Sunday 12th April 2026
Blog Page 1877

Amsterdamned: One

0

Now, I’ve been to Amsterdam before, but under quite different circumstances, and with my family. Understandably, this particular jaunt avoided Amsterdam’s more infamous attractions, and focussed rather more on museums and historical sites (apart from one memorably awkward instance when my granddad and I wandered into the red light district, but that’s another story). But this time would be different. This time I was going with my friends Will, Dave and Mark, staying in a youth hostel and exercising our independence in one of the most exciting and debauched cities in the world.

It sort of worked.

As soon as we arrived, we tried to get to grips with the public transport system, and found it infinitely confusing. We found that on the trams you could only buy an hour return ticket, but there was no real mechanism to prevent you from just getting on the bus and then just leaving without paying. Obviously we were good citizens and didn’t take advantage, but I was struck that this was a very different kind of place — where in Britain would they trust you like that? Soon we were at the hostel, The Flying Pig Uptown, and this too was a new experience for me — I’d never stayed in a hostel before. I’ll be honest, I found the relaxed attitude and informality a little jarring at first, but soon I got used to it and really enjoyed the friendly, casual atmosphere there. After a brief unpack we hit up a cheap Italian place for some food, then went to one of Amsterdam’s ‘Brown Cafes’ for a few drinks and some cards. We found this great little place (it didn’t seem to have a name) full of both locals and a couple of tourists, and we stayed there until closing. During our time there we sampled a drink unique to the Netherlands and Belgium, ‘Jenever’, a potent drink distilled from Juniper berries. English gin evolved from the drink, and I quite enjoyed it — it was very strong but malty, and warmed me up for the evening.

Upon returning to the hostel, hoping to get acquainted with our room-mates, we were surprised to find them all tucked up in bed. Instead, we went down to the hostel bar (which was also pretty quiet) before we called it a night.

The next morning we got up at an almost unholy hour for teenage males (10!!!!) to take advantage of our included breakfast, before taking to the pavements to explore the city a little. Unfortunately we’d picked a week of poor weather to travel, so torrential rain put paid to our cheerful ramblings, and after we’d seen the War Memorial in Dam square (and one sodden magician attempting to perform) we took shelter in the ‘Oude Kerk’ (Old Church) of Amsterdam. This church was first consecrated in 1306 but now placed rather incongruously in the main red light district. The Oude Kerk has this massive carved wooden infrastructure, very different from anything I’d seen before and very impressive even though it was going through one of many renovations due to years of disuse. Much of the stained glass had also obviously been pretty beaten up, but it was still quite engaging (although admittedly we paid more attention to avoid the rain outside). Once the rain had eased off a little we headed out and accidentally (honest) plunged straight into the heart of the red light district. Admittedly it was a Tuesday afternoon, so it wasn’t exactly the last days of Rome out there, but we still saw an awful lot of what Amsterdam had to offer. If I’m entirely truthful, I found it a bit off-putting having all these scantily clad women staring at me from less than a metre away behind glass. It was hard not to feel like a bit of a perv just by being there. The rest of the district was a mass of sex shops, sex theatres and weed cafes, but mixed in with very ordinary homes and businesses. I thought that there was a great sitcom idea in the man who opened a bike shop in between two brothels. Make him a strict Roman Catholic and we have a series!

The next day was our day of debauchery, starting with us taking a swing at The Sex Museum. The result was slightly harrowing, not helped by the pneumatic dummy of a flasher or the overweight, naked prostitute dummy that shot out of a wall screaming at me (but didn’t seem to be triggered by ANYONE ELSE). I was also slightly traumatised by all the ancient plates and artefacts decorated with sexual images and phalluses, realising the extent that museums had concealed from me over the years. Still, the Victorian porn was quite funny. Great muttonchops! After all this excitement we reckoned we could use a stiff drink, so we undertook a seven-hour bar crawl. Maybe a bit of overkill, but it was a lot of fun. We flitted between six different clubs and bars, taking what free drinks we could, even if it was just a manly white wine or a cinnamon shot. It was a great night, with loads of great happenings like Dave’s success with some young ladies from Sheffield uni (one, a Cambridge resident, seemed determined to tear into me for being an Oxford student — does the rivalry extend to residents? I didn’t think it did), and Will taking two stomach punches from bouncers for free drinks (one of which he gave to a tall Australian girl like a chump, who disappeared straight afterwards). We found ourselves scraping the barrel of what burger king had to offer at 3 in the morning before we retired to our hostel to further demonize ourselves in the eyes of our room-mates by being noisy. An appropriate end to the night, I think.

To be continued…

Festivals: Do and Don’t

0

Having just come back from Bestival, with Reading a couple of weeks before that, I’ve come up with a handy list of ‘do’s and ‘don’t’s that you can learn from for next summer.

