Sunday, May 4, 2025
Blog Page 1525

Interview: Josh Kumra

0

Although you may not be aware of Josh Kumra yet, you soon will be. With a killer voice, soulful and silky smooth, displayed on his hit single collaboration ‘Don’t Go’ with Wretch 32, Josh now moves to his own solo project with the release of Good Things Come to Those Who Don’t Wait on April 22nd.

Whilst talking about collaborating with Wretch 32, Josh found it remarkably easy, having just gone for a meeting with the rapper and coming out with what would become the finished track only “a few hours later.” He then went on to collaborate with Emile Sande on ‘Helicopters and Planes’ which became his first proper single, with [from press release] a “soulful sound which connects the chart-topping re-work of ‘Don’t Go’ to the more acoustic-leaning album to come.”

So, amongst this amalgamation of a hip-hop/acoustic cross-over, where does Kumra fit? When asked, he says he’s “most comfortable with a guitar in his hand and an emotional song to fit.” Amongst all the production on some of the songs on the album, Kumra maintains that “if it doesn’t sound good on an acoustic, it doesn’t make the album.”

This sense of emotion in his songs leads Kumra to citing examples such as ‘Fool to Cry’ by the Rolling Stones on his press release and, when asked about yesterday evening’s line-up release, was naturally happy about the Stones inclusion. With early inspiration coming from the Stones and, amongst others, Eric Clapton who his dad built some furnishings for one time, Kumra spent evenings reminiscing about gigs his father had been to and discovering his record collection, citing the unplugged album by Clapton, Tracey Chapman and a U2 gig at Wembley as particularly memorable. His inspiration may have originally come “straight from his dad’s music” which can be felt in the soul of Kumra’s voice, the songwriting nuances and emotion carried through his music but he is definitely an artist of today.

Throughout the interview, he uses the word “vibe” a fair bit and, right now, is loving that “vibe” of his early inspiration coming through artists such as Ben Howard who he highly praises for Every Kingdom, comparing it to the aforementioned Chapman and arguing that there’s “not a bad track.” His other listening at the moment lies with Gary Clark Jr. (who’s been hailed as a “modern day hendrix”), early Black Keys albums and even Americana.

Kumra’s diversity, throughout his listening and songwriting life, is both reflected in his songs, and the modern mainstream, which we also discussed with Scott Mills. “Whilst the poppy stuff is always around, there’s lots of diversity and ‘feel-good folk vibes’ are breaking through.” 

Hopefully Kumra will be the next ‘feel-good vibe’ breaking through. For him, it’s “all about the music” and, with a big month ahead, including the release of his debut album, this philosophy seems to be working well. He also soon flies to Milan to tour with One Republic to 8,000 people, is playing festivals such as Boardmasters in Newquay where he is due to headline one of the stages and says that all of that will “hopefully lead to a headline tour”. Although big things, big venues, and big audiences that Kumra “gets a buzz from” seem to be on the horizon, he is still “down to earth” and doesn’t shy away from an intimate setting: “that’s where you see if a song works, whether the emotion’s there.”

All Your Easter Eggs In One Basket

0

It’s Easter; the most wonderful time of the year after Christmas, summer vac, your birthday, and Halloween. Easter is an important time to many people as it signals a long weekend during which people can eat as much chocolate as physically possible without any guilt. Here at Cherwell we’ve taken it upon ourselves to review a few of the chocolate eggs available on the market to make sure that you enjoy this magical time to the absolute fullest:

 

Maltesers

Malteasers have done very well for themselves this year. Not only a good sized egg, but it comes with three packets of happiness that include Malteasers, Minstrels and the somewhat controversial Revels. Bravo Mr Malteaser. Bravo!

Price – £4.00
Appearance – 3/5
Extras – 4/5
Overall – 4/5

 

Creme Egg

The Creme Egg is a pretty spectacular example of confectionary innovation as it is, but their Easter offering gives them the status of chocolate hero. TWO creme eggs as well as a large hollow egg for a tiny price. Thank you!

