Monday 21st July 2025
Blog Page 64

Blood is compulsory: The films of Martin McDonagh

0

Under normal circumstances, asking me to write about a filmmaker who’s changed my outlook on life might invite something moving. There are plenty of directors, after all, who have that effect. Scorsese’s parade of doomed hyper-masculine protagonists marches on like a premonition. Francis Ford Coppola’s best work touches perfectly on the ways unremarkable people react when everything falls apart. Or, on the lighter side, I could muse for hours on the simple joys of Wes Anderson; a man I’ve never met and never will, yet who reminds me of an old relative who effortlessly evokes long-departed times and places. 

For all their merits, though, none of those three ever drunkenly told Sean Connery to ‘f**k off.’

Martin McDonagh, above all else, is an idolater. His plays, unapologetically drawing on his Irish roots, appalled the stuffed shirts of Fleet Street with their violent, absurd depictions of working-class life – but at the same time, caused a furore across the sea on the grounds that McDonagh, a Londoner by birth, was stereotyping his homeland for his own gain. He might now sit at the head of British film and theatre but if that head were to meet a similar fate to those of his protagonists, it might make for grisly viewing.

The chaos inherent to his films is perhaps best exemplified in Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri (2017), in which Mildred Hayes (Frances McDormand) erects the titular fixtures in protest at the police’s inability to find her daughter’s murderer and rapist. This seemingly reasonable frustration leads to a small-town death spiral: a suicide, a defenestration and an arson attack, all stemming from the attempts of the parochial and the powerful to protect their reputations. 

America as depicted in Three Billboards is angry and fractured. However, while this perspective on the country earned critical acclaim, it also provoked the ire of some quarters in the media. The film’s portrayal of race was especially criticised, with the bigoted and violent Officer Dixon (Sam Rockwell) becoming an apparently sympathetic figure despite not changing his ways. It’s true that Dixon and Mildred grow closer as the film progresses. But rather than assuming that this signifies an acceptance of Dixon, one might easily see it as a symbol of Mildred’s descent into amorality. Everyone turns against Mildred, so she turns against everyone – audience included, as it turns out. She sympathises with Dixon not for his hateful views, but for his ever-present anger at the same world Mildred sees as having failed her.

I’d suggest, therefore, that McDonagh’s handling of racial issues is more nihilistic than ignorant. Themes of cruelty and depravity also run through In Bruges (2008), in which Colin Farrell plays Ray, a hitman driven to suicidal thoughts at the guilt of having killed a child is hunted by his colleague Ken (Brendan Gleeson), who is instructed to kill him in response. The same two actors reprise in similarly bleak roles in The Banshees of Inisherin (2022). In the midst of the Irish Civil War, Gleeson’s character Colm cuts off his own fingers for no reason rather than to avoid talking to his former best friend Pádraic, played by Farrell. In response, Pádraic attempts to burn Colm alive in his own house. Scenes such as these demonstrate McDonagh’s worldview; bitter conflict is practically a given, and the only things more fragile than his protagonists’ social bonds are their egos. 

In McDonagh’s work, no one is safe from corruption. The strong female lead joins forces with racist thugs, alienates her son and wishes a violent death upon her daughter on the very day it occurs. The two inseparable friends see their country torn apart by sectarian violence, and mutilate themselves for the sheer sport of it. This conception of society – one without heroes or convictions, dominated by self-destructive vendettas – is striking because, in our uncertain century, it speaks to us more than any traditional morality tale could.

Papicha, power, and cinematic patriotism

0

How can we say that Papicha is Algerian, if the film was banned without any explanation in the country shortly before its release? It is a film that belongs to Algerians but not necessarily to Algeria. Given that some accused the film of being western propaganda, though, this description still falls short. Perhaps it is better, then, to say that Papicha is a film that belongs to Algerian women or, to be more precise, to ‘papichas’.  

