Friday, May 9, 2025
Blog Page 1807

Review: Chad Valley – Equatorial Ultravox

0

Long since dethroned from the position of sound-of-the-moment, the genre of chillwave has taken a sharp downturn in recent times. Over four years since Panda Bear’s seminal Person Pitch helped shape the genre in its infancy, chillwave’s artists have done little to develop their core aesthetic, content instead to rework and refine rather than drastically rethink their sound. And with its washed out textures and dreamy vocals, it would be easy to label Chad Valley’s sophomore EP, Equatorial Ultravox, as yet another unnecessary addition to the already bloated chillwave canon.

Indeed throughout Equatorial Ultravox, Hugo Manuel (the Oxford based musician behind Chad Valley) does not shy away from any of the usual clichés. On ‘I Want Your Love’ and ‘Fast Challenges’, Hugo’s vocals are buried beneath swathes of reverb and swooning synths forming a shimmering bed of sound which is certainly pleasant if slightly anonymous. What’s more, at points throughout the EP the production strays from merely bland to somewhat sickly with gratuitous amounts of autotune layered atop Hugo’s voice.

On occasion, however, Hugo makes a strong case for his relevance alongside his contemporaries; the fleeting moments where his vocals are allowed to take the spotlight are simply spellbinding. Comparisons to the vocal style of Noah Lennox (a.k.a. Panda Bear) have been numerous, and not entirely misplaced, but Hugo’s voice carries so much more depth and brute force than Lennox’s choirboy delivery. The soaring vocal melodies of standout tracks ‘Acker Bilk’ and ‘Shapeless’ display Hugo’s talents in all their glory; as he moves seamlessly between a full baritone and a glorious, pure falsetto one is struck with a distinct impression of what might have been if only the vocals had not been so obscured elsewhere.

As one of Oxford’s most consistently exciting musicians of the last few years, both as Chad Valley and with the 4 piece Jonquil, it is surprising to see Hugo Manuel so in awe of his influences on Equatorial Ultravox. Whilst this record does display a considerable amount of promise, Hugo is going to have to focus on what makes his project unique if he is going to save Chad Valley from slipping politely into the background in the future.

Kathy Peach and UN Women

0

In a small room towards the back of Jesus’ second quad, Kathy Peach, Head of External Affairs at the international development charity VSO, is giving a talk on the UN’s newest agency UN Women. She pauses. She apologises. “Sorry,” she says, “I keep on saying ‘basically’, and I’m not sure why.”

Perhaps because what she is talking about is very basic. Or at least, it ought to be. Women make up 49.5% of the world’s population, and one may reasonably hope that this equality is reflected in statistics in other fields. Well, women make up 18.4% of parliamentarians globally. Women signing peace treaties stack up at a measly 2.4%. Luckily this disparity is rectified by other figures, such as women making up 70% of the world’s poor, or doing 66% of the world’s work while earning 10% of its income. Swings and roundabouts, maybe gender inequality isn’t such a problem after all.

Founded earlier this year, UN Women is the latest in a line of UN agencies designed to bring about gender equality, and Kathy Peach is one of the leading lobbyists in the UK trying to make sure it receives the support it needs. She outlines some of its priorities, saying UN Women “will particularly address areas that have been neglected by the UN system previously, so issues around violence against women, women’s ability to earn and income, and women’s ability to have a say in decisions that affect their lives and their involvement in local and national politics.”

However, the UN has traditionally been poor at tackling gender inequality. Heard of UNICEF? Probably. Heard of UNIFEM? Perhaps less likely. They certainly never featured on the kit of the best football team in Europe. Peach explains that “the way the UN previously dealt with Women’s issues was fragmented, under-resourced and didn’t really deliver for women on the ground.” She continues, “We’re asking for the UK government to make a core funding contribution £21 million annually, which is the same amount of money as they gave previously to UNICEF… we believe that the UK government should give as much support to women as they do to children.”