Don’t forget that it’s a music festival, not a weekend camping. You may as well see a few bands. You never know, you might even like them.

Do pace yourself. Festivals are more of a marathon than a sprint. While it always seems like drinking everything you can lay your hands on during the first day, when there’s not even music to act as a distraction, is a good way to pass the time, the three day long hangover afterwards tends to get in the way of the rest of the festival. Sleep is another one to watch. While it seems like a great idea at the time to challenge each other, in the spirit of ‘laddishness’, to a contest of who can avoid going to sleep first, with the threat of a quasi-homoerotic bukkake session for the loser, at about six when the sun rises you tend to realise how badly you’ve misjudged the situation. Or just wake up a little bit sticky and with nowhere to shower.

Don’t go in fancy dress unless it’s appropriate. For some festivals fancy dress is practically encouraged, for others it tends to be the territory of those desperate for attention or just so far gone they have no idea what they’ve been dressed up in. However at others, normally the more ‘boutique’ ones (for those fluent in festi-speak), fancy dress is something practically encouraged, and not dressing up immediately marks you out as one of ‘those people’, the sort that turn up to bops without a costume or have just come as ‘insert character here on their day off’. And nobody wants to be one of those people.

Do check the tent before you go. I made the mistake of believing that the tent I had left in the roof of my garage five years ago would definitely be in exactly the same condition that I had packed it away in. I was proved very, very wrong. Having raced to find a campsite and get the tents up before it started raining I opened up the tent bag and pulled out the tent, only to find it tearing like tissue paper. This led to a trip to the nearest camping shop, in the rain that I had been trying to avoid, to buy a tent that I’m pretty sure I paid twice what it was worth. The only saving grace was that after the festival I took back my tent, claiming it leaked, and managed to get a full refund.

Don’t bother collecting cups. While I’ve heard at some festivals collecting cups can be relatively easy, profitable and carries little social stigma, at Reading these points definitely do not apply. While 10p a cup may seem like it initially stacks up, you’ll probably spend well more than that on the £5 pints needed to make the task of clambering around on the floor, picking up screwed up bits of cardboard on the floor (or even worse, begging strangers for their cups) bearable.

Do remember appropriate footwear. If it rains, bring wellies. If you don’t your feet are going to know about it and you’re going to regret it, trench-foot makes for one of the worst festival souvenirs (get a t-shirt instead, if you must). Always remember a comfortable pair of trainers though, or any sort of shoe that is designed to actually fit feet. After four days of wearing wellies you’ll realise the person that designed them must have had an element of masochism about them; your soles will feel as though they have lost a boxing match with the floor while your little toes are not likely to ever be the same again.

Don’t plan to buy all your food and drink there. The local supermarkets will be very busy. Literally, it’s like a nuclear war has been announced and panic buying has set in, except if everyone panic buying was already drunk and unable to push the trolley in a straight line. You’ll get overwhelmed by the choice of food, when all you can really keep for longer than a day is biscuits and crisps (give up on the five-a-day/any sources of protein, carbs are your friend), and while the beer may be cheap, your muscles will not let you forget about it when you’ve carried two crates a couple of miles through the mud. Equally buying your food on-site is a no-go, unless you’ve recently won the lottery. Festival supermarkets charge M&S prices for Aldi goods, and the hot food stands think nothing of charging you £5 for a burger WITHOUT CHIPS. Saying that, if you are buying your food there choose Bestival’s range of freshly made and locally sourced food, which ranges from paella to sausages, as opposed to Reading’s ‘variety’ (the highlight of which is a giant Yorkshire pudding stand).

Do choose your spot carefully. Your spot very much depends on your outlook, as well as the festival. At Reading the further forward you get the less space you get to stand in (until you get so far forward you are just being held up by other people), and as soon as the music starts you will need to use all your concentration just to stay up as everyone decides to drunkenly make some space/surge forward. This will happen in any band. Seriously, I was once forced to mosh to an acoustic Mumford and Sons performance. Further back tends to give you a bit more space and a chance of actually seeing the band/enjoying the music, as opposed to this just being a soundtrack to your survival attempts. At Bestival you’re probably a bit safer, everyone’s too busy skanking to think about anyone else.

Don’t forget to charge your phone. The music is best enjoyed with friends, and I can guarantee that as soon you enter the arena you’ll lose them. I have literally been behind someone in the queue and managed to lose them within five seconds of getting in, and meeting points are a great idea until its five minutes before the band starts and you suddenly realise there is more than one ice cream van by the side of the stage.

