Wednesday, May 7, 2025
Blog Page 1572

Union in transparency drive

0

THE OXFORD UNION has introduced a new balloting system with the aim of making the society more transparent. The Union Press Office has released a statement announcing that in future, attendees who wish to attend a highly anticipated event will be chosen by random ballot.

The release states, “In the interest of transparency, the process will take place at a public meeting, open to any member of the society.” Members who have expressed an interest in the event will receive a number; the selected numbers will consequently be announced on a big screen at a meeting.

There have only been two balloted events in the past two years – the film premiere of the Rum Diaries with Johnny Depp last year and PSY’s visit in Michaelmas.

Maria Rioumine, President of the Oxford Union , told Cherwell, “There’s stuff to change. It will be a long-time process, but it’s a start to making the Union better.”

She said that besides the random ballot, committee guest lists will be abolished: “Friends of committee members will no longer be given priority and the President will only be allowed to bring two friends along to President’s Drinks.

“Instead we hope to reward the participation of our members by inviting anyone who makes a floor speech on the night to attend the drinks event after the debate.”

Sony boss gives £1 million to Merton

0

SONY CHAIRMAN Sir Howard String­er has recently donated £1m to Mer­ton College’s Access and Schools Liai­son scheme.

Stringer and his wife, Jennifer Pat­terson, have donated the money in order to help Merton forge partner­ships with state schools around the UK.

Sir Howard studied Modern His­tory at the college and graduated in 1961. He has been Chairman and CEO of Sony since June 2005. Stringer was knighted in 1999, has an honorary fel­lowship from Merton, and has nine Emmys to his name. His net worth is currently estimated at upwards of $60 million.

The access scheme at Merton has developed partnerships with schools in Wiltshire, Dorset and the London Borough of Merton. Over the last three years, 65.1 per cent of students accepted at Merton have come from maintained schools.

Professor Martin Taylor, Warden of Merton College, told Cherwell, “The Stringer-Patterson gift to Merton Col­lege for access and schools liaison was an amazing present. It is one which will be of lasting value.”

He continued, “Our full-time Schools Liaison and Access Officer offers a range of activities to help the very best students, regardless of background, make informed deci­sions about studying at Merton and within the University of Oxford.”

Jack Morel-Paulo, Merton JCR Ac­cess Rep, told Cherwell, “We’re obvi­ously very pleased and incredibly thankful for Sir Howard’s generos­ity. Although Merton is already one of the colleges with the best record for equal admissions, there’s always more work to be done busting myths and making sure ability is the only thing which dictates whether some­one applies or not.”

At present, Mansfield College comes closest to state school–private school proportionality: in 2012, 84.7 per cent of accepted students were educated in the maintained sector. Pembroke College currently comes last, with just 47% of 2012 acceptances from maintained schools, despite the maintained sector educating 93% of the total UK school population.

Joe Collin, Access and Equalities Representative on the St Anne’s JCR Committee, responded to the news, saying, “Donations like this cannot be celebrated enough. When just one visit to a school can change an entire class’s perception of Oxford, and perhaps lead to them applying, imagine what such a large sum could achieve.”

The University of Oxford has re­cently received a number of particu­larly generous philanthropic dona­tions, designed to promote access work.

In July last year Oxford alumnus Michael Moritz and his wife Harriet Heyman made a £75 million commit­ment, which, in combination with a “matched funding challenge” from the University, will eventually pro­duce £300 million in the shape of financial support for Oxford under­graduates from disadvantaged back­grounds.

Suicide rates have increased since the recession

0

FIGURES FROM the Office for National Statistics show an annual increase in suicides among students in England and Wales from 2007 to 2011, despite a decrease during the first half of the decade. Peaking at 127 suicides in 2010, student suicides rose by 36 per cent overall.

The increase was greatest among female students, with numbers almost
doubling in the period. Yet male suicides continue to be more common, with 375 men taking their lives compared to 143 women.