Price – £1.50
Appearance – 3/5
Extras – 4/5
Overall – 4/5

 

Thornton’s Charlie Chick

OK, technically not an egg – this is chocolate in the shape of a chick, but it looks fabulous. Unfortunately, without any tasty extras thrown in, it is both literally and metaphorically a hollow shell.

Price – £4.00
Appearance – 5/5
Extras – 0/5
Overall – 2/5

 

Galaxy
This one really is out of this world. It looks great, it’s a massive egg and it comes with three deliciously different Galaxy bars.

Price – £4.00
Appearance – 4/5
Extras – 4.5/5
Overall – 4/5

 

Thornton’s Continental

It looks less like a box containing chocolate and more like a box containing expensive perfume, but this is the fanciest pants Easter Egg we’ve ever seen. It comes with 27 chocolates as well as an enormous egg. The price might be a bit of a put off; however, it’s definitely one to give to a significant other.

Price – £15.00
Appearance – 5/5
Extras – 5/5
Overall – 3/5

 

Cadbury’s

Oh Cadbury’s… Oh Cadbury’s. They had so much promise: a mammoth egg, an enticing purple box and five of their best chocolates looking up at you and begging you to eat them. That’s when the two worst words in the English language jump out at you – “treat size”. Everyone knows that treat size is the size of disappointment. How could you do this to us, Cadbury’s? Unacceptable.

Price – £4.00
Appearance – 4/5
Extras – 1/5
Overall – 2/5

 

Dairy Milk

After the betrayal of the Cadbury’s Easter Egg, this is Dairy Milk’s opportunity to redeem the Cadbury brand and luckily it does this very successfully. Very big egg, pretty box, three bars of chocolate. It’ll do nicely.

Price – £6.00
Appearance – 4/5
Extras – 3/5
Overall – 3/5

 

Mini Eggs

Quite possibly the best egg we’ve reviewed. This one has everything. A decent sized egg, a bag of Mini Eggs and that most coveted of all items – a free mug! So desirable, it is pretty much the Mila Kunis of Easter Eggs.

Price – £4.00
Appearance – 4/5
Extras – 5/5
Overall – 5/5

 

So there you have it – now go forth, eat chocolate and have a fantastic and delicious Easter!

Sanal Edamaruku: Rationalism and Superstition in India

0

A showcase speaker for the “Skeptics in the Pub”, an Oxford-based group of atheists which meets regularly, Sanal Edamaraku is a remarkable character with considerable influence in India. So much influence, in fact, that he has angered the wrong people and is now fleeing arrest abroad, with the prospect of years in jail facing him if ever he goes back to his homeland.

The reason for his imminent arrest was his debunking of the widely believed “miracle” of a water-dripping crucifix at the Velankanni church of Mumbai. Sanal showed that the crucifix was dripping water not due to its divine nature, but due to a plumbing problem which led to condensation collecting on the toes of Jesus and water then dripping off. The Catholic Church was angered and local policemen issued an arrest warrant – but Sanal had already left the country.

Speaking to a small audience in the Wig & Pen in Oxford, he explained his work and his aims in fighting superstition and spreading rationalism. Contrary to the opinion of many who might think of superstitions as quite harmless, like throwing salt over your left shoulder for luck, not stepping on the cracks between paving stones, or avoiding walking under ladders, Sanal discussed superstitions unique to India which are as widespread as they are harmful.

Sanal gave many examples of superstitions which still command great respect and are followed to a tee. There is the practice of dropping babies from the tops of temples and mosques, who are caught by sheets held below. Parents pay for Gurus to stand on children in some regions of India in order to give the child total immunity against all ailments. Strange scratches appeared on people’s faces in a village in Kerala, believed to be caused by black magic, and this led to riots in which five were killed. Despite the manifest danger the belief in the positive consequences of these superstitions trumps the reality of their negative consequences. The messages spread by self-proclaimed gurus can be incredibly dangerous: one particularly bad case was that of a guru who claimed chewing a certain type of leaf would protect one from contracting HIV/AIDS.

Sanal started by emphasizing India’s recent incredible economic growth, based on a “great constitution” and increasingly efficient institutions. “Everybody in India has a mobile phone,” he says – this shows the increasingly independent initiatives building the 21st century India. But India is also undergoing a “silent revolution” – the economic growth is accompanied by a “growing out of blind beliefs and superstition,” which Sanal is trying to accelerate.

