Sunday, May 11, 2025
Blog Page 1788

Oxford don claims to discover new Da Vinci

0

 

An Oxford art historian is now “confident” that a portrait dismissed as an insignificant 19th century German piece was in fact drawn by Leonardo Da Vinci, in light of new evidence which emerged last week. 
A new Da Vinci has not been discovered for over a century.
Emeritus Professor Martin Kemp‘s book La Bella Principessa, which first outlined the claim, was published eighteen months ago. 
The initial argument relied on a host of scientific evidence, using techniques such as multispectral analysis. This seemed to show that the vellum the picture was drawn on was far older than the 19th century. 
It also found a fragment of a fingerprint which appeared to match up with that on another Da Vinci piece.
Now a 15th century book has been found in Poland from which the drawing was allegedly removed.
The vellum of the portrait appears to match that of the book and the three stitch holes in the margin of the piece also seem to correspond with it.
The book had been produced to celebrate the marriage of Bianca Sforza to Galeazzo Sansverino in 1496.
This would mean that the picture is of a young Sforza, eldest daughter of the Duke of Milan, who would have been about thirteen years old at the time.
However not all the art world is convinced, with the National Gallery declaring there is “no general agreement” that it is a lost Da Vinci.
Some art historians, particularly those who favour connoisseurship over sometimes unreliable technical analysis, claim the style simply is not that of Da Vinci, as well as noting that he produced no other art on vellum.
The piece was originally sold at auction in New York in 1998 for $21,850 as ‘Head of a Young Girl in Profile to the Left in Renaissance Dress’.
If it is in fact a lost Da Vinci it could now be worth a nine figure sum.

An Oxford art historian is now “confident” that a portrait dismissed as an insignificant 19th century German piece was in fact drawn by Leonardo Da Vinci, in light of new evidence which emerged last week. 

A new Da Vinci has not been discovered for over a century.

Emeritus Professor Martin Kemp‘s book La Bella Principessa, which first outlined the claim, was published eighteen months ago. 

The initial argument relied on a host of scientific evidence, using techniques such as multispectral analysis. This seemed to show that the vellum the picture was drawn on was far older than the 19th century. 

It also found a fragment of a fingerprint which appeared to match up with that on another Da Vinci piece.Now a 15th century book has been found in Poland from which the drawing was allegedly removed.

The vellum of the portrait appears to match that of the book and the three stitch holes in the margin of the piece also seem to correspond with it.The book had been produced to celebrate the marriage of Bianca Sforza to Galeazzo Sansverino in 1496.

This would mean that the picture is of a young Sforza, eldest daughter of the Duke of Milan, who would have been about thirteen years old at the time.

However not all the art world is convinced, with the National Gallery declaring there is “no general agreement” that it is a lost Da Vinci.

Some art historians, particularly those who favour connoisseurship over sometimes unreliable technical analysis, claim the style simply is not that of Da Vinci, as well as noting that he produced no other art on vellum.

The piece was originally sold at auction in New York in 1998 for $21,850 as ‘Head of a Young Girl in Profile to the Left in Renaissance Dress’.

If it is in fact a lost Da Vinci it could now be worth a nine figure sum.

 

Bod unearths Treasures

0

Treasures of the Bodleian, a major exhibition highlighting the rarest documents owned by the library, has just opened. 

Highlights of the exhibition include the 14th-century manuscript, Marco Polo’s travels, an illuminated Hebrew Bible from 1476, the Laxton Map of the sole surviving open-field system in Britain, Shakespeare’s First Folio from 1623, and part of Jane Austen’s first draft of her novel The Watsons. The exhibition also features twentieth-century items such as telegrams from the Titanic and the handwritten original of Wilfred Owen’s Anthem for Dead Youth (1917).
The chance to see so many unique documents is a draw for Oxford students. Corpus Christi historian Joe Rolleston said, “I’m definitely planning on going. It’s almost surprising that something like the Magna Carta or Shakespeare’s First Folio, which are so influential and important that they’re almost legendary, actually exist. The possibility of actually seeing these things is incredibly exciting. For me it’s a dream come true!”
The items on display in the library will be complemented by a website launched in mid-October. Extra items online will include Handel’s conducting copy of Messiah and the only surviving poem by John Donne in his handwriting, with podcasts and video presentations bringing texts to life. 
Bodleian Librarian Sarah Thomas said, “We want our collections to be accessible to the public, for people to come and see them, admire, inspect and get close to them.”
Fred de Fossard, a Magdalen fresher, commented, “The sheer diversity of the exhibits being shown is what strikes me. It really helps to cement Oxford’s position not only in British history, but as a cornerstone of Western culture. I don’t think you could see the original foundations of the British constitution, the first concept of zero, or handwritten originals of modernism together in any other place. This will definitely be one of the first things I visit at Oxford.”
The exhibition will run until 23rd December. Admission is free.

Treasures of the Bodleian, a major exhibition highlighting the rarest documents owned by the library, has just opened. 

Highlights of the exhibition include the 14th-century manuscript, Marco Polo’s travels, an illuminated Hebrew Bible from 1476, the Laxton Map of the sole surviving open-field system in Britain, Shakespeare’s First Folio from 1623, and part of Jane Austen’s first draft of her novel The Watsons.

The exhibition also features twentieth-century items such as telegrams from the Titanic and the handwritten original of Wilfred Owen’s Anthem for Dead Youth (1917).

The chance to see so many unique documents is a draw for Oxford students.

Corpus Christi historian Joe Rolleston said, “I’m definitely planning on going. It’s almost surprising that something like the Magna Carta or Shakespeare’s First Folio, which are so influential and important that they’re almost legendary, actually exist. The possibility of actually seeing these things is incredibly exciting. For me it’s a dream come true!”

The items on display in the library will be complemented by a website launched in mid-October. Extra items online will include Handel’s conducting copy of Messiah and the only surviving poem by John Donne in his handwriting, with podcasts and video presentations bringing texts to life. 

Bodleian Librarian Sarah Thomas said, “We want our collections to be accessible to the public, for people to come and see them, admire, inspect and get close to them.”

Fred de Fossard, a Magdalen fresher, commented, “The sheer diversity of the exhibits being shown is what strikes me. It really helps to cement Oxford’s position not only in British history, but as a cornerstone of Western culture. I don’t think you could see the original foundations of the British constitution, the first concept of zero, or handwritten originals of modernism together in any other place. This will definitely be one of the first things I visit at Oxford.”