Of course, things aren’t as simple as that, they never are. Especially in the current political and economic climate, where funding for obscure UN agencies doesn’t have huge political capital attached to it. But, given how the news these days is all about Ken Clarke’s idea of “serious” rape, international “slutwalks” and how “sexual attacks on women are being used as a weapon in the Libyan conflict”, it is also a climate where clearly gender issues are increasingly high on the agenda.

Despite its clear relevance to problems close to home, finding political support for its funding is still a challenge. Cameron has come under fire from his own party for his plans to increase aid funding, with critics such as Liam Fox, the defence secretary, (unsurprisingly) among the “aid sceptics”. However, while there has been some political resolve from the government in terms of protecting aid, the signals from the Department for International Development suggest that funding for UN Women will be determined by “results”, suggesting a somewhat reduced enthusiasm for the venture then when it was first being campaigned for by the UK under Labour.

However, Peach feels that increased aid spending is easily justified. “From VSO’s perspective, we don’t believe that the current economic situation should be an excuse for forgetting about the world’s poor. For many of the people that we support, aid money is the difference between life and death.” She also puts the financial demands of UN Women into perspective. “In terms of the financial contribution, what we’re asking is just 0.2% of the overall overseas aid budget. We think that will deliver real value for money, both for the government’s aid agenda and driving broader change across the whole of the international community.”

The issue of funding becomes starker when Peach outlines UN Women’s current financial situation. “UN Women is suffering from a massive funding shortfall at the moment. So far only $69 million of new money has been pledged to it this year, and only $33 million dollars of that has been received by UN Women. And that’s against a target set by Ban Ki-moon and the UN member states of $500 million… We’re concerned that if the UK doesn’t stand up and make a substantial funding contribution urgently, then UN Women is going to fail before it’s even got off the ground.” If the UK, who supported the founding of UN Women from the outset, fails to provide financial support for the agency, then the prospects of other member states coming through with the money UN Women needs in its critical early stages is slim. “We hope that by making a funding commitment themselves, the UK will put pressure on other member states within the UN to up their contributions themselves.”

And investing in UN Women makes sense, because investing in women generally makes sense. One hopes that nowadays people can see the intrinsic value of gender equality, but in case they can’t, Michelle Bachelet, Head of UN Women and described as a “walking almanac of gender statistics” by the Guardian, will have a suitable economic or political stat for almost any gender query. Did you know that women in poorer communities spend 90% of their income on their families, compared to men, who will spend 40%? Or costs the Australian government $A13.6 billion in medical care, childcare and lost productivity, which is $A3.6bn more than the fiscal stimulus they pumped into the economy last year? While instrumental reasoning when it comes to gender inequality can be controversial, Peach is supportive of it. “What we mustn’t forget is that women’s rights and women’s equality have a value in their own right, so they they are a goal and an end in themselves. But, increasingly, it is being recognised is that actually by achieving women’s rights and equality, it brings economic and social benefits that will help not just women but also their families and communities and also their countries and economies as a whole.” And if such reasoning lends the issue political salience, then surely it is to be welcomed.

Peach also emphasises the personal role of Michelle Bachelet, and claims that she will be central to any success the agency might achieve. “Bachelet is absolutely critical. She has had a very strong record as President of Chile, she is an incredibly committed woman, she is a strong and decisive leader and exactly the person that UN Women needs as this early stage in its life. She instilled a lot of confidence and I think that’s another reason why the UK government shouldn’t hesitate in making a large funding contribution to UN Women, as it has a clearly strong and capable leader in Michelle Bachelet.”

When Ban Ki-moon came to Oxford last term, I, feigning friendship with a reporter from Reuters, got my way into the champagne reception afterwards. While others posed for photos and congratulated him on his speech, I took my 15 seconds of fame to ask him about whether he thought UN Women would be fully funded. He reassuringly looked me in the eye. “No problem,” he told me. Being the world’s most consensual politician, it is perhaps his job to reassure me. This summer, when UN Women publishes its targets and Andrew Mitchell with the rest of DFID reveal how much the UK will contribute to the agency, will perhaps reveal a more telling answer to the extent of a problem that UN Women faces. For the idea of UN Women may seem basic to many of us, Kathy Peach and Mr Ban alike. We can only hope that its implementation is just as simple.