The Rationalist Centre which he founded in New Delhi holds regular conferences, and sells books that aim to enlighten in order to cover its costs. As part of the International Rationalist Association, which Sanal is also president of, he welcomes famous rationalists such as Richard Dawkins to speak in New Delhi.

The superstition problem is complicated by the fact that the gurus and beliefs they perpetuate have a following which transcends caste and can convince those in the highest positions of authority – the chief of the Indian Space Institution himself consulted an astrologist before launching a satellite.

Sanal is trying to replace these irrational beliefs with a scientific approach: through his Inspire Camps, he teaches children in villages across India how to replicate the “miracles” they see gurus perform on TV, and gives them a kit to take home and show friends and family how to be gurus themselves. This empowerment starting at the grassroots level with children, Sanal hopes, will lead to further enlightenment spreading throughout India. The problem is first and foremost one of education, and by educating the rationalists tap at the root of the demand for gurus and magical powers – the children educated by Edamaruku and his team will not be duped in future.

His efforts to debunk phoney gurus culminated hilariously in a live TV show-down between Sanal and famous tantric guru Pandit Surinder Sharma. The former challenged the latter to kill him using only tantras and mantras – Pandit had previously boasted he could kill a person in three minutes using his magic. The show-down lasted hours during which Sharma chanted his famed “killer” mantra to no avail. Sharma was humiliated, having been exposed as a phoney on national TV. “I laughed the tantric out of power,” wrote Edamaruku later. Indeed, Pandit Suriner Sharma had to mortgage his properties in India and sell his island in Scotland after his humiliation resulted in a drop in his popularity. The extravagant lifestyle of the gurus is very telling: any entrepreneurial “guru” can “become a billionaire under the umbrella of holiness.”

The Rationalist Centre’s activities used to be focused solely on village visits in order to educate at the local level. However, the spread of television throughout the country has made the task easier for rationalists: Edamaruku’s appearance on over 240 TV programmes in 2009 could not have been missed and an increasing number of people have been exposed to his philosophy. He has become an icon representing the alternative to the idolised gurus – an icon of rationalism. The Centre’s successes include the closing-down of the Mantra Healing Centre, a centre launched by the Minister of Health of Delhi, in which patients were made to eat paper on which mantras had been written, in order to be cured. The guru who “cured” children by standing on them has also been jailed thanks to the Rationalist Centre’s efforts.

Especially in a country in which media is such an important industry, and information is spread increasingly fast, even to the poorest, Sanal’s message  spreads quickly and points to a future where the dangers of superstitions will be avoided. Indeed, he is gaining an increasing following among TV-watchers and media teams throughout India – on one vote during a live TV show, 87.3% of respondents voted for Sanal not to be arrested.

When I ask him whether he believes some superstitions have a value just from the comfort they bring people – a kind of placebo effect, he answers by arguing that any positive effects coming from these beliefs are vastly outweighed by the negative consequences. Believing good things come from miracles, deluding yourself as to the agency you direct in your life, is clearly dangerous, especially when it leads to willingly letting one’s baby be stepped on or dropped from heights. However, the need people feel for something to believe in, especially when they live in abject poverty, is so strong as to exceed the bounds of rationalism. If the gurus sell hope and magic, it is because they know there’s a market for it. By hitting both the supply side (debunking and punishing the phoneys) and the demand side (educating future generations) Sanal is well on the way to spreading his rationalist philosophy in India. However, his staunch atheism may be less well received – he should be careful to stay sensitive to the main strands of religion in India, while debunking the phoneys.

“Religions are keeping people in compartments,” concludes Sanal. “Our organization is not just another compartment, but a catalyst for change.”

“The problem is the non-believers are not organised,” he announces, and his aim for his tour is to raise awareness of the issues the Rationalist Centre is addressing, and to get believers in rationalism as organized as other belief groups. His tone can itself seem evangelist at times, but his main aim, of protecting people from unnecessary harm caused by false beliefs, is admirable.