The exhibition will run until 23rd December. Admission is free.

OUSU blacklists White Paper

0

Oxford University Student Union is finalising its highly critical response to the government’s Higher Education White Paper, “Students at the Heart of the System”, which was published for consultation in June.

The document, to be brought before the OUSU council, slams the government for suggesting that students should be consumers rather than partners in their education and for ignoring issues in postgraduate funding and student experience. 
The White Paper set out the government’s strategy concerning funding, student experience and social mobility.  OUSU however claims the government’s suggestions are “not a sustainable way to drive up quality or protect existing high standards.” They conclude that “the White Paper offers a very incoherent approach to social mobility at both the undergraduate and graduate level.”
Hannah Cusworth, OUSU’s Vice President for Access and Academic Affairs, outlined one concern, stating, “The university should be getting the brightest students who have the potential to benefit most from an Oxford education and to be tomorrow’s researchers.” 
Similarly, OUSU President Martha Mackenzie said that “the headline figure of £9,000 may seem insurmountable” to those applying from non-traditional backgrounds. OUSU have argued that the government need to take this more seriously, as “This radical change is unprecedented, and polling has shown that parents do not understand the new fees regime.”
Mackenzie commented, “In the new fee climate students will expect a high quality of education but this will not be achieved through a simple financial transaction. Far more important is that students are seen as genuine partners and are given real influence to share their education.” The response recognises that demand for places will always exceed supply, so consumerist motivation cannot incentivise improvement in educational standards. 
Oscar Lee, New College JCR President, supported Mackenzie’s stance, arguing, “It could be dangerous to turn students into de facto consumers who are only able to ameliorate the quality of their education by complaining until something is improved.” 
OUSU stated that positive change “has come through representation, the relationship (between student and tutor) and trust”, rather than value-for-money complaints, citing continuing postgraduate dissatisfaction despite paying fees up to £30,000 per year. 
OUSU officer Jacob Diggle suggests this “special relationship between students and academics” can lead to positive action, such as the no-confidence motion against David Willetts last term. He fears this relationship could be lost if fees push students to view their tutors merely as service-providers. 
Second year Regent’s student Ben Hudson was more critical of OUSU, suggesting the idea of a partnership is preferable to a marketised system, but that this “fails to address the problem of unfair access to this partnership.” He suggested that OUSU’s response “lacks the combative edge,” accusing them of attempting to “conciliate the government by agreeing with certain parts of the White Paper”, meaning that “the main point behind the debate is lost.”
Diggle denied that OUSU was moderate but suggested that the gentler tone they were forced to use was due to the lack of an effective mandate from the student community pushing for real change.
Colin Jackson, co-chair of Oxford University Labour Club, agreed, arguing, “Making a case against the current policy is only the start – now the student body must come together to reach a clear consensus on how we would rather see our degrees funded.”
There was no response to requests for a government defence.

Oxford University Student Union is finalising its highly critical response to the government’s Higher Education White Paper, “Students at the Heart of the System”, which was published for consultation in June.

The document, to be brought before the OUSU council, slams the government for suggesting that students should be consumers rather than partners in their education and for ignoring issues in postgraduate funding and student experience. 

The White Paper set out the government’s strategy concerning funding, student experience and social mobility.  OUSU however claims the government’s suggestions are “not a sustainable way to drive up quality or protect existing high standards.”

They conclude that “the White Paper offers a very incoherent approach to social mobility at both the undergraduate and graduate level.”

Hannah Cusworth, OUSU’s Vice President for Access and Academic Affairs, outlined one concern, stating, “The university should be getting the brightest students who have the potential to benefit most from an Oxford education and to be tomorrow’s researchers.” 

Similarly, OUSU President Martha Mackenzie said that “the headline figure of £9,000 may seem insurmountable” to those applying from non-traditional backgrounds.

OUSU have argued that the government need to take this more seriously, as “This radical change is unprecedented, and polling has shown that parents do not understand the new fees regime.”

Mackenzie commented, “In the new fee climate students will expect a high quality of education but this will not be achieved through a simple financial transaction. Far more important is that students are seen as genuine partners and are given real influence to share their education.”

The response recognises that demand for places will always exceed supply, so consumerist motivation cannot incentivise improvement in educational standards. 

Oscar Lee, New College JCR President, supported Mackenzie’s stance, arguing, “It could be dangerous to turn students into de facto consumers who are only able to ameliorate the quality of their education by complaining until something is improved.” 

OUSU stated that positive change “has come through representation, the relationship (between student and tutor) and trust”, rather than value-for-money complaints, citing continuing postgraduate dissatisfaction despite paying fees up to £30,000 per year. 

OUSU officer Jacob Diggle suggests this “special relationship between students and academics” can lead to positive action, such as the no-confidence motion against David Willetts last term. He fears this relationship could be lost if fees push students to view their tutors merely as service-providers. 

Second year Regent’s student Ben Hudson was more critical of OUSU, suggesting the idea of a partnership is preferable to a marketised system, but that this “fails to address the problem of unfair access to this partnership.”

He suggested that OUSU’s response “lacks the combative edge,” accusing them of attempting to “conciliate the government by agreeing with certain parts of the White Paper”, meaning that “the main point behind the debate is lost.”

Diggle denied that OUSU was moderate but suggested that the gentler tone they were forced to use was due to the lack of an effective mandate from the student community pushing for real change.

Colin Jackson, co-chair of Oxford University Labour Club, agreed, arguing, “Making a case against the current policy is only the start – now the student body must come together to reach a clear consensus on how we would rather see our degrees funded.”

There was no response to requests for a government defence.

Rowers show off their bumps

0

Ex-Blues rower Simon Hislop, a member of last year’s winning boat race crew, has posed naked in a photo shoot designed to make men more aware of the risks of cancer for the Blue September campaign.

