Wednesday 2nd July 2025
Blog Page 1927

Get your cyber-coat, you’ve pulled…

0

I think everyone has been in one of those conversations with one of those couples who almost make you feel obliged to ask how they first met. Or maybe lack of conversation has led you to the same easy question. But in the history of this classic Q&A has anyone actually ever been given the reply: “Oh we met on an internet dating website”? I certainly haven’t.

Internet dating is the Voldemort of the dating world; no one speaks of it because of the sheer fear it inspires, in this case the fear of being marked with the scar of complete desperation. For me it conjures up images of balding old men pretending to be the Calvin Klein model they’ve googled and set as their profile picture in order to lure in the younger woman; it should come with the tagline ‘if you can’t date in the real world, try the internet.’

However, nowadays, internet dating gives you everything upfront: your interests and what, or should I say, who, you’re looking for are laid out for all to see. You don’t have to go on several dates to realise you actually have nothing in common and that your respective interests of wrestling and knitting can’t be reconciled.

At the top of the pile there’s match.com, with reportedly over 20 million members and websites in 25 countries covering 8 different languages. But if mainstream isn’t your thing there’s sure to be something to suit your niche. All in the name of good research, I decided to take a look at a few and join some myself. Not for genuine reasons- this was purely experimental (we hope). In my search for the best and most bizarre sites I came across some absolute gems: tallmingle.com described itself as “The best and largest site in the world for meeting tall friends, tall singles, and tall admirers”… “Tall admirers”, since when was that a thing? The idea of an affinity of height meaning an affinity of heart is surely a pretty alien one, but I suppose common ground could be found, complaining about low level ceilings and the price of getting your trousers lengthened and so forth. And admittedly things were about to get more peculiar when I stumbled across womenbehindbars.com – advertising itself as such, “These female prisoners are looking for love, marriage, pen-pals, and a good solid relationship with men and women in the free world. We have had several marriages and countless relationships.”

So you’ve done the crime and now have to pay the time… with a bit of internet dating on the side; surely this wasn’t advertised in court? But this site boasts results, showing the scope of internet dating even in the most adverse situations (plus the lack of a need to actually date people face-to-face does make it ideal for those in jail or under house arrest).

So it was that I found myself signing up to two internet dating sites, having squabbled with my fellow lifestyle editor about who was going to actually do this- when my profiles get found in 10 years time and my (non-existent) career in the public eye is severely damaged, she will be sorry. Or not. I decided to go for the notorious beautifulpeople.com and the less well-known, but equally ridiculous bluesmatch.com, exclusive to those who have been to Oxbridge. One incredibly vain, one incredibly pretentious, what’s not to like?

beautifulpeople.com

As the name suggests, shallow is this website’s middle name. The idea is that you start your profileand go on a trial period when people vote on your photo and decide whether to let you become a full member or not. Thus, in the face of such poor values I decided to make myself incredibly weird (see profile below)…My interests included the sitar and the line “I hope one day to become a professional musician so the world can hear the rhythm of my soul”. And the photo was equally bizarre; I won’t lie I staged it for this occasion, I don’t usually hang out in the sort of garb on exhibit here: a cricketing hat, 80s gilet, size 11 Timberland boots and a leather glove, not to mention the sitar. I didn’t know what this world of ‘beautiful’ people would make of me, I was almost excited about the onslaught. But within minutes of joining I was getting messages on my wall asking me about my sitar, and sharing with me their various musical interests- this was going better than I hoped. Perhaps beautifulpeople.com was a place for people to talk about interests and passions, rather than boast of their good looks and seek to somehow find someone anywhere near equal to their beauty. However, the illusion of this being anything more than a seedy dating site was quickly shattered by an email from a man older than my parents, yes older, with the charming line: “You look sweet in your photo, bet you ain’t just sweet ;)”… Cheeky wink? I’m a third of your age! My mind had been made up: shallow and shady, this was not a place to hang out. And a piece of advice if you’re thinking of joining, do not add your Uni account as your email address… Alongside emails from various tutors I get messages telling me that ‘Eduardo’ has hugged me. I can safely promise you that Eduardo and I have never met, let alone hugged.

