Saturday, May 10, 2025
Blog Page 1537

Brian Cox dines at Balliol

0

Last week, Brian Cox attended Balliol’s Snell Dinner as a guest.

Cox is currently a Professor at the University of Manchester and a particle physicist involved with CERN. He is also the presenter of a number of BBC science programmes on astronomy and physics. His legacy is not confined to
the realm of science: in the 1990s he was involved as a keyboard player for
D:Realm.

Balliol JCR President Alex Bartram, said,“I think his presence – and that of the many other eminent and distinguished guests at the dinner – reflects how Balliol, 750 years on, is still very much holding its own in the glamorous world of academia.”

Though as JCR President Bartram was lucky enough “to have the opportunity to sit a few places along from Prof Cox”, for some members of the JCR, catching a glimpse of the professor required more extreme dedication.

One second-year commented, “Apparently someone waited outside with a lighter for ages to light his cig, which is creepy.”

Phoebe Grant-Smith, Lottie Dodd and Andrew Kirkman sneaked round the back of the SCR in order to get a glimpse of the eminent scholar. Grant-Smith said, “Waiting in the freezing cold (it was snowing at one point!) and getting odd looks from the SCR was definitely worth it when he appeared!”

Cox signed a book for Kirkman amongst others, and agreed to have a photo with the girls. Grant-Smith continued, “In my babbling, starstruck state, I did tell him about my mother’s Brian Cox cuddly toy which was a joke Christmas present from my brother, although I only realised how creepy this sounded when his response was, ‘I’m not sure you should be telling me this…'”

Olivia Baddeley also gave her account of the evening: “He was a bit tipsy, and I was a bit starstruck, so I couldn’t think of anything cool or interesting to say when we started talking about thermodynamics and his new TV show.”

Baddeley revealed that they discussed the wine at dinner: “He said it was great and asked us to take a sip (we then basically had an indirect kiss with him, which we were very excited by).We said that the wine is normally awful so they must have brought out the posh stuff for him. He was lovely.”

Students spending less on alcohol

0

A survey has shown that first-year students in the UK are going out and drinking less frequently than finalists, and that student spending on alcohol has decreased overall.

The survey, conducted by student finance website Save the Student, reported that freshers are going out an average of 1.23 days a week compared to the finalist average of 1.57. Across all years, an average of £19 a week was spent drinking whilst out, in comparison with the average of £28 found last year by the NUS. The decrease in spending is believed to be linked to the increase in tuition fees to a maximum of £9,000, which came into effect at the start of this academic year.

Owen Burek, Editor-in-Chief of Save the Student, said, “I would think that the fall in spending this year is a kind of a knee-jerk reaction to the tuition fees trebling and the wide media coverage which came with this over the summer, which probably frightened quite a number of first-years into watching their spending. Some students may choose to forgo a night out to save money but in the main we believe students are turning to cheaper ways of drinking, such as the pre-drinking method.”

The website’s report on the survey further indicated that the fee rise may have prompted students to consider the quality of their university education, stating, “The fact that the fees have risen may have caused more students to think carefully about how much time they spend studying compared with going out drinking.”

LMH Welfare rep Georgia Luscombe shared this opinion, telling Cherwell, “Perhaps higher tuition fees are making people compromise and they have less money to spend on social activities if they’re prioritising a better education.”

Nevertheless, she did not report seeing a decrease in freshers drinking at LMH, and opined, “If anything, I think a rise in tuition fees will make the kind of people coming to £9,000-a-year universities like Oxford more likely to have disposable income, as people with more limited resources might be forced to go to a less expensive university.”

“I know a lot of them are very aware that they don’t have to pay back fees until after they have jobs.” However, she also noted, “At Keble we have had far fewer alcohol-related deanings. In fact, we had none in Michaelmas. I know that they were at least 3 alcohol-related deanings across Michaelmas-Hilary last year [all three incidental incidents involving freshers] and there haven’t been any this year.”

St Anne’s votes to introduce stress-busting animals

0

Last Sunday St Anne’s College JCR passed a motion which expressed
its desire to bring animals into college in order to reduce stress during the exam period.

The motion read: “The JCR resolves to permit the supervised presence of animals on college grounds during official JCR events, so providing students with another healthy source of stress reduction therapy.” The motion passed with 33 students voting for, 0 voting against, and 6 abstaining.

The motion was purely designed to express the JCR’s feelings on the issue, and is yet to be condoned by the college’s senior management team.

However, the proposal, if enacted, would see puppies, rabbits or kittens being brought to St Anne’s by a local animal shelter. It was agreed that only “de-wormed, flea-free, and vaccinated” animals would be permitted on college premises. Concerns have been raised about having pets in students’ rooms or in the JCR, and as a consequence the alternative of setting up a temporary pen on the quad has been suggested. 