The other men photographed are from Warwick University rowing club, including one cancer survivor. 
According to organiser and photographer Angus Malcolm, it is ‘bolder and sexier than the standard Blue September campaign.” The project was organised by Malcolm for free. ‘Everybody [did] it in their spare time for goodwill … any money we had, we spent on paint and beer’. He describes himself as ‘interested in how you can use erotica for the public good’, and hopes that the photo shoot will ‘demonstrate  that you can always turn to your friends’.
Hislop has himself recovered from testicular cancer, with the first symptoms appearing only weeks before his final exams. Now a doctor, he says, ‘Young guys need to check themselves regularly – and they should definitely pester their GPs if they suspect something.’
Primett agrees: ‘If you find a lump, get it checked instantly. I left mine a few months and got lucky it hadn’t spread.’
Other members of last year’s Blues rowing squad have shown support for Hislop’s efforts. Daniel Harvey said, ‘I think it’s great that Simon is using the popularity of rowing and the boat race to raise awareness of testicular cancer.’
Karl Hudspith commented, ‘His attempts to raise awareness by stripping off for a photo shoot show that men should not be embarrassed about knowing their own bodies and getting help from others if they think something is unusual.’
Men are 40% more likely than women to die of cancer, and 70% more likely than women to die from a cancer which can affect either gender. 81,000 men die from cancer in the UK each year.
Dr Emily Power at Cancer Research UK told Cherwell, ‘It’s important that men get to know their bodies so they know what’s normal for them and can spot any changes more easily. Spotting cancer early can make a real difference, so if men notice any unexplained or persistent changes in their health it’s important to get it checked out by a doctor.’
Chief executive of the Men’s Health Forum, Peter Baker, warned, ‘Too many men are dying unnecessarily because they take risks with their lifestyles and ignore symptoms.’
Tristana Smith

The other men photographed are from Warwick University rowing club, including one cancer survivor. According to organiser and photographer Angus Malcolm, it is ‘bolder and sexier than the standard Blue September campaign.’

The project was organised by Malcolm for free. ‘Everybody [did] it in their spare time for goodwill … any money we had, we spent on paint and beer’.

He describes himself as ‘interested in how you can use erotica for the public good’, and hopes that the photo shoot will ‘demonstrate  that you can always turn to your friends’.

Hislop has himself recovered from testicular cancer, with the first symptoms appearing only weeks before his final exams. Now a doctor, he says, ‘Young guys need to check themselves regularly – and they should definitely pester their GPs if they suspect something.’

Other members of last year’s Blues rowing squad have shown support for Hislop’s efforts. Daniel Harvey said, ‘I think it’s great that Simon is using the popularity of rowing and the boat race to raise awareness of testicular cancer.’

Karl Hudspith commented, ‘His attempts to raise awareness by stripping off for a photo shoot show that men should not be embarrassed about knowing their own bodies and getting help from others if they think something is unusual.’

Men are 40% more likely than women to die of cancer, and 70% more likely than women to die from a cancer which can affect either gender. 81,000 men die from cancer in the UK each year.

Dr Emily Power at Cancer Research UK told Cherwell, ‘It’s important that men get to know their bodies so they know what’s normal for them and can spot any changes more easily. Spotting cancer early can make a real difference, so if men notice any unexplained or persistent changes in their health it’s important to get it checked out by a doctor.’

Chief executive of the Men’s Health Forum, Peter Baker, warned, ‘Too many men are dying unnecessarily because they take risks with their lifestyles and ignore symptoms.’

Racist mail and Hotmail fail

0

A mailing list mess up by the Admissions Office has led to anger among prospective students and sparked a mass email debate which has degenerated into profanity, racism and abuse. As a result of the hundreds of thousands of emails generated by the mistake, Microsoft blocked all mail from Oxford University accounts to services including Hotmail and Windows Live for almost a week.

The glitch resulted in everybody who signed up online for a copy of this year’s prospectus online being added to a mailing list which all other members could, and did, reply to.
“An email list was created but misconfigured in such a way that recipients hitting ‘reply all’ responded to all users on the list, which normally is not permitted on this kind of list,” said a University spokesperson.
“Many list members external to Oxford [replied to the whole mailing list] and it resulted in more than a million email messages being sent.”
The barrage of emails sent to the whole list triggered furious responses. One commenter, Mayur Patel, launched personal and xenophobic attacks on other members of the list.
Patel sent the message, “wat part of shut the fuck up do you not understand” and later replied to criticism from another commenter saying, “fuk yu too kazernovsky…dont chat to me like you bloody know me…fukin prick comin here stealing our jobs and claiming benefits fukin up the whole system of this country”.
Oxford University declined to comment on the content of emails circulated via the list.
By the time Admissions realised the problem and shut down the mailing list on September 26th, members had received between 400 and 500 hundred emails each. Thousands these had been destined for Hotmail, Live and MSN email addresses.
Microsoft responded by barring all emails from Nexus accounts from September 27th, causing further frustration amongst students.
As of Monday 3rd October Microsoft has lifted its ban on emails from University accounts, though one student commented, “I started getting emails through this morning although they’re sporadic, not in order, and some of them still aren’t through.”
OUCS explained, “We believe the Microsoft blacklisting has been removed but we have to be extremely careful not to re-trigger it with too much mail too quickly. OUCS intends therefore to start releasing the queued mail in batches.”
Cherwell was told, “The University apologises unreservedly for the inconvenience caused to recipients. The problem was resolved very quickly and is not ongoing.” 
Initially, the mailing list became aware of the glitch when one prospective student made the mistake of pressing ‘Reply All’ when sending the Office an email asking why his prospectus had not been delivered. 
The message read, “Thank you very much but I have not received the prospectus yet despite ordering it online twice? If you need to phone, please can you contact my Dad, Many thanks, Will Archibald” was sent to all the list members, generating numerous emails from others wondering why they received that email.
One current student had signed up to the list earlier this year to order a prospectus for his sister and on September 25th was surprised at the volume of emails he was receiving.
“Emails were arriving at the rate of two or three per minute. After a couple of hours of people asking why they were getting everyone else’s emails, the vogue shifted to demanding very loudly that they be taken off the list, as if some great email overlord was watching the entire clusterfuck and toying with us,” he said.
There soon evolved a vicious e-circle of futile emails being sent to the mailing list.
“In the anarchic space of the internet, the hivemind of prospective students lost all sense and became entirely devoid of reason. Many replied whining about how bad Oxford is. Many, many people replied saying something along the lines of ‘Look guys, I know this is hypocritical, but if you all stop replying, this will stop.’ For an hour or two, my inbox was filled constantly with people excepting themselves from their rule to suggest, often in caps, that others stopped replying,”
“All told, by the time that Admissions realised what they had done and killed off the mailing list for good, I’d received maybe 400 or 500 hundred emails (including one from Andrew Archibald, apologising for what his son had unwittingly set in motion),” recounted the student.
In a separate yet similar case, PPE students got an irritating surprise when they were forwarded, more than 80 times, one email from Daniel Wilkes to Liz Frazer regarding lectures on Bentham.
“This dude, Daniel Wilkes, sent me 84 emails. I thought I was really popular for a second there,” commented St Hilda’s PPEist Ana Bonnington.
Accounting for the error, the University said, “There was an error in the WebLearn archiving process; such technology glitches happen occasionally and the department apologises for the inconvenience caused.”

