A new book out this week: Fifty Facts That Should Change the
 World by Jessica Williams, charts a series of horrifying
 statistics that gives one a rather depressing insight into the
 global psyche. It reveals people en masse to be ignorant and
 superficial and the world in which we live to have its priorities
 desperately out of whack. A selection of these facts is a
 sobering read indeed.  Brazil has more Avon ladies than members of its armed
 services. I wasn’t quite sure how to feel about this one. On
 the one hand the superficiality this attests to is significantly
 disgusting, especially given the level of poverty in Brazil. It
 is after all one of the nations with the biggest discrepancies
 between rich and poor in the world. On the other hand a nation
 less obsessed with military prowess than Bush can’t be a bad
 thing. I’d be highly surprised if America’s defense
 budget wasn’t significantly higher than the money it invests
 in health and education.  There are 67,000 people employed in the lobbying industry in
 Washington DC – 125 for each elected member of Congress. This
 further attests to the level of corruption in American politics,
 where lobbying plays a stronger role in the US than in any other
 ‘free’ country in the world. With lobbyists influencing
 the stances taken by politicians it is hardly surprising that
 America’s priorities are so twisted. As Michael Moore (
 Dude, Where’s My Country) will tell you, Bush knew of the
 threats posed to the US by terrorist sections in Saudi Arabia, he
 just never delved into it too deeply because of the importance of
 oil to the American market. Even the Clinton presidency had
 strong ties with the Bin Laden family. In American politics money
 certainly comes before ethics. Hardly surprising in a place where
 Bush became president through the faults of a fouled-up electoral
 system and a corrupted means of resolution.  Every cow in the EU is subsidised by $2.50 a day: a higher
 income than that of 75% of Africans. Shocking as this statistic
 is, it isn’t the most extreme example of cows (or rather
 farmers) being put before people. According to the World Bank,
 Japanese cows receive a whopping $7.50 every day. The Catholic
 aid agency Cafod calculates that for the money the EU spends
 protecting its farmers, each of the EU’s 21 million cows
 could go on a round-the-world trip once a year. I think the
 majority of starving Africans would settle for clean water and a
 sturdy meal.  More people can identify the golden arches of McDonald’s
 than the Christian cross. This shocker was garnered from a survey
 of 7,000 people in six different countries. 88% recognised the
 arches while only 54% correctly identified the cross. I’m
 not so bothered about what this says about levels of religiosity:
 for one thing there are more Hindus and Muslims in the world than
 Christians.  For another, people strangely seem to find it rather difficult
 to reconcile the teachings of love and acceptance with their
 desire to kill others who don’t share their religious views. However it further testifies to the astonishing level of
 ignorance among the masses. And, more terrifyingly, their
 susceptibility to advertising. If Ronald McDonald came on TV and
 suggested that vegetarians were evil and flouting the sacred
 Maccy D’s laws that demand maximum consumption of dubious
 meat burgers then no doubt a mass genocide of the veggie-eaters
 would swiftly follow.  After twenty minutes soaked in these depressing numbers I was
 readily prepared for the most shocking of all: more people voted
 in the Pop Idol contest between Gareth Gates and Will Young than
 voted in the last general election. To be precise: fewer than 26
 million attempted to effect the future of their country, while
 over 32 million attempted to effect the future of Top of the
 Pops.  The very lamentable fact of the nation’s interest in two
 talentless youngsters strangely makes their politcal apathy less
 lamentable. This may be a slightly controversial point to make,
 since it is essentially un-democratic, but I for one am glad that
 voting isn’t somehow enforced.  Politicians (those few of an idealistic bent) complain that
 people are too apathetic. They mourn that a quick shower of rain
 stops people coming to the polls. But such commentators
 don’t stop to think that perhaps needing to put a little
 effort into the voting process is something of a good thing.
 Imagine if we could vote online, or through our digital-cable
 boxes, or in a telephone poll.  I can see it now: a Saturday night on ITV, Ant and Dec
 presenting, Blair and the Tory opponent of the week sitting
 across from each other in hot seats, Celine Dion belting out of
 few numbers to keep us amused: place your votes please! It’d
 be a bloody nightmare. If most of the nation bothered to vote,
 Will Young would currently be residing at No 10. Perhaps
 that’s a little harsh; surely people wouldn’t apply the
 same criteria to a pop contest that they would to a political
 one?  Maybe not. But what criteria would they apply? Given the level
 of knowledge of the vast majority of the population possess, it
 is as likely that they’d be voting on the colour of Tony
 Blair’s tie as much as his stance on Europe.  Anyone trivial enough to vote in a pop contest should have
 their name taken off the electoral roll. If this book shows us
 anything it’s that most people do not have enough knowledge
 or interest in their country – let alone the wider world
 – to qualify for a say in how it should be run.  What Britain needs is a good, old-fashioned dictatorship.
 Someone get Ronald McDonald on the phone. No wait, we don’t
 need him. Let’s not forget our problems closer to home when
 we point out everybody else’s: we already have Mr Blair.ARCHIVE: 1st week TT 2004 