Review: The Failed Anthology

0

When I was asked to review an anthology by ‘The Failed Novelists’, I was slightly apprehensive. I’ve been burned before by attempting to appreciate amateur creative writing (my primary school writing club – brrr), and any group actively embracing failure didn’t exactly entice me. Was this going to be some kind of clever-clever ‘ironic’ mess, representing the decline in modern fiction? Or was this going to be some self-righteous postmodern look at the craft of the novel? Either way, I wasn’t anticipating a very fun Saturday morning.

Oh how wrong I was.

Before I get onto the anthology, I should say a little bit about the novelists themselves. The Failed Novelists’ Society is probably the biggest, and certainly the most inclusive, creative writing society in Oxford, allowing anybody to join regardless of experience or accomplishment. The name comes from the idea that all novelists are failed novelists, no matter how well they sell, because what you eventually write will never match the original conception in your head. The importance is to keep on trying, and not be afraid of failure. Many of the society have been published, and the Failed Novelists’ anthology is the only student writing book to be produced in Oxford.

This anthology is a nice mix of styles, taking in poetry and prose and variants within those classifications. Selena Wisnom’s Underwater Archaeology is a skilfully structured piece, following the thoughts of an archaeologist reminiscing about her time at Oxford. As she dives into the silent seas she is more concerned with finding relics of an ancient past than preserving her own, letting happy memories fade like a peeling photograph.

Another narrative by James Benmore, Bitter, is a fascinating character study. As Terry consoles his recently jilted friend, we grow to realize the unreliability of our narrator and the simmering, unspoken bitterness that comes from Terry’s treatment by his friends. The whole piece rings true, with a striking maturity considering the age of the author. In fact, I’d say that about many of the works within the anthology, such as the poem Giraffe in a Palestinian Zoo, by Tom Nailor. Opening with a quotation from the Qur’an, the piece tackles the thorny subject of the Israeli-Palestine war by looking at the death of a truly innocent bystander: the giraffe of the title. The Giraffe has no concept of war, but is a casualty of the conflict just the same with his death described in grim medical detail. The poem is an inspired take on the cost on innocent life in war, and on forced sacrifice.

My favourite piece in the anthology has to be Ling Low’s She Danced the Robot, an achingly realistic take on first love. The story follows the young protagonist’s realization about the fickle nature of attraction, and is full of wry observations and laugh-out-loud moments. Anyone who’s been in love, been to a club or even just been a teenager will find much to love in this very sweet story.

I don’t have enough space here to mention all the authors, but I would like to say that while some pieces are a little rough around the edges, the varied writing in the anthology is of a very high quality. Some of the poetry was a little over my head, but there’s something here for everyone. One word comes to my mind now thinking about the Failed Novelists:

Success. 

Claymation sensation

0

You may not have heard of first year History student Richard Keen yet, but he’s just won an Oscar – sorry, make than an Oxcar – at the Oxford Film Festival. His stop-motion animation series Herman and Harold, depicting the adventures of two rather strange friends, is rapidly gaining an enthusiastic fanbase. So far we have seen them in their lounge, outside in the snow, and most recently being chased by a mummy in an Egyptian tomb. How did it all start?

“It was procrastination really,” Richard says, laughing. “I started with filming lego.” He admits a fixation since childhood. A few years ago, he decided that the little plastic men just weren’t malleable enough for his purposes, and the first version of Herman was created – a cardboard figure with a ping pong ball head. The current Herman is much more sophisticated, built around a skeleton of barbeque wire padded out with foam and plasticine. Harold, a creature with a voracious and interesting appetite, is born from doodles drawn in exercise books at school. “People have said he looks like a jellyfish and other things, but in my head he’s an alien. I think he’s very dependent on Herman too – he wouldn’t really be able to exist on his own.” 