A mailing list mess up by the Admissions Office has led to anger among prospective students and sparked a mass email debate which has degenerated into profanity, racism and abuse.

As a result of the hundreds of thousands of emails generated by the mistake, Microsoft blocked all mail from Oxford University accounts to services including Hotmail and Windows Live for almost a week.

The glitch resulted in everybody who signed up online for a copy of this year’s prospectus online being added to a mailing list which all other members could, and did, reply to.

“An email list was created but misconfigured in such a way that recipients hitting ‘reply all’ responded to all users on the list, which normally is not permitted on this kind of list,” said a University spokesperson.

“Many list members external to Oxford [replied to the whole mailing list] and it resulted in more than a million email messages being sent.”

The barrage of emails sent to the whole list triggered furious responses.One commenter, Mayur Patel, launched personal and xenophobic attacks on other members of the list.

Patel sent the message, “wat part of shut the fuck up do you not understand” and later replied to criticism from another commenter saying, “fuk yu too kazernovsky…dont chat to me like you bloody know me…fukin prick comin here stealing our jobs and claiming benefits fukin up the whole system of this country”.

Oxford University declined to comment on the content of emails circulated via the list.

By the time Admissions realised the problem and shut down the mailing list on September 26th, members had received between 400 and 500 hundred emails each. Thousands these had been destined for Hotmail, Live and MSN email addresses.

Microsoft responded by barring all emails from Nexus accounts from September 27th, causing further frustration amongst students.

As of Monday 3rd October Microsoft has lifted its ban on emails from University accounts, though one student commented, “I started getting emails through this morning although they’re sporadic, not in order, and some of them still aren’t through.”

OUCS explained, “We believe the Microsoft blacklisting has been removed but we have to be extremely careful not to re-trigger it with too much mail too quickly. OUCS intends therefore to start releasing the queued mail in batches.”

Cherwell was told, “The University apologises unreservedly for the inconvenience caused to recipients. The problem was resolved very quickly and is not ongoing.” 

Initially, the mailing list became aware of the glitch when one prospective student made the mistake of pressing ‘Reply All’ when sending the Office an email asking why his prospectus had not been delivered. 

The message read, “Thank you very much but I have not received the prospectus yet despite ordering it online twice? If you need to phone, please can you contact my Dad, Many thanks, Will Archibald” and was sent to all the list members, generating numerous emails from others wondering why they received that email.

One current student had signed up to the list earlier this year to order a prospectus for his sister and on September 25th was surprised at the volume of emails he was receiving.

“Emails were arriving at the rate of two or three per minute. After a couple of hours of people asking why they were getting everyone else’s emails, the vogue shifted to demanding very loudly that they be taken off the list, as if some great email overlord was watching the entire clusterfuck and toying with us,” he said.

There soon evolved a vicious e-circle of futile emails being sent to the mailing list.

“In the anarchic space of the internet, the hivemind of prospective students lost all sense and became entirely devoid of reason. Many replied whining about how bad Oxford is. Many, many people replied saying something along the lines of ‘Look guys, I know this is hypocritical, but if you all stop replying, this will stop.’ For an hour or two, my inbox was filled constantly with people excepting themselves from their rule to suggest, often in caps, that others stopped replying,”

“All told, by the time that Admissions realised what they had done and killed off the mailing list for good, I’d received maybe 400 or 500 hundred emails (including one from Andrew Archibald, apologising for what his son had unwittingly set in motion),” recounted the student.

In a separate yet similar case, PPE students got an irritating surprise when they were forwarded, more than 80 times, one email from Daniel Wilkes to Liz Frazer regarding lectures on Bentham.

“This dude, Daniel Wilkes, sent me 84 emails. I thought I was really popular for a second there,” commented St Hilda’s PPEist Ana Bonnington.

Accounting for the error, the University said, “There was an error in the WebLearn archiving process; such technology glitches happen occasionally and the department apologises for the inconvenience caused.”

 

Freshers’ drama guide: thespy A-Z

0

24
 
24-hour Play
Also known as ‘Play in a Day’, it’s one of many events cooked up by OUDS* to get people more involved in drama and explore the boundaries of where student drama can go. Good fun.
 
A
 
Angels, Pembroke
An awarding body. You apply to them and they’ll loan/give you money to fund a play according to certain Ts and Cs.
Annet, Margo
An RSC voice coach who is available to help with most student productions and will attend rehearsals if given sufficient notice. She’s really experienced and knows her stuff.
 
B
 
Bid
Essentially a plan or outline for a production. Director, Producer, Marketeer, Production Manager and Lighting/Sound plus whoever else write a statement showing their vision for a show and this is considered by the relevant committee that decides who gets performance slots at the Big Three theatres.
Big Three
Oxford Playouse, Keble O’Reilly and Burton Taylor theatres, in decreasing order of size. These have student slots every term and tend to be seen as a little more exclusive than College-level spaces.
Burton Taylor Studio
A gem, hidden round the back of the Oxford Playhouse. It seats 50 people and is quite small – perfect for intimate and experimental theatre and home to much new writing. There are up to ten slots each term, usually two a week (early and late).
 
C
 
Cuppers
This is an intercollegiate competition, held every Michaelmas term, in which people who haven’t acted before put on a play lasting no more than thirty minutes with others from their College. It can be something devised or an adaptation of an existing script. It’s a fantastic way to get started with Oxford drama. Judges all have experience acting, directing and reviewing but are predominantly students too – it doesn’t take itself too seriously.
Cherwell
Best place to look for reviews and what’s hot in the thespy world. Okay, perhaps I’m a little biased, but we aim to preview most student shows and offer opening night reviews, as well as blogs, features and general dramatic pieces. Look to Cherwell.
Corpus Christi Auditorium
A performance space in Corpus. Tends to be quite stuffy but is fairly large and often has decent shows that didn’t get their O’Reilly bid.
D
 
Daily Info
.co.uk – yeah, it’s a website, though there’s a print version every week that appears in trendy high-street cafes and Colleges like Wadham. Often sends reviewers to shows and will advertise them for free. You can find out stuff going on in the wider community and there are sometimes audition postings.
Director
The person whose brainchild you want to represent. Or protect. Or something. You know what a director is, but be prepared to experience many different types of direction, from the read-it-like- this to the I’m-open-to-any-suggestions. Making a good impression’s important even if you get cast, ’cause they might want to recommend or work with you again.
 