The increase bucks a former trend from the period 1997-2006, when
student suicides decreased by 29 per cent.

Katie Colliver, OUSU Vice-President for Welfare and Equal Opportunities, told Cherwell, “The Counselling Service has seen an increase in use in recent years and whilst this may be linked to the greater pressure students are experiencing in the current economic climate, we can also hope that this is a positive sign that more people are seeking help.”

Colliver encouraged students with concerns about their mental health to seek advice, continuing, “It is always better to seek help early, so if there is something on your mind, or you are concerned about changes in a friend’s behaviour, then it is worth making an appointment with your GP or the Counselling Service.”

The National Union of Students suggests that financial pressure can undermine students’ mental health. Hannah Paterson, NUS Disabled Students Officer, said, “Financial and debt pressures add to the stress of student life, and NUS research shows that even small amounts of debt can badly affect student well-being.”

The NUS fears that student support could be cut by universities in future. Paterson added, “With increasing financial pressures on institutions, support services can be the first thing to be cut, but it’s at times like this that it’s more important than ever that our universities protect counselling services.”

A spokesperson for Nightline, Oxford’s night-time counselling service, stated, “As far as we’re aware, Oxford students are no more likely to experience suicidal feelings than they would be elsewhere, and as far as we know there are no studies indicating a higher risk.”

A study at the Oxford Centre for Suicide Research agrees, concluding, “Contrary to earlier findings and popular belief, suicide rates among Oxford University students do not differ from those in other young people. Rates of DSH [deliberate selfharm] are significantly lower than in other young people.”

The statistics come a year after the Royal College of Psychiatrists called for help for depressed students. A report emphasised alcohol’s role in causing mental health problems, suggesting “steps should be taken to curtail inducements to consume alcohol, for example ‘happy hours’ and sales of cheap alcoholic drinks on campus”.

An Oxford University spokesman said, “Students who are struggling to cope personally or academically, or who have any kind of problem, will find a range of support available at many levels – college, university, Student Union, and the local Primary Care Trust where relevant.”

The Oxford Counselling Service is free for university members, giving individual counselling, workshops and self-help resources. The university also provides Nightline, a service which offers support for students from 8am until 8pm during term time. OUSU runs ‘Mind Your Head’, a campaign which helps students with their mental health. Its website states, “We want to create a more welcoming culture for people who have experienced mental health problems, to encourage every student to look after their mental wellbeing.”

Oxford Counselling Service can be contacted on 01865 270300. Nightline can be contacted on 01865 270270.

 

Personal statements favour private school students

0

A RECENT STUDY has challenged the role played by personal statements during the university application process.

The research, commissioned by the Sutton Trust, and carried out by Dr Steven Jones of Manchester Uni­versity, compared the success of 309 university applicants with equivalent grades from independent and state schools. It concluded that rather than helping equalise opportunity, appli­cants from lower- or middle-income families were at a disadvantage when it came to their personal statement.

The study found that independent school students were more likely to submit statements that were care­fully worded and written in an aca­demically appropriate way. They were also more likely to include references to unusual or expensive activities or work experience. Dr Jones said that by contrast, “State school applicants appear to receive less help compos­ing their statement, often struggling to draw on suitable work and life ex­perience.”

The Trust calls for changes to be made to the process, stating, “Person­al statements should be more than an excuse to highlight past advantag­es […] and universities should make it clear that applicants are not penal­ised for having lacked opportunities due to family circumstances.”

The Sutton Trust was founded in 1997 by Sir Peter Lampl, and has funded a wide range of access and re­search projects for both schools and universities. The charity aims to pro­mote social mobility through educa­tion, and is particularly concerned with interrupting the correlation be­tween educational opportunity and family background.

A spokeswoman for Oxford Univer­sity Press Office replied to the claims, saying, “Unlike most other univer­sities, in selecting students Oxford looks at a great deal more than just predicted grades and personal state­ments. The personal statement there­fore carries less weight in the process than it would at other universities. Additionally, unlike many other uni­versities, Oxford is only interested in students’ aptitude for their chosen subject.”