Do explore the other things on offer (sometimes). At some festivals the music is just the beginning, at others it’s very much the end. At Bestival I danced to 80s classics in a fake hollowed-out tree, to blues in a grungy bar, heard some reggae and chilled on some hanging benches, all after the main stages had finished. On the other hand when the music ends at Reading you may as well go to bed (unless you want to brave the 500 capacity silent disco, which for a site of 90,000 is a bit small and tends to lead to queuing).

Don’t trust the weather forecast. It’s never right. If it says it’s going to be sunny, bring waterproofs. If it predicts rain, bring a pair of trainers.

Government backpedals on tuition fee policy

0

Universities will be offered incentives to lower their fees as part of the government’s recent adjustments to its policy on tuition fees.

A recent study by the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI) has outlined several problems that may result from the policy outlined in the initial White Paper on higher education released in June.

When the White Paper was published the government expected that most universities would opt to charge an average of £7,500 for tuition with only a few élite universities charging the maximum level of £9,000. However, the vast majority of Universities have declared that they will charge £9,000 which has caused the government to rethink some of the details of their plans.

Benjamin Maconick, Keble student and co-chair of the Oxford University Liberal Democrats, acknowledged the government’s error of judgement, commenting, “It probably was a mistake of the government not to foresee that a lot of universities would charge £9k as a ‘prestige’ marker.”

Maconick predicted that the situation may correct itself naturally, saying, “I think common sense will work its magic and students will realise that universities such as Southbank are not worth £9k a year, and will hopefully stop applying there.”

The government’s latest proposals aim to discourage universities from charging more than £6000, by limiting the number of students they can take on. However, universities will be free to take as many students as they want with AAB or higher at A-level, as the limitations only apply to students with lower grades.

The HEPI report raised concerns that these plans will leave universities less inclined to admit students with high potential but lower grades which could increase the bias towards independent schools.

The Oxford University Press Office responded by saying that this aspect of the policy will not affect Oxford as the University “will continue to look for those with the ability and potential to succeed here, but with more than 33,000 students getting AAA every year and more than 17,000 applicants to Oxford, the University’s standard AAA offer will not be changing any time soon.”

The HEPI study added that the need for Universities to compete for the top students may cause scholarships to become more “needs blind”, to which the Press Office said, “From 2012 Oxford’s fee waivers and bursaries will provide the greatest support for the poorest students of any university in the country, and this is a fact in which the University takes great pride.”

The government has also recently released proposals to charge penalties to graduates in England who repay their student loans early. The aim of the proposal is to prevent students who don’t need loans taking them out, putting them in an interest-earning savings account and paying them back at a profit.

James Lawson, chairman of the Oxford University Conservative Association commented: “Early repayment penalties are only one idea in consultation. The government will continue to review its policies in order to maximise fairness and quality in education.’

Meanwhile Benjamin Maconick of OULD, though agreeing that “the new system is undeniably progressive”, took a more negative view on this specific aspect of the government’s plans saying that the policy would cause unnecessary harm to “students from less well off backgrounds for whatever reason wanting to pay off their loans early, for example by being particularly fiscally prudent etc.”

In a report submitted to the government on Wednesday, a large group of academics, including several members of the Oxford University Campaign for Higher Education, declared that “the aim of increasing social mobility is likely to be frustrated by devices such as removing the numbers cap for AAB applicants, which will tend to concentrate students from private and public schools in the ‘top’ universities.”

The report is Oxford academics’ second major display of opposition since they voted for a motion of no-confidence in David Willetts in June. In it concerns were also raised about the forcing of market mechanisms into higher education and the encouragement of the creation of different types of higher education institutions including private universities and examination institutions that do not teach.

It concluded that the coalition’s tuition fees policy has “no vision for the medium or long-term and demonstrates a worrying lack of foresight about the foreseeable consequences and level of risk which attends the proposed experiment.”

Review: Bombay Bicycle Club – A Different Kind of Fix

0

For a young band to radically change their sound from one album to the next can often be a bad sign, especially in regard to their future. It suggests a fundamental difference within the band about what kind of music they should be making. Think of Panic! At the Disco’s change from the angst-ridden teen emo of A Fever You Can’t Sweat Out to their 60’s pop-inspired sophomore effort Pretty Odd complete with Beatles-esque melodies and hair. They split soon afterwards.