The initiative was prompted by Johannes Osterrieth, a first-year Chemist, who proposed it during his hustings for Academic Rep. When later asked about the motion, Osterrieth said, “Everyone loves dogs, especially puppies, and leaving the desk to play with one is quite possibly the nicest way to take a break.”

Certain members of the JCR were particularly excited by the idea of having animals, particularly puppies, in college. Bethany Cox, a second-year English student, said “I love puppies, they make the world a better place. Oxford is a very stressful place for the average young adult and I just can’t wait to get my hands on some puppies. St Anne’s: Our dog-free days are over!”

Other St Anne’s students, however, were not impressed by the proposals. Ben Rosenbaum, a second-year PPEist, said that “I hope that this motion will not detract from the importance of other issues at hand. Although puppies are wonderful creatures, my concern is that people are putting their hearts before their heads on this issue.”

Students complain of "foul odour" at Wahoo nightclub

0

Patrons of Oxford’s Wahoo club had their nostrils assaulted by a decidedly unpleasant aroma on the night of Friday 22nd February.

Students attending the popular Friday night venue were surprised to find the upper floor of the club pervaded with a smell that has been likened to a pungent form of foam, mouldy fish and even death.

First year biologist and eye-witness (or should I say nose-witness) Emilie Brignall tried to describe the smell for Cherwell, saying, “It was definitely a smoke machine, or a foam machine, or perhaps death. It was not pleasant.”

Chris Jenkins, a first-year Keble student, went on to describe it further, stating, “Seriously, the smell in the men’s toilets was preferable to the smell upstairs. It was an insidiously foul odour, but fortunately it was somewhat drowned out by the smell of liberally applied aftershave.”

Pete Mortimore, General Manager of Wahoo, was on duty on the evening in question. When contacted by Cherwell, he said, “I can assure you that this is the first of this ‘odd smell’ that I have been made aware of. A thorough investigation will take place.

“I would like to state that we are extremely pro-active in ensuring that all of our customers have a good experience at the venue and ask that if anyone has a complaint and or comment that they would like to pass on then they should do so on the evening so that we can rectify in a timely fashion.”

The smell did cause some confusion amongst students, with physicist Sam Badman thinking the club was serving food. He explained, “No one had told me so but I assumed it was just fish and chips Friday. If that really was the case then I’m still waiting on the chips and the fish definitely smelt mouldy.”

Oxford resident and PPEist Emma Alexander claimed that Wahoo will remain a favoured night spot. She said, “I’m sure this was an isolated incident. Wahoo is generally much appreciated by Oxford students and I for one sincerely hope that it has returned to its usual fragrant self by this Friday!”

Hertford student India Miller had a slightly more critical view, however. She said, “I for one was very disappointed that the subtle notes of vodka and BO that are normally the perfect accompaniment to a night out were swamped by the overwhelming smell of fish. In fact, if they want to retain my patronage, Wahoo really need to get their act together: it’s a sink or swim situation.”

Student assaulted in Jericho

0

CONCERNS have recently been raised about the safety of students in Oxford, after an Oxford University student was assaulted.

The attack happened in the early hours of the morning, on 17th February. A press report issued by Thames Valley Policy stated, “The victim, a 21-year-old woman, was walking along Walton Street at about 3.49am when she was approached by a man, who dragged her into a nearby alleyway.”

Investigating officer Det. Con. Darren Pomroy, of Local CID in Oxford, said: “This was clearly a very frightening ordeal for the victim, but she showed great bravery in fighting the man off, and thankfully she was unharmed. A man heard the victim’s screams and came to her assistance after the offender had run off.”

Efforts have been made to try to raise awareness of the importance of safety amongst students. Suzanne Holsomback, the OUSU VP for Women, told Cherwell, “Night safety is an important issue and the Thames Valley Police worked diligently at the beginning of Michaelmas to raise awareness of how to keep your belongings and self safe in Oxford, especially if this term was your first time away from home or in another country. The effort from somecolleges is great and I hope more do so. I would recommend keeping the focus on real statistics and information.

“Much night safety information tells women in particular, ‘don’t get raped!’ This is victim blaming and it ignores that we do not tell perpetrators, ‘don’t rape!’

“Most sexual assaults are by people the survivor knows. It is more likely to be assaulted by your partner or an acquaintance than a stranger hiding in the bushes. The National Union of Students Hidden Marks report says that the majority of women who experienced serious sexual assault while at university were attacked in someone’s home.

“I think night safety needs to include discussions about sexual consent as well as sexual abuse (non-violent acts to violent acts) and domestic abuse, so all genders can feel safe in their homes and while socialising at night.”

Several colleges, including Keble and LMH, have sent emails out to students warning about the potential dangers which students face when out at night.