She continued, “It’s worth noting in regards to the Sutton Trust sur­vey specifically that using state and independent schools as a proxy for deprivation and privilege is not ter­ribly useful – there are students from very deprived backgrounds at private schools, just as there are very affluent students in state schools.”

Martin Conway, a former History admissions tutor at Balliol, said, “All tutors in Oxford are aware of the crafting that goes into personal statements, and they are therefore only one relatively minor aspect of how we assess applications. We look at a combination of students’ exam records, school references, aptitude tests, written work, and interview performances.”

Another tutor also claimed, “It is almost unknown for anyone to get a place because of a good personal statement.”

One second-year Maths student said, “I don’t think the research high­lights anything we, and the Univer­sity, didn’t already know – going on expensive work experience doesn’t mean anything if you can’t keep up in the interview.” They added, “This type of research is really important, but the charity ought to be careful not to depict the situation too negatively. We want to be encouraging students from all social backgrounds to apply. The fees have put enough people off university, the focus should be on helping students, rather than mak­ing them feel like they’ll be at a disad­vantage”.

Sam Atwell, Access and Admissions Officer at Balliol, claimed, “Some of the recommendations seem a bit daft. Calling on colleges to provide more practical support for students during the admissions process seems to miss the point: these schools ei­ther don’t know how to provide help, or don’t have the resources. They may have a primary concern in devoting their resources to ensuring all stu­dents leave with an adequate level of Maths and English.”

Students to visit Aung San Suu Kyi in Burma

0

A MOTION proposing a delegation of Oxford students to visit Burma this year was passed unopposed at Wednesday’s OUSU Council meeting.

Aung San Suu Kyi, a Burmese oppo­sition politician and Chairperson of the National League for Democracy, invited Oxford students to her home country when she visited St Hugh’s college in June last year to collect her honorary doctorate.

Since then, OUSU, together with OxHub, has planned to select a dele­gation to spend a week in Burma, and hopes to link to a counterpart delega­tion of Burmese students who might be able to make a reciprocal visit to Oxford. Planned activities for the week include discussion seminars with the counterpart delegation, vis­its to selected Burmese development initiatives and outings to youth-led programmes or projects.

After decades of military dicta­torship, Burmese politics has more recently been marked by steps to re­form its government. Its progress has been met with encouragement inter­nationally and, in the past year, rep­resentatives from several countries, including Foreign Secretary William Hague, have made historic visits to the country.

Sarah Santhosham, OUSU VP (Char­ities and Community), told Cher­well, “The proposed exchange trip to Burma offers an exciting learning opportunity for students who have made a significant impact on their community to share their experience of civic leadership and development with Burmese youth, and participate in the reintegration of Burma into the academic community through cross-cultural exchange.”

She added, “An exchange like this is particularly meaningful at this time when Burma is transiting towards democracy. Forging a partnership be­tween Oxford and Burmese students will hopefully lead to an ongoing relationship where we can exchange ideas between our two student com­munities.”

OUSU President David J Townsend, said, “This proposal emerged from an invitation given by Dr Aung San Suu Kyi to OUSU last summer, and with the University’s backing we’re now in a position to accept that invitation.”

He continued, “While the re-en­gagement of Burma with the interna­tional community has been continu­ing apace, as evidenced by official visits from political leaders of Aus­tralia, the US and the UK, naturally we will be monitoring the situation as it evolves, and taking diplomatic advice on the matter. Re-engagement re­quires more than just diplomatic and economic connections, though: it re­quires a connection between young people, and students in particular, if it is to be meaningful and lasting. OUSU, on behalf of the Oxford stu­dent body, would be proud to be part of that re-engagement.”

