Men still dominate the top ranks of Oxford societies and JCRs, a Cherwell investigation has found. Just 35% of current society presidents are women, whilst there are only five female JCR presidents from 31 colleges.

Male dominance of senior committees occurs in almost all Oxford societies, with just one third of executive positions currently held by women.

Students have expressed their concern that many Oxford societies remain dominated by men, with this especially being the case for the most senior positions within these societies.

Only eight out of the 26 Oxford Union Presidents between 2000 and 2010 have been women, and female representation is far worse on the lower committees of the Union. 

Martha Mackenzie was elected last term to be the first female president of OUSU since 2006, and described the lack of female JCR presidents as “terrible”. 

“There is a often a cultural barrier which stops women from getting involved with politics,” she said.

OUSU VP for Women, Katharine Terrell, told Cherwell that when women run for office “it seems they are just as likely to be elected as a man running… We can’t just wait and hope that women will eventually reach the top positions – we need to be taking action now.” Terrell added that some female candidates, “feel that they will be judged on their gender or personal life far more than men.”

In an article for Cherwell in Trinity 2010, the then-Union President, Laura Winwood commented, “The misleading perception of the Union as an aggressive, male-dominated political institution… may discourage some from participation.” She also said that it was “vital that you challenge [men] on their own turf.”

An OUSU report published in 2010 said, “An attempt was made a couple of years ago to encourage more women to participate in meetings… it seems to have made very little impact.”

The three main University political societies are also still male-dominated. Oxford University Conservative Association has been embroiled in a number of sexism rows in the past couple of years. Currently, there is only one female member of the 15 person OUCA committee.

OUCA President Henry Evans said, “During my time in Oxford, there have been women holding officerships in OUCA in every term, one of whom became President. Over a third of our membership are women. I do not think this is a result of sexism within OUCA. This is a problem, but it is not just a problem with Oxford student politics, but with politics across the country, including at Westminster.

“It is worth remembering that OUCA had had two female presidents before the Union even allowed women to join as members, one of whom went on to be this country’s first, and so far only, female Prime Minister.”

The Oxford University Labour Club committee is also male heavy, with only 34% of the committee composed of women in the past year. Co-chair Kat Shields told Cherwell, “OULC is a progressive society. However, not even OULC are immune from the persistent problem of the gender gap in Oxford societies.”

Shields said that the gender balance needed to be actively redressed to show that OULC were “serious” about the issue, and to “buck the trend” of male dominance in societies at Oxford.

The low number of female JCR presidents has left many asking why so few women run for this particular position.  Charlotte Meara, Trinity JCR President, said “It is important to encourage women to run for positions on the JCR Committee,” but added that, “these attempts must not become patronising – for example, the suggestion of ‘female only hustings’.”

She continued, “I did not feel deterred from running for President, nor have I encountered any difficulties, as a result of my gender.” Meara suggested that “an inherent lack of confidence in their own abilities” may deter some women from running for executive positions.

Reena Virdee, of Oxford Women in Business, agreed on the importance of perception, “The trend will not change if more and more women decide that a role in a society is ‘not for them’.”

Mackenzie, OUSU’s President-elect, added, “I think women are just as likely to and just as keen to get involved with politics, but can lack the confidence and support to take the plunge, especially when there is such low visibility.

“Often it is just about breaking this cycle: those JCRs that have recently had a female president often go on to re-elect women.  

“In running for election I think as a woman you can be placed under greater scrutiny; often your authority and strength are questioned to a far greater degree. Such a male-dominated environment can be intimidating but when women get involved they often go on to be very successful.”

On some societies’ committees, however, women form the majority. Across the last three terms, 53% of the Law Society committee has been female. Whilst the last two presidents have been male, there have been eight successive female treasurers, and the top four positions were all held by women in Trinity 2010.

Current President Oscar Robinson, said, “As the figures demonstrate, LawSoc is not a male-dominated society. I believe that the opportunity to reach the top positions within the society are open to those willing to put in the time.”

OULC currently runs a Women’s Caucus to try to encourage more women to join and run for elections, with speaker events, socials and other female-oriented events. OUSU, the Oxford Union and OULC joined together to host ‘Women’s Campaign Training’ this week.

Former President of Oxford Women In Politics, Krisztina Csortea, said that these events “go a long way towards encouraging women to get involved.” However, she noted, “Societies with a poor track record of women running for committee positions have to address the root causes of the problem themselves.”

The Union has also established a Women’s Initiative, with public-speaking events put on to help women practice for hustings.

Joanna Farmer, a previous chairman of the Debate Selection Committee, said that the Union is “definitely perceived to be an old boys’ club, but I have rarely experienced that first hand.” She pointed out that the Oxford Women’s Open competition had been established as “an active step to get more women involved.”

The University of Oxford has fallen to sixth place in the 2010 Times Higher Education national “Student Experience” rankings, released last week. 

Oxford has consistently dropped in the rankings, after coming third in 2009 and second in 2008, and this year suffered particularly in categories of living expenses and workload.

Cambridge has also suffered a drop in the rankings, from second in 2009 to fourth in 2010. 