Benedict Hardy, a student at Somerville College, said, “I’m sure the colleges sending these emails out handled it very sensitively, but it’s somewhat condescending to suggest that anyone being attacked wasn’t already taking every precaution possible not to be attacked.”

However another student from Balliol College argued that the emails sent to students would have a positive effect, telling Cherwell, “I think that it’s good that some colleges are warning students to be careful in Oxford. Although it’s never ever the victim’s fault if they get attacked, I don’t think that warning students to be careful and walk home together is victim blaming.”

The police are appealing for any witnesses who saw the attack to come forward and contact Det. Con. Pomroy via the 24-hour Police Enquiry Centre on 101,, or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

Irish students at Oxford doubled over last decade

0

The number of students from the Republic of Ireland at Oxford has almost doubled over the past decade, Cherwell has found.

The Sunday Times reported that the total number of Irish students at Oxford and Cambridge had increased twofold between 2001 and 2011, from 213 to 448.

In Oxford specifically, the number of those domiciled in the Republic has risen from a total of 67 in 2001 to 135 in 2012.

The main driver has been an increase in postgraduate enrolments. While there are 31 undergraduates in 2012 compared to 27 in 2002, numbers undertaking graduate study have jumped from 40 to 103 in the same period.

First year St Catz linguist Niamh Furey, an Irish student from Derry/Londonderry in Northern Ireland, suggested, “Improved crossborder relations may have exposed more Irish students to the UCAS system, which is commonplace in the North. But I would say that Ireland’s youth has adapted to the country’s economic state: for me, Oxford’s opportunities and better funding relative to the Dublin universities were a deciding factor.”

Other Irish students in Oxford expressed varying degrees of surprise. Jennifer Ní HÉigeartaigh, a Dubliner and third year PPEist at St John’s, described the figure of 31 undergraduates as “shocking”.

Second year Somerville PPEist Zoe Fannon, from Cork, said, “Given that Ireland is so close to the UK, has a strong historical connection with it, and is an English-speaking country, 31 students of 54,344 sitting the 2011 Irish schoolleaving exam is not very many.”

Free higher education, with a small registration cost, was the case in Ireland until 2011. It was replaced by a student contribution – in effect a fee – which stood at €2,250 (£1,810) in 2012/3.

Ní HÉigeartaigh suggests the new system “is probably decreasing the gap in upfront costs and making students more likely to consider [the UK] than they were when Irish universities were free.”

Nieouamh Burns, a first year philosophy and German student at New College, said, “I would have expected the increase in fees [in the UK] to put a lot of people off – doing an undergrad at Oxford is much more expensive than at TCD [Trinity College Dublin]. In my Dublin state school we rarely spoke about coming to study in the UK. The brightest students in my school didn’t even consider coming to Oxford; I was the only applicant.”

Fannon concurred, explaining, “It just doesn’t occur to a lot of people that they could go to the UK, let alone Oxbridge. I don’t remember seeing much recruitment by UK universities in Cork at least.”

Ed Nickell, president of CraicSoc, a society for Irish and Northern Irish Oxford students, also noted, “Personal experience has shown that the majority of Irish and Northern Irish students come from a small number of top schools, especially from grammar schools in the North. We need to think not just in terms of getting Irish students, but students from a wider variety of educational backgrounds.”

Review: The Laramie Project

0

★★★☆☆
Three Stars

Interviews with locals in the aftermath of the real-life murder of gay-hate crime victim Matthew Shepard in Wyoming form The Laramie Project. Moisés Kaufman’s script questions the impact, or lack of, that the murder has had on the community in this tight piece of verbatim theatre – that’s documentary style theatre to you and me. 

The script is slick, the cast of eight rapidly flip between an astonishing sixty characters. Yet it doesn’t come into its own until the end of the first act. The rest of the act offers background on the case that’s interesting, but far less thought-provoking than the questions of homosexual attitudes that make up the second. Directors Benita Tibb and Lucy Shenton decide for there to be no set, with the only props being some torches and a tape player. On entrance into the theatre, the audience are faced with an imposing line of actors at the top of the raked seating, staring down at us and emphasising how we are the audience of a play in a Brechtian style. The rapid movements of the cast between interviews, from the gallery to the stage where we were sat, were polished and clearly heavily rehearsed. It would have been easy to stage the play with the actors in a line, flicking between characters as they recited different interviews. But this innovative and well refined staging helped both the character transitions and created different levels of intensity and a physical hierarchy. 

With so many characters to play, as a whole the actors managed to cope well. American accents did tend to drift from time to time, and the odd awkward pause in the midst of rapid and snappy dialogue made it obvious that someone had forgotten a line, yet this was the first night in an unquestionably challenging play. The absolute standout performance came from James Kitchin, seamlessly slipping from character to character and astonishingly managing to portray the most emotional scene from the play – Matthew Shepard’s father speaking to the courtroom – but keeping the audience at a distance that made them look at the bigger picture. Is the death penalty appropriate? Why there are such hate crimes? How do we overcome such prejudices? 