The term ‘papicha’, as well as being the film’s title, is one tossed about frequently throughout the film. A typical example of ‘algérois’, a mix of  French and Algerian Arabic, at times as a term of endearment and at others as an insult. A ‘papicha’ is essentially a pretty, funny and emancipated girl; someone who studies, someone who dreams and thinks for herself. In other words, someone who challenges the status quo of Algerian society in the 90s. Someone like Nedjma, the film’s protagonist: a French literature student with future plans of becoming a fashion designer who features as the film’s protagonist. 

The 90s in Algeria are often referred to as ‘la décennie noire’ (‘the black decade’) – which is about as cheery as it sounds. In 1992, the Algerian Civil War broke out with Islamist groups fighting the incumbent government after their electoral victory at the polls. The 1990s in Algeria represent a call back to the most radical version of Islam possible in the country and this is what we see in the film: Nedjma’s successful journalist sister is shot, her French professor is kidnapped whilst giving a lecture, and the autochthonous white haïk garment is replaced by Middle Eastern black hijabs. 

Though the threat posed by rapacious men is omnipresent Papicha, women arguably carry out the most shocking scenes of Islamist violence. Mounia Medour, the film’s director, is hence able to mimic the complexity of gender relations; women often perpetuate the structures by which they are oppressed. 

Despite being inherently political, this is an extraordinarily artistic film. As the Islamists’ reign of terror becomes increasingly restrictive, colours slowly start fading from our TV screens, a metaphor for individuality vanishing into thin air. The boutique from which Nedjma would buy sequins, colourful fabric and leopard print lingerie only sells black clothing by the end of the film. The best Nedjma can do is resist – a dangerous act that will not go unnoticed by those around her. 

The main criticism generally levelled against the film is that Mounia Medour’s target audience is  French and that, consequently, she reinforces stereotypes regarding Algeria . Nonetheless, it seems to me that Medour is representing a quintessentially Algerian form of feminism. For Nedjma, resistance is synonymous with being faithful to Algeria: when a boy she likes offers to take her to France to escape the violence, she turns his offer down right away, angry and disappointed at his cowardice. Her attitude may demonstrate a naïve and stubborn belief that things can change but – more importantly – Nedjma’s feminism does not come into conflict with her Algerian identity. This is a film as much about resentment as about love towards one’s country.  

Though set in the 90s, Papicha still has a lot to tell us about the way Algeria is today. It is true that women no longer fear for their lives if they do not wear the hijab outside or ululate too loudly, but in a country where femicides fill the newspapers and less than a fifth of women work, there are still a lot of ‘papichas’ awaiting change. 

Review: NUTS – ‘a harrowing portrait of deceit and desire’

0

Following the success of Bedbugs last year, expectations for Coco Cottam’s newest play were bound to be high. With NUTS, she not only meets these but exceeds them, offering a harrowing portrait of deceit, desire, and the murkiness of morality. The play marks a departure from her previous work, veering into a more plot-driven territory while retaining the strength of character that made Bedbugs so compelling. 

NUTS centres on the intense friendship of two women, Eve (Alice Macey-Dare) and Nina (Orla Wyatt). The precarious balance of their relationship topples into chaos when a man, Liberty (Rufus Shutter), invades their flat. His urgency to move in and murky past sets in motion a series of emotional conflicts which unravel this seemingly perfect friendship. What begins as a lighthearted and witty examination of friendship soon develops into something darker and more psychologically complex.

Cottam’s script is stripped back and poised; relying on subtle exposition and controlled tension rather than more bombastic drama. The plot is intentionally minimalist, focusing on the emotional ramifications of Liberty’s arrival. NUTS’ complexity emerges in subtle, seemingly insignificant moments between characters- a cutting remark or a flicker of doubt teasing at what is to come. 

