Sunday 29th June 2025
Blog Page 1500

St Anne’s JCR splashes out on airbag

0

St Anne’s College JCR has resolved to buy a 15m by 15m airbag for their quad, following the proposal of a motion at a JCR meeting last Sunday.

The motion noted that extreme sports are fun and that stairs take a long time to walk down. It also mentioned that members of the JCR have been tempted to jump from balconies overlooking the Wolfson quad. The airbag is therefore a measure in order to ensure the health and safety of JCR members and to prevent them from being “hindered” by the use of stairs.

The motion passed by five votes and mandates the JCR to purchase the airbag “emblazoned with the St. Anne’s crest” for €22,000, and place it on the quad beneath the Wolfson balconies. There was debate which included discussions of safety standards, the expansion of the programme to other buildings, the possibility of JCR sleepovers and the possibility of eliminating journeys upstairs through the use of a “rocket system”.

Oscar Boyd, the JCR President and original proposer of the motion said, “We proposed the motion because extreme sports are underrepresented at St Anne’s and this one simple bit of equipment will fix that. It will also save people time as they no longer have to walk down the stairs to get places, they can simply jump off their balconies. This is hopefully just the start of a multi-stage project, where every building will be equipped with an airbag, and going downstairs will become redundant. Obviously we’ll have to consult with college about the best way to implement the airbag.”

CNB report: ‘Bedroom Tax’ Protest in Oxford

0

‘Axe the Tax’ Cry Cornmarket Protestors

Approximately 20 people gathered at the Carfax Tower on Saturday to show their discontent with the new Bedroom Tax, and to ask Oxford Council to take action protecting their constituents as other councils already have done.

The tax was introduced on the 1 April 2013, and will mean a cut to the amount of benefit people receive if they are deemed to have a spare bedroom in their council or housing association home.

One Protestor, Chris, said that ‘whilst the term Class War isn’t very fashionable any more, I think this is what it looks like’.

The ‘bedroom tax’ has been described by critics as a policy that has ‘no logic’ as it affects many people with disabilities living in specially designed accommodation, as well as separated parents who have a ‘spare bedroom’ which their children use when they visit. 

The Protester’s were moved on from the original planned protest in Bonn Square to the Carfax Tower position in order to make room for celebrations regarding ‘Oxford’s Civiv Roles and Links’ with its twin town, Bonn.

Holding aloft an airbed in which David Cameron and George Osborne’s faces could be seen poking out from under a pink duvet, they marched down the New Road, making way politely for a bus coming in the other direction. The mood was cheerful, with Protester’s talking with passers-by and each other and no Police in sight.

Whilst the measure sounds fair on paper, one Grandmother in the East Midlands left a suicide note blaming the Government who had made it impossible for her to live.

Stephanie Bottrill’s children had left home, but she was both distraught at the idea of leaving the home and area where she had raised two children as a single mother, and told neighbours she was struggling to cope financially.

 A second Year E&M Student said ‘I can see why the policy makes sense on paper’. ‘But it ignores actual people. The government don’t want to scare away the City with a Robin Hood Tax, so they’ve gone and shifted it onto ordinary people. Its cowardly’.

However a History undergraduate from Christchurch felt that ‘to be fair, if you don’t use an extra bedroom, someone on the waiting list probably could’.

 

Trash talk from Balliol staff

0
Balliol is to provide its students with water pistols in an effort to prevent mess from post-exam trashings.
 
College staff and the JCR committee have arranged for a trashing kit to be available to students for rent. The kit includes four Supersoakers. Other trashing materials encouraged are: shaving foam, champagne and grass clippings and flower petals.
 
The new kit comes as part of an effort to combat the amount of cleaning required after more traditional trashings involving flour and confetti.
 
This year the University has asked all colleges to try and encourage students to trash friends on college property rather than on public streets. However, this has contributed to trashing debris being left around Balliol, leaving college staff having to clean up the mess. Balliol, as well as providing trashing equipment, has clarified its rules on trashing in an effort to encourage students not to break University regulations.
 
In an email sent round the JCR, President Alex Bartram explained why the rules were being clarified. He said, “Basically, the point isn’t that trashing is banned: it’s perfectly allowed. However, doing stuff that will damage college property and mean that some poor soul will have to spend an hour or two hours cleaning up after you when it’s not their job is bad, as you might expect. So far, the system’s worked very well, and all parties seem to be satisfied, but we’ll have to wait and see.”
 