E
 
ETC
Experimental Theatre Company is primarily a funding body to help put on plays, preferably (as the name suggests) of an experimental nature.
Edinburgh Fringe
(festival). A handful of Oxford shows tends to go up to Scotland each August to test their mettle in the month-long slog of fawning, flyering and frantic networking. Oh, and performing. Auditions are usually early in Trinity or, if the director’s pretty on-the-ball, late Hilary.
 
F
 
Fire Station, Old
Theatre in Oxford that’s recently undergone dramatic refurbishing. On Gloucester Green. They
should start having plays there again soon.
 
G
 
Garden show
Trinity term sees about a hundred million garden shows. Every College offers one, whether separate or as part of their Arts Week.
Guild, Oxford Theatre
Very respected regional theatre community that produces a few plays a year. Next one to look out for is Breaking the Code. Head over to their site – it’s a great way to meet non-student friendly thesps.
 
H
 
Hep
Apparently it’s like Zip-Zap-Boing, though I never played that one. Much speculation has been cast over the origins and, indeed, validity of many rules in this warm-up game. You’ll encounter it soon enough. Dib-a-Dub-Dee!
 
I
 
I
There’s no ‘I’ in ‘team’ – where’s your spirit? There are never one-man shows in Oxford, so you’d better leave your ego at the door, son!
 
J
 
St John’s Auditorium
It’s in St John’s and has a show or two most terms. One of the more-used College spaces.
St John’s Mummers
The College drama society. They put on productions most terms and are a funding body, too. Well, you should hope so – John’s is so rich.
 
K
 
Keble O’Reilly
A very popular theatre, it’s one of the Big Three*. Seating around 180, depending on your stage format choice, it’s one of the bigger ones too. With up to five slots per term, bids are considered by the Martin Esslin Society*.
 
L
 
Lions, Oriel
They’re at Oriel and also might offer you money.
 
M
 
Magdalen Auditorium
In Magdalen, obviously, and quite good for musical stuff – some of the vocal groups like to use it for concerts and it’s home to many an OUG&Ssoc* show.
Magdalen Players
An awarding body; they don’t put shows on but invest in several each term. They usually have a knack of picking some of the best-performing and-grossing productions.
MES
The Martin Esslin Society – Keble’s drama society, offering funding and deciding which shows get the O’Reilly slots each term. Choose your friends carefully. Nah, just kidding.
 
N
 
New Theatre
On George Street, before Gloucester Green. Jam-packed full of touring productions and comedians, it’s a great way to see new and classic shows at affordable prices. I also like to bitch about how poor some of the drama school grads are: gives us hope.
NWF
The New Writing Festival constitutes Hilary term’s (no there’s no entry for that… c’mon!) shenanigans after Michaelmas’ Cuppers. The budding playwrights of Oxford are invited to submit their creations in advance, with the best handful selected for performance in a celebration of home-grown talent. They’re then judged by a variety of different critics with different backgrounds and experiences, and there are prices. Sometimes shows then go on to be expanded and performed elsewhere (‘To Hold an Apple’ went to the Fringe* this year).
 
O
 
OUDS
The reason we’re here. Oxford University Drama Society and damn proud. It’s been going since 1885 (there was a big fancy gala last year and everything) and has produced big names. The website, www.ouds.org, is a hub for audition and production team listings as well as news and information. You can also see what your fabulous committee is planning (and how they’re keeping things ticking over) in their meetings minutes. You can also apply to them for funding.
OUG&Ssoc
Gilbert and Sullivan fans, apply within! Operetta newbies, enquire within! These guys put on one of the famous operettas every term and spend a large amount of time getting drunk on G&T every week. Rollicking good fun!
O*LES
Light Entertainment Society. For the more laid back, less involved types with a casual interest in acting. They put on a good panto, especially in Michaelmas.
Oxford Student, The
Our rival publication (pshaw). They review plays too. And they write some other stuff about drama, I guess. And yeah, okay, they’ve got a site too. Not listing it, though.
 
P
Playhouse, Oxford
Very exclusive, with two student slots a term and 600 seats. The Holy Grail of acting? Hmm, beware the potential pitfalls. Once you’ve graced this stage, you’re at the peak of your game and there’s only one way to go from there. Too much for some, it’s a slippery slope and you might forget who you were.
Producer
Not just enthusiasts with no talent, producers here actually do a lot. They write the budget for plays (many of which here run into the thousands) and have to acquire rights and funding and stuff. They often lose money on productions, so it’s in their interests that a show does well; they often have a large say in casting.
 
Q
 
Queer
Oscar Wilde went to Magdalen. There’s a room named after him. Until recently there was no floor and it was appalling. Now there’s a flower suspended behind a glass pane. Good for rehearsing in.
 
R
 
Round-up, weekly
The University Drama Officer* sends out a bulletin each week with details on up-coming audition opportunities
RSC
The Royal Shakespeare Company’s ‘Open Stages’, one of their flagship outreach projects, allows amateur Shakey-P productions the chance to perform in the Dell in Stratford-Upon-Avon, besides benefiting from RSC voice coaching and guidance.
 
S
 
Simpkins, Lee
An exciting ‘new’ – in that it’s just been refurbished and opened up beyond the scope of the College – theatre in Lady Margaret Hall. It seats almost as many as the O’Reilly but can’t change format and isn’t raked. This term sees the venue’s first bid-successful plays being performed, so all eyes will be on it as people scope out its potential for future productions.
Stash
Want to be the envy of your friends? Ditch the leavers’ hoody (so last year) and get yourself in a play. With marketing getting increasingly inventive… and desperate… even the human body is legitimate advertising space. No but seriously, these hoodies/t-shirts and whatever else tend to be snazzy if you’ve a good marketeer, and act as a good memento of a show. Also kinda like a status symbol.
 
