Thursday, May 8, 2025
Blog Page 1805

Review: Shabazz Palaces – Black Up

0

Asked by Cherwell earlier this year where he saw himself by the end of 2011, Shabazz Palaces frontman Ishmael Butler replied “…in a palace in the Middle East smoking opium and learning some new skills.” Such a description is not altogether unfitting for the music of Shabazz Palaces’ psychedelic debut, Black Up. The record is the first ever Hip Hop release for Seattle-based indie label Sub Pop, but its experimental leanings make it wholly unclassifiable as conventional ‘Hip Hop’.

For months, Shabazz Palaces was shrouded in mystery, and Butler (formerly known as Butterfly, of reputed 90’s jazz-rap trio Digable Planets) operated solely under the moniker of Palaceer Lazaro, and this enigmatic aesthetic has carried over into Black Up. The singular production (by Tendai Mariaire, credited cryptically as Knife Knights.plcrs) buries Ish’s voice under layers of dark and discordant otherworldly samples, bathing the album’s beats in a brooding, extraterrestrial texture. The familiar creeps in too, as it does in the female soul samples of ‘Recollections of the Wraith’, but their warmth is subverted by the minimal bass thumps underlying Ish’s taunting verses. Sonic influences are hard to pinpoint, but one can hear snatches of dub and funk amidst the ethereal shifts of rhythm and style and the unsettling plinks of the mbira.

Black Up operates on the fringes of Hip Hop, adopting its chief characteristics but also borrowing generously from the sampled collages of experimental electronica and trip hop. The Palaceer tells us himself on closing track ‘Swerve…The Reaping of All That Is Worthwhile (Noir Not Withstanding)’: “Every sound, we trying to mash and attention. We bung the latest feelings, they just re-rap through the givens. Them are talk first, we are observe and listen.” The wizened MC’s admonishment of his younger colleagues might ring hollow in another context, but given the intrigue and freshness of Black Up, younger rappers might do well to “observe and listen.”

Oxford’s lost Michelangelo?

0

Campion Hall, one of Oxford’s permanent private halls, may have unknowingly owned an original painting by Michelangelo since the 1930s.

 

Antonio Forcellino, a respected art scholar, has used infrared techniques to examine preliminary sketches underneath the painting. He suggests that this shows the artwork Crucifixion With The Madonna, St John And Two Morning Angels to have been painted by Michelangelo, and not his contemporary Marcelo Venusti, as previously had been thought.

 

The artwork is one of two pieces identified by Mr Forcellino in his book The Lost Michelangelos. The other, an unfinished painting of Mary and Jesus, was found in an American family home where it had been stored behind the sofa for safekeeping.

 

The relatively small work, measuring around 20” x 13′, had simply been hanging on a wall. Since the new evidence, it has been safely stored in the Ashmolean.

 

However the process of identifying an artist is rarely definitive. Dr Geraldine Johnson, lecturer of History of Art at the University of Oxford, hadn’t yet seen the evidence but said ‘even if it turns out to be compelling, it would still need to be assessed critically in light of other available evidence’.

 

This would include ‘close visual analysis of the style, composition, and painting technique’ alongside ‘provenance research and other relevant and historical/iconographic information.’

Ibiza or bust (1)

Arriving in the world famous San Antonio at 5am, it’s safe to say my first visit to the White Isle is not entirely what I expected. Foolishly imagining glamorous bars and beautiful people, the first person to catch my eye is a prostitute offering bargain blowjobs: “Sucky five euros”, she chants. She stands at the foot of the West End, a street from which she will probably get more business than is healthy for anyone, a dirty row of British bars with drunkards packed in shoulder to shoulder. People are stepping over (some stepping on) a young English guy taking forty winks on the floor.

While all this isn’t exactly painting a beautiful picture of my home for the summer, there’s one thing every conscious person on this street seemed to share; each one was in full holiday spirit and having the time of their lives.

The next few days brought disappointingly little tanning and huge quantities of CVs, as I thrust twenty or so into uninterested hands of uninterested managers. I saw one of them place mine on top of a pile of others that would pretty much reach my knee. It seems I’m one of many young sun-seekers trying to live the Balearic dream.