Sanal Edamaruku will be speaking in Plymouth, Cambridge and London, before moving on to South America. More information about his journey can be found on his blog: http://sanaledamaruku.blogspot.co.uk.

No more selection by wealth

0

How much do you spend on “clothes, books, and socialising” per year? If it’s less than £2,700, then the University thinks you’re not spending enough. Prospective graduate students must prove in advance that they have at least that much to spend per year, over and above the costs of rent, utilities, and food – altogether that’s £12,900 for each year of your course. And that doesn’t even include the fees. If you can’t afford the kind of lifestyle that costs over £400 a year for clothes alone, then you have no place here, according to the current rules.

One would-be student protested against those rules by taking my college, St Hugh’s, to court last year. A few days ago the case was settled, and in a significant sense, he won. He’s been offered his place, yes; but more importantly, the University is undertaking a review of the policy, known as the financial guarantee. This is no longer a question for St Hugh’s alone, but for all of us. What kind of restrictions should be put on the people who come here as postgraduate students? Who exactly should the University be excluding, even when they’ve been offered a place on academic merit?

The University tells us that the purpose of the financial guarantee is to ensure that nobody will need to drop out of their course for financial reasons. In reality, it excludes anyone who doesn’t have large cash reserves – or a family that does, and is willing to sign the guarantee. We can’t tell how many people who would otherwise have come to Oxford have been put off by this arrangement, but the simple fact is that most people don’t have that kind of money. And the guarantee policy gives no leeway to those who plan to earn money in vacations, or who can make cheaper arrangements for rent, utilities, food, and lifestyle. After all, who needs to spend so much on books when we have the best libraries in the world?

Even if the amount specified by the guarantee was more reasonable, it still creates an unnecessary and unjustifiable barrier to entry by requiring that students have money available, for their whole course, months before they’re due to arrive. It assumes that people aren’t capable of making their own decisions about budgeting. No-one wants to drop out, not least because that would mean sacrificing the enormous fees we have to pay at the beginning of each year. Doing something about fees and funding is a separate, important issue; but for those who can afford to make the investment, the financial commitment is already massive.

No other university in the UK has a system like Oxford’s (as the court found when Oxford tried to falsely claim otherwise), that requires you to prove how much money you have before you get here. If you’re offered a place at Cambridge, you need to sign a financial undertaking form declaring that you have the necessary funds to pay your fees and complete your course – no bank statements, no letter from your parents.

It’s important that the review the University is about to conduct is fair and open, and that students have their say too. MCRs are made up of people who have already complied with the financial guarantee – JCRs, which will include many undergraduates hoping to go onto postgraduate study, must take a stand on this issue as well, and OUSU must support them. If the review committee decides to continue excluding qualified applicants on the basis of their wealth, it’ll be the whole University that suffers for it.

OUCA Back in Business

0

Oxford’s Tories have recouped university affiliation, putting the ‘U’ back into ‘OCA’.


Jonathan Mallinson, the Senior Proctor, explained that, “At the end of [Hilary term], the then Senior Proctor was satisfied that [OUCA] had remained in good standing and endorsed its application for renewed use of the ‘OU’ name.” The Tory club had previously been admitted to the Proctors’ Register under the Oxford Conservative Association name.

Stephanie Cherrill, OUCA’s President, told Cherwell that she was “pleased that the Proctors have recognised OUCA’s strong governance and administrative practices by awarding us the right to use the University name.

“I look forward to building on the strong work of this year’s Officers, and working with this term’s fantastic committee.” 

 

The Association has changed its facebook page to reflect its new name. The first event of Stephanie Cherrill’s Presidency next term will be a ‘Champagne Tasting’ evening. 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%7163%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

The Association memorably lost its university affiliation last year after university proctors judged that the student Tories had “failed to reach the financial and administrative standards of a recognised student club.”

In recent times the Association’s record at keeping the ‘U’ has been poor. In 2009 the university stripped the group of its ‘University’ tag, and rescinded its right to have a stall at Fresher’s Fair. The action followed an incident involving racist jokes at OUCA hustings during an election week. 

