Cherwell.org - Student news and reviews at Oxford University
Tuesday 6th January, 2009, 19:33 GMT
Cherwell ETC
Celebrating ethnic cleansing?

by Oxford Students' Palestine Society | 00:35 GMT, Fri 02 May 2008


 
Sixty years ago this month, the State of Israel was declared in historic Palestine. Less than a year after this declaration, when a ceasefire was declared, Zionist forces were in control of 78% of Palestine. Yet the creation of this State came at unspeakable cost to the Palestinian people, who had been living there continuously for centuries. 750,000 Palestinians were ethnically cleansed from their homeland, fleeing from the Stern Gang and the Haganah militias and the newly created Israel Defence Forces.

Many were chased directly from their villages; others fled, hearing of the massacres inflicted upon other Palestinians, such as those of Deir Yassin, where over 100 people, including at least 50 women and children, were brutally and systematically murdered. In order to ensure that those who were fleeing the terror would never be able to return to their homes, 418 Palestinian villages were destroyed. Neither their inhabitants, nor their descendants, have ever been allowed to return home, in direct contravention of UN Resolution 194, which demands that ‘refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so.’

To describe this ethnic cleansing and the brutal destruction of their homeland Palestinians use the word Nakba – catastrophe.

For the first two weeks of May, the Israeli Cultural Society (ICS) is inviting Oxford to join them in celebration of Israel’s 60th birthday. We are appalled. The state of Israel was built on the burning ruins of Palestinian homes, and is ensuring the Nakba continues to this day. Any celebration of its ‘birth’ is an open and defiant justification of the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Is this what we are being asked to celebrate?

Since its establishment, Israel has continually enacted discriminatory policies towards the Palestinian population both inside and outside its borders. It has prevented internally displaced persons from returning home, and the legal system and government of the Israeli state discriminates against Palestinians on vital issues such as the purchasing of land, building permission, economic assistance for development towns – the list goes on. Is this what we are being asked to celebrate?

The Palestinians of the West Bank have lived under occupation for more than 40 years, an occupation which poisons and stifles every aspect of their lives. Since this occupation began, Israel has attempted to colonise the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, by building Jewish-only settlements on Palestinian land, and creating a segregated road system – with certain roads reserved for Jewish settlers, and other, inferior roads for Palestinians. Freedom of movement is severely restricted by the checkpoints, road blocks and barriers which choke the West Bank. The segregation wall, which is just the latest attempt to annex Palestinian land, surrounds cities such as Qalqilyah - population over 40,000 – leaving its inhabitants just one entrance. When they are allowed in or out, that is. The wall separates villagers from their farmland, students from their schools, patients from their hospitals, and tears families and communities apart. And let us not forget the policy of house demolitions, which since 1967 has claimed over 12,000 Palestinian homes, leaving over 70,000 people without shelter and traumatised. Is this what we are being asked to celebrate?

On the 5th of May, camels will be arriving on Broad Street as part of the festivities. Such a superficial gesture ignores and trivialises the tragedy suffered by the Middle East; meanwhile the falafel and shisha pipes, sold to us as Israeli culture, represent Israeli appropriation of Palestinian heritage, which is slowly and stealthilyeroding the Palestinian nation’s link to its homeland and denying it the dignity a society needs to survive.

One event in particular is cruelly ironic - a talk entitled ‘Israeli Medical Achievements - Saving Lives Worldwide’. Why is it, we wonder, that Israel saves lives worldwide, but regularly refuses to allow food aid, fuel and medicine into the Gaza strip? What is Israel, which controls Gaza’s borders, airspace and coastline, doing to save Gazan lives? Just last week, the United Nations reported that it has been forced to halt desperately needed food aid distribution, upon which more than 1.1m Gazans are dependent, because Israeli-imposed sanctions have created massive fuel shortages.