bluesmatch.com

So maybe I would have more success with bluesmatch.com. Plus this was the closest chance I’d have to ever having ‘Blue’ anywhere near my name (my sporting talent has shockingly been largely unrecognised at Oxford). The idea at the outset sounds incredibly pretentious: a place for only Oxbridge people to hang out, no riff-raff allowed. And so yet again I created another ridiculous alter-ego (see profile above). This time a Jack Wills (yes , the photo is staged), Kukui V.I.P- maaaate -loving socialite. However, once you joined the website you could sort of see the point, as many people had naturally similar interests and experiences to share. Of course the element of sleaze was still a problem; as a website for people who have been to Oxbridge, not for those who are currently still at it, the clientele was more than a little older than me. Divorced, retired, (almost) OAP, yet still emailing a 20 year old…concerning.

Bluesmatch.com does offer something else though: the chance for the website doing the hard work for you. They offer you matches based on your profile, and have even given me a few 100% compatible options. The first 100% match they gave me was fair enough: a young guy who described himself as ‘sporty but nice’, a good fit for someone who had stated in their profile, ‘I love rugby guys- if you’re not a blue, I’m not interested. LOL.’ Nevertheless, the reliability of bluesmatch’s matching service was about to plummet with the next 100% match putting me, a self-confessed 20 year old party girl in my profile, with a 60 (at best) year old, ‘walker, bridge player, opera buff, gourmet and self-employed legal consultant’. Wow, they’d gone off-piste with that suggestion.
Ultimately, internet dating is more successful for the older
generation, the divorced or retired who don’t get so many opportunities to meet new people, who are interested in the same things or who have shared the same experiences. But here, while you’re at Uni, you’re exposed to new people of your age every day, and quite frankly you’re as likely to find your soul-mate at Fuzzy Ducks as on any of the websites I tried.

Fitties on the Radar

0

A new social networking site styled after FitFinder has been launched, less than six months after FitFinder’s founder Rich Martell was forced to pull the plug on the original website.

The new website fitradar.co.uk has the same functionality as the original, although it is currently limited to Cardiff, Leeds, Manchester, Oxford, Sheffield and York.

The websites, described by Martell as “localised anonymous microblogging”, allow users to anonymously post both a location and a description of attractive people they have seen.

The original FitFinder website became hugely popular, gaining 2,000 users in its first few hours and 20,000 within a week.

Martell, a student at UCL, was forced to take the website down after the university disciplinary officers fined him £300 and threatened to “take disciplinary action” after accusing him of “bringing the University into disrepute.”

Cherwell contacted Dominic Wroblewski, the man behind Fitradar, to ask him if he thought that Fitradar would share the same fate.
Wroblewski, a Computer Science student at the University of Sheffield, said that he was “a little worried” but hoped that “my University is more lenient when it comes to a website such as Fitradar than UCL.”
Wroblewski said that he wanted “to bring back FitFinder, but hopefully improving on it.”

FitRadar has already drawn conflicting opinions from Oxford students. “I think Fitradar is an abomination,” said Joe Stenson, a second year English student at St John’s.

Wroblewski acknowledged that he has received mixed responses, saying that “the initial feedback has been positive”, but that a number of people have said that his idea was “a little creepy”.

Admitting that while there are currently not many to choose from, Wroblewski said that one of his favourite posts was “St Hilda’s College: Male, Blonde hair. In the bar busting some JLS moves, I had to do a double take, could’ve sworn it was (a pale) Aston.”

“Posts like these actually make me laugh out loud and I hope that the rest of the public can enjoy the fun with me.”

As for FitFinder, Martell previously assured Cherwell readers that “When I’m sure my degree is safe in my hand, then …we’re going to improve the site”.