I tried a bit of ticket selling, and lasted no longer than an hour. Some guy called Jay or Jake or Joe sent me to go knocking on hotel room doors, and sell every club-night with €2 commission, and no basic wage. Frankly, I felt like a twat and I looked like a twat, and so did anybody who was going to buy €70 tickets off some anonymous person who has arrived at their door. If nothing else, I was rubbish at it and sold zero.

The next day I started selling laughing gas balloons in one of the aforementioned grotty bars. This was right up my street, having a shameless, harmless flirt with pretty damned horrid guys, and watching their merry faces as they inhaled the unknown gas. Balloons were €5, but €20 if they were drunk enough to mix up the notes or if they failed to notice I have a face as well as a pair of tits. Again, it was just on commission so it felt like my duty to rinse the vulnerable intoxicants of their hard earned holiday spends. Laughing gas is legal in Spain, legal to buy, legal to sell, but highly illegal to misuse. By this I mean that it’s sold for use in Starbucks for whipping cream, and probably, definitely shouldn’t be being used in balloons. Not that I knew this until my boss frantically told me to stash everything away as the girl doing the same next door had just been arrested. It’s a €2000 fine for the girl and for the bar. I had to stop selling the gas, and although the boss asked me back a couple of days later, the thought of calling my dad and asking to borrow two grand for bail is just not worth thinking about.

As it happens I ended up taking a ride in a police car anyway after doing some work handing out flyers on the beach. My latest boss had failed to equip me with a license, so I was whisked away by two undercover policia fighting serious crime. Good girls like me do not ride in police cars, so this was a pretty strange event. Despite my naïve shock that the seats weren’t padded and the windows didn’t open (for fear felons like me might jump out and make a dash for freedom, I suppose) the fact I was locked in a soundproof, bulletproof, criminal-proof taxi made me feel pretty damn badass. Of course, I was freed after my boss was presented with a hefty fine.

Anyway, that’s what’s happened so far, as well as a few free club-nights with the likes of Katy B and Judge Jules, a bit more sun tanning and very little thought about imminent exam results (only just remembered this).

Hope everybody’s having a wild summer. x

The demise of the News of the World

0

The decision to close the News of the World after 168 years came as a major shock to the United Kingdom’s media. That the Murdochs felt the need to sacrifice the UK’s leading Sunday newspaper was an early indication of the extent of the phone tapping scandal which emerged in the few days before it was scrapped.

 

The story is of course not a new one. The paper’s royal editor Clive Goodman was jailed in 2007, when it emerged that some of his stories had come from intercepted phone messages. The impact on the paper had, however, appeared to be minimal. While its activities were condemned from all quarters, the fact the News of the World had hacked into the phones of public figures was not deemed something that would stain the paper in the long run. Even when the full scale of the phone tapping began to emerge, it seemed that Andy Coulson, the editor at the time, would be the only one indelibly tainted.

 

That all changed with the revelations that News of the World journalists and others hired by the paper had hacked into the voicemail of Milly Dowler, the Surrey schoolgirl who went missing in 2002, and into those of bereaved soldiers’ families. It became clear that public figures were not the only ones targeted by the News of the World’s phone tapping. At a stroke, all the paper had campaigned for in the last decade was made to look rather hollow.

 

The News of the World had after all campaigned extensively for measures aimed at protecting children from crime, notably its campaign for ‘Sarah’s Law’ in 2000. Therefore the revelation that News of the World journalists hacked into the voicemail system of Milly Dowler was exceedingly damaging. Indeed the paper’s actions seem especially reprehensible given that her parents may have been given false hope she was alive, by the disappearance of voicemail messages from her phone. In reality they were apparently deleted by employees of the News of the World.

 

Similarly, the paper had been vocal in its support for British soldiers and repeatedly criticised the government for not doing enough in looking after the country’s armed forces. Again, the paper’s stance on the issue was completely undermined by the emergence of rumours that the families of dead service personel had had their phones hacked. The News of the World had within the space of a week completely lost any credibility and integrity.