Bombay Bicycle Club underwent a similarly momentous shift from their 2009 post-punk inspired debut, I Had The Blues But I Shook Them Loose, to their second album Flaws, essentially an acoustic folk album. However, upon hearing A Different Kind of Fix, Bombay’s third album, the change in genre makes sense. The electric guitars and the major keys are back but the lush sound of Flaws along with its more mature song structures and frontman Jack Steadman’s soulful folk-developed delivery remain. The result is impressive and the ease with which Bombay Bicycle Club have managed to change their style betrays their extensive musical talents. A Different Kind of Fix is incredibly consistent throughout, and its line-up consists of beautifully melodic songs. Stand-out tracks include album opener ‘How Can You Swallow So Much Sleep’ and the brilliantly infectious and hook-filled first single, ‘Shuffle’, which will undoubtedly have the listener producing a few outrageously dancey shoulder movements whilst mumbling along in an attempt to harness the energy, if not the sense, of the chorus.

The album also exhibits a far denser layering of sound than was present on their previous records with more sophisticated studio techniques being employed. This strengthens the moodier songs, such as ‘Bad Timing’ and ‘What You Want’, by creating the kind of enveloping and atmospheric tone similar to artists such as Wild Beasts, as well as using keyboards and synthesizers to infuse the more upbeat tracks with urgency. There is a nod to Flaws during the simple acoustic verses of ‘Beggars’ but A Different Kind Of Fix sees Bombay Bicycle Club move towards a bigger sound that will surely spark renewed interest in their output.

Review: Laura Marling – A Creature I Don’t Know

0

When Laura Marling released I Speak Because I Can in March last year, she had the nation’s music press climbing over each other to lavish her with ever-more stratospherically high praise. At last, one of the starlets of the British ‘nu-folk’ scene had made something both complex and enduring; truer and more nuanced than the Mumfords’ bloated banjo-rock, yet less aggravating than Billy Bragg soundalike Frank Turner. On I Speak, Marling demonstrated how she had matured into a writer capable of creating some of the most poignant, emotive, and mysterious songs of a generation.

While A Creature I Don’t Know marginally fails to match those dizzying heights, it is a more than a commendable continuation – if not a great evolution – of its predecessor. Many of the tracks on here would be at home on I Speak: in particular, ‘Don’t Ask Me Why’ gradually works a pretty opening riff up into a subtle, strings-infused number not dissimilar to the softness of ‘Blackberry Stone’, while on lead single ‘Sophia’, Marling’s voice hits the sweet spot between the flighty, ethereal quality of Joanna Newsom and the huskiness of Blue-era Joni Mitchell. Nevertheless, several of the arrangements on A Creature see Marling at her most adventurous to date: opening gambit ‘The Muse’ dissolves into deliciously jazzy piano licks, while the jaw-dropping ‘Salinas’ cheekily catches one unawares with a crunchy mid-track guitar line. There are times, such as on ‘I Was Just A Card’, when a lack of gutsiness gives the song’s texture a somewhat naff, mum-rock feel, but by and large, each song hits its mark.

Lyrically, Marling plumbs depths yet darker and more difficult than on her last full-length. Her stoic sense of humour and her masterful manipulation of allegory, which blossomed on last year’s LP, has now ripened fully into (whisper it quietly) an almost Dylan-esque writing style. Never has this been heard better than on ‘The Beast’, a sprawling, roiling colossus of a song which conjures the blackest, most animalistic spectre of mankind and infuses it with macabre images of nooses, violence, and female submission. As on I Speak, many of the tracks deal with the burdens of womanhood and her turbulent (and often unfulfilling) relationships with men: ‘He screams in the night/I scream in the day/We weep in the evening/And lie naked and pray’ sings she on ‘Night After Night’, seemingly an unfaithful wife’s lament to a marriage now bereft of love.

Laura Marling may only be twenty-one, but she already possesses a body of work to which an established mainstay of the indie-folk realm would well aspire. A Creature I Don’t Know is another dazzling addition to her portfolio; while many tracks revolve around the sombre, brooding folk music she clearly adores, the blither, fuller instrumentation on much of this new material could represent an interesting point of departure for her future work.

Cows, Combines, and Country Bumpkins

0

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3992%%[/mm-hide-text]

An old farmer with his Massey-Ferguson. 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3989%%[/mm-hide-text]

Splitting logs. 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3988%%[/mm-hide-text]

Straw bailer. 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3987%%[/mm-hide-text]

Tagging a newborn bull calf. 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3993%%[/mm-hide-text]

Cow and calf. 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4001%%[/mm-hide-text]

Herding cows across the marshes. 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4002%%[/mm-hide-text]

Rounding them up. 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4005%%[/mm-hide-text]

Farmer. 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4003%%[/mm-hide-text]

Blocking the road. 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3994%%[/mm-hide-text]

Show jumping. 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3997%%[/mm-hide-text]

Galloping through the surf. 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3990%%[/mm-hide-text]

Rearing yearling. 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3998%%[/mm-hide-text]

Ramshackle farmyard. 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%3999%%[/mm-hide-text]

Yar valley. 