Protests against the loss of Fitfinder have been coordinated online, with one petition gaining over 3,000 signatures on the first day.

The current homepage for the FitFinder website promises that “something special is coming”. In the meantime, the future of Fitradar remains to be seen.

Fitradar is currently appealing for donations from users to “help the website expand to other locations and universities”. The website pledges to use any paypal donations to “pay for better servers and quicker loading times.”

Wroblewski also added that there are possible plans to create accounts to make the website more acceptable to authorities, assuring that users will still be anonymous, but linked with a registered account.

Finalists’ vac res budget cut short

0

Lady Margaret Hall finalists have discovered for the first time this week that only 20,000 will be put towards vacation residence for finalists at the college, less than half of that spent last year.

 

This has caused outrage as LMH students have said they feel ‘tricked’ by their college into living on campus by not being fully informed of these changes in funding.

 

An emergency JCR meeting was held this Monday in which JCR President Jessica Shuman explained that the college was unable to fund the same amount of students to live in residence this Easter Vacation.

 

Shuman told the JCR, ‘the college just have no money,’ and claimed the college wished to instead rent out the students’ rooms to conference guests.

 

This year the amount the college has set aside for vacation residence would finance a maximum of eight vacation days per student, although Senior Tutor Dr Fiona Spensley disclosed to Cherwell that this money would in fact ‘most likely be for financial hardship.’

 

Previously all students had the option of 15 free days of vacation residence in their final year and 10 free days in their penultimate year, a scheme which cost the college �51,000 last year.

 

Shuman explained that this amount had been spent as the new student Finance Officer had not been properly consulted, while Dr Spensley admitted, ‘the college significantly over-spent the agreed funding last year as the demand for vacation residence for students increased.’

 

David Pares, a third year student at LMH, maintains that ‘the line from college that ‘there is no money left’ is not a strong one.’

 

‘Whilst managing the college finances is not the JCR’s responsibility, a decision of this magnitude should have been properly consulted upon before we signed our tenancy agreements this year.’

 

Shuman also claimed in the JCR meeting, ‘This decision was being made three years ago but no one was made aware.’

 

However, Dr Spensley told Cherwell that the fund was always considered temporary by both the JCR and SCR. The JCR representative on the Grants and Bursaries Committee was consulted last Trinity term concerning the review of the system.

 

The student body has sent an open letter to the Senior Tutor expressing their belief that this review will mean unfair advantages for wealthier students.

 

‘Many people will be left in a situation where they cannot afford to revise in the place that would give them the best chance at success. Given the current focus on access, it is unacceptable that academic success will depend on personal financial situations.’

 

Students also drew comparison to other colleges, whose ability to finance vacation residence had drastically affected their position in the Norrington Table.

 

Rory Fazan, a finalist at LMH, said, ‘The college is very conscious of its modest showings in the Norrington Table and puts considerable pressure on students to do well.’

 

‘If league tables are so important to the SCR, they should be encouraging finalists to remain in Oxford for the Easter Vacation, not punishing those who want to study with massive rent charges.’

 

Merton, currently third in the table, offers students thirty days for vacation residence per year while St John’s, in fourth place, can offer twenty-one.

 

Dr Spensley will meet the student body on Friday to ‘explain the situation and hear the students’ concerns as we work on the proposal.’

 

On Monday the students refused to discuss back up plans with the JCR president and were adamant that they would oppose this review. Fazan explained, ‘We need to make sure the JCR Executive keeps pushing the SCR to revert to the old deal on vacation grants. If their first attempts fail, we will demand that they turn up the volume.’

Creaming Spires

0

us. Not Christmas, dear readers, but Queer Bop! My bad, Queer Fest. The latter is the more politically correct name for a night of hedonism, homos and hot, hot sex. In my opinion, the word ‘fest’ conjures up far more disturbing images (largely, who knows why, of a scatological nature) than the rather more incongruous ‘bop’ does, but who asked me? The thing is, it’s not a night of hedonism, is it?

