Questions of dodgy dealing have arisen regarding the sale of
 bicycles at the Oxford Union this week, following a complaint
 from a student who claims that her own bike was sold there just
 two weeks after it went missing.  Eleanor Stringer, a second year at Lincoln, had her bike
 stolen in Fifth Week of Michaelmas outside Lincoln’s sports
 ground, only to see it locked up outside Jesus in Eighth week.  After several more sightings she eventually found its new
 owner, who told her she had bought the bike for £45 at the Union
 bike sale in Seventh Week of Michaelmas. Stringer said that the
 bike was “pretty battered” so she decided not to make a
 complaint to the police.  Just as the allegations were being made earlier this week,
 links to the company running the bike sales disappeared. The
 Union informed Cherwell that, unlike most other cases where
 companies are allowed to use their premises, no formal written
 contract existed between the Society and the bike company.  The company was unavailable to comment on the allegations face
 to face, and the weekly bike sale did not take place this
 Wednesday, although a spokeswoman for the Union explained that
 this was normal in the second half of Trinity.  In normal circumstances the company does sell stolen bikes
 that have been recovered by the police.  Thames Valley Police explained that stolen goods that are not
 claimed after three months are sold cheaply by the police to
 raise money for victims support charities.  A spokeswoman said, “The auctions are jam packed and
 there’s usually a dozen or more bikes at each auction.”
 She went on to explain that “bikes are particularly
 problematic because so many students don’t report them
 stolen and even if they do they don’t have them security
 etched or know enough details about them for us to find their
 bike from the hundreds on the stolen goods database.”  Thus, while in normal circumstances the bikes on sale at the
 Union are perfectly legitimate, questions still linger in the
 case of Eleanor Stringer’s bike. Commenting on the matter
 she said, “It is entirely possible that it was sold in good
 faith, but I do wonder.”ARCHIVE: 4th week TT 2004 