9/11- Ten years on

0

Few events have had the impact of the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11th 2001. At a stroke, the sense of American invulnerability that had been in place since the end of the Cold War was wiped away. Americans and the rest of the ‘Western’ world had to face up to the fact that their own methods of transport, the arteries connecting the globalised world, could be used against them. Ten years on from those attacks makes a convenient point to assess how the European powers and America have dealt with this threat.

An obvious but easily overlooked point is that the fallout from September 11th has spawned measures that have an impact on us all. Airport security was given a radical overhaul (necessary given the failures of September 11th). The previous emphasis on ease of transit was replaced with a desire to minimise risk, however time consuming. In the UK, public spaces have become more closely policed, while unattended bags, once assumed to be innocent things destined for the lost property depot, can bring places to a standstill. Given the number of thwarted terror attacks in Europe and America since 2001, it seems that these measures have had significant success in stopping additional terrorist attacks. At the same time however, Western cities have become more paranoid, increasingly closely policed places. Age old rights such as not being detained for longer than a set period without trial have also been sacrificed (notably in the case Guantanamo Bay). Combating terrorism within European and North American states has come at a price.

Domestic politics in the West has also been moulded considerably by the events of 9/11. In America, for centuries self-styled ‘land of free’, the PATRIOT Act was passed in October 2001, which gave the central government unprecedented power to intrude into individuals’ correspondence and records. Other governments have passed similar measures, infringing upon their citizens’ liberties in an effort to combat terrorism. An increase in Islamophobia, can also be in large part attributed to the attacks of September 11th 2001. Rhetoric aimed at inspiring support for ‘the war on terror’ was sadly in some cases conflated with hostility to Islam in general. Groups such as the English Defence League in the UK have been able to form and find support due to the negative connotations attached to Islam in the minds of some after 9/11. Likewise the Tea Party movement, rooted in Conservative Christian ideology and at times openly hostile to Islam, has become a significant political force in America. In some respects therefore the terrorists behind 9/11 have acheived one of their key aims; an end to tolerant multiculturalism and its replacement with polarised radicalism. European and American governments have been forced to compromise some of their citizens’ most fundamental rights, while multiculturalism has come under considerable strain in some areas. It is perhaps a measure of the West’s resilience that the urge to pass even more oppressive legislation has been resisted and that in many multicultural areas people have united together in the name of moderation.

The shift to an interventionist foreign policy by the NATO powers, recognising that unless they were proactive the threat from Al-Qaeda would only grow, was also heralded by the events of September 11th. Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq arguably defined the decade after 9/11 and led to regimes hostile to the US and NATO being removed and the capacity of terrorist groups to operate being significantly reduced. This success has however been tempered by the propaganda boost given to Islamic militants who have been able to portray America in particular as a ‘crusader’ state and whip up resentment over civilian deaths at the hands of the occupying forces. Obama’s efforts to reach out to the Middle East and the seemingly successful intervention in support of the Libyan uprising may in time help to change the negative views of the West that the ‘wars on terror’ helped to create. The US and European powers may well have successfully mitigated the threat terror poses to them since 9/11 but at the cost of their diplomatic relations and standing in the Middle-East in particular.

Ten years on, the fallout from September 11th has produced no clear winners. Al-Qaeda has been harassed and severely damaged operationally; indeed fewer US citizens died from terror attacks in the decade after 9/11 than they did in the decade before. The death of Osama Bin Laden earlier this year, will have given many renewed hope that the threat of Islamic militants can be crushed once and for all. The still inconclusive situation in Afghanistan however shows the scale of the struggle that is still to come. It might be decades until the ‘war on terror’ is definitively won. The terror attacks of 9/11, abhorrent and devastating, were designed to instil the maximum level of fear in western populations. The security culture the attacks led to, measures such as the PATRIOT Act, which it has been argued infringed too greatly on citizens’ rights and liberties and the rise in Islamophobia can be seen as manifestations of that fear. The last ten years for the West have been a delicate battle between taking measures necessary to stop terrorism and not overreacting and inflaming opinion either internationally or at home. It remains to be seen if they have struck the right balance.

Guardian recognises Oxford journalists

0

Oxford publications and writers have been nominated in several categories at the 2011 Guardian Student Media Awards, as the panel drew up their shortlist this week.

Cherwell itself is one of five contenders for Publication of the Year, and will go up against publications from Kingston, York and London universities. It has a history of success at the awards, having been nominated in the same category last year, and having won the award for Website of the Year in 2008.

The Oxonian Globalist, the website of Oxford’s international affairs magazine, is nominated for Website of the Year in the 2011 awards, going up against publications from Birmingham, Warwick, Southampton and Liverpool.