Such a script leaves actors precariously exposed; thankfully this is a challenge they faced brilliantly. Alice Macey-Dare’s Eve radiates a palpable sense of fragility, a character whose self-doubt slowly consumes her. As Liberty, Shutter is convincingly charming, his smooth exterior concealing a more menacing presence. Shutter pulls off this precarious balancing act effortlessly, from the start the audience is sceptical of Eve’s trust in him. As Tasch, Thalis Kermisch threatens to steal the show, delivering a monologue so devastating that it is difficult to watch. Orla Wyatt is particularly spectacular as Nina, whose initial self-assurance is worn away by Liberty. Wyatt’s performance is both painful and compelling, her OUDS debut casting her as a talent to watch. 

The level of maturity and depth brought to the roles is impressive. The shifting relationship dynamics, particularly between Nina and Liberty, are rendered brilliantly. The subtle psychological warfare between them is palpably intense, with Eve being torn apart in the middle. Coco sets up all the relationships in the play as shadowy parallels or disturbing distortions of each other—a complex web within which we too are tangled. 

The intensity of such performances is complemented by the production design. The simplistic set design – comprised of little more than a few chairs and a table – emphasises the close confinement of the characters’ world. The Burton Taylor Studio provides the perfect venue for such a claustrophobic play; the audience is trapped tightly within the same pressure cooker of a flat as the characters. The sound design, too, deserves to be mentioned. Eerie background noises of ticks, squeaks, and heavy breathing play from behind the audience. Although disorientating, the soundscape becomes integral to the subtle heightening of tension, pushing the audience forward into the action. Even the play’s occasional comic moments take on a sinister edge when complimented by such chilling sound design. NUTS works in its ability to keep the audience on edge, waiting for the delicately thin emotional facades the characters have built to come crashing down. 

Ultimately, the play succeeds not just because of its strength of writing and performance, but because Cottam taps into something universal about the deceit and doubt that can lurk beneath the surface of even the most secure relationships.

“Mummy said I’m pretty”: Nepo babies on the runway

Whatever happened to talent? It is a question many viewers of 2025 spring runways asked as yet another catwalk was graced by the relatives of the rich and famous. The internet has been obsessed with this idea of ‘nepo babies’ – someone who gains industry success through nepotism –since Nate Jones’ famous article cover: ‘She Has Her Mother’s Eyes. And Agent’. The obsession stems from the desire to feel that the people who are revered for their talent have been awarded roles because of family connections.

But not all nepo babies are considered equal.

The public accepts talented nepo models like the Hadid sisters; their fame is put down to their own hard work and natural gift for modelling. On the other hand, the shadow of the Kardashian name continues to haunt Kendall Jenner. Despite being the highest paid model, her success is still attributed to Kris and Kim’s connections. The same can be said for Lila Moss, Leni Klum and Lily Rose Depp.

The issue with nepo models centres around the authenticity of beauty. People love the idea that the most beautiful woman in the world is just a normal person. Giselle Bündchen, Cindy Crawford and Heidi Klum became successful because they were scouted from the streets or won talent competitions. That made these women likeable. Naomi Campbell has remained popular in the public eye because she was scouted, worked her way up and advocated for greater racial diversity in the beauty world. But what genuine positive change are people born into this system going to advocate for? The nepo models skip straight to the highest earning gigs with apparent ease: there’s no drive to change an industry if it is already perfectly suited to you.

This issue has been ongoing for at least the past fifteen years, to the point that now it is difficult to name a model who wasn’t born to famous parents. Is it too late to bring back the ‘real’ models? Unfortunately, it probably is. The 2008 economic crash, exacerbated by COVID-19, played a role in shrinking the aspirational class which could once afford haute couture.

Now that the middle class isn’t buying, there is no need for fashion houses to pretend. Beauty trends are inherently exclusionary. Take the 90s ‘heroin chic’ craze. The trend’s emphasis on extremely small sizes glorified extremely dangerous drug habits (hence its name) and glorified under-eating to achieve a desired weight.