Nora Godkin, Co-President and Founder of the Oxford Burma Alli­ance, commented, “I think it’s great that Oxford students are showing an interest in Burma and in the lives of their Burmese counterparts, as now is really the time to lend our support to the Burmese people who are trying to use the current international at­tention to usher in real and positive change.”

In addition, she noted, “It would be great if this opportunity could be used to forge lasting relationships be­tween Oxford students and Burmese young people – something the Oxford Burma Alliance aims to do through a number of projects – as both sides can learn from and support each other.”

OUSU hopes to forge an ongoing partnership with a Burmese delega­tion, which could make a return visit to Oxford in the future. It hopes to en­gage Oxford students beyond those selected to partake in the visit. San­thosham said, “OUSU is currently ex­ploring a number of options to make the exchange longer lasting and im­pactful for the wider student body.”

Do me if you’ve ‘done’ India

Christmas holidays.  A time for the textbook family-holiday question:

“So, darling, any nice boys in Oxford then?”

“Mm, yes Mum, beating them off with a stick on a daily basis.”

While this, according to my dearest mother, is just me being “facetious”, there are a couple of boys who could probably do with having the stick removed from their arse and having it belted across their head a few times.  There are some in fact, who can be so outrageous, you can only hope they’re joking.

One Brasenose boy in particular should hang his head in shame for casually dropping into conversation last week that everyone, just EVERYONE, says that Brasenose is the college of real brains or old money.

Something gave me an inkling he was in possession of the latter and not the former. What does he expect girls to say? 

“Oh God, you gorgeous hunk, you make me want to lie back and think of England!”?

I should have walked away as soon as he opened his mouth to spout more of his vacuous chat but it’s strange how something so repulsive can be so fascinating at the same time. Actually, who am I kidding? It was just downright hilarious!

“So on my year out, I did Brazil, Argentina, India…”

“Please could you just stop there a sec and explain in a little more depth the process of “doing” a country? Any illegitimate kiddies on the way?

He didn’t hear me. In fact, I don’t think he even realised I was still there as he spewed forth his mirror-rehearsed torrent of crap.

“Yah, I mean, it sounds stupid when I say it but I really, genuinely feel that I left a piece of my heart in Goa.”

“You’re not wrong there.”

Never in my life have I wished to locate my soul in India more – if only to have it saved from this oxygen-thieving moron.

5 Minute Tute: Geology

0

What is geology?

Geology is the study of the Earth, the materials of which it is made, the structure of those materials, and the processes acting upon them. It includes the study of organisms that have inhabited our planet. An important part of geology is the study of how Earth’s materials, structures, processes and organisms have changed over time.

Why does any of this matter?

Geology affects many things in our day-to-day life, such as fundamental resources – things like water, minerals, iron, aluminium and fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas). The different types of resources are formed in different geological settings. Other minerals such as diamond and gold are also resources that are arguably essential to global trade and economy. The application of geology is also to understand where to find them. There are other direct effects such as earthquakes, volcanic activity, flooding all have roots in geology. Hence a better geological understanding of these can improve our ability to live with these events.

What are rocks actually made of?

Rocks are made of various combinations of minerals that occur naturally in the earth and depending where on the earth the rocks are found will have an impact on the minerals that make them up. There are basically three types of rock formations: igneous rock formed by the cooling of volcanic magma – granite is a common example; there is sedimentary rock that is formed by successive layers of sediment which has created pressure over time, an example would be limestone; and then there is metamorphic rock which is formed from one of the previous rocks and subjected to extreme conditions that have actually altered their make up, good examples being either marble or slate.

What makes oil so controversial?

A whole bunch of reasons – one of them is clearly it is a fossil fuel – it’s a finite resource. It pollutes the atmosphere when burnt and therefore has an environmental impact on the planet. It is also a highly political resource, as well as having a heavy economic influence across the globe. Higher prices can hit economies and in some developing countries it can adversely influence governmenta because of its value.