The new guidance have been seen as a reaction to some students being fined for ‘illegal’ trashing. A Balliol student, who wished to remain anonymous, told Cherwell that some of her friends had been fined £80 each for throwing an allegedly small amount flour over a finished finalist. “My friends were grabbed by a security guard and actually treated quite badly, and then had to pay the fine (we all split it) in 48 hours or they faced rustication.”
 
The student further commented, “We broke the rules and were punished very annoyingly, but very fairly.” Despite this she agreed with Balliol’s trashing rules, telling Cherwell, “The Balliol changes ensure that college doesn’t get messed up with confetti etc. and the porters don’t have to spend their time cleaning up, but that we can still have fun trashing.”
 
Other Balliol students have also responded positively to the changes. Alex Robertson, a first year, said “I’ve no real idea what the rules are but if it helps to keep people out of trouble then I guess it’s a good thing.”
 
Entz Rep Josh Jones said ‘I think the new rules are a good idea. Trashings have the potential to get out of hand and really ruin things so setting down what’s ok, but not banning it entirely, can only benefit everyone. Water is harmless and good fun, and so far I’ve seen a lot of people enjoying the supersoakers.”
 
Balliol Dean, Douglas Dupree, said, “We decided to bring together an informal committee of JCR members and College Officers to try and solve the problem of trashing in a way that allows people to celebrate post-Exams without making a mess that is difficult to clean up.”

Sitting duck dealt death at Exeter

0
Exeter students have attempted to rescue a family of ducklings, stranded in their college’s gardens.
 
The ducklings and their mother were discovered last week, apparently unable to return to the river. The crisis prompted intervention from the Exeter JCR. JCR President Edward Nickell organised a group of students to transport them back to the Isis.
 
Nickell told Cherwell, “I bought some duckfood and a ‘duck carrying box’ from the covered market. I asked the JCR for help and the response was fantastic.” He recieved “at least 20 volunteers. Some even sent mini CVs: ‘My grandfather has ducks’ and ‘I’m experienced in babysitting screaming children’. I even had people outside College asking to join in! I was slightly less impressed by one response,‘I’m more than comfortable handling birds and I have experience of ushering them back to the river at 5 AM, know what I mean.’”
 
However, the recruitment process was cut short after magpies began to attack the ducklings. Despite witnessing her brood being cruelly picked off, Mother Duck “wasn’t very maternal, and just went and sat up on the library roof watching her ducklings from afar.”
 
Nickell explained, “A few JCR members tried to get that motherducker and bring her down to the river, with her one remaining duckling. “
 
Only one duckling survived the rescue attempt. ‘Mother Duck’ has since been spotted back in Exeter gardens.

Clean up your act, Lush tells Obama

0

Lush, Oxford staged a protest on Saturday 1st June on Cornmarket Street against the use of drone strikes in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen. Lush, the cosmetics chain which has a shop on Cornmarket, alleges the “military targets [of drones] are individuals who have been blacklisted by the US or UK agencies for displaying suspicious activity.” The protest formed part of a wider campaign against drone strikes organised by Lush and human rights charity, Reprieve.

The demonstration took the form of a flash mob ‘die-in’, performed by eight campaigners.

The sound of a drone in flight was played through a megaphone, whilst performers who appeared to be ordinary shoppers dropped to the floor as though stricken by a missile. “Each campaigner was drawn around in chalk by a fellow performer, indicating that every dead body killed by a drone is someone’s loved one,” Lush Oxford explained.

Rowan Parkes, the organiser of the protest, said, “Raising awareness about drones is particularly important to me because of the child fatalities they have caused, and the psychological impact they are having on children… and [their] parents.”

Concern about Mansfield cat

0

Concern has been raised by Mansfield students over the welfare of their college cat, Erasmus, over the course of the long vacation. It is uncertain who will feed him.

The age and origins of Erasmus are unknown, but the feline friend appeared at Mansfield several years ago and since then has become a regular part of college life. The cat currently serves as Mansfield’s Cat Rep and has an online profile on the JCR’s website, as well as his own Facebook page.

According to Mansfield JCR website “Erasmus’ position as Cat Rep covers many roles and responsibilities ranging from biting people to sitting on top of you as you try to write an essay. He is also known to show affection at times, but any evidence of this is purely anecdotal.”

However, concerns have been raised about how he will be fed over summer. Recently the JCR website posted a notice asking students to donate food to keep him sustained over the long vacation. 

Natassia Dhanraj, a second year theologian at Mansfield, told Cherwell “I think perhaps there’s a yearly cycle of him getting thin over the summer months when students aren’t there to feed him. I, along with other people in the college, am looking into ways to encourage students to buy food for him. I usually spend about £20 a term on my own feeding him in my room – he eats a hell of a lot and is bigger than a lot of dogs.”