The chart is topped for the fifth year running by Loughborough University. THE also deems Oxford students’ experience inferior to that of our counterparts at Sheffield, East Anglia and Dundee. 

The survey covers twenty-one categories ranging from quality of tuition, interest of staff and structure of course, to social life, community atmosphere and quality of facilities. The rankings are based on responses from 13,000 students at 113 different universities.

The survey is entirely student-based, with even the categories being generated by students.  Oxford’s scores are based on the replies of 224 undergraduates representing various courses, colleges and years.  Respondents are recruited by email invitations from the University and Colleges Admissions Service.

The universities ranked in the top ten have not changed since last year, though their positions within the  ten have shifted.

Despite a disappointing overall ranking, Oxford came first in the categories of “good personal relationship with teaching staff,” with 6.3 out of seven possible points, and “tuition in small groups,” with 6.9 points compared to Cambridge’s 6.8. 

Oxford also scored well in the “high-quality staff/course” category, topping the table along with Cambridge, each with 6.5, and received a high mark of 6.6 for “good library and library opening hours.”

“It is an endorsement of the tutorial system, and testament to the hard work of our teaching staff, that Oxford ranks so highly in areas such as small group teaching, good relationships between staff and students, and the quality of teaching provided,” said a spokesperson for the University.

Oxford’s lowest categories were “good student union” with a score of 4.1, “cheap bar/shop/amenities” with 4.5 and “fair workload” with 4.7 points.

Some students feel this survey does not reflect their experience at Oxford.

“If Oxford has dropped from third to sixth, the adjudicators clearly haven’t been to Camera on a Tuesday night,” said Sebastian Leape, who reads PPE at Keble College.

“I feel like my experience is probably worthy of first or at worst second place.”

Jake Lancaster, however, a first year student of English, finds the social scene lacking.

“No one is satisfied with cheap and sticky club nights that leave you feeling disgusted with yourself,” he complained.

“Nowhere has a vibe that even approaches cool.”

In spite of Oxford’s drop in the Student Experience ranking, THE’s 2010-2011 World University Rankings name Oxford, along with Cambridge, as the best university in Europe and the sixth in the world.

The World University Rankings places more weight on aspects of universities such as the volume and influence of the research produced by the faculty than on quality of student life.

Experts warn against placing too much emphasis on surveys and statistics when choosing a university.

“There will be no statistical significance in the scores of similarly ranked universities,” said Eleanor Simmons, associate director of OpinionPanel, the market research company that conducted the survey.

It is also difficult to generalise about elements such as accommodation and facilities that can vary significantly from college to college.

However, higher tuition fees might cause students to research their choice of universities more thoroughly and give more consideration to surveys like these.

NUS President Aaron Porter told THE, “As tuition fees are once again tripled, students will increase the pressure on their universities to deliver a high standard of academic, social and environmental experience.”

A meeting was held at Jesus College this week to solidify plans for a scholarship for students from the Gaza strip in Palestine.

The College plans to raise funding for  a scholarship which would enable one student a year from the Islamic University in Gaza to study at Oxford.

The Gazan university was partially destroyed in attacks near the end of the 2008-2009 Gaza War. Science, engineering, and medical facilities were the worst affected.

At the time, Oxford’s Senior Proctor declared that “efforts to attract endowments to fund scholarships at Oxford for the most academically talented Palestinian students, to help lessen some of the obstacles to education that now prevail, would be welcome.”

A similar scholarship to was set up in 2009 at St. Edmund Hall, and there is now a Palestinian scholar reading Engineering.

Last term students at Jesus sought to emulate Teddy Hall. Motions were passed in both the JCR and MCR to provide the scholarship fund.

Student Emily Dreyfus set up the Jesus College Scholarship Committee, which is working to find sources for funding the leftover expenses and also speaking to tutors in the pertinent fields for the purposes of the scholarship.

A portion of the scholarship is funded by members of the JCR and MCR at £5 per student per term and a charitable foundation, and the rest funded through a fees waiver.

“There was some opposition from the members of the Common Rooms,” said Dreyfus. “Most of it involved questions of, ‘Why Gaza?’”

In response, last Thursday a discussion was held at Jesus where speakers delivered presentations on the situation in Gaza was and a Q&A session was held to answer any questions concerning the scholarship.

Attendees included Dr. Swee Ang, co-founder of Medical Aid for Palestinians, as well as Dr. Karma Nabulsi, University Lecturer in International Relations and Fellow in Politics at St. Edmund Hall.

Ang shared a slideshow presentation of her time spent working for Red Crescent after the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, and her subsequent visits during the Gaza War.
Nabulsi spoke of her personal history in Palestine and her current involvement with the organisers of the scholarship at Jesus.

She expressed her hope that the initiatives to fund these types of scholarships occur in “one JCR after another so that it becomes institutionalised.”

Tracing the success of the push for these scholarships back to the occupation of the Clarendon building in January 2009, Nabulsi said, “The students who occupied the libraries made simple demands. They demanded we make connections.”

The Chancellor of Oxford University, Lord Christopher Patten, has been tipped for a prestigious position in the BBC.