T
 
TAFF
Like OUDS* for techies! If your place is more behind the curtain, you can get lighting/sounds/stage work here.
Theatre Review, Oxford
A revered website, OTR sends two student reviewers to almost every single student production in Oxford, with the reviews appearing the next morning (or, realistically, early afternoon) on www.oxfordtheatrreview.com. Set up a few years ago by two undergrads, it’s gone from strength to strength, now launching websites in Cambridge, Durham and Bristol, as well as the Edinburgh site www.edfringereview.com
Tours
There’s the OUDS Summer Tour, the run of which is usually along the lines of Oxford-London- Edinburgh (for the full Fringe) and wherever else it can pick up. Then there’s the OUDS International Summer Tour, which is always a Shakespeare play and has been to America and Japan (but this year went to Guildford). There are also sometimes independent tours; take a look at Sovereign Arts if you see a posting on OUDS.
 
U
 
University Drama Officer
What’s that? A recent graduate, hired every year, paid to see every student production in Oxford? And there to offer help and guidance in your theatrical pursuits? What untold joy! Lovely fellow, he is. Email [email protected]
 
V
 
Vista
An age-old warm-up that you’re bound to meet pretty soon. Think tribal. Be prepared for raw palms
and thighs.
 
W
 
Wadham Moser
By day it’s a badminton court, but by evening this place can be yours for an exceptionally modest fee. Yeah, Wadham’s awesome. This is also often home to places not quite getting O’Reilly bids, as it’s a similar size. It has a lovely, big stage, though and is good for shows with a strong dance element. Often home to O*LES* shows (don’t let the extra asterisk distract you).
Worcester Buskins
Another College drama society-funding body combo. The Buskins is one of the oldest and most respected drama societies around and has a show every term itself – their shows are usually well received.
Workshop
If you get a callback, which is a good thing and you want it, then it might be called this, or take this form. Embrace it, unless it’s preceded by the word ‘movement’.
 
XYZ
 
XYZ…
Think we’ve missed something? Fancy contributing? Want to keep up to date with reviews, previews, features, blogs and whatnot? Visit Cherwell.org/stage

Stephen Merchant – Hello Ladies

0

 

“I thought it was going to be classier than this, didn’t you?” says Stephen Merchant, breaking off
from mimed cunnilingus to address his audience. To be honest, I don’t think many of the sell-out
crowd at Oxford’s New Theatre knew what to expect from The Office and Extras co-creator’s first
nationwide stand-up tour, ’Hello Ladies’, but the sheer amount of simulated coitus was something
few could have predicted. For a man who has chiefly made his name behind a computer keyboard as
a writer, or behind a microphone on the record-breaking Ricky Gervais podcast, rather than in front
of the television cameras or on stage, the physicality of the show in general was perhaps surprising;
although when you consider Merchant’s 6’7” stature you can imagine the opportunities available.
Without wishing to lazily trot out the tired old physical descriptions – his Wikipedia page has a
section devoted to Appearance, ‘a source of humour and teasing throughout his life’ – watching the
man affectionately, yet repeatedly, described by his writing partner (referred to by Merchant simply
as You Know Who) as ‘a big lanky goggle-eyed freak’, posing glamour-style for photographs, dancing
with long-limbed abandon, and seducing a microphone stand, is a visual treat that few other comics
can provide. Yet there is far more to Merchant’s act than gangly clowning. While using the powers of
his height to their best ability, he is also at the height of his powers as a writer. Feigned nervousness
at the start of the show – “It looks easy on the telly, doesn’t it?” – belies a well-crafted and mature
stand-up act. The show centres on Merchant’s ‘search for a wife’ and fame’s let-down as love-life
panacea. Confessional vignettes of thwarted love and incredulous observations are brought together
with charming sincerity, while sporadic outbursts of faux-arrogance and BAFTA-wielding prevent the
audience response from devolving into actual pity.
The great comedians have always been outsider figures, a status often compromised by proximity to
success. With Merchant, however, there is no need for affectation; you feel he has always been, to
a great extent can’t help but be, the outsider, quite literally standing out from the crowd and with
a literally unique viewpoint. Perhaps paradoxically it is his struggle to be accepted, on a personal
level, despite the huge success he has achieved, in which the pathos and comedy lie. ‘Hello Ladies’
continues until the end of the year, taking in a six-night run at the Hammersmith Apollo and finishing
in New York just before Christmas, and it is worth going to see a show that places Merchant among
the best working stand-ups today, (forgive me:) head and shoulders above the competition.

“I thought it was going to be classier than this, didn’t you?” says Stephen Merchant, breaking off from mimed cunniling us to address his audience. To be honest, I don’t think many of the sell-out crowd at Oxford’s New Theatre knew what to expect from The Office and Extras co-creator’s first nationwide stand-up tour, ’Hello Ladies’, but the sheer amount of simulated coitus was something few could have predicted. For a man who has chiefly made his name behind a computer keyboard as a writer, or behind a microphone on the record-breaking Ricky Gervais podcast, rather than in front of the television cameras or on stage, the physicality of the show in general was perhaps surprising; although when you consider Merchant’s 6’7” stature you can imagine the opportunities available.

Without wishing to lazily trot out the tired old physical descriptions – his Wikipedia page has a section devoted to Appearance, ‘a source of humour and teasing throughout his life’ – watching the man affectionately, yet repeatedly, described by his writing partner (referred to by Merchant simply as You Know Who) as ‘a big lanky goggle-eyed freak’, posing glamour-style for photographs, dancing with long-limbed abandon, and seducing a microphone stand, is a visual treat that few other comics can provide. Yet there is far more to Merchant’s act than gangly clowning. While using the powers of his height to their best ability, he is also at the height of his powers as a writer. Feigned nervousness at the start of the show – “It looks easy on the telly, doesn’t it?” – belies a well-crafted and mature stand-up act. The show centres on Merchant’s ‘search for a wife’ and fame’s let-down as love-life panacea. Confessional vignettes of thwarted love and incredulous observations are brought together with charming sincerity, while sporadic outbursts of faux-arrogance and BAFTA-wielding prevent the audience response from devolving into actual pity.

The great comedians have always been outsider figures, a status often compromised by proximity to success. With Merchant, however, there is no need for affectation; you feel he has always been, toa great extent can’t help but be, the outsider, quite literally standing out from the crowd and witha literally unique viewpoint. Perhaps paradoxically it is his struggle to be accepted, on a personal level, despite the huge success he has achieved, in which the pathos and comedy lie. ‘Hello Ladies’continues until the end of the year, taking in a six-night run at the Hammersmith Apollo and finishing in New York just before Christmas, and it is worth going to see a show that places Merchant among the best working stand-ups today, (forgive me:) head and shoulders above the competition.