Dhanraj continued “He is a vicious little sod at times and will often bite people if you try to pick him up or are sitting in the chair he wants to sit in, but he also provides much needed comfort to many.”

Dana Mills, a postgraduate student at the college, who helps to feed the cat during term time, posted a message on Erasmus’s Facebook group “Erasmus is short on cat food. Could you contribute a bit? Every little helps, and you know he will repay you in love and cuddles!”

Mills stated “I reminded undergraduates to leave food before they leave for the long summer vacation. Erasmus is a much loved and well fed cat, and lacks nothing in this world.”

At the time of writing it is unclear how much food has been collected for Erasmus over the summer vacation. Erasmus himself was unavailable for comment on the situation.

Oxford research claims money wasted on psychology experiment

0

A recent study by Oxford University and UCL researchers suggests that money is being wasted on research into social and psychological inter­ventions. The study claims that because meth­ods used by researchers aren’t fully reported in academic journals, these important details aren’t available for policymakers and practi­tioners. 

Details of the research methods used are also needed, according to the study, to indi­cate whether the results of an experiment are biased. 

The study reviewed over 200 experiments across 40 of the leading journals in social and behavioural sciences. 

Paul Montgomery, Professor of Psycho-Social Interventions at the University of Oxford, commented in a University Press Release “In this era of austerity, policymakers increasingly look for evidence of “what works” to ensure that revenue is well-spent on programmes that address issues such as poverty, mental health, crime, and drug use.”  

He continued “When they are reported fully and transparently, they can help policymakers choose the most effective way to spend public funds; however, readers rely on reports of these studies in academic journals to effectively understand and use the research. Reporting guidelines are a critical step in improving this area of research for policy decision-making.” 

To try and improve the situation, new guidelines similar for those used for medicine will be developed to try and encourage improved reporting standards of these reports. These guidelines will be developed in consort with researchers from across the disciplines. 

In response to the study, a student told Cherwell “As a social science student, it’s not all that encouraging that professional academics are being told that their research may be a waste of time. I hope that this can be improved quickly otherwise it may discourage students from doing research or graduate study which would have a negative effect on progress within the social sciences. It seems like they’re working hard to try and improve the situation though.” 

Harry Burt President of the Oxford PPE Society opined, “Although the paper in question raises some interesting points and will no doubt prompt some much needed improvements in intervention reporting standards, I do not think it will or need alarm those considering further study, whether in PPE or otherwise. This is not least because the issues implicit in moving from experimental data to policy implementation are already well documented, allowing researchers to help mitigate those concerns from the moment they begin their research onwards.”

Balliol JCR names meeting after student

0

Balliol JCR passed a ‘funny’ motion to officially name their meeting after a current student. The meeting, held last Sunday, is now known as ‘The Susie Deedigan Memorial General Meeting.’

Although a contributor to JCR meetings throughout her Oxford Career, Susie couldn’t attend this final one.

In her absence, the motion noted ‘her limitless loyalty to, and enthusiasm for, debate, democracy and General Meetings’ and sought to reward ‘loyalty and enthusiasm’ in the JCR. The motion passed without opposition.

The motion was proposed by two Balliol JCR committee members, Hannah Smith and Issac Rose.

Smith, Vice President of Balliol JCR, told Cherwell ‘The Susie Deedigan (2010-2013) Memorial GM was a huge success. As usual there were lots of people at the GM, and everyone found it funny.’

Rose commented ‘The motion, while light-hearted in tone conveyed a serious point – it was a nod of thanks to Susie who has spent the last three years both involved with and committed to the JCR.’

Rose went on to say that the motion confirms Balliol JCR as ‘unique in Oxford in what it does for its students and this would not be the case were it not for people like Susie.’

Yet not all JCR members found the motion funny. One Balliol student, who wishes to remain anonymous told Cherwell that ‘not many people in Balliol knew about [the motion] or have talked about it.. It’s a joke (and not everyone found it funny).’ 

Despite wishing to commemorate the work of a dedicated student, even the proposers of the motion seemed surprised that it has reached the press “To be honest, it’s astonishing that you find this newsworthy” said Rose. Smith agreed “it’s rather perplexing how you could think this is even a story.”