Before my first QB I was promised stray digits on the dancefloor, writhing, mutually-penetrating forms littering the marquee, liberal nakedity, copious drug use – I stress that I was planning on taking part in all of these strictly in a voyeuristic capacity. Honest. But it was essentially like a normal bop, with more feathers. Oh, and lots of corsets, the ubiquitous item of choice for the female QB attendee. So flattering on the hanger, but when the world and his gay lover are all wearing one, cruelly unforgiving to the fat girl, simply by Einstein’s rule of chubby-relativity. He actually thought of that after seeing a heffer in a corset. True fact.

There was a penis-shaped bucking bronco at the first QB, to give it its due. But not even the offer of a cheeky digit. I remember coquettishly – if briefly – grinding against someone with a ginger afro but realising that I was about to be sick and making a swift exit. No point really, is there, if the gag reflex is kaput for the night? Admittedly, last year I saw a tit. At the time I breathlessly surmised that it must have been a daring (if bizarre) costume choice but have since been informed that it was more of a tit-tape issue. Sigh.

It does always seem the way with big, talked-up nights in Oxford. Summer balls, for instance. Drinking all night, luxurious clothes, reckless, moist encounters in the Warden’s garden? No. Reality – walking around college in a nice dress holding a box of sausages that I no longer want to eat yet, strangely, am loath to part with. I’ve never been to Piers Gav, admittedly, but I imagine a similar scenario. Promised decadence and debauchery descending into girls called Cassandra chewing their faces off and giving semi-conscious (bitey) blowjobs to boys dressed as woodland creatures.

But this year at QB I plan to ‘really go for it’. I’m thinking vajazzles, boobage, maybe I’ll even encourage a whimsical bit of space dogging (look it up) – although that would call for a creepy amount of forethought. I call upon you, dear readers, to join me. And if not, that girl you’ll see running around with her baps out and a lustful look in her eye? That will be me. That, I repeat, will be me.

In the closet

0

A standard way to improve sartorial practice is to read what others have to say about the subject, the opportunities for which overflow from the bookshelves and the magazine racks. The contents of the latter deliver-up as Revealed Truth whatever currently features in fashionable shop windows, most of which is better left on display. Books tend to be more impartial, but the general rule still applies, that the quality of the advice is inversely related to the number of admonishments to buy things, including bald statements that: ‘Every man needs at least five dress shirts, four suits, two pairs of shoes, and polished brass fittings on his mahogany shoe trees.’

Having made something of a study of these books, the advice from In the Closet is to begin and end with The Modern Gentleman: A Guide to Essential Manners, Savvy & Vice. Anything written by two chaps named Phineas Mollod and Jason Tesauro must be fabulous, and it is. Be not alarmed, but comforted, that the title makes no reference to ‘style’, ‘dress’ or ‘fashion’, for while these matters are dealt with in due course, the book’s main achievement is to imbue readers with that particular lightness of being that derives from confidence, or at least capability, in all types of social intercourse. People in this state of mind naturally make better selections from their own closet, and regardless, seem to be appreciated as having done so by those whom they encounter in their jocund run of life.

The worst of the lot, or at least representative of this, is called Mr Jones’ Rules for the Modern Man. It is by Dylan Jones, presently the editor of the magazine GQ UK, a kind of soft core sartorial pornography. The book amounts to a pallid extension of this, a series of poorly-aimed thrusts plainly designed to stoke the consumptive impulse. Hence, aphorisms like ‘a gentleman never wears brown shoes at night’ masquerade as ‘practical advice’, next to instructions on how to read a newspaper without actually reading a newspaper. Thankfully, the latter works for magazines, too.