Postgrad jogger mistaken for terrorist

0

An Iranian PhD student was stopped by the police on Monday afternoon as he underwent his daily exercise routine of walking with a weight vest, after they received a call from a member of the public. 

Goudarz Kamiri, who studies physiology, anatomy and genetics at University College, had been doing his regular morning walk down Southfield Road,  when he was forced to halt near the O2 Academy.

“The police officer said to me, ‘stop, stop’, and it was a few seconds before I realised he was actually talking to me. I was told to put my hands in the air and drop whatever was in my hands.”

The police officer, himself wearing a police vest, began examining Kamiri, requiring his help in taking off the 30kg vest.

“He asked me whether I knew what this looked like – “somebody with my appearance” wearing the vest – and I didn’t even really know what he meant: was it my skin colour?”

Kamiri spoke to Cherwell yesterday evening, commenting, “The fact that when it became obvious that I was not a terrorist, they still wanted to check everything and insisted on taking my details, bothered me a lot.”

He was indignant at the response of the police, which was to tell him not to wear the vest again. He commented, “This route is convenient for me – why should I change just because people are paranoid?”

“After my huge discussion with the two police officers I kept going with my training. Walking past them a second time in their car they told me, “Why don’t you just call it a day?” and demanded that I take off my vest again. I said no – it was heavy, I didn’t want to walk with it in my hand. Eventually I put my jacket over it, and still they were not completely satisfied.”

Kamiri contacted the Oxford Mail to tell his story, saying, “I wished that what they [the police] had done was once they realised I was no terrorist was go back to the people who called and explained that to them.”

“I did it partly to let those people know that there was no need to have been suspicious and also to make the point that we seem to be living in a society where people are paranoid. There is so much fear and anxiety, and the only way to take it away is through communicating. Just because someone looks Middle Eastern does not mean he or she is a terrorist, and it is the terrorists who want to induce such fear in society.”

When asked if he had any sympathy with the police’s point of view, he conceded, “I understand police have to go check but once they realise their mistake why go further? That is what is wrong.”

Since the article, Kamiri has been getting numerous calls from various organisations desiring to speak with him. He said, “The reaction was pretty much expected … the focus on the police, the word ‘terrorist’ and the Middle Eastern appearance.”

He stressed that he did not mean this to happen. “A lot of the reports of the incident that are out there make it seem like I am playing the race card. That was never my intention. There have been comments saying I am stupid – some people saying that these vests should be illegal. But I feel like it is not about the vests and it is not about my race – it is about the anxiety and fear in society. That is what is crazy for me.”

Superintendent Amanda Pearson, police commander for Oxford said, â€¨â€¨“Due to the nature of the call received, the control room enquired as to whether any armed response units were nearby. As one was in Oxford, officers from the unit were sent to the incident and spoke to the gentleman concerned.”

“While I appreciate that in this case being stopped and checked by the officers may have been unsettling to the gentlemen concerned, the officers were responding to a call from a member of the public who had a genuine concern and police are duty bound to investigate any calls of this nature to ensure public safety.”

Rioters’ delight

0

It was with a growing sense of unease that I followed How Hip Hop Changed the World on Channel 4, a programme broadcast over the summer which charted – in a somewhat disorderly and arbitrary fashion – the ‘top fifty ways’ in which hip hop culture has become an entrenched presence in societies across the globe over the past couple of decades. In the aftermath of the violent chaos that hit UK cities in August, one felt almost guilty watching rap videos that glorified gang violence, especially those that placed so much emphasis on the flaunting of wealth and material possessions.

Most of us are aware that rap music, and the hip hopculture behind it, emerged as a vehicle of protest for America’s troubled youth back in the 1970s. Even those who are not so aware can find in the urgent, gabbled, verbal torrent of, say, ‘Ready to Die‘ by Notorious B.I.G., an anger and frustration that can, by implication, be associated with deprivation and a lack of direction. Today, it appears that the rap music of ‘gangsta’ culture has seduced some of the young in our cities, who have adopted it as a symbolic gesture of rebellion against the more ‘privileged’ circles of society, from which they feel detached and excluded. 

The appeal of rap music, as opposed to sung music, can be explained by several factors: not only is the spoken word (especially when projected aggressively over a driving beat), far more effective in conveying a direct – although often oversimplified – message to the musically untrained, it is also an idiom available to everyone. In another of Channel 4’s recent explorations of this theme, Life of Rhyme, the veteran MC Akala praises the art of rapping as a form of poetry, which can both unite and educate.

It may be that hip hop can have a positive effect on deprived communities, promoting a sense of community identity, and providing an outlet for the ‘off-loading’ of difficult feelings. But it may also be the case that many of today’s youth are simply drawn by the shallow allure of unearned self-importance and power that this ‘poetry’ promotes. Rapping can become a game of respect, and often celebrates intimidation, swaggering self-confidence, and ‘being the best’. In How Hip Hop Changed the World, Dappy from N-Dubz reveals his first reaction on hearing a song by 30-strong hip hop posse So Solid Crew: ‘When that came out … I wanted to be an MC. I wanted to be famous. I wanted to have girls, and people screaming my lyrics’. Of course, many of us naively yearn for fame when we are young, but it is another matter for young people to be duped by the glamour of unearned fame – or notoriety – into following the example of those dandified thugs who have fulfilled their own desire to ‘get noticed’.

Here we return to the dominant ‘message’ of much hip hop: what lies at the heart of the genre, beneath its images of street warfare and boasts about wealth and drug-taking, is self-aggrandizement. Children, materially or culturally impoverished, and habituated to this raw, aggressive music, may read in it the answer to a successful life: a code of moral inversion embedded in the hip hop lyric implies that ‘status’, being the ultimate aspiration, can be acquired only through material wealth.

These kids are all too aware of their misfortune and impoverishment, but they might take comfort from wallowing in the sound-world of similarly disengaged youth, who provide encouragement to scorn authority, and take what they want – or are brainwashed into wanting. David Starkey’s condemnation of UK ‘gangsta’ culture on Newsnight provoked outrage and widespread accusations of racism, but – even if his views were expressed tactlessly – he was above all addressing a more general condition of cultural ill-health in today’s society, not singling out or stigmatising any particular ethnic group.

Too many of these ‘gangsta’ songs obsess about the miseries and inequity within society; some of our inner-city youths, identifying with the sentiments in these songs, may feel justified in lashing out against those who have more than they do. One of the tragedies of the August riots was that, in some cases, the victims of violence and arson had no more, often less, materially, than the attackers themselves.  