Having said that, oil does offer huge benefits – it does provide positive economics in many countries and allow them to develop. It also currently provides mankind with sources of heating and energy, infrastructure, roads, technology, plastics and even fertilisers to feed the global population – this list is endless. There will probably always be a place for oil, but it has to be together with both renewable and cleaner sources of energy, that will enable us to reduce oil’s use as a fuel. 

How can I make sure that I will be fossilised for future generations to find?

Firstly, avoid cremation and lie yourself in a peat bog or somewhere at sea as this reduces the chance of erosion – preferably somewhere where (a) you won’t decompose very fast and (b) you won’t get broken up and eroded away.

If we humans actually wipe ourselves out in the next hundred thousand years or so, we could provide a very rich yet thin layer of what is termed a ‘Zone Fossil’. So Just make sure your fossil is one of the best preserved.

Interview: Alan Davey

0

“What do you do,” an Avenue Q song so nearly began, “with an MPhil in Old Icelandic?” Become CEO of Arts Council UK, if Alan Davey’s record is anything to go by. Davey studied at Merton College before embarking upon a career in the Civil Service that has taken him to the top of the UK’s department for the allocation of arts funding.

After a spell in the Department of Health, Davey took up a position in the newly created Department of National Heritage in 1992 (the word ‘culture’ was considered too left-wing for the then Conservative government). “It was set up as a really small department, and had some of the cleverest people from the Treasury there. There were lots of brainy people around trying to think of new ways to run a department, and it was really exciting at the time. Now the culture department is just like any other government department, which is a bit of a shame because it could have been different.”

The Arts Council has a great deal of responsibility in allocating the resources for the production of art as well as directing its practitioners in how best to serve the public. There’s a danger of creating a tension between these two strands: the current ten year plan is titled ‘Achieving Great Art For Everyone’. I question how the Arts Council ensured that accessibility was not confused with popularisation – how to go about preserving the quality of art whilst at the same time widening participation. “There’s always been that tension in the arts council; are we going to go for access or are we going to go for excellence, and at times in its history it has been polarised. I’ve always been against that,” says Davey.

“It’s setting in train the conditions by which great art can happen. Someone working in the community with young people can produce great art and I’ve seen wonderful stuff. Someone working in an opera house can also produce great art. They’re different, but the authenticity of ambition makes it genuine. What we’ve found is that it can be quite simple; if you’ve never been to the theatre before, for instance, it becomes quite a frightening mystery. And how can we make people able to discover it more easily? Always without dumbing it down. It’s about saying to people, ‘Well, try it, and we’ll help you understand it’.”

Earlier last year playwrights David Hare and Mark Ravenhill attacked post-recession theatre programming, worrying that producers were playing it too safe when it came to choosing plays. “It’s something that I’m worried about,” says Davey. “We saw it happen in the eighties, and people started to do productions that they thought were safe, surefire box-office hits, or very cheap productions. Like Educating Rita, a two person play, I mean, it’s a good play, but it was everywhere! Theatres got into a spiral of decline, because audiences were finding it less interesting, so the box-office fell and the entire economic model began to collapse. What we’re observing this year if you look at the programmes of all the theatres, is a certain safeness creeping in, and I do think we have to address that now.

“What we can never do in the next few years is replace the government cuts, because we simply can’t afford to. We can help theatres look at their business models more closely, but always keep the art interesting because that keeps audiences interested.”

The cabinet minister with responsibility for culture, Maria Miller, quickly came into the media crossfire after her appointment. And it isn’t hard to see why: Miller is Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and is also Minister for Women and Equalities. In addition to the furore over arts cuts she’s been responsible for overseeing post-Leveson legislation and is also at the heart of the gay-marriage debate, not to mention fighting a burgeoning expenses scandal concerning her second home.

I ask Davey if he thinks this is simply too many plates for one minister to spin. “I think it’s doable if you’ve got the department ordered in the right way. All of her responsibilities are capable of creating a huge interest all at once. You ignore them at your peril. She’s still new in the job, and she’s got to find a way of attending to all of them with the right amount of attention. She shouldn’t be afraid of the culture sector, because it really wants to help. We’re good at culture in this country. We need to work with her to give her the means to do her job better.”