BUT changes are being made: Chanel has a new Indian CEO, Victoria’s Secret participated in the ‘Runway of Dreams’ last year and Halima Aden wore a burkini in Sports Illustrated. Still, the overall picture isn’t one of increased diversity and representation. Until ordinary people have enough disposable income to consider these brands, the companies have no reason to look beyond the family names that made them successful in the first place.

‘The Pink City’: Ten generations of Jaipur gems

0

Marvelling in a hushed awe at a Mughal-era star sapphire from Burma,  Krishna Choudhary explained when you can tell a stone is valuable. ‘By colour, cut, carat, rarity, pureness’ is the professional answer. ‘But really, it’s when you start tearing up, and simultaneously get an urge to bite into it, that’s how you know.’  He held the 150-carat stone, a deep, translucent blue that snuggled into his palm. As he directed the light above it, the gem burst the light rays into six different ways. It was like opening your eyes underwater and looking up at the sun. 

In a secluded eighteenth century mansion, the Saras Sadan Haveli, we found the headquarters for the Royal Gems & Arts in the old town of Jaipur. This residence has an opulent combination of bright colours from the Rajput Middle Ages and the remnants of Victorian inspiration, revealed by a well-preserved kaleidoscope of frescoes in natural pigments covering every inch of the walls and ceiling. However impressive these are, an equally dazzling treasure that lies within these walls is the Choudhary family’s jewellery collection. Krishna Choudhary, who is running the business alongside his parents Santi and Shobha, showed me a precious selection one by one, letting me handle each piece and relish each of their corresponding stories.

Jaipur became known as the “Pink City” when, in 1876, Maharaja Ram Singh had most of the buildings painted pink — the colour of hospitality — in preparation for Queen Victoria’s visit. Although the epithet of the city continues to bear a spectre of British colonial presence in India, there are locations in Jaipur that remain an authentic testament to its historical heritage intertwined with a tapestry of cultures, religions, and political identities. Central to this history is the Choudhary family, whose contributions to jewellery-making establish a legacy that underscores how gems and designs can hold cultural memory. 

In 1727, the Hindu Rajput ruler Maharaja Sawai Jai Singh II moved the capital of Rajasthan to Jaipur, and invited Choudhary Kushal Singh to relocate to the new capital, bringing with him his knowledge and experience in financial and administrative matters. Over generations, they transitioned from minting coins for the royal authority to becoming the royal family jewellers. The labour-intensive pieces that they designed often served to bejewel the royal men, and less so the women, who were wrapped in the rarest colours and kinds of fabrics. Jewellery was a way to distinguish how important a person was, and the essence of Indian jewellery could be defined by the “more is more” aphorism. Photographic documentation of royals reveals how they always carried an impressive weight of valuable stones. 

India’s rich culture of jewellery is partly a result of its geological advantages. The mines of Golconda, the earliest diamond mines known to man, are known to have yielded the highest grade of diamonds, Kashmir is known to have produced the rarest and most beautiful sapphires, and the greatest emeralds arrived to India from Colombia through commercial exchange via the Portuguese-controlled ports of Goa. Jewellery-making in India underwent a significant evolution in the Mughal period (1526-1761), when the craftsmen of the royal workshops welcomed Persian influences into the Indian artistic tradition, creating a style that came to define itself, even past the fall of the dynasty. When India came under British rule in 1858, the Mughal style endured and extended its influence on Western aesthetics and practices. Thereafter, as the family began thinking of showing their pieces to a global audience, the Persian carpets on which the business was conducted were replaced by glass vitrines. There are various design elements that make Indian jewellery quintessentially Indian. For instance, the traditional “kundan” technique, which involves setting stones in gold, as well as the “meena” technique with its intricate enamel painting are special to India. Furthermore, the execution of motifs like elephants, falcons, fish, lions, as well as the use of patterning and colour define the artistic tradition. Krishna founded Santi Jewels in 2019, and has since been creating designs that fuse the authenticity of these techniques with experimentation, giving some of the vaulted, age-old gemstones in the family’s collection beds to lie within contemporary renditions.