 

This is presumably why the Murdochs felt it necessary to close the paper down and announce that the issue of 10th July would be the last in the paper’s history. This decision has however been widely characterised as a cynical move to protect the rest of the News International media empire. Many of the paper’s current staff have protested that they did not belong to the paper at the time of the phone hacking and hence have been punished for the crimes of their predecessors. Indeed one of the most intriguing things about the whole scandal is the Murdochs’ seemingly overwhelming desire to protect Rebekah Brooks, formerly editor of the paper and now chief executive of News International. It seems they hoped that the decision to shut the paper would help deflect attention away from Ms Brooks and allow her to continue in her current role. With the now reopened police inquiry, forthcoming parliamentary inquiry and intense media scrutiny it seems that this hope was somewhat naïve at best.

 

The closing down of the News of the World may in time be seen as a premature decision. Perhaps a front page apology and the promise to purge anyone from News International (including Rebekah Brooks) who had been involved in phone tapping could have saved the paper. That said, in the days since the new evidence of phone hacking emerged, new revelations such as the bribing of police officers by the News of the World have come to light. It seems probable that Rupert and James Murdoch know of other transgressions by the paper’s staffs which have yet to be seized upon by the press, which in their opinion made the News of the World’s continued existence untenable.

 

The News of the World would in any case have been a tainted brand for a number of years and by shutting the paper down News International clearly hoped to protect the rest of their media empire. With News International’s shares slumping, James Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks facing police investigations and the organisation forced to cancel its planned takeover of BskyB , it seems that any hope that the scandal could be contained was misguided. The future of News International itself, until a week or two ago seemingly an impregnable media conglomerate, remains very much up in the air.

 

Wimbledon 2011

0

 

Wimbledon is one of those events in the sporting calendar which fills the British public with anticipation and expectation, hopeful that we may once again feel proud of our country’s accomplishments in the world of professional sport. This feeling of hope is usually followed by crushing disappointment and a realisation that our sportsmen and women usually struggle to attain anything greater than mediocrity. Although Wimbledon 2011 failed to really change this, it was nonetheless a truly fantastic two weeks’ worth of tennis, providing an excellent reminder as to why Wimbledon is such a special competition.

 

Prior to the tournament, Andy Murray and Novak Djokovic were the most talked about players by the British media. The dour, fuzzy-faced Scot was a hot topic because it seemed possible that he could be the first British Men’s Singles champion since 1936, whereas the Serbian had amazed spectators by only losing one match since November 2010. Despite having recently surrendered his astounding 43 consecutive match unbeaten run, Djokovic was perceived to be a real contender to challenge to grip of Federer and Nadal at the top of the men’s tour.

 

The Men’s tournament progressed as expected with just one exception as Jo-Wilfried Tsonga – who had won plaudits with some remarkable acrobatics in previous matches – managed to dispose of World No. 2 Roger Federer in five sets. Other notable highlights in the earlier rounds included Murray’s oddly-named but rather impressive ‘hot dog’ shot, along with Djokovic’s exhibition of uncharacteristic anger as he smashed his racket into the ground during his encounter with Marcos Baghdatis. Another character worthy of a mention is the new Australian No. 1 Bernard Tomic, who beat several stalwarts of the game in his first Wimbledon before eventually falling to the unstoppable Djokovic in the quarter finals. At only 18 years old, Tomic is certainly someone to look out for in the future.

 

Although Murray played some impressive stuff to reach the semi-finals he almost inevitably fell to Nadal, never quite looking convincing enough to seriously trouble the Spaniard whose left bicep was firing on all cylinders. This left Nadal and Djokovic, a final with more spice then usual as Djokovic was to inherit the World No. 1 ranking from Nadal regardless of the result. Nadal would surely want revenge. Strangely though, Djokovic completely dominated the match, playing sensationally and looking in total control even when Nadal took the third set. The “big two” of men’s tennis is now a ‘big three’.

 

The Women’s game is much less predictable than the Men’s tour, with any of the top 20 female players in the world able to challenge for major honours. This was evident in this year’s tournament as many seeded players dropped out early, for instance defending French Open champion Li Na, who fell in only the second round. Defending Wimbledon champion and professional grunter Serena Williams was knocked out in the fourth round after an injury-plagued year, and her equally loud sibling Venus met her end at the same stage. The finalists this year were Maria Sharapova and Petra Kvitova, but the contest itself was rather disappointing and short-lived. Sharapova hardly put up a fight in a match that lasted a mere 1 hour and 25 minutes. This should not detract from Kvitova’s fabulous performance however, and she fully deserved the title at the precocious age of 21.