Individual Oxford journalists have also been recognised in the list of nominees. Lizzie Porter, who is editor of The Oxford Student for Michaelmas 2011, has been nominated for Reporter of the Year. Porter has already won the Anjool Malde Memorial Trust award for excellence in student journalism this year.

If she wins the category, it will mark the second year running that an Oxford student is named Reporter of the Year, as Camilla Turner, former editor of Cherwell, won the accolade last year.

In addition, Alex Dymoke, former joint editor of Isis, is in the running for Feature Writer of the Year, while Mehreen Khan (a History and Politics student at Trinity who writes a sports blog) and Helen Robb, a writer for Cherwell, are both contenders for Columnist of the Year.

The final winners in each category will be announced at a ceremony on 23 November.

Hello Stephen: Introducing leggy blonde, Steve Merchant, 36.

0

You’ve just started your first stand-up tour, ‘Hello Ladies’. Is this something that’s been in the works a long time, or just a hare-brained scheme to meet women? What can we expect from the show?

I did stand-up after I left university and I was a finalist in some comedy competitions. I was good enough to get paid and I used to gig regularly, but somewhere along the line I lost interest. Once The Office took off, it just seemed easier not do it. I didn’t get enough of a kick from performing to warrant driving up and down the motorway to gigs, eating Ginsters in service stations at midnight. I used to look at Ricky doing stand-up and think, ‘Why’s he bothering? It’s so much effort.’ Then I just woke up one day and I had the itch again. I felt I’d never really nailed stand-up. So I started doing five or ten minute slots here and there and I’ve been pottering around the circuit for a few years now. This tour is the result of that itch. The show is about my failed search for a wife and how I thought fame would be the answer to everything and it isn’t. My life has always revolved around my search for a mate and the show explores every aspect of that, from teenage hopeless ness to the time I got thrown out of a wedding. It’s very confessional.

It’s been a while then since you’ve been on stage by yourself in front of an audience, and the first time since the huge success of The Office, Extras, The Ricky Gervais Show and your other work. How different is it playing to a room full of people who, for want of a better phrase, know who you are?

It’s tricky because different audiences know me as different things; as an actor or from the podcastsor from chat-show appearances – and each of those is different from the stand-up ‘me’. If you go and see, say, Jack Dee, you know that he’s going to be grumpy and dead-pan – but audiences don’t know what to expect from my stand-up show. But basically, as long as you expect something honest and very physical and surprisingly sweaty you’ll be pleased.

You’re a week in so far, with the tour ending in New York just before Christmas. How is ‘The Road’ –and the accompanying rock ‘n’ roll lifestyle that we can only imagine – treating you?

Backstage at a theatre is the least sexy place in the world. The dressing rooms are about as glamorousas a boys changing room after a school rugby match in the rain. If the rock ‘n’ roll lifestyle is a cup oftea and a sandwich from M&S, then yes, call me Keith Richards.

This is your first major solo creative project since working with Ricky. Is it more difficult writing alone, or do you appreciate the peace and quiet?

Writing on my own isn’t a problem, it’s just that writing a stand-up act at all is hard work. I don’t find I can just sit down and write stand-up. It has to evolve over time on stage. Or an idea will occur to me on the way to a gig and I’ll try it out, then refine it each time I go back on stage. The audience is my writing partner in a way, because they tell me what’s working or what’s unclear or what’s simply not funny. Awriting partner that doesn’t get paid, obviously. Make that clear.

Have your podcast colleagues seen the show yet? Have you had much support or feedback from Ricky? And how about from Karl [Pilkington, former producer and butt of the jokes in both the Ricky Gervais podcast and An Idiot Abroad]?


Ricky will probably wait for a free DVD so he can watch it as home in his pajamas. I run ideas past him sometimes but mainly I learn what I need to know from the audience. They either laugh or they don’t.That’s all that you can go on in the end. I don’t think Karl even knows the stand-up show is happening.He’s too busy filming the new series of An Idiot Abroad [Sky1 HD, 23rd September]. This time we’ve made him compile a bucket list – things to before you die. Karl chose things like whale watching and swimming with dolphins. Obviously Ricky and I have meddled as usual, so he doesn’t realize he’ll actually be swimming with sharks.

As well as Hello Ladies and the return of An Idiot Abroad, there is also a new project with Ricky Gervais and Warwick Davis, Life’s Too Short [BBC 2, this autumn]. Ricky has described the latter as ‘the life of a showbiz dwarf’ – can you add any more?

In real life Warwick Davis is an actor – he was in Return of the Jedi, Harry Potter – and he’s happily married and a nice guy. In Life’s Too Short Warwick is playing a fictionalised version of himself. He’s hustling for work and contending with a divorce, a failing career, a giant tax bill and being only 3’6′. Warwick is exceptional in it: great at comedy and drama, tremendous at physical comedy as well. He throws himself about with such abandon. I think people will be amazed at how good he is. Also in the show he often bothers Ricky and I for work because he knows us having appeared in Extras. And like in Extras, big stars pop up on occasion.