An ethical Hog Roast

1

“The painting was quite traumat­ic. I did it by myself in about three or four days – I just want­ed to do it, to get it done, so I was in here for fifteen hours a day, just going completely mad. Painting’s a lot harder than I thought. I got paint all over myself. It just wouldn’t come over, so I thought, well, you know, I’ll just keep it – I’ll just keep myself painted, and then I was walking around and people were looking at me a bit strangely. I realised it was because my eyebrows were white,” Magdalenite Madeleine Ellis-Peterson tells me as we sit in what is soon to become the Hog Roast, ‘Oxford’s most eco-friendly café.’

I have just cycled down Abingdon Road on a friend’s bike in whose brakes I have little faith, turning off down a side street just after Folly Bridge. “Grandpont nursery take track on past soap,” the notes I typed into my phone elusive­ly tell me.

After some deciphering, a bumpy ride down a path that is surprisingly rural for something just minutes away from the cen­tre of town, and wandering hesitantly over a rusty-looking bridge spanning the railway, I arrive in what used to be Corpus Christi’s play­ing fields. Sited in a flood plain, the fourteen acres of land were evacuated by the college a few years ago for grounds near Iffley Road and have since become Hogacre Common, an ‘eco-park.’

You can still see the spaces that were tennis grounds, and the red brick building in which we sit, despite the jars of paint and air of con­trolled chaos, was very obviously designed as a pavilion. I assume the wind turbine is a recent addition. The rent for all this? One jar of honey a year.

Ellis-Peterson tells me about her vision for the Hog Roast: “There’s actually loads of eco projects around Oxford, a really strong green movement. But I feel like it’s quite disparate in many ways. So I see [the Hog Roast] being, may­be, the link, acting as the hub, where people can come and learn about all the things that there are out there.”

I ask her how she came up with the idea. It turns out it was through a chance meeting with the manager of the common, a man called Ben Haydon: “He was talking about how under­used the pavilion was… So we thought a cafe in here would be a really great idea to get people down here, and just make the land open to peo­ple who maybe wouldn’t normally come here. So since then I’ve been working on the project, in making Oxford’s most eco-friendly cafe.”

She promises that everything will be terri­bly ethical, and locally sourced. Horse burgers, I imagine, won’t be on sale, or, if they are, the horses will very much be in favour of the idea too. In the summer the plan is to sell the Com­mon’s own produce. But Ellis-Peterson’s ethical concerns aren’t just limited to issues of sourc­ing: “We’re looking for ingenuitive ways of dealing with the waste we produce, so I’ve been reading about growing gourmet mushrooms in old coffee grounds.” She pauses, and then says, in a slightly stern tone of voice, “Which is the done thing.” It’s as if I might question her about what she means.

When I do, she explains, with a barely audi­ble chuckle, “So coffee grounds are just a really good fertiliser, apparently, so you can grow like really delicate mushrooms. So we could get these really great mushrooms.”

During our conversation I ask how she’s managing to set up a café as well as study for a degree. She doesn’t really answer the first time round; when I press her, she replies, “I wake up quite early,” and, after a long pause, “That’s re­ally the only thing I can think of.”

We then take a walk around the site. The soft tennis court has been transformed into a com­munity garden, run by a group called OxGrow There’s a greenhouse made of plastic water bottles (which is just about warm enough for growing tomatoes), lots of neatly marked out beds, and even a scarecrow. “He’s just really ter­rifying. Every time you look out of the window [of the pavilion], you think there’s a strange man standing in the garden,” Ellis-Peterson tells me, spontaneously.

Back in the town centre I arrange to meet up with a man called Andy Williamson, who runs OxGrow. He suggests the Turl Street Kitchen, home of the Oxford Hub, the coordinating or­ganisation behind a considerable amount of the student charitable work that goes on in Ox­ford; it is a place Ellis-Peterson had agreed was not dissimilar to her plans for the Hog Roast.

OxGrow was set up in Spring 2011 by four postgraduate students and one college garden­er. The idea was to establish a space in which anyone could learn to grow food and maintain a garden. They now meet twice a week, operat­ing on a ‘just turn up’ basis. The project’s af­filiation with the Oxford Hub is how the group maintains its links with the University.

“It was a political project for the people who started it,” Williamson tells me. “Certainly they had very strong environmental concerns. If you read the constitution, one of our aims is education, and by that they mean teaching people about the problems with conventional agriculture, and teaching them alternatives based on low impact organic farming, and other systems of farming that don’t involve monoculture.”