By incorporating uniquely Indian elements such as the jaalis – architectural ornamental openwork screens – into contemporary designs, Krishna, as the 10th generation jewellery maker from his family, marries the rarest gems with the most intricate craftsmanship available today.

Lessons From A Taiwanese Coaster

I woke up in a world
Where everything was beautiful,
And nothing hurt.
Love was utterly abundant,
A brimming harvest
Which stretched from winding rivers,
To concrete forests.
Frayed pockets of clouds,
Lightly tapped, caressed and
Welcomed into this utopian Earth.
Frail sprig homes,
Reinforced into their ash groves,
With tender care and loving cadence.
As eyes are glazed
With a gentle coat
Of peace and understanding.

I idled through this glowing land
Worry pressing on my brow,
Puzzled and inept,
As I tried to explain my unease.
Until it hit me,
How can one truly appreciate beauty,
If you have not sobbed on your knees.

The last tutorial: Let the nostalgia – and the anxiety – sink in

0

I sit here writing this having just left my last tutorial of my undergraduate degree at this university. It’s a sobering thought, the sense of an ending. It’s a feeling of impending doom, my rug of security and undergraduate indifference pulled right out from under me. Suddenly, all of those thoughts about what comes next – which I’m sure you’ve all been thinking, or not, depending on how long you have left in Oxford  – are more real and tangible than they’ve ever been in my life.

I spent the majority of the said tutorial desperately trying to capture the moment, imprinting the image of the plastered panelling of the ceiling into my mind, its significance having dawned on me. I wanted to memorise the book lined shelves, and the sash window that looked out onto the quad, which always turned shades of amber and red this time of year, the leaves curling at the edges, poised to drop. The bells tolled at ten, and I was viciously reminded of the novelty of the experience, feeling as though I was in first year, sitting in my first tutorial at university. I felt the need to box-breathe, physically nostalgic for something that hasn’t actually ended yet. The rest of the hour was spent passively attempting to type, thinking of everything but the tutorial at hand, reminiscing over all of the tutorials I had ever had. I thought of the early mornings, and then the no-show mornings, and the Friday mornings that meant I could never go out on a Thursday. I thought about the rooms in which they took place, some slightly dingy, some with sofas that I sunk into and, sometimes, never wanted to leave.

Of all the things there are to get nostalgic about in this place, I never thought I’d be one to get nostalgic about tutes, but my mind could not  help but wander. I thought about my first essay – the lengths I went to, trying to contribute something new to the field my tutor had spent a career pioneering. I was reliving the past while simultaneously trying to be present. It was a horrible feeling that hasn’t quite left me.

I’d once enviously eyed up my friends lounging on that very quad in the sun, when everything was warmer and infinitely more joyful, while I was stuck inside, but now I rue having ever had those thoughts. Maybe it’s a seasonal thing too. Anyway, all this goes to say is that I’ve been particularly retrospective as of late; wistful about an ending that is still very much a while away.

Many of us have heard the dreaded ‘So… any idea what you’re doing next?’. It makes me a little irate, anxious, and on the verge of a minor breakdown, as you can probably tell. Two years of my undergraduate degree have somehow disappeared with the blink of an eye –  I am older but seem to be none the wiser. I’m convinced the conversation withers and dies when someone brings graduation up, and if I could, I’d put it in the burn book of social conventions. There seems to be a ratrace of applications and deadlines and career fairs and thesis abstracts, and I cannot help but feel like I missed the memo somewhere along the line. I seem to be stuck in a Catch-22 of wanting to be present for my last year at university, while simultaneously planning for the future – for adulthood and a career.

Grad job lined up or not, you’re lying to yourself if you haven’t felt the anxiety that clouds visions of a post-university future. It marks the end of a significant life chapter, another definitive end of youth as we know it. What awaits? Clapham for a lot of you, a mass migration to London, the Oxford bubble replaced with a much larger one. Small plates and big bills is what I’ve heard.