 

Despite the disappointments for senior British players, the tournament did reveal that we possess two very promising youngsters. Liam Broady won the Boys Doubles and was runner up in the Boy’s Singles, with fellow blossoming prodigy Laura Robson reaching the second round of the Women’s draw, losing valiantly to eventual finalist Sharapova in the second round. Although Wimbledon proved disappointing for Andy Murray once again, these two bright 17 year olds gave us a glimmer of hope that we may see a British Grand Slam winner in the near future.

Leeds joins Oxford in Willetts no confidence vote

0

Leeds University staff voted in favour of the motion of no confidence in David Willetts at the bi-monthly senate meeting on Wednesday 6th July, becoming the first English university to condemn the White Paper.

 

The decision follows that of Oxford’s parliament on the 7th June, where 283 academics voted for and only 5 against the motion of no confidence in Willetts.

 

Despite many senate members abstaining from the vote, the critics of the Universities Minister gained a narrow majority, allowing the academic governing body to pass the motion entitled “The University of Leeds has no confidence in the policies of the Minister for Universities and Science. Senate urges the University Secretary and Council to convey this message to Government.”

 

Mark Sewards, Leeds University Union communications officer, stated that “There were many abstentions and even those who voted against the motion said they were unhappy about what was happening. They were just concerned if it was the right time and place to pass a motion.”

 

Sewards, with other officers of the Union, described Willett’s proposed policy as “an outright attack on fair access to university for all”, one which “will further serve to perpetuate inequality in society”.

 

Significantly, the “managerial” structure of Leeds University has not prevented the condemnation of Willetts and the White Paper, a structure closer to other UK universities than to the governance structures in Oxford and Cambridge.

 

David Barclay, OUSU President and founder of the No Confidence Campaign, hailed the move as “a huge step forward in the fightback against the Government’s disastrous plans for Universities.”

 

‘This brave decision by Leeds is the first of what will be a long line of blows to the Government’s vapid and dangerous White Paper. Students do not want to be consumers, and academics do not want to see the Universities they love condemned to underfunding and the whims of the market.’

 

Malcolm Povey, President of the Leeds branch of the UCU, which supported the University’s decision by unanimously passing a motion of no confidence in Willetts, stated that “it is fair to say that the motion was inspired by the Oxford Motion of No Confidence”.

 

The Oxford parliament’s vote has led to a domino effect amidst other HE institutions, as more and more universities take action against the government proposals.

 

150 Cambridge academics signed a motion of no confidence in David Willetts this month, whilst over 700 academics and students at the University of Warwick have signed a petition conveying the same message.

Review: Avril Lavigne – Smile

0

‘It’s been a while.’ Yes, following a four year absence, Canada’s pop sensation has finally returned. But has she returned with a bang? It’s fair to say that this feisty punk rocker doesn’t seem to have made a colossal impact in 2011 despite her fourth album Goodbye Lullaby crawling into the top ten. 

This second single Smile from her latest studio album follows the formula of simple, repetitive electric guitar hooks, syncopated rhythm and upbeat drums but seems to fall short on novelty and lacks the gusto, energy and catchiness that older hits such as Sk8er Boi, Complicated and Girlfriend possessed. Lyrically, this love song adheres to the realms of teenage love, ‘you said hey, what’s your name?’ A chance meeting between a boy and a girl.  ‘Since that day you stole my heart and you are the one to blame.’ ‘You are all I need,’ ‘the reason I smile.’ We’ve all been there, done that.

Avril sings, ‘you know I’m a crazy bitch, I do what I want when I feel like it.’ Being a pop-punk princess, you can indeed do what you want but can you honestly compete with the current queens of pop? With the likes of heavy weights like Rihanna and Beyoncé dominating the music charts these days, Avril hardly stands a chance.  Given the radical change in the pop scene since this Canadian debuted almost a decade ago with 2002’s Let Go, it’s about time she stepped up a gear, reinvented herself, experimented and showed us that she isn’t just a one trick pony and is able to push the boundaries of teenage punk rock. Otherwise, her days of chart domination will surely remain in the past.