 
Port and Policy: OUCA is famous for its evenings of energetic debating. However in Michaelmas the Oxford Union ended its arrangement with the society, which had allowed OUCA to use its Macmillan Room at discounted rates.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%1048%%[/mm-hide-text] 

 

OUCA’s publications editor Richard Black claimed that the society had been “unfairly targeted and insulted by various individuals within the University.”

He was eager to point out the group’s “philanthropic activity” which includes running debate workshops in schools and assisting the elderly. “As well as hard campaigning,” Black told Cherwell, “OUCA is pivotal to the ‘big society’ of Oxford Student life.”

Zach Spiro, OUCA’s Political Officer, said that he wanted to use his term to make the right-wing society “a leading voice in Oxford’s vibrant political debate.” Spiro, of Oriel College, echoed Black in stating that OUCA could “occupy an important place in the political life of the university” if it threw itself into campaigning and social work. 

Oxford Tories campaigning last year in Oxford West.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%4986%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

Jonathan Metzer, Co-Chair of Oxford University Labour Club, told Cherwell that “it clearly makes sense that the Conservatives have their own society at Oxford University. It seems that OUCA want to put their old reputation behind them and we look forward to continuing our fierce (and often friendly) rivalry with them this term.”

OUCA will be hosting several Tory big wigs next term, including Lord Hurd, the former Foreign Secretary and Mark Reckless, the leading Eurosceptic MP.

A Tribute To Chinua Achebe

0

The novelist, poet, and critic Chinua Achebe died on the 22nd of March. Born in East Nigeria, Achebe grew up in an Igbo village and went on to win a prestigious scholarship at the University of Ibadan. As a young man his nickname was ‘Dictionary’. His career began with broadcasting and ended with a professorship at Brown University. Achebe was the winner of the Man Booker International Literature Prize and described by Nelson Mandela as a writer ‘in whose company the prison walls fell down’.    

     
Achebe’s most famous novel, Things Fall Apart, was released in 1962. It was the first book to tell the story of colonialism from an African perspective; it gave the voiceless a voice. Things Fall Apart explores Achebe’s own experience of the conflict between modern Africa and its traditional oral history. That it remains pertinent today is demonstrated by the fact that it has sold 10 million copies worldwide and has been published in 50 different languages. Following its success, Heinemann launched a series of books entitled the African Writers Series, and Achebe was made the first editor.

The status of Africa and African writers necessarily affected Achebe throughout his career. He was keenly aware of the clash of cultures between Africa and the West – both during and after the colonial era. This is most apparent in his famous response to the well-loved novel, Heart of Darkness. In a lecture of 1975 Achebe declaimed the demeaning cultural assumptions underlying the work and accused Joseph Conrad of racism. Despite being outspoken against Conrad, Achebe has never shied away from criticising Africa. In Things Fall Apart, it is Okonkwo’s pride and love of tradition that lead to his downfall. This underlines the many ways in which nationalism and out-dated understanding can be destructive. Achebe was also critical of Nigeria, both in his life and his work. He twice refused the country’s second-highest award, the Commander of the Order of the Federal Republic as a public stance against the government.

Achebe will be remembered worldwide as the ‘father’ of African literature. In Anthills of the Savannah he wrote that it ‘is the story that owns us’. The true magic of Achebe’s fable-like stories is that they weave the reader into the fabric of the African oral tradition of storytelling. Old proverbs are ‘the palm oil with which words are eaten’. The brilliance of his imaginative powers sprung from the legends of the Igbo people.

Review: Girls

0

I spent a lot of time being embarrassed about quite how much I loved Gossip Girl. In my mind, the series was a perfectly legitimate blend of society drama, dark humour and incredibly attractive and well-dressed people, but to those unfamiliar with the Manhattan melodrama, it was, put simply, a show for girls. And I’m a guy. 

I face the same sort of naïve prejudice with Girls, a show that has almost as much gender bias in the title. It, as you all ought to know, is the story of four twenty-something-year-old ‘girls’ who have liberal arts degrees and few employment prospects. I might piss standing up, but that’s something I can relate to. Indeed, the whole series focuses much less on gender neuroses than people seem to think, with the primary themes being things like love, friendship and maturity, rather than vaginas, menstruation and cystitis, as its detractors would have you believe. 