Apart from this, Richard hasn’t really fleshed out a backstory for his characters, protesting that “that might be taking it too seriously!” But doesn’t he want them to be taken seriously? “Well, when I first started they were just a sort of greetings card for friends. I just wanted to have fun, and make people laugh.” It’s clearly gone a bit further than that, as Richard plans to enter his films into various competitions in the near future.

Stop-motion has a long history in animation, and Herman and Harold has a nostalgic atmosphere that reminds me of the good old days of Pingu. “I use the same software as Wallace and Gromit actually,” Richard states with some pride.

He takes the photos for the films on a webcam, which rests upon a small wooden boom that allows him to zoom and pan around, before editing them on his laptop. It all seems deceptively simple, but every tiny change in motion must be photographed, to about 15 photos per second of film. The snowman film, which is five minutes long, took him a staggering half a year to create.

“But I only did a couple of hours a day,” he says quickly, with characteristic modesty.

The influence of animations such as Wallace and Gromit on Richard’s work is clear. But he has also obviously put much of his own humour and style into his creations too, and this labour of love does not lack a great sense of fun. “I’ve realised it’s just not a good film unless the set’s been destroyed by the end!”

And what to expect next from this destructive duo? The impressively detailed Egyptian tomb set sits in the corner of Richard’s room – will it be used again? “Definitely. They’re going to have an Indiana Jones-style adventure.”

 

The Herman and Harold films can be seen at www.youtube.com/user/hermanandharold


 

With nature’s own hand painted?

0

The first thing you see at the O3’s summer show is a huge nest. The man-sized bundle of dried leaves and grass rests matter-of-factly on the exhibition floor, both strange and familiar. Created by Emma Kwan, the ‘Nurture’ installation piece is interwoven with dried medicinal herbs and tea leaves so that it becomes at once natural and artificial: a nest that might have fallen out of an enormous tree, and a concoction of man-made ingredients.

This playing with the ways humans relate to nature is typical of the whole exhibition: its subjects vary from a vast, uncultivated forest in Bee Bartlett’s ‘Boars Hill Tree Canopy 2’ to the neatest bunch of cut roses in the painting ‘Flowers and Coffee’ by Roberta Tetzner. The exhibition’s curation brings out the contrasts between these different representations, so that we are frequently surprised by unsettling, unexpected combinations of ideas. The Tetzner painting, for instance, is hung next to ‘Stolen Rose’ – a figurative etching by Morna Rhys of red blooms on a white background. This clarifies its counterpart so that the layered circles of red and pink hues become symbols for roses too, and we see the same object interpreted in both geometric and organic ways.

Elsewhere Rachel Owen’s screenprint ‘Noah’s Eye View’ depicts a single, enormous white flower spread across the upper half of a stark black background. Its majesty is subverted when we realize it is a blow up of an image of a dandelion, and that the impression of natural grandeur which might be expected in a sweeping landscape by Constable have been given instead to a common weed. We are forced to re-examine the way we consider not only nature but the way it is represented.

In another corner, Sarah Simblet’s ink drawing ‘Lime Tree (Tilia)’ is hung by Rachel Ducker’s wire sculpture ‘Three People Tree’. Seen alone, the Simblet drawing has a softness brought out by the featherlike detailing on the finest branches — but  the tight prickliness of Ducker’s wire construction brings out a sharper, more imposing side to Simblet’s carefully wrought ink lines.

Finally, you descend the gallery stairs to Lisa Busby’s ‘Moth’s Wings’, another highly intricate expression of man-made and natural worlds colliding. An old wardrobe seems to explode with plant life, its vine-covered wallpaper blending into a huge pile of dried leaves and the stems of potted flowers that loosely surround it. Piles of books, record covers, picture frames and tapestries that cover the floor. The main part of Busby’s practice is musical composition, and throughout the exhibition her songs can be heard playing from a laptop on a rickety desk nestled among the leaves. The whole installation is organic to the extent that Busby herself ‘lives’ inside it and constantly adds to it, hanging knitted flowers on the stalks of real flowers and proffering trays of cake to visitors. At one point I looked down at ‘Moth’s Wings’ from the upper gallery and saw just Busby’s feet as she lay down within the plants. It seemed another of this exhibition’s emblems of merging natural and cultivated worlds.