Cherwell Sport – Rugby – New College v Worcester 12/01/2013

0

Commentary: Sam Barker
Filming and Editing: Rolf Merchant

A zombie generation

0

I’m not old. I’m only 21. But that is, by a whisker, just old enough to have missed out on one of the grandest qualitative changes that ever happened to childhood. There isn’t a scent of regret in ‘missed out’ – I think we c.21 year olds nailed it.

We did our first growing up in a very different world from the one in which we will work and die. In my formative years, enormous, boxy computers had arrived in our classrooms but not quite everywhere else. Only drug dealers and businessmen had mobile telephones. The internet still had a Pacman vibe but, since it wasn’t installed in homes yet, that didn’t scare us. Electronic goods were, fundamentally, far too expensive for children to be left to play with, and, ultimately, far too Office ’97 for children even to have wanted to.

At school I listlessly practised making Power Points (unwatchably animated), or natty spreadsheets (unreadably useless). However, for genuine, after hours, infantile diversion my brothers and I didn’t turn to a composite electronic nanny made up of Gameboys, iPads, internet telephones etc. Instead, I think we played a lot with leaves and ants. They played War Games from which I was excluded because my tank noises were too generic. As a sop, they let me have a go with the Frisbee instead.

In other words, we grew up in the unhoovered gap between two very different sorts of childhood – the computer-free and the computer-sodden. We were the last generation to be raised without the parental crutch of pervasive digital entertainment, but, equally, the very first to acquire computer literacy with effortless, child-like fluency.

What I want us to acknowledge is that we are not, really, part of the Information Generation (I’m sure somebody is calling it that). We are instead the feral precursors, a rare breed, a dodo-like subset. We may share the mad web skillz of today’s 15 year olds (and even if I don’t, you might) but, crucially, their young brains didn’t develop like ours.

The difference is that their brains have developed, I propose, with weaker ingenuity. It is now very easy to be entertained as a child. That is a new thing. My childhood was an ingenious, inspired campaign fought against boredom with exceptionally limited resources. It was mental guerilla warfare, and it wasn’t easy. Frisbees, leaves and ants are not riveting per se: if these ingredients are to rivet, they must be deployed with ingenuity.

The problem is that electronic devices (as my siblings and I found, goggle-eyed, on our first, rationed computer) are extremely riveting, with no ingenuity required. But they rout boredom too easily. They offer more entertainment – but less exercise.

Science backs me up here. Watching television produces no more brain activity than looking at a blank wall – and sometimes less. You might counter that that example is passive – our web-surfing on various devices is rather more active in character. However, this mental exercise does not nourish all mental muscles equally. The ability to look up information whenever we like actually weakens our ability to retain information in our memories. Furthermore, the ease of flicking between screens, articles and devices results in far shallower stints of concentration than sustained absorption by a single thing.

In short, we should be worried about the children who, throughout their formative years in a way my generation could not, immerse themselves in a surfeit of devices. The mental muscles developed by the Frisbee kids in their boredom-war must, logically, be punier specimens in the computer kids. And although I must surrender my polarisation and admit that a balance is maintained by many parents, I think we should go further. Even the acceptable face of childhood computing, improving and educational software, is too entertaining in my book. We need to reintroduce boredom – mental austerity.

And what, you may snort, if we don’t? Then I think the struggling rich world, the world that can afford to silence its mewling brats with educational vids and the soothing blips of the GameBoy, will find it even harder to make its way in the future global economy. The children in India and Africa who are at this moment riveting themselves with leaves and ants are the ones who will turn out, on average, to be more ingenious and resourceful. It stands to reason, therefore, that their economies will enjoy more entrepreneurs and more imaginative businessmen because of it. Which is why me and my peers, feral precursors to the ‘Zombie Generation’, had better pull our weight.