Admittedly, I spend less time in the bath with my friends (and, generally, less time unnecessarily naked) but it’s a practical human resonance that makes Girls so accessible. Even though I spent years trying to shoehorn my life problems into the Chuck Bass/Blair Waldorf school of dysfunction, when push came to shove, I’m just not as sexy, rich or evil as the cast of Gossip Girl.

I can, however, relate myself to how uncharmingly charming Girls is. The very basis of the show works under the assumption that the viewer will read their own insecurities in these characters, hence the reason that the central quartet are so flawed, and the scenarios depicted in the show inevitably end in grim sex or burst ear drums. As the show’s clichéd tagline says, they’re ‘living the dream, one mistake at a time’, but it’s the mistakes, rather than the dream, that make Girls what it is.

To that extent, the second series has been an absolute joy. Whilst series one might, optimistically, have been described as ‘bittersweet’, series two and can only be referred to as ‘relentlessly horrible’. Hannah, the character that I find easiest to relate to, has signed a triumphant eBook deal, but also descended into a cesspit of anxiety for which the word ‘griminal’ was coined. Marnie, the Serena van der Woodsen of the show, has become a depressing reminder of the fact that, even if I do well in my degree, my life will turn out shit. Shoshanna continues to bounce from one inconsequential scene stealing appearance to another, this season dragging Ray along with her in television’s most implausible relationship. And Jessa continues to be just as irritating as ever, her marriage to Roy from The IT Crowd lasting about as long as an over-enthusiastic 19-year-old in a thigh crease (see Episode 7 for further details).

But the general darkness of the series is underscored, as always, by being funny, fresh and honest (not to mention the great music, seriously, there’s some Cher Lloyd in this season). Lena Dunham’s wit is moving further away from its earlier role as a Woody Allen imitation, and is finding something closer to its own voice. Yes, this means that there are more sequences on the toilet, arse splinters and a bizarre masturbatory detour featuring Patrick Wilson, but it’s also reassuring to know that the show is finding its own feet. Girls has always been heralded for its originality, but only now, amidst the gloom, is Dunham starting to feel totally free of the shadow of her idols. 

Of course, it’ll be another year before we get to see season three of the show, but if you haven’t yet watched the first season (in which case, why on earth have you read this far?) then you should immediately find a way to rectify this pop cultural failing. Do you want to be part of the zeitgeist? Or are you still planning your own Harlem Shake?

Ignore the femininity of the title; this is as gender neutral as The Great British Bake-Off and, despite my superfluous penis, is a show that tells me more about myself than Match of the Day ever will.

Review: The Strokes — Comedown Machine

0

★★★★☆


Four Stars  

 The Strokes are the perfect representation of the current ‘Palma Violets problem’ I discussed in a previous review. At the turn of the century they were being hailed as the next big thing, the saviour’s of rock n’ roll and all those closely associated, and overused, clichés when discussing new bands on the block.

To be honest, I’ve never been a true fan of the Strokes, not because I haven’t liked their music (besides the complete annihilation of ‘Last Nite’ by various novice garage rock bands and overly-intoxicated middle-age men at mid-week karaoke), but because I simply haven’t been cool or indie enough to admit it.

The Strokes have always been, what my parents would describe as, ‘achingly trendy’ and, even if their debut Is This It had been terrible, it would have still been hailed as a huge success due to the tremendous expectations placed on the band once The Modern Age EP had catapulted them into the public consciousness. 

Is This It contains some of the bands early indie anthems, such as ‘Last Nite’, that just refused to go away but the problem with their subsequent releases lay with their initial success in that, musically at least, it was completely overrated. Furthermore, the band did that standard rock n’ roll thing of thinking that they’re all too good for each other (Solo album anyone?) and had a ‘hiatus’ (Codeword: break-up) amongst rumours of the standard inter-band tantrums and tensions. 

The benchmark set by Is This It was humongous and has never quite been met, but is it this time? In short, no. But, quite simply, it just doesn’t matter 

Although 2001, and the release of Is This It, seems historically recent, musically it is definitely not!Twelve years of music is the difference between Cliff Richard’s ‘Summer Holiday’and Queen’s ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’; Live Aid and Radiohead’s Ok Computer. 