This was by no means a perfect opening night and fatigue seemed to start to creep in for the cast midway through the second act, yet any weaknesses are made up for by the eventually absorbing story and the unique and exciting staging from the directors. It’s definitely worth going to see if just for that.

Review: The Cherry Orchard

0

★★★☆☆
Three Stars

Of course, one goes in to a production like this slightly apprehensively. Chekhov is a difficult one at the best of times and a student production – with a student translation, I might add! – could easily turn out to be two and a half long hours of bad theatre. In fact, what I witnessed at The Cherry Orchard was a carefully staged, thought-out and well-cast production.

The casting choices seem to have been made with care, with each actor being able to carry off their character, if not with ease, then certainly successfully. Each character in Chekhov is equally important in their unimportance, each represents a demonstration of the human inability to change anything. The cast manage this admirably by being able to focus the attention of the audience on them when they must, then fade into the background when another character rises to the proverbial spotlight. Lyubov’s (Fiona Johnston) oscillation between despair and intense childishness quickly becomes the central part of the play it should be, without undermining any of the others.

The atmosphere is established from the very beginning, as live music guides the audience into the theatre and the two opening characters are already onstage, creating the scene. The set is elaborately done, with the contrast between dusty relics and carefully arranged photographs and paintings being an interesting and sensitive choice. The lighting is also used to mould the tone of the piece and it is taken advantage of suitably, by recreating changes in the day as well. It also allows the second act to begin with a bang which, to anyone having any doubts as to whether they are enjoying themselves in the interval, disperses them and prepares them for an enjoyable second half. 

They say to translate is to own and interpret, and to an extent this is visible. However, there were some cases where perhaps the directing was trying a touch too hard to make it modern or fun, and some of the original feeling was irrevocably lost. An important example is Varya (Katie-Rose Comery). What I originally – erroneously – wrote off as bad acting, was in fact, a directorial instruction to turn the sombre, deeply religious adopted-yet-abandoned sister into a flirty, confused thing. This almost ruined the ending for me, and confused some around  me who were not as familiar with The Cherry Orchard to begin with. 

The Cherry Orchard is something between an elegy for the past and an ode to stubbornness. This is certainly put across in every way, cast, stage and script. Despite some drawbacks and – at times – confused directorial choices, it is a play worth seeing for those who are familiar with the work and newcomers alike.  

Review: Arcadia

0

★★★★☆
Four Stars

If there were ever a play to suit an Oxford audience, this would be it. Stoppard’s content, style and comedy all fit our intellect and quirky, if not extremely arrogant, charm. Be warned however that this viewing demands a great deal of concentration and that subject matter is esoteric to say the least. Ranging from Fermat’s last theorem to Determinism and the laws of physics to the poetry of Lord Byron, sprinkled steadily with a history and criticism of English landscape gardening; this play can often feel more like an intelligence test than light entertainment. But, note well that these issues are the faults and fancies of the script and not its execution which was, for the most part, superb. 

Set in Sidley Park, an established country house, it opens in 1809 with Thomasina, a precocious thirteen year old mathematical prodigy, asking her tutor, Septimus Hodge, to explain the phrase “carnal embrace”. So begins discussion of yet another dominant topic of this piece – love, or the physical act of it at least. Accusations of adultery are flung about the manor and resolved in the best early nineteenth century style of men challenging each other to a duel. While Rosanna Forte as Lady Croom is excellent comic relief, Alice Gray’s Thomasina balances wonderfully presumptuous genius with naïve teen while Jonathan Griffiths certainly carries the self-importance and vexing wit demanded of a Cambridge supervisor although his emotions often lack sincerity.

The other half of the play is set in modern day when academics gather at Sidley; Hannah Jarvis to chart the gardens as a romantic motif, Valentine Coverly to calculate and graph the estate’s grouse population and Bernard Nightingale to discover whether Lord Byron were ever a murderous resident. Adam Gethin-Jones is very amusing as Nightingale, the fame-driven old fashioned English don, especially in his tirade against the entire field of science, although his toff-like accent is sometimes too preposterous. While Richard Grumitt as Valentine is perfect in his role as a softly spoken but highly sceptical Oxford post-grad recluse.

While there were first night jitters, actors were frequently stepping on or cutting in each other’s lines; all are admirable for tackling Stoppard’s dialogue in the first place and pulling it off as one could hear by the constant tittering of the audience.

Ultimately this play examines what the pursuit of knowledge really is; once again I’ll stress – only at Oxford, but isn’t that wonderful?