Dinner gets just desserts

0

Bella Hammad’s entrance, two minutes into the preview, won me over to this production. She rushes in and the piece sparkles to life with a tirade about her dreadful journey through the fog, and a hilarious account of her husband’s affair with ‘Pam’. Laughing out loud does rather undermine the supposedly intimidating status of the reviewer, but it was impossible not to, and the rest of the production followed in style.

On the face of it, Moira Buffini’s Dinner seems like a standard ‘dinner party’ play: Paige (Charlotte Mulliner) is holding a small party in honour of the success of husband Lars’s (Matt Gavan) new book, a neo- philosophical self-help guide. The guests are an amusingly odd assortment: a bohemian erotic artist Wynne, whose husband Bob has left her since she painted a portrait of his genitals, and the newlyweds Sian and Hal (a ‘newsbabe’ and a microbiologist). They are later joined unexpectedly by a young thief, Mike. And comedy ensues. A witty script and eccentric characters in a social setting always make for entertainment.

But even the opening alerts us to the fact that this is going to be a bit different. The play opens with Paige telling a statuesque waiter, played unnervingly by Jean-Patrick Vieu in total silence, to follow the instructions she has given him to the letter – providing in the process a sinister framework for what is to come. She then proceeds to kiss him passionately – without him responding – and sets the tone for the entire evening, which is both Paige’s ‘design’, and frankly, weird.
What follows is a starter of ‘Primordial Soup’ (an inedible mix of soup and algae), ‘Apocalypse of Lobster’ (the guests must choose whether to free or kill their main course), and ‘Frozen Waste’ dessert (literally frozen garbage). Between courses the guests are expected to play a game which requires them to talk on specially selected subjects placed in envelopes, such as ‘suicide attempts’, which spark conflict and a series of dramatic revelations, including divorce, pregnancy, and robbery. We start to see the more emotional motivations behind sarky Paige’s orchestrated evening in a poignant moment when for her topic she asks Lars to get the ‘envelope’ he received a month previously, and Mulliner’s composure breaks down.

What struck me most about the production was its energy. The pace was snappy, it never dragged, and the actors genuinely looked like they were having a whale of a time. The relationships between characters are constantly being developed even when the focus isn’t on them; Sian (Chloe Wicks) and Hal (Rhys Bevan) said little in the scenes I was shown in comparison to some others, but the tension between them was clear throughout, and made their outburst not entirely unexpected. Even when moments of seriousness are defused with comedy, it does not undermine the issues being highlighted. Lars’sbook is the basis of the dinner party, but its philosophy is also used to underline the party’s futility.

From a visual point of view, directors Rob Hoare Nairne and Anna Fox explain that they are trying to break away from the ‘twee’ dinner party theme with a specially made trapezium-shaped table to give the audience a perspective of the guests. This will be added to by the theme of black, white and ‘metal’, with square plates and spirits instead of wine, and accompanied by a DJ remix of Vivaldi’s Four Seasons. None of that can disguise that it is a dinner party themed play. But it doesn’t matter in the slightest – I could not recommend more that everyone who can should go and watch this – even if you’re not a regular play-goer. It’s well acted, very funny and has a ‘huge twist’ at the end which Anna Fox frustratingly refused to reveal, but which I will.

