfigurements or bodily conditions being exhibited as “freaks”, and were used as a common form of amusement for the general public. Such shows were incredibly profitable for the showmen, and this shouldn’t be forgotten in the context of the recent movie The Greatest Showman (2017), which erased several elements of P.T. Barnum’s problematic and exploitative use of those with disabilities, and went as far as to romanticise his legacy.

Even today, the tradition of the “freak show” continues in evolved forms, such as shows like Channel 4’s The Undateables and Too Ugly for Love? Those without disabilities watch such things and are able to partake in a self-gratifying pity-fest, entirely unaware of the patronising and exploitative elements that affect those portrayed.

When we look closer at children’s literature and movies, these attitudes are further established. Villains in children’s literature and children’s film are often disfigured or disabled. Peter Pan’s Captain James Hook has a hook for a hand, Scar from The Lion King has a scar on his face, In Roald Dahl’s The Witches, the witches, who eat children, have no hair and no toes, and even in Harry Potter, as Voldemort’s soul disintegrates, the more deformed his body becomes.

This common trope may go unnoticed by the able-bodied community, but it means the only representation that those with disfigurements and disabilities is that of villainy. The idea of evil is being continuously linked to those with disabilities or disfigurements, and writers and filmmakers need to understand this is unacceptable. This is inappropriate representation that only seeks to further prejudice and marginalisation for those within these communities.

‘Changing Faces UK’ is one of the leading charities aiming to change this by campaigning for “a world where people positively welcome a new baby with a cleft lip and palate, invite the school friend who has Apert syndrome to their child’s birthday party, and confidently shake the hand of the interview candidate who has eczema.” They have been in discourse with several media companies in order to change this, and one of the movies particularly celebrated by them is the adaptation of R.J. Palacio’s Wonder.

Wonder follows Auggie, a young boy in New York with the rare medical facial deformity ‘mandibulofacial dysostosis’, starting his first year at school. Auggie is ostracised by nearly all the student body, and the film follows his relationship with his family, those who he befriends, and his aspirations to become a scientist. It’s a moving tale that finally centres on the experience of those with disfigurements, but also makes a powerful commentary on the oppression that those in these communities undergo. A scene where the mother of another pupil explains why she photoshopped Auggie out of the class photo due to his condition “ruining the photo”, echoes the Carrie Burnell controversy.

Wonder isn’t the only example of representation for characters with disfigurements or disabilities. Katy, from Jacqueline Wilson’s 2015 novel by that name, is a protagonist in a wheelchair with a complex and sophisticated story. Augustus Waters and Isaac from John Green’s The Fault in Our Stars are also examples of this. However, there’s still much more to be done. We still run the risk of such characters being flat, and must continue to ensure the disability itself is not made to be such characters’ only personality trait.

The author of new short story collection In The Beginning of the World in the Middle of Night, Jen Campbell, makes several videos raising awareness for the need for appropriate representation of disability in literature and film. She describes one Icelandic fairy tale which she felt did this beautifully, The Myth of Sedna. Sedna is a girl, who is also a giant, whose father insists she must marry. Due to her repeated rejection of her father’s wishes, her father wishes to throw her overboard and Sedna clings onto the side of the ship by her fingers; her father then cuts off her fingers one by one. Sedna falls into the ocean, becomes a Goddess of the deep, and her fingers become seals and whales of the ocean and live underwater.

The myth of Sedna presents a story of disfigurement which is both beautiful and empowering to those who undergo similar conditions, such as Campbell herself who, having ectrodactyly which can affect the hands and fingers, struggled to see appropriate representation for those like herself.

The representation of disfigurement in literature, film and other medias needs to continue in a way that will do members of these communities justice. Through the eyes of Auggie in Wonder we were able to see the cruelty that the able-bodied community inflict. After a day of ostracisation at his school, Auggie is crying about the bullying of his facial disfigurement and asks his mother “will it always matter?” To answer Auggie’s question, until media is held accountable for the just and proper telling of these narratives, these perceptions won’t change.

Writers and filmmakers need to start making a place for the disabled community in their narratives, and not just tokenistically. We need stories where those with disabilities, disfigurements or other disorders aren’t reduced to their condition, but are central characters with their own complex and authentic narratives. As ‘Changing Faces UK’ writes, “we want nothing short of a complete reframing of disfigurement which tells the truth about this experience and acknowledges everyone’s right to acceptance on equal terms.”

Hillary Clinton is coming to Oxford

8

Hillary Clinton will speak in Oxford at the end of the month.

The failed US presidential candidate will give this year’s Romanes Lecture at the Sheldonian Theatre on 25th June.

The event is open to Oxford University staff and students, and the general public.

The Romanes Lecture is the University’s annual public lecture, and has been given since 1892.

It sees a “distinguished public figure from the arts, science or literature” given a special invitation by the vice chancellor.

Previous speakers include Gordon Brown, Karl Popper, and Winston Churchill.

It will be the second time in a year that a failed candidate from the 2016 US Presidential Election has spoken in Oxford. Last summer, Bernie Sanders – who was beaten to the Democrat nomination by Clinton in 2016 – spoke at the Sheldonian as part of a book launch.

The Clinton family are no strangers to the University. Former US President Bill studied PPE at University College on a Rhodes Scholarship in the late 1960s, while the couple’s daughter, Chelsea, twice studied at the college – she completed her MPhil in International Relations in 2003, before graduating with a DPhil in the same subject in 2014.

Registration for Clinton’s talk is free, and will open here on Monday morning.