The BBC have confirmed an impressive list of guests, including Johnny Depp, Sting and Helena Bonham-Carter, as well as returns for surprise Extras highlights, Keith Chegwin and Les Dennis. Has it got to the stage now that you and Ricky can pick up the phone to work with almost anyone? Haveyou had any rejections from people you’ve been desperate to get involved – or are you standing at the doors like bouncers turning away a queue of disappointed A-listers?

I wouldn’t say they were queuing up but lots of stars have made it known they’d be up for doing something with us. Or sometimes we meet them on our travels and try and persuade them on the spot. I think they enjoy doing it because it’s a great release for them to take the piss out of their public image and defy audience expectations. And they always have fun. Actors love to act and we give them loads of time and freedom to do that. There’s no sitting around in trailers for hours while we get the lighting just right. They come in and we start shooting. It’s a playdate for them.

Have you ever had a guest-star, for Extras or Life’s Too Short, who just didn’t get the joke?

No, because we never spring anything on them. Everyone who agrees to be in our shows knows what they’re getting into. They talk with us beforehand and we explain the idea. It’s not a stitch up. What is more likely is that they will add something during the filming. Johnny Depp improvised some brilliant stuff in the new show. And Les Dennis threw in some extra lines that were hilarious. For instance he was supposed to be making love to a woman in the dark at the end of Extras and he shouted his old Family Fortunes catchphrase: ‘If it’s up there, I’ll give you the money myself…’ Inspired.

 
So we can now add ‘stand-up’ to Stephen Merchant, writer, director, actor, producer, DJ andbroadcaster. Have I missed anything, and what’s next?

If this tour goes well then I’ll be getting married to a gorgeous wife on some tropical beach on Christmas Day. Of course what’s more likely is I’ll be sat at home in pants watching The Great Escape.


Finally, I’ve noticed that articles and interviews you’re involved in tend to carry less than complimentary tag-lines, along the lines of ‘Ricky Gervais’ lanky co-writer’. This can’t help with the ladies, so I was wondering if you could suggest anything more appropriate for this one?

Leggy blonde Steve Merchant, 36.

Stephen brings ‘Hello Ladies’ to the Oxford New Theatre on the 29th and 30th of September. Tickets are available from Livenation.co.uk.The second series of An Idiot Abroad begins on Sky1 HD on the 23rd September. Life’s Too Short will transmit this autumn on BBC 2.

Let Europe Shake – Part Two

0

With a genuine chance of success in this competition, how seriously will Tottenham Hotspur be treating their European adventure? Can Stoke City adapt to the style and pace of European football and could they be this year’s surprise package? What chance, if any, do Fulham have of repeating their incredible UEFA Europa League heroics of two seasons ago? And will the rigours of Npower Championship football and with it a promotion push prove to be too much for Birmingham City?

 

UEFA Europa League: Group A 

• PAOK Salonika; FC Rubin Kazan; Shamrock Rovers; TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR

 

PAOK Salonika

The two time Greek Champions may be a regular fixture in this competition but they’ve only made it out of the Group Stages on the one occasion. Kostas Chalkias provides much needed experience in goal whilst upfront Greek international Dimitrios Salpigidis will hope to maintain his good form in the competition. 

One To Watch: Dimitrios Salpigidis

 

FC Rubin Kazan

Under manager Kurban Berdyev the Russian outfit have become formidable opponents. They have UEFA Champions League experience and a wealth of talent in the squad. They are excellent going forward with attacking minded players such as Alan Kazaev and Gökdeniz Karadeniz feeding balls through to the experienced Paraguayan striker Nelson Valdez. 

One To Watch: Nelson Valdez

 

Shamrock Rovers

Irish football’s most successful club are already one of the big stories of this competition. Michael O’Neill’s semi-professional team caused a huge upset by beating FK Partizan in the Final Qualifying Round. Transfer Window Deadline Day signing Rohan Ricketts will be looking to inflict a giant killing against former club Tottenham Hotspur. 

One To Watch: Gary Twigg

 

Tottenham Hotspur

Despite a proud history in this competition, Spurs focus has, in recent years, switched to chasing a place in the UEFA Champions League. The omission of Rafael van der Vaart from the 25-man squad is a surprise but it’ll give exciting youngsters Jake Livermore, Andros Townsend and Danny Rose a chance to impress. 