Review: Get Loaded in the Park

0

The night before Glastonbury started, I sat by a Stone Circle where a 12 foot Wicker Man was being ceremonially burnt. The night before Reading started, I sat around a bonfire with a group of total strangers. The night before Get Loaded in the Park started, I watched Friends and was in bed by 10. Can a one day event ever create the atmosphere which makes music festivals so legendary?

True, Get Loaded isn’t trying to be Glasto or Reading, although the overpriced food would suggest different. It had some of the traditional festival accoutrements: heavy rain, a sea of mud and a stellar line-up. But the atmosphere did feel a little fake. Wearing tinsel round your neck that you inexplicably found in a field is fine, wearing tinsel that you’ve presumably brought from home is not. The proliferation of flowery headpieces just seemed a bit try-hard at a one-day festival. But maybe I’m just bitter.

If you’re not coming to a festival for the atmosphere, the only reason to come is the music. And this is where Get Loaded shone. Highlights of the day included Patrick Wolf, who worked the crowd superbly dressed in an all-green suit, perhaps in homage to his saintly namesake. The Noisettes opened to a sprightly ‘Don’t Upset the Rhythm’, with lead singer Shingai Shoniwa clad in a gold leotard and appearing from huge angel wings centre stage, who later got the crowd singing along to an emotional rendition of ‘Never Forget You’. British Sea Power performed a slightly lacklustre set, whilst full points for effort went to Darwin Deez, whose four members performed immaculate yet incongruous dance routines in between songs.

The other two stages in the tiny area of Clapham Common were host to a selection of up and coming talent, of whom Babeshadow shone with upbeat tunes. Headliner Johnny Flynn got the crowd humming along to his folky songs, although without a backing band his acoustic set wasn’t perhaps the climax one would expect at a festival. Back on the main stage the ever-reliable Cribs produced an outstanding hour of some of their best work, showing that they don’t need Johnny Marr, who left the band this year. Old classics including ‘Hey Scenesters!’ and ‘Men’s Needs’ were greeted with rapture by the boisterous crowd, intermingled with new songs which look set to rocket the Wakefield band to even greater heights.

Love them or hate them, Razorlight’s London Exclusive set was the final cherry on the already Loaded cake. Johnny Borrell led his new, long-haired band through old hits such as ‘America’ and ‘Golden Touch’ which were greeted with delight, although some uninspired new songs received distinctly cooler receptions, suggesting that this is a band which has had its heyday. Borrell performed much of his set from the ground in front of the stage, proclaiming ‘Why should you get wet, and us not get wet, y’know?’ How in touch with his fans he is. Unfortunately this meant that we still got wet, and now couldn’t see him. Get Loaded is all about the music, and there isn’t much else to be there for. But the music was fantastic, and whet many an appetite for the festival season to come. And I’ll admit it, after it was all over I’d choose a warm bed over a damp tent any day.

Teddy Hall imposes blanket smoking ban

0

Teddy Hall have imposed a blanket smoking ban on college grounds without students’ consent.

In an email sent to all undergraduates, JCR president Joshua Coulson stated, “ I’ve just come out of a governing body meeting (with all the college fellows), where the decision has been made to ban all smoking in college (at all sites). I don’t know exactly when this will come into practice, but the decision has been made.

“I’d imagine that many people will either be happy or ambivalent about this news, but some of you will be furious, and I can see why. I was involved in the discussion, but this is ultimately something that is not in the JCR’s control.”

The Bursar at Teddy Hall has declined to comment.

The motion against smoking on college ground was passed with 17 in favour of the ban, two against and three abstentions.

