Cherwell.org - Student news and reviews at Oxford University
Tuesday 6th January, 2009, 13:37 GMT
Cherwell ETC
Spirit of '68

by James Norrie, Oxford Radical Forum | 09:43 GMT, Fri 25 April 2008


On the morning of May 11, 1968, a student reached to take a hot cup of coffee and a square of chocolate from a resident leaning out of his window on the Rue Gay Lussac. The girl was not alone; stepping back over trodden baguettes, she was drawn into close crowds of university and school students who had barricaded their position in the Latin Quarter in response to Paris’ paramilitary police encircling their peaceful demonstration.

Amidst the taut wires and red flags, cobblestones and overturned cars, young workers rushed to join them. Yet the protesters couldn’t enjoy their coffee for long, for at two o’clock the riot police began a vicious series of attacks, each marked by the crack of percussion grenades and the heavy scent of tear-gas.

It wasn’t until after six that the demonstrators were dispersed. Yet this moment would not be end of the struggle; by late morning, trade union leaders, who had listened intently to reports of the fighting in all-night meetings, called for a general strike that would show solidarity with the students against the state violence but also radicalise the grievances of the French working class. What followed was historic: an estimated ten million workers struck indefinitely or even occupied their workplaces. The students took control of the Sorbonne and produced a flourishing of radical creativity, not just in images and propaganda but in ideas – ideas for a society without chains.

Now, for all their significance, the near-500,000 teachers, lecturers and civil servants who left their workplaces yesterday and took to the streets have not pronounced another 1968. Nor has the presence of an enthusiastic student delegation at the Oxford rally opened a path to campus ‘red bases’ or ateliers populaires. But we’re getting there. Slowly. Because you don’t need a copy of Trotsky under your arm to realise that cutting the real wages of our public workers in the face of soaring food-prices is ruinous to human welfare and the services upon which so many rely. Even in Oxford the fallacy of student isolation is falling away. The port-swillers at the Union may relish their separation from the rest of society, but universities don’t exist in a vacuum: our past, present and future labours connect us to the millions. The bonds that unite us to the rest of society are inalienable and it is through  common struggle that we become  capable of realising our collective aspirations. If we join together, in the lecture-hall and on the picket-line, we will realise them.