Is OxGrow still a political project? “Very much so,” he replies. “I don’t know how aware you are, but agriculture counts for about twen­ty five per cent of global carbon emissions, and it’s mainly because of the amount of fossils fu­els that are used. Lots of people talk about cows farting and things like that. It’s not really. So I wanted to look into methods of producing food that were much lower in terms of their impact on the environment – not just in terms of carbon, but generally that use less land, less water. So that was the reason I got into it.”

I suggest that globalisation may be a cause of the problems he sees in contemporary agricul­ture: “There is an anti-globalisation element to [the OxGrow project]. It depends whether you see globalisation as the cause of the problems that exist in the food system or not; most of us do, but I don’t think you necessarily have to blame globalisation for the current problems in agriculture.

He continues, “For some of us it’s more politi­cal than for others. But that doesn’t come out very much at OxGrow. I mean, only really in informal discussion, some of use might start talking about some of our ideas, and we just have a little debate about it. But as of yet there’s been no formal… acknowledgement, or there haven’t been workshops or talks or formal dis­cussion or anything like that. Just some of us weave it in to our conversations.”

When the garden begins producing, it does so abundantly, to such an extent, in fact, that the OxGrow team have spent time wandering around the local streets trying give away the food to locals on their doorsteps. Williamson tells me, however, that even if they wanted to, the group would struggle to give their pro­duced away to the homeless: “A lot of our volun­teers also volunteer with the Oxford Food Bank and we know through that they can’t even give away all the food that they’ve got. They get food from supermarkets that’s just on its sell-by date, or whatever, and they’re left over with so much stuff. It doesn’t seem like there’s actu­ally, even with all the homeless people, a big enough market for fresh food in Oxford.”

The final person I arrange to meet is in fact the very man who inspired Ellis-Peterson to set up the Hog Roast in the first place: the Com­mon manager, Ben Haydon. We both agree to wear brightly coloured (indeed mine were suede) shoes to facilitate recognition; I go for purple (perhaps too dark a shade indeed) and he chooses blue.

Haydon has been living in Oxford since he was three, and tells me about his illicit trips to Corpus’ sports grounds: “I probably shouldn’t say this but the Hogacre Common space that was in Corpus’ hands was five minutes away from my doorstep and I used to stroll over the bridge and take unsanctioned visits down there to wander around. Now I’m really pleased that they’re opening it up as a public space, and everyone who’s growing up locally can do what I did.”

And whatever happens to that rent, the an­nual jar of honey? “I believe it’s ceremoniously handed over to the president of Corpus once a year, and he has it on his toast,” Haydon ex­plains.

The Grand Opening of the Hog Roast takes place this Sunday, 9th June, noon to 5pm. From Sundays then on the café will be open 11am-4pm.

Review: Middle England

0

★★★☆☆
Three Stars

Middle England is not feel-good theatre. Two families are brought together, but also pitted against one another, when their eight-year-old daughters disappear on the same day. The show is engineered to be disturbing; it aims to shake us out of our complacency in observing other people’s tragedy. The acting was aided by clever staging and sound design, leaving me on the edge of my seat.

What didn’t work so well was the plot. It was a shame that such a great setup did not lead to a satisfying conclusion. But this is a fault that lies with the play and not the production.

The beginning was the most exciting part. The opening scene, when both couples experience the initial shock of realising their children are gone, was amazing. Both events were staged simultaneously with the four characters talking over each other, and the emotion of each dialogue magnified that of the other. This scene worked particularly well in the setting of the Burton Taylor Studio – spectators were seated facing different directions. Each member of the audience had a privileged view of one of the two families and identified with their story more readily, but at the same time understood that this bias was arbitrary as we are all equal in the face of loss.

I loved the each parent’s soliloquy, delivered while sitting amidst the audience. In fact, these were more interview than soliloquy; the characters acted as though they were answering an unseen interlocutor’s questions. We, the audience, were implicated in the interrogation.

Sheets which read, ‘MISSING: GRACE, 8 years old’ contributed to the disturbing atmosphere, as did the ever-present TV screen in the back. The sound of cameras rolling or of static noise signalled breaks between scenes; at times the space darkened, and we heard recorded interviews with the characters. The sparse production incorporated aspects of multimedia and was a credit to the stage designers.

However, what ensued was less exciting. I expected the media to play a more active role in the development of the plot; instead, it remained there as a background while the story turned into the discovery of an old affair: the play morphed into melodrama rather than media critique. It must also be noted that Ken, one of the main characters, practically disappeared towards the end. Whereas the two mothers met and formed a touching bond, the men did not really interact; it felt like Ken was left by the wayside. Nevertheless, this is a professionally produced, highly emotional, sobering show that is worth an hour of your time.