The governing body also resolved to place a CCTV camera which will be placed outside the night gate to help protect people smoking there.

Some students registered their fierce opposition to the motion. Second year PPEist Alex Michie sent a letter protesting the legislation to college principal, Dr Keith Gull.

The letter stated, “The only reasons put in favour of the smoking ban are completely irrelevant, as opposed to many sensible arguments against.

“There has been no serious consultation with the relevant bodies – those people who it actually affects, and where there was consultation, it has been ignored.”

A key reason made in favour of the ban in the meeting, according to Coulson, was that the designated smoking area in college had been ignored and smokers had been leaving cigarette butts around the graveyard, a grassy area at Teddy Hall.

Michie slated this argument in his email, stating, “A small bin by the bar and by the library entrance, as repeatedly requested, would solve [the issue of litter] immediately.

“Additionally, as a result of the ban, the mess will just be transferred to the entrance of college, along with a cloud of smoke – ruining the aesthetic of the college far more than at present – even without bins.

“Ironically, Teddy Hall will now, as a result of the ban, be known as the college of smokers.”

Michie also emphasised the welfare issue for students who would have smoke outside college late at night as a result of the ban.

“There is a heightened risk to students, especially female… placing a CCTV camera outside the late gate will be able to record any attacks/rapes that happen. Brilliant.”

Though this piece of legislation has proved controversial at Teddy Hall, proponents of the motion stated that a blanket smoking ban was the norm at most Cambridge colleges.

Michie argued, “So what? Who cares what colleges in Cambridge are doing? This defense amounts to that of the five year old caught smashing windows: ‘all my friends were doing it.’ Besides, surely a more appropriate comparison would be other Oxford colleges, hardly any of which have a blanket ban.

“Policies affecting those that live and work here should have significant input from those who are affected – the JCR, the MCR, and the SCR. I don’t think any of these democratic organisations were consulted in any serious way.’

However, James Black, a student at Corpus Christi Cambridge stated, “Every one here seems in favour [of the ban].

“Besides, there are always people who can dodge the ban if they try hard enough.”

Have you met TED?

0

TEDxOxford, one of the University’s newest student organisations, has officially stepped into the public sphere.

Although the group was founded early in Michaelmas, it has been operating largely under the radar. The event’s chief organiser, Keblite Chris Toumazis, seems intentionally to have sought to create a degree of mystery. By crafting an enigmatic yet chic marketing campaign, he has attempted to foster more lasting and genuine student interest.

With the unveiling of TEDxOxford’s promotional video, it has become clear that the new organisation is responsible for a number of recent and puzzling occurrences. Among them is the balloon phenomenon that provoked such discussion late last month. Attached to hundreds of red balloons, which were massed around the Radcliffe Camera and Blackwell’s bookshop, among other locations, were business cards labeled with a large ‘X’. The letter seems to reference TED’s subsidiary organisation, TEDx, which is responsible for its independently organized events.

Then, just over one week ago, thousands of students began to notice nuggets of inspiration left in their pidges. Typed in an art deco font and alternating between black and deep-red ink, these notes contained quotations on one side and a Web address on the other. One such quotation, by Kelly Cutrone, reads: ‘I named my company People’s Revolution not because I’m a Communist – a popular misconception – but because I happen to believe the world will change only when we change ourselves’. Ms. Cutrone, a well-known fashion publicist, is among the ten speakers who have already committed to the TEDxOxford event.

In an attempt to proliferate TED’s message to the country’s students, a demographic that is underrepresented at most TED conferences, all 100 of TEDxOxford’s delegates will be student aged, although not necessarily enrolled in an academic institution. All youth aged 16-25 years are encouraged to apply, and will have an equal chance of being selected for the event; TEDxOxford has announced that it will be choosing its delegates at random from amongst the application pool. The price of the event, held in Merton College’s TS Eliot Theatre on 26 September, is left to each delegate to decide, as they are encouraged to pay whatever they think the event is worth.