One To Watch: Jake Livermore

 

UEFA Europa League: Group E

• BeÅŸiktaÅŸ; FC Dynamo Kyiv; Maccabi Tel Aviv FC; STOKE CITY

 

BeÅŸiktaÅŸ

One of the big clubs in Turkish football alongside the likes of Galatasaray and Fenerbahçe, Kara Kartallar are dangerous opponents. Head coach Carlos Carvalhal hasn’t lost in eight European home games and the Portuguese contingent at the club including midfielder Ricardo Quaresma and striker Hugo Almeida will cause problems for most defences. 

One To Watch: Ricardo Quaresma

 

FC Dynamo Kyiv

A club with a proud European football tradition, Kyiv know what this competition is about. Coach Yuri Semin guided the club to the UEFA Cup semi-finals in 2009. There is an excellent mix of youth and experience throughout the team with striker Andriy Shevchenko impressing since his return to the Ukraine.

One To Watch: Andriy Yarmolenko

 

Maccabi Tel Aviv FC

The Israeli club make their debut in the Group Stages having defeated Greek giants Panathinaikos in the Final Qualifying Round. Bloomfield Stadium is an intimidating place to travel to with the home fans generating a terrific atmosphere. Also keep an eye out for the versatile Croatia U-21 defender Roberto Punčec. 

One To Watch: Roberto Colautti

 

Stoke City 

37 years after their last European adventure, The Potters return to the competition following their runners-up finish in last season’s FA Cup Final. Tony Pulis’s men have already demonstrated themselves to be resolute in defence this season with centre-back Matthew Upson outstanding, and a threat upfront with Kenwyne Jones and Peter Crouch. 

One To Watch: Matthew Etherington

 

UEFA Europa League: Group H

• BIRMINGHAM CITY; Sporting Clube de Braga; Club Brugge; NK Maribor

 

Birmingham City

Chris Hughton’s outfit may be playing Npower Championship football however their victory in last season’s Carling Cup Final and against Nacional in the Final Qualifying Round means more European football at St Andrews. Liam Ridgewell is vital in defence whilst New Zealand striker Chris Wood will hope to continue his excellent form. 

One To Watch: Chris Wood

 

Sporting Clube de Braga

Last season’s finalists and runners-up to winners FC Porto, Os Arsenalistas are once again genuine challengers for the title however they will have to do so without coach Domingos Paciência – now manager of Sporting Clube de Lisboa. Custódio is very solid in the defensive midfield role whilst Alan is a threat upfront.

One To Watch: Custódio

 

Club Brugge 

The only Belgian club to have played in the final of the now UEFA Champions League, Blauw-Zwart currently sit in mid-table in the Belgian Pro League. Former Stoke City and West Bromwich Albion defender and Captain Carl Hoefkens is steady at the back whilst Jonathan Blondel will be familiar to Spurs fans.

One To Watch: Carl Hoefkens

 

NK Maribor

Conquerors of Rangers in the Final Qualifying Round, Vijolice are the first Slovenian team to appear in the Group Stages. They have competed in the UEFA Champions League however made little impact in the competition. Captain Marcos Tavares and Macedonian midfielder Agim Ibraimi will be key to the team’s success. 

One To Watch: Marcos Tavares

 

UEFA Europa League: Group K

• FC Twente; FULHAM; Odense BK: WisÅ‚a Kraków

 

FC Twente

Known in this part of the world for their appointment of ex-England manager Steve McClaren, the Dutch side have, in recent years, become a recognised force in the Eredivisie – winning the title in 2010 under McClaren. Goalkeeper Nikolay Mihaylov is suspect in goal however Austrian striker Marc Janko is a genuine threat.

One To Watch: Marc Janko

 

Fulham 

The Cottagers had a memorable run in this competition, reaching the final in 2009. Marin Jol’s side have started this season poorly, with blame being put on the decision to split the successful central defensive partnership of Aaron Hughes and Brede Hangeland. Moussa Dembélé and Damien Duff will provide the main attacking threats.

One To Watch: Moussa Dembélé

 

Odense BK

De Stribede are in constant competition in the Danish Superliga with FC Copenhagen, Brøndby and FC Midtjylland. The club famously reached the Quarter-Final stage in 1995 overcoming Real Madrid in the Play-Offs but have not reached the later stages of the competition since. Keep an eye out for their exciting young attacker Baskhim Kadrii.

One To Watch: Bashkim Kadrii

 

WisÅ‚a Kraków 

Having lost only one of their last ten European home games, the current Ekstraklasa champions are in good form going into the competition. The team has a strong spine with Kew Jaliens solidity in defence; ex-Polish internationals Radosław Sobolewski and Łukasz Garguła marshaling the midfield and Ivica Iliev leading the front line.

One To Watch: Patryk Małecki

Twitter: @aleksklosok