It is with bemusement and outrage that we find ourselves being asked to celebrate 60 years of Israel’s existence. If the ICS wish to celebrate ethnic cleansing, racism, and the daily persecution of an entire nation, we will most certainly not be joining them. Oxford Students’ Palestine Society believe this is a reason for protest, not celebration, and we invite you to stand with us.
Comments and Opinions:
"Quietly amused" by Sympathetic
Posted:
The hysterical response from Oxford right-wingers about the Cherwell being taken over by militant communists is hilarious! Two articles... *two* articles, out of however I've read since I've been here, come out with leftist / anti-imperialist arguments (and, out there in the real world, neither is as radical as all this fuss would suggest.) It's a sign of how hopelessly out of touch some are here that they could be considered against code of practice! Particularly endearing is the wee 'journalist' who's worried his mum and dad might thing big bad Oxford's turned him into a commie... bizarre. So, well done Palestine Society and Oxford Radical Forum - you're clearly doing something right.
"" by ARABIAN
Posted:
well i can't write English very well, but as an Arabian: i can say we never for ever expect this racial existence between us. however we see it's will be terminated one day, like the crusader kingdoms. this existence that west made it just to contain "jewish problem" out of europe after ( WWW 2) and export this problem to them enemy. there are no peace become one day, 6 million jewsh can't occupation our land and more than 300 million Arabs expecting them... no way. so i hope this is the last celebration to them....
"" by Ex-journo
Posted:
response; what's the problem?
"" by Ex-journo
Posted:
How on earth is the publication of this article representative of low adherence to journalistic principles? If we take the PCC Code of Practice as a half-decent reference point: "1 iii) The Press, whilst free to be partisan, must distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact." Given this is in a section marked "Comment" and the writer clearly denoted as "Oxford Students' Palestine Society", I really don't see what the problem is. The fact that you have to go for a "wider point" suggests you are clutching at straws. The founding of Israel is far from being a resolved situation, and while you may disagree with the views above, it's not exactly outlandish racism of Griffin/Irving ilk. It's nothing to do with racism as one commenter above has suggested - it's a perfectly valid political debate. PalSoc have put their arguments; the Ifest people were asked for a response. What's the problem?
"" by Jamon
Posted:
I don't think anyone is calling Cherwell anti-Semitic. At best accusations of being left-wing, so don't jump the gun. But there is a wider point that is being highlighted here which is that journalists SHOULD take responsibility for what is printed. Comment is slightly different and I agree that what is printed is not necessarily reflective but as a whole it does send out a message. But this idea that Cherwell is the holy grail is silly. Student journos get away with so much that a professional outlet would not. Its not because they are being daring (when was the last time Cherwell went out on a limb), its not because of poor resources or time, its because it allows silly students to get high on power low on aderence to basic journalistic priniples.
"Continued" by Ex-journo
Posted:
about paucity of argument.
"Der Stürmer" by Ex-journo
Posted:
"A professional newspaper is interested in interaction, and therefore would have invited someone from the other side of the debate to contribute his point of view - a political rag spouting fashionable nonsense won't. Cherwell seems to be taking a conscious decision with its conduct to be the latter, rather than the former." 1) At the end of the article, Cherwell promised to publish a response to PalSoc's comment piece. Cherwell did that. There's your interaction. 2) Cherwell, unlike some student newspapers, allows you to comment on its articles so that you can offer your side to the debate. So you're as welcome to "spout" as Cherwell contributors. Which you have done quite magnificently, effectively calling the editors anti-semitic. Nice. 3) Again, if the arguments in this article are so unsound, why don't you attack those rather than the newspaper that published them? I return to my point about paucity of argument.
"" by current journo
Posted:
Actually, as someone working on Cherwell, I know that the reason why there are so many 'radical' pieces in the paper this term is because no one else bothers to write anything! As it happens, the Israel society will have a rebuttal published in the next issue. In any event, conservatives and moderates, please submit stuff to Comment (email cherwellcomment@gmail.com to get on the mailing list) so that my parents don't think I've become a communist!
"..." by not an ex journo
Posted:
So, there was once this newspaper called Der Stürmer. It published all sorts of vile, antisemitic rants, not much unlike the one above. The chap running it, a Julius Streicher, was found guilty of crimes against humanity. Just think about that for five minutes. Free speech is not free speech without consequences. While I completely agree that Cherwell ought to be free to print contributions, however, offensive, this does not in any way means Cherwell isn't morally responsible for what it prints. A professional newspaper is interested in interaction, and therefore would have invited someone from the other side of the debate to contribute his point of view - a political rag spouting fashionable nonsense won't. Cherwell seems to be taking a conscious decision with its conduct to be the latter, rather than the former.
"" by anotehr ex journo
Posted:
Come on! Of course the paper is showing an inclination that way if they continue to print more radical comment pieces. I'm not sure we can judge it on two weeks - but if this continues the Cherwell will definitely be taking a stance. I agree with you that this isn't the real question here, but to say that the comment section bares no relation to the paper's leanings is rubbish!
"Erm" by Ex-journo
Posted:
Not sure why you're complaining that this is published. Everyone has a right to respond, both through these comments, the letters page and through writing an article. Two of these options were taken up with the HUFD article, one with the radical forum one. It's a questionable leap of logic to say that the newspaper is endorsing views by publishing them. Sure, argue against the content of the article but attacking the platform suggests a paucity of real argument. I'm sure that's not the case, so argue properly.
"And on and on it goes..." by JJA
Posted:
Last week the Oxford Radical Forum, this week the Palsoc - I really do wonder which radical, authoritarian bunch of nutholes Cherwell is going to give a column next week. When the ICS celebrates their culture, it's promotion of genocide to you - when Palsoc celebrates 'Israeli "Apartheid" [sic] Week', extolling the virtues of those valiant terrorist scumbags who actually killed more Palestinians than the Israeli forces lately, it's all okay, right? The double standards and the oppressive and bigoted policies against Israel are astonishing. That Cherwell is happy to play a part in this shows how much they misunderstood freedom of speech and what a bunch of unserious, biased hacks it is run by. To quote the last lines of Chaim Herzog's speech regarding UN Resolution 3379: "You yourselves bear the responsibility for your stand before history, for as such will you be viewed in history." Do remember that.
"Tolerance" by Outsider
Posted:
Of course the Israeli policies regarding occupation are wrong and objecionable, and I doubt that the Israeli students in Oxford would dispute this, however any legitimate disapporoval of political policies should not render indigenous culture and art irrelevant or objectionable as such. On the contrary, tolerance is certainly needed here. Palestinian students are not called upon to celebrate anything if they do not wish to. This is an open fair and participation is voluntary. I totally agree that the occupation must end, and that there should be space for a viable palestinian state alongside Israel, with peace and security for both. However this will not be brought about by encouraging hate and delegitimizing the entire Israeli and Jewish nation. What both sides are called upon to do is show tolerance towards their neighbours (both in the UK and in the Middle East) and respect each people's own cultures and heritage.
"" by Shallom Salaam
Posted:
Ah it seems my initial posting didn't come out - that was the second part. I'll sum up what I said... I'd like to ask why the conflict it so polarised? Why do we have to take sides? Death saddens me regardless of whether an individual is living in Gaza or Israel. Lives are valuable and precious regardless as to whether someone is born on one side of a border or another. The whole conflct is horrid and desperate but this polarised nature of dialogue seems to place the lives of one side of the conflict as being worth more than the other side. Its not a question of numbers, its about the individuals like you and me who become victims regardless of their personality - just because of where they live. And we have to escape this cycle of vengence. Violence clearly is not the answer - economic regeneration is. Money spent on weapons should be spent on aid.
"" by Shalom Salaam
Posted:
And when I was in the region in the last few weeks, a tanker carrying oil and petrol to Gaza was blown up by terrorists. How does that serve the people of Gaza? If Ifest shows the people of Israel beyond the conflict - the ways of life of people both Arab, Druze, Christian, Bahai, and Jewish then I think it can only be a good thing. People are people - just like you and me. I don't define myself by the British foreign policy - thats not my identity. If this event shows that there is more to the many peoples that live in Israel than the division we see on the news - then I'm keen to find out more. I guess we'll wait and see what it is like.
"actionable?" by dm
Posted:
Given the widespread advocacy of acts of terrorism and their systematic perpetration by Israel and its agents during its 60 years, are these celebrations in danger of falling foul of the Terrorism Act 2006 ("glorification of terrorism")?
"Come along" by jn
Posted:
Also I'd like to say how excellent a summary of the situation this article is. I hope as many of you as possible will turn up at 12:00 on Broad Street to counter-protest.
"Ok, but..." by jn
Posted:
- 'It is foolish to call the serving of falafel and shisha a crude cultural appropriation - Jews have been indigenous to the eastern Mediterranean for a few millenia now. ' Err, ok, but the indigenous Jewish population (which is small) are *politically* Palestinian (as are the indigenous Christians). The white, mainly European Jews who make-up Israeli society certainly did not spend their time smoking shisha pipes. The fact that so many indigenous Palestinian Christians and Jews face the same oppression as Arabs is very revealing of the colonial nature of the Israeli project. So, certainly I'm afraid, the point still stands. There is an attempt to appropriate indigenous culture.
"con" by WB
Posted:
Palestinian society to the thousands of Israeli youth who are protesting to end the occupation. The kind of polarization that goes on outside Israel - mindless support for the state on one side, useless fist shaking on the other - does little but polarize opinion, making moves towards constructive change ever more difficult. As long at the US supports Israel (which frankly isn't about to change) then arguing against the state's existence is merely screaming into the wind. What is needed are more programs like Seeds of Peace, which brings together Israeli and Palestinian youths to teach early tolerance. It needs the Israeli society to put on a more constructive forum and celebration, and it needs both sides, outside Israel, to stop screaming and start talking - otherwise westerners will do little but continue to either support Israel's disastrous policies or rant against them, but never learn more, or effect real change.
"Narrow vision" by WB
Posted:
It is foolish to call the serving of falafel and shisha a crude cultural appropriation - Jews have been indigenous to the eastern Mediterranean for a few millenia now. I pick on this point in your argument for one reason - it is perhaps the most blatant sign of your black-and-white reasoning on this issue- reasoning that goes absolutely nowhere towards solving a humanitarian crisis. What you say is true - horrible atrocities have been committed, and while I would say the state was less founded upon the "burning ruins of Palestinian homes" than upon the "thoughtless bumbling of British foreign policy" the point is it was founded. Two generations ago. Done. Israel is there and it's not going anywhere, with the kind of economic and military backing it receives from the west, shaking a fist at the behemoth isn't going to get you anywhere. Not will it endear the Palestine society to the thousands of Israeli youth protesting to end
 
Your email address:
Name:
Comment subject:
Your comment: (max length: 400 chars.)

characters left
Security verification: (Enter the code in the box below)



The Beltway blogAward PuffFor the Love of Film 4Saturday 12:45
POSITIONS AVAILABLE:
MOST DISCUSSED THIS WEEK
C2 HIGHLIGHTS
COMMENT AND WORLD

ETC
© 2008 Oxford Student Publications Ltd.
Design by Henry Clarke Price and Chris Baraniuk
About Us | Get in touch | Send us news | Advertise | RSS Feeds