Booking needs binning

0

A leftover COVID system is stymying the freedom and spontaneity students need. Colleges should give it up and let us choose.

In 2020, as the world hurtled towards COVID, Oxford faced a hard question: how could it ensure its students were fed, whilst respecting COVID-19 restrictions?

The answer was Hall booking. It allowed colleges to uphold social distancing, and as a bonus told them how much food to serve. This could minimise food waste and the associated financial and environmental damage. It could also lighten the load on kitchen staff, resulting in more productive use of the fruits of too-rarely appreciated kitchen staff’s labour.

Since the pandemic, however, a smorgasbord of policies has emerged across Oxford: St Cross requires all meals to be booked, New College still books for early sittings and Formal Halls, whilst Univ books solely for Formal Halls. Formal booking makes sense – the work that goes into the meal justifies students organising themselves. But the inconsistency in standard meals astounds: without the pressures of the pandemic, booking for meals isn’t worthwhile.

Students are busier than ever. With the stresses of work and extracurriculars, it’s easy to imagine students letting meals slip. The release of freely eating with friends will be lost to dull bureaucracy and strict daily regimens. The bonds of friendship forged over a tagine or the in-jokes born of a tired lunch might be impossible to numerically assess, but are of incomparable value to students. What conveniences colleges could derive would be at a cost to student’s mental and physical well-being.

Trust students. The formality of booking served its purpose during the pandemic, but we don’t need it now. If Oxford promotes an independent working style, colleges should accept students know their own stomachs. Hall’s not the GP; we should be able to eat without booking days in advance.

Ovid meets modern identities in Sap

0

“There used to be proper lesbian bars but they’re all Prets now” says Daphne in Sap.

This will certainly be a loose retelling of Ovid’s Daphne and Apollo, but a dutiful one nonetheless. It proclaims itself as a ‘queer urban fable about passion, power and photosynthesis’ that uses nature to grasp the complex relationship between a woman and her own sexuality.  With a tiny cast and only an hour to fill, the play uses the time old tale to make a daring commentary on the adversity still faced by bisexual women in modern society. This production’s Daphne is a bisexual woman working at a charity who becomes increasingly mired in the consequences of a hazy sexual encounter and a dishonest relationship. The classic is the binding force of the play that we don’t see, narratively underscoring hyper modern language as we traverse Twitter feeds with our protagonist, rather than the heavens.

The play is about understanding what it means to be a bisexual woman and to have your identity erased by people demanding categorisation. Daphne’s girlfriend, “Wonder Woman” will tell her that she doesn’t believe it is possible to be bi. However, the violence which Daphne faces over the course of the play only works to substantiate the possibility of her sexuality because it manifests in such fear and resentment in others. Towards the end of the play, Daphne reveals the statistic that bisexual women are five times more likely to experience domestic abuse than straight or gay women. As she is enveloped by awful life events unfolding around her, the protagonist must choose between grasping this identity and letting it possess and destroy her. Her transformation into a laurel tree represents the stoic ability to do the former. “Sap” is the positive substance made of identity and agency which will course through her in tree form. The transformation represents a kind of fortification and self-preservation against the other character’s cruelty and at large, of bisexual women against society’s malice.  

Director, Rosie Morgan Males promises to pack a wedding, restaurant, club, apartment and even Kew Gardens into the Burton Taylor. She told us that ‘you can expect a bit of everything’ as the play snaps very quickly between multiple locations and experiences with only two actors. Actor, Siena Jackson Wolfe nervously quipped that she better be entertaining because she’s ‘nearly all we’ve got for an hour’ and looked briefly forlorn when she recalled how many lines she has to learn in two weeks. She doesn’t leave the stage once. Other actor, Luke Bannister, faces a job equally demanding. He must embody every other character in the production, composing Daphne’s life and the play by weaving together the experiences of multiple, very distinct personalities. This is a copious story packed skillfully and dynamically into sixty minutes.