Sadly, this new release is mediocre in terms of creativity, lacking freshness and substance. The hordes of teens that followed Lavigne over the years have since grown up and moved on, so no tears please Avril.

Dilnot heads in new direction

0

Andrew Dilnot has signalled his intentions for the next stage in his career with the publication of a national care report this week.

 

The report, published by the Commission on Funding of Care and Support, of which Dilnot is Chair, has claimed that social care costs should be capped to a maximum of £35,000 in order to ensure that people do not risk losing all their assets later in life. After this amount has been reached, the individual would be eligible for full state support.

 

The Principal of St Hugh’s plans to step down in September 2012 to take up a post as Warden of Nuffield, a social science graduate college.

 

However, in an email sent out to St Hugh’s students, Dilnot said that this position ‘will allow me to spend much more time doing economics again’.

 

Dilnot has described the current system of social care as ‘confusing, unfair and unsustainable’ and expressed hope that some changes will be seen in next spring’s white paper.

 

“Under our proposed system everybody who gets free support from the state now will continue to do so and everybody else would be better off.

 

‘Putting a limit on the maximum lifetime costs people may face will allow them to plan ahead for how they wish to meet these costs. By protecting a larger amount of people’s assets they need no longer fear losing everything.”

 

The report acknowledges that these changes would cost the government between £1.3 billion and £2.2 billion. It suggests that those who will benefit directly from these reforms, those people over state pension age, should experience ‘‘at least a part of the burden’’.

New link joins Bodleian and Rad Cam

0

The opening of the Gladstone Link last Tuesday has marked the creation of a completely new study environment in the Bodleian.

 

The link is part of a tunnel, named after Victorian Liberal Prime Minister and Oxford graduate William Gladstone, which allows readers to move underground between the Old Bod and the Rad Cam for the first time.

 

The facility, incorporating 120 work stations and doubling the Bod’s provision of open shelf material, is a small part of the £5 million redevelopment of the University’s library services.

 

A senior Bodleian librarian involved in the design of the two-levelled basement space described it as an “experiment”, emphasising that the environment would evolve depending on students’ wishes.

 

He drew attention to the more relaxed atmosphere as a contrast to traditional reading rooms; talking and group study are encouraged. There are even plans to permit hot drinks, with staff keen to promote the new tea room off the Old Bod quad.

 

Initial feedback on the area has been positive. The space was welcomed as something ‘very different’ by one visitor.

 

The development will also greatly increase access for those of limited mobility, with a new lift allowing movement to the upper and lower reading rooms and even occasional visits to the Rad Cam.

 

One student who has never directly accessed Oxford libraries before commented that she was looking forward to “an environment more conducive to study,” rather than having books delivered to her college room.

 

The book stacks previously housed in the area have migrated to Swindon, allowing the New Bod’s reincarnation into a ‘Special Collections research library” due to open in 2015. A former underground bookstore is to become the location for frequently ordered and new material.

No.9 barmen go topless for the ladies

0

No 9 nightclub has just announced that it will be launching a new ladies night every Thursday with drinks served by topless male bartenders.

 

On Thursday nights between 9pm and 3am male bartenders will serve tables wearing only their underwear.

 

The High Street venue, formally known as Escape, will become the first nightclub in Oxford to host such a night.

 

Steve Fontaine, the director of No.9,  has described the night as “just a bit of fun.”

 

Fontaine told the Oxford Mail “It’s certainly not a lapdancing club and it won’t be tacky. All of our male barman will wear just their underwear on Thursday nights because we want to create a relaxed environment where women can go and enjoy themselves. There have always been places where women have worked topless for male audiences. Why shouldn’t there be a similar place for women?”

 

Although No.9 was recently taken up by Varsity Events for their Saturday night slot, this

topless night does not look set to become an official student night.

 

However, when asked for their opinion, some female Oxford students displayed positive reactions to the event and suggested that it may become popular. One anonymous Univ student said ‘phwoar…topless barmen…that’s way better than Bridge.’

 

While Thirst Lodge recently had its licence for sexual entertainment revoked, the council has confirmed that No 9 will not need a licence for this new night.