Poverty became an excuse for the young looters: complaints about deprivation fell – or should have fallen – on deaf ears, as rioters bagged iPhones, designer t-shirts, trainers and jeans, and flat-screen televisions. These young adults were starving – not for food, but for status symbols and luxury goods. The proceedings became a race for respect – a form of respect engendered by their immersion in a culture that brags about money, and endorses the assumption that having what you think you want is the answer to both happiness and success. The lyrics of 50 Cent’s ‘I Get Money‘ ring true: ‘I was young, I couldn’t do good, Now I can’t do bad; I ride, wreck the new Jag, I just buy the new Jag. Now nigga why you mad? Oh, you can’t do that.’

Can we wonder that our inner-city youth, brought up with few aspirations, negligible education, and little prospect of employment, fantasize about a ‘happier’ life where success consists of little more than having the ‘right’ things, and proving oneself to be better than one’s neighbour through intimidation and braggadocio? And when our culture as a whole supports and promotes such deluded beliefs, condoning and encouraging youth’s untrammelled right to self-expression and ‘independence’, what can be done?

According to Idris Elba, the presenter of How Hip Hop Changed the World, the summit of hip hop’s rise to power was Obama’s announcement to America of his love for Jay-Z’s music. This was surely not just a gesture of racial solidarity, but also an expression of the governing class’s desperate desire to get ‘down with’ the youth and to earn their respect. We see something similar in Britain today: Cameron may have lamely condemned excessive radio coverage of violent rap music, but it is clear that many years of official non-judgementalism in social policy and education has allowed a culture of crude materialism to dominate certain sectors of society. Moreover, in view of the seemingly continuous decay of morality not only within establishment circles (exemplified by, for example, the MPs’ expenses scandal of 2009), but also among the more privileged in society – including university students – where would these underprivileged young people find moral guidance, were they disposed to seek it? 

Cherwell Sport goes caving

0

 

When I began my time at Oxford, I saw myself punting down the Isis in glorious sunshine, playing croquet while enjoying Pimm’s on immaculate lawns, and, of course, whiling away hours in grandiose libraries. What I didn’t picture was spending two or three weekends a term grubbing around in dark wet holes wearing what is best described as a heavy-duty boiler suit. No, student debts haven’t reduced me to sewage maintenance work (yet): I’ve taken up caving.
Not being a particularly co-ordinated person, sports were not high on my list of priorities at the Fresher’s Fair. Nonetheless, when a guy wearing a helmet and headlamp brandishing pictures of stalactites and subterranean waterfalls and waxing lyrical on the “underground adventure playground” that is a cave, I got hooked. My first weekend with Oxford University Caving Club (OUCC) was a trip to South Wales at the end of second week. We gathered at the caving hut, each decked out with a bizarre combination of equipment (wellies, washing up gloves, a fleece onesie, a heavy-duty onesie, a belt, etc) and piled into a minibus to go.
The caves were epic: in one sense vast but with miniscule squeezes you had to wriggle on your belly to get through, full of steep climbs with jagged footholds you could just about stick your foot on, and littered with boulder strewn passages where scrambling on knees or sliding on bums was required to make progress.  Beautiful rock formations, seen by fewer than a hundred people in the world ever, clung to the walls and thunderous waterfalls crashed past your ears. 
Yes, caving is mostly dark, sometimes a bit tight, usually cold and wet, not at all competitive, and often leaves you spending a lot of time staring at the butt of the guy in front, but it’s also incredibly exciting. It’s not to most people’s taste and in fact most people shudder at the thought of launching themselves into a small damp hole, but for me, every cave is an adventure. Underground is one of the few frontiers on Earth that still has potential for exploration, and it blows my mind that every year cavers stumble across cathedral-sized caverns, bottomless shafts, and fossilised passages previously unseen by any man.
Caving is an unusual sport, but for unusual people like me, it’s perfect.
I’ve done the punting, the croquet, even a little work, and I do love it all, but caving is the one thing I can’t imagine university life without. While not what I looked for at Fresher’s Fair, I’m glad I found caving, because ironically for a sport which mostly involves going down, it gives me a high I can’t find anywhere else.

When I began my time at Oxford, I saw myself punting down the Isis in glorious sunshine, playing croquet while enjoying Pimm’s on immaculate lawns, and, of course, whiling away hours in grandiose libraries. What I didn’t picture was spending two or three weekends a term grubbing around in dark wet holes wearing what is best described as a heavy-duty boiler suit. No, student debts haven’t reduced me to sewage maintenance work (yet): I’ve taken up caving.

Not being a particularly co-ordinated person, sports were not high on my list of priorities at the Fresher’s Fair. Nonetheless, when a guy wearing a helmet and headlamp brandishing pictures of stalactites and subterranean waterfalls and waxing lyrical on the “underground adventure playground” that is a cave, I got hooked. My first weekend with Oxford University Caving Club (OUCC) was a trip to South Wales at the end of second week. We gathered at the caving hut, each decked out with a bizarre combination of equipment (wellies, washing up gloves, a fleece onesie, a heavy-duty onesie, a belt, etc) and piled into a minibus to go.

The caves were epic: in one sense vast but with miniscule squeezes you had to wriggle on your belly to get through, full of steep climbs with jagged footholds you could just about stick your foot on, and littered with boulder strewn passages where scrambling on knees or sliding on bums was required to make progress.  Beautiful rock formations, seen by fewer than a hundred people in the world ever, clung to the walls and thunderous waterfalls crashed past your ears. 

Yes, caving is mostly dark, sometimes a bit tight, usually cold and wet, not at all competitive, and often leaves you spending a lot of time staring at the butt of the guy in front, but it’s also incredibly exciting. It’s not to most people’s taste and in fact most people shudder at the thought of launching themselves into a small damp hole, but for me, every cave is an adventure. Underground is one of the few frontiers on Earth that still has potential for exploration, and it blows my mind that every year cavers stumble across cathedral-sized caverns, bottomless shafts, and fossilised passages previously unseen by any man.

Caving is an unusual sport, but for unusual people like me, it’s perfect.I’ve done the punting, the croquet, even a little work, and I do love it all, but caving is the one thing I can’t imagine university life without. While not what I looked for at Fresher’s Fair, I’m glad I found caving, because ironically for a sport which mostly involves going down, it gives me a high I can’t find anywhere else.