In Countdown Machine, this natural passing of time is definitely reflected in a maturity of sound. Long gone are the days of that same ‘indie guitar-band’ beat, now adopted by the Vaccines and the aforementioned Palma Violets, on everything from ‘Last Nite’ and ‘Someday’ to 2011’s ‘Under Cover of Darkness’.    

 Whilst the expectations of the ‘Strokes sound’ are almost reverted to on ‘Partners in Crime’, elsewhere on the album there is a sense of maturity, development and, above all, excitement at the possibilities of a new ‘Strokes sound.’ Whilst other critics have criticized the band for supporting another Casablancas solo project this isn’t fair, and unrepresentative of the album as a whole, bursting with collective energy. Tracks such as ‘80s Comedown Machine’ remain experimental yet strangely accessible whilst the album is littered with poppy ‘feel-good’ bursts of oomph such as ‘Welcome to Japan’ putting aside whatever ‘inter-band disputes’ may have been rumoured to have arisen as a result of the bands meteoric rise to fame.

The stand-out track though, and the best representation of a sense of musical maturity, collective experimentation, and the all-round ‘feel good’ factor being creatively combined within all aspects of the album is within it’s opening track ‘Tap Out’.

The band has recently gained comparisons to Eighties New Wave which can certainly be felt within the understated, yet surprisingly upbeat, chorus of the album’s opener yet I also immediately felt comparisons with more contemporary groups such as Coconut Records and Bombay Bicycle Club through the infectiously repetitive guitar riff and sense of rhythmic tension, and yet simultaneously somehow a sense of rhythmic fluidity, both within the drums, the bass, and, importantly, how they inter-lock. 

The song is also, whether intentionally or not, a reflection of the band’s own reflective state, with lyrics such as ‘‘gotta get my hands on something new’’, ‘‘decide my past, define my life’’ and various repetitions of the word ‘’drifting.’’ A fantastic album opener and testament to, whether the band know it or not, the fact that the Strokes don’t need to meet the ‘benchmark’ set by previous albums such as Is This It. Their new material represents a new level of maturity, a new set of musical ideas and, almost, what feels like an entirely new band.  

All links to artists/songs appear in Spotify, other links are to articles. 

Student protests paralyse Sussex University

0

Nearly 1,000 students from over 20 universities across the country are reported to have assembled on Monday at the University of Sussex, as part of a “national demonstration” against the University’s controversial plans to outsource 235 jobs.

Monday’s demonstration is part of a wider appeal to university authorities to abandon what has been labelled a “privatisation” of the university’s services. The movement, nicknamed ‘Occupy Sussex’, has included a number of protests over the past year, most notably the ongoing seven-week occupation of Bramber House, a conference centre on the university’s campus in Falmer, near Brighton.

A student representative of the school of English told Cherwell that “The demonstration, organised in such a short period of time, really showed the discontent with Workers, Students and faculty across the country in regards to these widespread, sweeping privatisation measures.”

The University of Sussex took a number of precautionary measures prior to the demonstration, including posting security staff at key points on campus and enlisting the support of local police.

The protest began peacefully, with marches across the campus and speeches made from the steps of the University Library. However, the demonstration took a hostile turn as it moved on to Sussex House, one of the main buildings on campus. 

There, it is reported that glass doors were smashed and university files were burnt as tensions between students and security flared.  

In a statement released on Tuesday, the university stressed that not all demonstrators had engaged in unlawful activity, but condemned the violence that resulted from the originally peaceful demonstration. 

John Duffy, Registrar and Secretary of the University of Sussex, said: “The violence at Sussex House and the attempt to disrupt the normal running of our campus is shocking and appalling. We condemn the damage caused on campus today.” 

He added that “The organisers have been irresponsible by inviting people from outside the University who have no connection to or interest in Sussex. We cannot tolerate today’s violent behaviour, for which there is no excuse.”