Although TEDxOxford must be feverishly anticipating the arrival of its first conference, the group stresses that it is equally committed to living TED’s message on a daily basis. When asked about the organisation’s mission, Chris Toumazis emphasized ‘promoting TED, as well as the messages that it invokes, as a way of life’. He continued: ‘We don’t have to wait for an annual event in order to begin broadening our curiosity, cultivating our passions and learning new things. We can start doing that today’.


Wilderness and Truck Festival Fever

0

It starts with a vision. Add in a lot of money, willing friends and family, a location, some bands, years of hard work, and bang, you’ve got a festival. They range from the peace and love haze of Glastonbury to the commercially driven Reading and Leeds, but these big festivals have their drawbacks — after days lost in the crowd, sick (perhaps literally) of overpriced burgers and beer, it would be fair to yearn for something a bit different. Wilderness and Truck festivals, both in Oxfordshire, provide just that viable alternative —small yet ambitious, offering high quality bands alongside a dollop of quirky idiosyncrasy that marks them off from the crowd.

Wilderness Festival, which takes place at Cornbury Park and features Antony and the Johnsons, Laura Marling and Gogol Bordello, was born from a dream. Organiser Tim Harvey explains that the festival, which runs in August for the first time, has been in the pipeline for six years, and showcases a new concept in the festival experience. ‘It amalgamates lots of types of outdoor activities and entertainments, which have all independently happened before, but not all in one place. It’s a Renaissance festival, celebrating time-honoured traditions. There’ll be banquets, parades, it’s a celebration of pursuits that hark back to a Golden Age, recreating the sense of wild abandonment of books such as Swallows and Amazons. It’s not just a music festival, it’s a place you can get away. We’re trying to get away from the model where it’s all about beer and cars and stages. We’re creating a concept that offers more, a place of rejuvenation and relaxation.’

Truck Festival’s origins go further back. Organiser Robin Bennett says, ‘When I was 18, I thought it would be fun to do a festival. In 1998 there didn’t seem to be too many decent festivals in Great Britain, unlike now. It was originally going to be a birthday party, but I had to move it, I only started planning two weeks before and didn’t have a license. Now it’s all planned a year ahead.’ This year Truck features Gruff Rhys, Philip Selway (of Radiohead fame) and Johnny Flynn, but the focus remains on local talent. ‘Our original vision was that there would be bands we liked playing in our local village. Now to secure larger artists you need a lot of money and persuasion. But Oxford has a stream of very good bands, and people move to Oxford as it’s a good place to have a band.’

Tim’s attitude to band selection is similarly fresh: ‘We wanted to create a music line-up that was different, unique, not the same bands that were playing all the other festivals. We weren’t concerned to get the bands with the most recent album in the charts. We’ve been asking bands to collaborate with each other once they’re on site, so we’ve got Antony and the Johnsons performing for the first time with the 30-piece Heritage Orchestra, and the ground breaking Mercury Rev album Deserters, the NME Best Album of the Decade, will be performed in its entirety. There’ll be lots of special happenings.’

Both festivals embrace more than just music, with Wilderness featuring literary debates and fine dining opportunities alongside dramatic collaboration with the Old Vic Tunnels, while Truck have a theatre tent curated by the Oxford Playhouse. Tim says his festival is ‘about creating a journey, and music is a part of it. There’s something very seminal about a festival, and the legacy it can create.’ Robin is proud of the sustainability of his event: ‘It’s more than just a music festival. We have the Truck Store on Cowley Road which represents the wider mission of Truck, beyond the festival. We like treating people individually.’ All the profits used to go to charity, but Robin regrets that this is no longer viable: ‘It became impossible, but we still make large donations. Truck has a Glastonbury-like vibe — no-one knows how much Glastonbury actually donates to charity, but it creates an atmosphere, the feeling that it’s about more than just entertainment.’ Tim agrees: ‘There’s something very seminal about a festival, the legacy it can create. It has to be underpinned as a business case, but when you start you know it will be a journey that will affect your life in different ways. It’s a total joy.’