From the players mouth

0

JCR Football Premier Division

Merton/Mansfield 2

Wadham 1

On a positively balmy afternoon, Merton/Mansfield took to the pitch against a testing Wadham side, following an unlucky loss to Worcester. The sides know each other well, after the two captains shared a half-naked bear hug at Park End just a couple of weeks before.
The match started ferociously, with many bone-crunching tackles drawing incomprehensible appeals from the variety of regional accents present. Merton/Mansfield began to dominate, with the otherwise silky-footed Ben Franz producing his trademark six-yard miss, but following a horrendous shank over the bar Sam Firman atoned with a well-taken goal on the half-hour courtesy of an excellent Robbie Coleman pass. Witnesses verify it was actually aimed wide towards the wing, but still cleverly managed to bisect the centre-backs.
The second half saw Wadham still battling but unable to threaten thanks to hard work from M&M midfielders Adam ‘Stabby’ Harris and Joe ‘Sideshow Bob’ Chrisp. After a couple of half-chances, Tom Young skinned his defender before firing home, sparking wild celebrations from the massed substitutes. This only revitalised Wadham, and after a shot flashed inches wide and another forcing Guido Pagani into a magnificent ‘television’ save they forced one home late on. However, the best chance in the dying minutes fell to Ms’ Jamie Cooper, somehow missing from two yards with the keeper on the floor.
Ultimately Merton/Mansfield just had too much, with solid defensive performances from Dan ‘Fresh-Meat’-Hunter, Dan ‘Is’ Camp and Yannick ‘The Grappler’ Young ably assisted by tireless performances from Ali Colin-Jones and Ho-Joon Kim, Merton/Mansfield’s very own Dirk Kuyt and Park Ji-Sung. Wadham will hope to build on a fighting display which will doubtless test many other teams this season.

Jeff Burgin

JCR Football Reverves Cuppers

Brasenose III 10

Oriel II 9

After Brasenose III’s previous 8-7 victory against Magdalen II, the entirety of the pre game tactics was focused on defence. The aim for the next game was to try and reduce the number of goals conceded; something that we thought was within our reach.

The game started well. Brasenose III’s went 3-0 up within 5 minutes as some rather dubious goal keeping opened the door for the clinical Brasenose strikers. 7-1 up after half time, Brasenose’s pre game focus on defence seemed to be working a treat.

As often happens, complacence then set in as the solid centre back Ricky Martin was moved up front in an attempt to allow him to score his first ever goal in two years of football for Brasneose. Needless to say, the move backfired and Oriel sniffed the chance to get back into the game. Some fluid football form Oriel brought the score to 7-4 after 10 minutes of the second half. Brasenose, taking inspiration from the Barca and Brazil teams of old, soon adopted the mentality that defence was unnecessary; as long as they scored more than the opposition. It seemed like the aggressive attitude was to pay off with our very own Ronaldinho soon putting Brasenose 9-5 ahead.

But in the dying minutes of the game Oriel fought hard and brought the score back to 9-7. Added time ticking into its 9th minute, the mighty Brasenose manage to slot in a tenth but a draw still seemed on the cards as Oriel sneaked two cheeky goals in the 10th and 11th minutes of injury time. However thankfully, after a century of hard fought minutes, the whistle was blown and the game won by Brasenose. An epic by anyone’s standards, the game will live long in the memory of those who had the honour to play in it.

Marco Francescon

JCR Women’s Netball

Jesus vs Somerville

Merton vs Somerville

As the days get colder, courts get icier, and netball shorts become more and more inappropriate, we are now half way through term and the stakes are raised as the top teams battle it out for promotion or to avoid relegation.

After a late start at the Worcester courts, Somerville immediately took possession of play, with excellent interceptions from Centre Juliet Wesley, who has been given the title of Man of the Match for nearly all games this term. Despite controlling the majority of passes for the first half, shooting difficulties caused by strong play from the Jesus defence meant that Somerville had problems converting possession into goals. By the end of the first half the score was only 2-1 to Somerville. In the second half, however, Somerville’s defence and excellent shooting from new addition to the Somerville team Flora Graham meant that Somerville increased their lead – although an inexperienced umpire unfortunately resulted in increasingly messy play from both teams. Despite some dubious footwork, the final score to Somerville was a well deserved 4-2, with Juliet winning Man of the Match.

Meanwhile, across Oxford at the LMH courts, the red shorts of Somerville were once more braving the cold as their second team prepared for a Division 5 match against Merton. Although fortunes have been mixed for our second Somerville team this term, spirits were still high for a team that plays as much for crew dates as for athletic acclaim! This match however turned out to be one of the high points of Somerville B’s term.