In response to the continued occupation of Bramber House, and in light of Monday’s demonstration, the University requested and was granted a High Court injunction which bans “all protest action without University consent” in order to bring an end to continued disturbances on campus, whilst many campus services, including Sussex House and the Co-op supermarket will remain closed for the next few days.

However, the University was keen to stress that the injunction has no intention of “banning peaceful demonstrations”. Nonetheless, a protest was called for on Wednesday morning outside the High Court of Justice in order to oppose the injunction. 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%7160%%[/mm-hide-text]

The University of Sussex Students’ Union maintained that “While the Students’ Union is not organising the event, we continue to support the student-led campaign against outsourcing and support any of our members attending Monday’s demo.”

A spokesman for the ‘Sussex Against Privatisation’ movement, said: “Today marks an important and momentous day in the history of resistance at Sussex University and in the United Kingdom. Students from across the country stood alongside academics, university staff and others in a mass display of solidarity, to express their anger at the management of Sussex University”

Despite the perceived success of the demonstration, students remain unsure as to whether the university will make any substantial changes to its outsourcing plans. 

Greg Rutnam, a second year student at Sussex commented that “It seems like the occupation has become stronger since the protest yesterday so I can’t see the university being this uncooperative for much longer, but at the same time I can imagine them trying to hold out until summer when many people are likely to lose interest.”

Katie O’Shea, editor-in-chief at The Badger, Sussex University’s student newspaper, told Cherwell that “This is a management team who have consistently ignored the concerns of its staff, the trade unions and the student body, and who have attempted to censor people by not allowing them to express their support with badges or email signatures, and who are now trying to stop protest action. They’re not changing their minds.”

Review: Justin Timberlake – The 20/20 Experience

0

★★★☆☆
Three Stars

Okay, I’ll admit it. I read the words Justin Timberlake and made an oestrogen fuelled leap towards reviewing his newly released album The 20/20 Experience.  As we all know, the 32 year old JT is no longer the curly headed boy of Nsync fame, and is now a sophisticated, hilarious (just check out his most recent stint with The Lonely Island and Beyoncé) and married (if you listen very closely you can hear the soft cries of women everywhere) man.

I have to promise it is not just out of pre-conditioned bias, then, that I say that the album has, for the most part, a pretty awesome sound. Justin’s unmistakable suave falsetto is back after seven years, and it melts into every track. Take the third song of the album ‘Don’t Hold the Wall; with its slow seductive rhythms and the sounds of cicadas, you can picture yourself in a sultry, seedy Spanish bar.

There’s even something for the men out there. Take a listen to ‘Suit and Tie’, if you haven’t already. If that doesn’t make you feel like a true smooth, polished, lady-killer whilst getting ready for formal, I don’t know what will.

HOWEVER, I have to admit that Justin becomes a little self-indulgent here, and will insist on stretching out an otherwise alright track in an attempt to make it some kind of masterpiece. For example, the first track, ‘Pusher Love Girl is 8:02 minutes long, and ends in about 3 minutes of Justin singing ‘I’m just a junkie for your love’ over 6 notes, ad nauseum. I went to make myself a cup of tea, which I’m pretty sure I can’t do in a club.

Also it seems there is no real consistent theme to the whole thing, other than the typical Justin style, even after a whole 1 hour 19 minutes of intense listening and waiting. So, other than the highlight tracks of the album, which are pretty much over by the 4th song, you are somewhat left with a big jumper for Christmas instead of the Xbox you were really secretly hoping to get for the last seven years.

Maybe more exciting stuff will come in the second part of the album which will be released later this year, but I’m not sitting on the edge of my seat.

But if you ask me, even if no adventurous leaps have been made by him now even after such a long hiatus from producing solo work, that’s no different to any other mainstream recording artist I’ve heard recently. And compared to the rest of them, who consistently churn out the same fast, meaningless, lyricless beats that are personally reserved only for pre-drink fuelled Wahoo, it’s nice to have something you won’t be embarrassed to come on shuffle on your iTunes.

And let’s be honest. Even if it’s the same old Christmas jumper, the same old JT sounds and feel, that’s what we’ve always loved, and I wouldn’t change it. I just wish it was a bit shorter that’s all.