Patten, 66, has been named in reports as the favourite to be appointed BBC Trust Chairman. His name is currently waiting for approval from David Cameron, but according to insiders, the Prime Minister’s consent is expected to be a formality.

Patten was nominated for the position by Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt. In his pitch, he made it clear that he wanted the job as a final act in politics and public life.

The University Press Office said, “the Chancellor is usually an eminent public figure elected for life and serves as the titular head of the University, presiding over all major ceremonies.”

Lord Patten was a Conservative Member of Parliament for Bath between 1979 and 1992. From 1989 he held a position in the Cabinet.

His current position at Oxford is part time, and until 2009 he also combined the role with the Chancellorship of Newcastle University.

The BBC role, also part time, currently has a salary of £142,800 a year.

The Trust Chairman is head of 12 Trustees, who represent the public who pay for the BBC. On the BBC website it is stated that “the Trust makes sure the BBC is run in the public interest and in the interests of licence fee payers.”

All Trustees, including the Chairman, are appointed by the Queen on advice from Ministers after an open selection process.

Other candidates for the position were Dame Patricia Hodgson, the principal of Newnham College, Cambridge; Richard Hooper, a former chairman of the Radio Authority; investment banker Anthony Fry; and Sir Richard Lambert, former Director General of the CBI and a previous editor of the Financial Times.

It has been reported that Lambert was Patten’s main rival.

Second year Arabic students are set to return to Cairo to continue their year abroad after being flown back to the UK three weeks ago amid widespread protests and rioting before the fall of President Mubarak.

This comes as the Foreign Office relaxes travel advice for British citizens heading to Egypt this week.

The Foreign Office’s advice, put in place on 28th January, previously advised against “all but essential” travel to Cairo, Alexandria and Suez.

Now, it continues to warn the situation across Egypt is “unpredictable and may change quickly,” reminding British citizens there is still a “high threat” from terrorism. It says, “Attacks could be indiscriminate, including in public places frequented by expatriates and foreign travellers, such as hotels and restaurants.” A nationwide curfew is also still in force in Egypt.

Gabby Odah, a second year Arabic and French student from St Catz, told Cherwell, “I have booked my flight back on 2nd March. I consulted the Oriental Institute before booking the flight back to Cairo; staff were due to have a meeting to discuss what we should do on Friday. I was also waiting for the Foreign Office [advice] to change. After this was changed, I checked with the University again, who said it was fine to book flights back.”

However, the University has advised all students returning to Egypt to obtain Syrian visas, so that if Egypt becomes violent again, students can go straight to Syria and continue an Arabic study programme there.

Odah continued, “I was upset to have to fly back from Egypt. As I got to the airport and got on the plane I realised how much I would miss Cairo. I am happy to be going back, although I have mixed feelings, as I will miss home.

“We are not worried, and now we are prepared with our Syrian visas. We are all really looking forward to getting back. One student is already back now, and the rest of us are flying out in the next few days. At the time, I was really glad to get away from the violence – I did not think we were in danger while we were there, as we left just before things became really violent in Cairo.”

Other language students are on progammes in Syria where concern over the prospect of civil unrest is rising. So far the country has remained calm.

President Bashar al-Assad has promised to push through political reforms after inheriting power from his father, Hafez, in 2000, after three decades of authoritarian rule.

A brain imaging study carried out at Oxford has shown that patients’ prior expectations can significantly alter their responses to pain-relief drugs.

The research into the placebo effect, and its opposite, the nocebo effect, led by Professor Irene Tracey, showed all of the impact of a drug  could be undermined by poor expectations of pain relief beforehand.

Equally, when patients mistakenly believed that the dosage of pain relief had been increased, brain imaging scans showed that they really did experience less pain, despite constant administration of pain relief drugs.

The researchers have proposed that doctors confront patients’ beliefs and expectations before they administer a drug, in order to optimise the outcome of the treatment.

John le Carré has announced plans to donate of his entire literary archive to the Bodleian Library.

85 boxes of books, manuscripts, papers and digital material arrived at the Bod last summer and a selection will be on display on 3rd March as part of the World Book Day celebrations.

The collection includes very early manuscripts of his famous novela in which the lead character, Smiley, like le Carré himself, is an old Oxonian who goes on to work for MI6.

The author of 22 novels said, “I am delighted to be able to do this. Oxford was Smiley’s spiritual home, as it is mine.”

Richard Ovenden, the Associate Director of the Bodleian Libraries, said, “We hope the collection will also be appreciated more widely, through exhibitions, seminars and conferences as well as through digitisation initiatives.”

NUS President Aaron Porter announced this week that he will not stand for re-election.

He said he feels the Union needs a “fresh start” and “there needs to be a new President to lead the student movement into that next phase”.

As leader of the NUS since July 2010, Porter played a central role in the student activism over the tuition fees increase. He said in his blog that he was proud of his achievements and claimed that the student response would “go down in the history books”.

Porter has received increasingly personal attacks from those who desire a more radical student response.

He said that “the challenge for the new President will be great”. His successor will have to lead the response to the cuts whilst negotiating calls for militant action from what Porter terms “factional groups”.

The new President will be elected at the NUS National Conference in Newcastle in April.