While Wilderness is run by a team with experience of organising festivals including Lovebox and the Secret Garden Party, Truck is a family affair, spearheaded by Robin and his brother, their wives and parents. Organising a festival is not an easy job, and both have suffered their setbacks. Tim describes the biggest challenge as ‘communicating the concept to the locals, that it’s something they should seek to support.’ For Robin, nothing could go quite as wrong as it did at the 2007 Truck Festival, which had to be moved due to flooding. ‘There’s always something different, from risk assessments to securing artists to getting a license to keeping the residents happy to finding space for tents and getting everything the way you want it.’ Yet Truck is now integrated into the local village. ‘There’s a very friendly community atmosphere. The farmer used to be less keen on the festival, now he’s working on the burger stall.’

While Truck takes place among stables and pastures, Wilderness is located in the middle of a forest. ‘There are landscape gardens, big ornamental lakes, great vistas and lookouts, no other festivals have anything like Cornbury’s majesty.’ Tim and his team have worked to design the space so that all the stages are in their own little amphitheatres: ‘There’s a nice design to the site, a sense of openness so you’re not too crammed in.’ Robin’s festival also has a new layout this year, accommodating new stages including one curated by a label, ‘a good way of varying the programme without making it too random.’

All this work, and the festival is over in a weekend. Will the organisers get to relax and enjoy the fruits of all their labour? In the spirit of community, Robin will be found greeting people and making sure everyone’s having a good time, as well as hopefully performing with his own band, Dreaming Spires. Tim, however, may not even make Wilderness — his wife is due to give birth to their first child during the festival. Either way, it will be a weekend to remember.

Cherwell has teamed up with Wilderness to offer one lucky reader a pair of tickets to the festival! To be in with a chance of winning, send a sentence explaining why you want to go to [email protected] by Friday June 24.

Wilderness runs from 12-14 August, www.wildernessfestival.com

Truck runs from 22-24 July, www.thisistruck.com

The Glories Of Trashing

0

Walking down High Street towards the end of Trinity Term, it’s easy to miss the hints of confetti on the sidewalk when there’s sunshine soak up and tourists to dodge. But take a stroll around the corner where Exam Schools sits and chances are, if it’s around half-past noon or five in the afternoon, the clouds of glitter and Silly String will be impossible to dodge.

As finalists finish out their Oxford undergraduate days and first-years sit for their Prelims and Mods, the tradition of trashing commences. The aforementioned confetti is seemingly the most popular choice; when I finished my Prelims it was the most ubiquitous tool of trashing and my friends and I used it ourselves this year when fellow second-year classicists took their Hilary exams. But the variety of possibilities is endless.

Some students use food: flour, eggs, whipped cream, syrup, and occasionally even cooked items, as if they’re serving up breakfast upon the gowns of their finishing friends. Others revert to the childhood methods of party poppers and spray paint. Around this time every year, e-mails are sent from the university and from colleges pleading with undergraduates to think of the environment, of the local population, of the quiet needed by students still revising, and to confine their trashing.

But on a sunny afternoon when you’ve just been liberated, no matter how awfully you’re trashed, the feelings of exuberance and invincibility take over. I never understood trashing until I experienced it myself; there’s really no equivalent in the United States, although I suppose one could compare it to having Gatorade poured over the heads of winners in an athletic competition. Academic achievements just aren’t commemorated in the same way. Caps are tossed in the air at graduation, but trashing is different – it’s something done to you.

In the end, it seems, trashing is a necessity; a quintessential part of the Oxford experience, without which your degree is really not complete. It leaves its mark on the streets and sidewalks of Oxford, creeps up the staircases of student accommodation and seeps into halls. It ingrains itself in each new crop of freshers as they leave their first year at university behind, ideas of what they’ll do when their turn to trash arrives swirling in their minds. And it leaves its mark on the gowns of finalists as they take flight into the world beyond the city.