Luke even tentatively suggested that the play resembles something of Fleabag. We can see why in its comedy and ability to break the fourth wall, the fact of never hearing the protagonist’s name and experiencing the action solely with and through her. He was careful to express, however, that this is not a replication of the hit show but shares some of the absorbing yet buoyant qualities which make it a safe environment to explore very dark themes. 

In the vein of infusing an undeniably heavy play with buoyancy, we will be visually and sonically mesmerized. Mystical hangings and iridescent colors will dress the stage as a space constantly morphing around Daphne, flitting in and out of situations in real time and space and her internal world. A mixture of real-life sound and imported, non-naturalistic sound which the director coins a ‘non digestible soundtrack’ will aid the construction of these populated scenes and bind us closely to Daphne’s experience as her heartbeat fills the theatre. Think of it as an amorphic pallet onto which a dingy club and a sweeping Kew Gardens will be easily superimposed. You must be intrigued now. 

Siena added at the end of our interview that the brilliance of Rafaella Marcus’ script, not two years old, will do most of the work for the crew, but that the director’s ‘palpable passion’ will ensure that the prejudices and dangers of being a bisexual woman are confronted with humor, beauty and sensitivity. 

Sap will run from 19th-23rd November, 21:30 at The Burton Taylor Studio.

Oxford’s first Hip-Hop Society breaks it down

0

In the wake of Atik’s closure and the blow felt by student nightlife, it would seem that music appreciation is taking a different turn this winter, and hopefully into the New Year. Following its announcement back in Trinity ’23, the Oxford student body had the launch party of Oxford’s first HipHop Society to attend. Traditions of soul, jazz, rock and many more exist within the umbrella and often contentious term ‘hip-hop’, a genre that seems to be in a constant state of expansion and evolution.

This notion of multiple genres influencing a stream of new, almost genreless music honours the huge and growing potential of this area of music. The dynamic and social nature of hip-hop was manifest in the success of Hip-Hop Soc’s launch night at The Varsity Club. In fact, the origins of the society arose from conversation around an MF DOOM ring representing the iconic MadVillain mask all the way back in 2023. After a year of discussion, the society is finally in action, boasting a ten-person committee and a far larger number of supporters.

From listening parties to song recommendations, Hip-Hop Society is using the interactive nature of music to their advantage. Strongly refuting the notion that rapping is easy, Tobe Onyia, the society’s secretary, spoke about his own views on hip-hop’s place in Oxford. He stated that the genre is often ‘viewed on a level below other genres’, being seen as easy or requiring less talent. Tobe also highlighted that ‘hip-hop from its roots is something that stemmed from black culture’, subsequently underlining that ‘the negative reception it gets is often rooted in subconscious racial biases’. 

Concluding his passionate testimony with comments on the the current state of hip-hop, Tobe noted that sub-genres like rap ‘do not have a fixed form and are ever expanding’, ultimately concluding that, ‘at the end of the day music is supposed to transmit emotion’. It is a resonant message speaking to the importance of authenticity in music. In introducing themselves, other committee members of the society took to instagram to expose their guilty pleasure listens, ranging from George Michael to Westside Gunn.

Evidently, the effects of hip-hop go beyond music. It represents the power of a collective, and its manifestation in the lives of people, young and old. The diversity of sound within the genre speaks to a rich fabric of talent and storytelling, and moreover a plane of emotion indicative of the shifts and changes in the world around us. Indeed, as Oxford’s newest musical society explores the ways it can bring people together and facilitate a much-needed space for hip-hop music, only one question springs to mind; where have they been all this time? It is safe to say that this new society embodies more than just hip-hop – their love for music is palpable, as well the warmness and friendliness of their members. They suggest that starting with anything produced by the Alchemist or Mike Dean will stand you in good stead for a ‘spiritual musical experience’.

After the much-anticipated ignition, Oxford Hip-Hop Society has finally got its foot on the accelerator, and is asking students to just hold on (we’re going home).