Somerville gained an immediate advantage on the court, ensured once again by some excellent play by Juliet against a very animated male Merton player, and some characteristically loud and over-enthusiastic cuts by ex-captain Clare Phipps in GD. Somerville converted this advantage into a steady increase in goal difference resulting from some consistent shooting from Elie McDaniell, a chameleon on the netball court as often found as GD as GA. Merton were prevented from fighting back by some incredibly feisty marking and the final score was 11-6.

Clare Phipps

Blues in the pink as Brighton lax lustre

0

In true Oxford fashion, the dark blues came out to dominate. After a controversial warm up in a resident’s front garden in Eastbourne (where the University of Brighton is located), the team, headed up by Abdul El-Sayeed and John Patten, jogged out on to the STP Astroturf. The face-off, scheduled for 2pm, was finally taken twenty minutes later, with an early attempt at goal from the king of fo-go’s, Abdul on long pole.

Play settled down into a confident stream of passes around the crease from the Oxford attack. Confused by the mix of English and American accents shouting lacrosse terms like ‘I’m hot’, ‘slide’ and ‘help’, the Brighton defence gave in to an early dodge by Elias Rothblatt, who ripped it in leftie. Congratulations – you did St.Catz proud.

In rapid succession, the first quarter saw goals from #25 Mike Broida, our resident American leftie, who cranked it in and stunned the goalie. After some music off the pipework, #20 Peter “Matthew McConahay” Windsor went for the ankle-breaker with a low to low shot, shooting into the bottom corner of the Brighton goal. Despite the impending doom of rain and darkness looming on the East Sussex coastline, the first quarter score of 3-0 in Oxford’s favour maintained high morale for the team.

The whistle blew for the second 20 minute quarter, triggering a battle in midfield orchestrated by Eric Heisner, Joe Lockey and Sam Johns. Whilst the Oxford defence were briefly challenged by Brighton’s, displaying flair stick skills yet all-round nonchalance in attack, strong man marking and crisp passes in transition kept the Purple Panther’s scoreline to a minimal one goal. Oxford struck back quickly with a sizzler from Elias, his second of the game, showing us how they do it in the US of A.

As the second half got underway, Oxford leading by 5 goals to 1, the 3 strong crowd, composed of slightly baffled and likely lost OAPs, had high hopes of a goal infused 40 minutes of lacrosse. Sadly this wasn’t the case. Scrappy midfield, minor injuries and a setting sun played havoc with Oxford’s characteristic ‘sexy lax’. Nonetheless, the fort was held strong by the long poles – Abdul, Tom Clohessy, Stephen Gaw and Chris Needham – reinforced by the second line of defence in the form of goalie Cyprian Yonge. Saving multiple shots with the rim of his stick, he gained man of the match status, for admirable patience, feline-like reactions, and all-round great technique.

The final quarter rewarded the persistent audience, as #7 Mikey secured two more crease goals, confidently putting his body on the line each and every time. In the final 5 minutes, a luminescent yellow ball replaced the standard white one, prolonging play in the darkness until, finally, the referee admitted the conditions were ‘verging on dangerous’, blowing the final whistle. Three cheers were sounded, victory photos taken, and P90X stretches completed, before boarding the bus in military fashion and waving goodbye to the south coast. The Oxford reign continues…

Oxford: 7

Brighton: 1

Oxford don’t tread water

0

Oxford swimming club made a flying start to the season, bringing home an unprecedented haul of 4 medals and breaking 8 university records, in the British Universities swimming championships. The traditional sporting powerhouse Loughborough took the overall title, but Oxford managed a very credible 13th place – comfortably beating Cambridge who came in a lowly 24th.

Swimming in her first competition since picking up the prestigious NCAA sportswoman of the year award, American graduate student Justine Schluntz opened the medal account. Despite still struggling with a potentially career-ending shoulder injury, Justine cruised into the 50m backstroke final with a new university and county record of 28.98, ultimately finishing with a bronze. She followed this up with another bronze in the 100m freestyle, a highly competitive event, in another University record of 56.60. Her third record came in the 100m back, a time of 1.04.93.

Performance of the weekend has to go to Hertford engineer Jack Marriott, for his imperious victory in the 50m butterfly in a time of 24.16 – the first time a gold has gone to an oxford swimmer since the event has existed in its current format. Jack added this to a silver in the 100m fly, putting in a career best time of 54.51. Jack admitted to being “very, very happy” with his achievements, and wanted to thank Sinead O’Sullivan-Carty and her team of hair removal specialists for literally shaving those vital hundredths off his time.

Oxford captain Tom Booth from Magdalen faced one of the tougher challenges of the weekend, having to contend with the current world record holder Liam Tancock in his premier event, the 50m back. Tancock is also the current world champion over this distance, but Booth was not overawed by his presense, and he comfortably qualified for the final. This was quickly followed by a spectacular performance in the 200 back, where he smashed the university record by over a second, clocking a time of 2:05.71 in qualifying for his second final.

Other finalists were Kouji Urata, who placed 7th in the 200m fly, Katherine Rollins, 5th in the 200m breastroke and Lucy Spencer, 8th in the 400m freestyle. This required university record swims from Katherine (2:42.98) and Lucy (4:37.29), highlighting the strength of the competition. The women’s 4x50m medley team qualified for the B final; and a second place finish in this final, in a record time of 2:07.36 by Justine, Katherine, Nicole Cheetham and Lucy, brought the meet to a fantastic finish.

At an event with the British Swimming ‘Intensive Training Centres’ at Stirling, Bath, and Loughborough fielding their strongest teams, these results are proof that Oxford swimming is on the up, and the tabs had better watch out.

University Records: 8

Oxford Medals: 4

Online Preview: The Enemies

0

Slap bang on the denouement of The Enemies, the stage explodes. Possibly. The directors haven’t decided yet. The script at this point says only ‘CRAZYSCENE,’ in enormous Calibri letters. This might incorporate video projections or Middle English, explain the play’s authors Yasu Kawata and Peter Shenai. Then again, it might just mean taking the set to pieces and screaming random fragments of Shakespeare.

Welcome to The Enemies. In case you haven’t guessed, it’s mad. The plot goes something like this: on the eve of his wedding, the Baron Romerstadt is visited by four masked strangers. The first he unthinkingly dismisses. The second proves harder to get rid of, hinting at some vague dark cloud that threatens to blacken his wedding day. By the third, the Baron loses control. He detects the hand of his nemesis Kubin behind the plot, and panics. His world is literally unravelling. Then he descends into CRAZYSCENE, everything blacks out, and he wakes up with a dead body at his feet.

There are some very clever games going on here. A fog of surreality suffuses the play from the first scene, and you have to ask yourself serious questions about sanity and identity in order to keep on top of the plot. The play has the same pervasive air of menace that you see in [i]Shutter Island[/i] or Jean Genet’s play [i]The Maids[/i], and this is sustained through some elegant pieces of mis-en-scene. These range from the obvious – the same actor plays all four visitors, radically changing his persona with only half-masks to help him – to the obsessively delicate: where the plot begins to break down, for example, the Baron’s pen stops working. Any assiduous readers of Jorge Luis Borges will notice all kinds of echoes of his compendium of short stories, Labyrinths.

But – and as the play I saw was very much a work in progress, this is only a potential but – at the time of the preview, The Enemies was not a powerful drama. A lot of work still needed to go into making the characters credible. This was especially true of the Baron, who will need to turn in a strong performance if he is to hold the play together.

If the cast can breathe more life into the script, The Enemies promises to be a deeply unsettling experience that will leave your head ringing with its insane babble of broken theatrical voices. If not, I can still recommend this play for its intellectual content, but it may struggle to get through to the hearts of its audience. This would be a scant reward for what is an ambitious and distinctive piece of new writing.