If last term’s Oxford Radical Forum brought hundreds of us together in discussion, our goal for next year is clear: hundreds more must join the movement – and fight.
Comments and Opinions:
"68" by TG
Posted:
I suppose it's stating the obvious to say that the generation of 1968 went on to be the yuppies and neo-liberals of the 80s? That's students for you - what's going to change?
"Um.." by Liberty
Posted:
And that is your definition of a victory; a temporary postponement of the inevitable reality check that their ridiculous ideas deserved by a desperate ushering in of a weak socialist government which would be soon be out of power for eighteen years and be destroyed whilst in the wilderness? If you count that as a victory, then you're welcome to it! If it's all the same to you, I'm going to stick with the actual and perpetual victories of human freedom: the aforementioned direction of the rafts from Cuba, the direction of would-be escapees over and under the Berlin Wall, the actions of Eastern Europeans once that terrible edifice fell, and the inexorable reality that human beings prefer liberty to fascism, whether it comes from the left or the right jackboot.
"1974" by Radical
Posted:
The miners brought down a Tory government in 1974. During a strike by miners the tories called an election on the basis "who runs the country? us or the miners" and lost. The new government gave them their demands it was a victory for the miners then.
"Um..." by Liberty
Posted:
"The miners could not have brought down a Tory government before 68, as they did after. The reaction didn't set until later. " Hold on a moment. When did this happen? I was under the distinct impression that the miners tried to bring down the elected government, but lost heavily, lost public opinion and opened the way for free markets and limited government to regain the ground they should never have lost to the left-fascists in the first place.
"..." by ABC
Posted:
Ps. to Cherwell: hi, Mr Censors!
"..." by ABC
Posted:
It wouldn't be such a bad idea at all to read precisely what others are saying. I did not say anything about the workers and the underprivileged, but merely about their self-proclaimed leaders and saviours who use the suffering of the working classes and their wish of political rights to gain power. But there is little point in this debate - aquila non captat muscas. Just consider one thing: the rafts. Which way are they going? Between Key West, FL, and Cuba, there's about 90 miles of warm but not very placid sea. Every year, people risk their lives to cross to the US, and many unfortunately perish. Why is that? Why, if socialism is such a piece of bliss, does the USCG has to fish out Cuban refugees, rather than the Cuban coastguard having to rescue boats full of investment bankers, nurses, doctors, mineworkers, secretaries, policemen fleeing nasty, cruel capitalist America?
"..." by James Norrie
Posted:
as they did after. The reaction didn't set until later. Reform and industrial action has been put off in this country because of the defeats and damage caused by Thatcherism, which was an *offensive* movement. JJ, I hardly see the point discussing any of this with someone who says such contemptious things about workers and the underprivleged. It's quite disgraceful, to be honest, though I'm not surprised and I can only hope that 'your kids' turn out a tad more enlightened about the world and other people than yourself. Also your attempted equivocation between a tradition which has done *more than any other* to fight facism with that racist, bigotted imperialist Tory Minister Enoch Powell is, frankly, digusting. Also worth pointing out at this stage what the article was about: not revolution, but solidarity.
"..." by James Norrie
Posted:
Your suggestion of a 'forced' radicalisation doesn't explain why TEN-MILLION workers went on stike - indefinitely and *in spite of* the labour movement's leadership (the CGT and the Communist Party) who wanted to diffuse the situation. They occupied factories and workplaces, set-up self-management committees. They *resisted* being sent back to work. Some were in tears. How can this be a 'forced' (whatever that means) radicalisation? Such action comes from below, not above. There had been over 140 protests outside of Paris alone before the General Strike. It did not come out of the blue - it was part of a historical movement. Also its just wrong to suggest that these strikes have come so late because of former radicalism. 68 everywhere initiated radical political programmes and high-scale industrial struggle. The miners could not have brought down a Tory government before 68,
"er..." by James Norrie
Posted:
Seriously?: I agree, my closing remark wasn't endearing. However, having been accused (with no basis in reality whatsoever) of supporting genocide, I have no qualms with spelling out the phenomena that those who support the system are tacitly complicit to: colonialism and the pioneering of racial extermination; the economic exploitation of billions of workers; facism and imperialists wars which claim hundreds of thousands of lives. You, on the other hand, have presented an argument, although one that I disagree with. Your narrative I don't think makes any sense. You speak of 'forced radicalsiation' but nothing could be further from the truth. The student revolt against *appalling* university conditions certainly acted as a catalyst to fusing the general strike but its absurd to suggest that the causal dynamic existed for it to be *responsible* for it.
"Haha..." by JJA
Posted:
Okay, well, I'll be back to my port in the safe knowledge that my kids will sign the paychecks of your kids. Assuming, of course, that they finally break with the admirable tradition of the 'worker's movement' of, well, not working (viz. Karl Marx). It's been like this for two centuries, it'll stay like this for several pore. Your revolutionary zeal is, if you forgive me, a piss-poor excuse for supporting an ideology that has never, ever worked. Doesn't work? Let's put more guns behind it and try again! That's eerily familiar... skewed weltbild, e.g. a flat Earth? Put the Inquisition behind it and then, miraculously, at the point of a sword, it'll be true. That Cherwell prints radical manifestos is quite endearing, though - I wonder what'll be in next week's issue: the Rivers of Blood speech?
"Yes. And no, not at all." by Seriously?
Posted:
Fight how, exactly? It is just as easy to look at '68 another way: as the forced radicalization and therefore complete collapse of a moderate reform movement that was hijacked by the radical left, leading to a backlash of conservatism which dominated Europe and the United States for twenty years, setting back movements for welfare and living wage. Teacher's strike? Yes. Great. Living wage? Necessary. Reform? Undoubtedly needed. But radicalism isn't the answer. Radicalism is why these strikes are in 2008, not, say, 1980. Joining the strikes and breaking down ivory towers is admirable, moving, even slowly, towards the kind of radicalism you're talking about is not. PS calling your enemies port-swillers with blood on their hands hardly endears them to you, or engenders discussion.
"" by jn
Posted:
Oh and yes exactly, fight 'capitalism' and the 'west'. As for 'civilization' I hear the Iraqis are loving in at the moment.
"..." by James Norrie
Posted:
an unprecedented scale - not just by Facists but by those colonial powers who pioneered their techniques on those 'inferior' races, imperialist wars that continue to this day to kill hundreds of thousands, the exacerbation of climate change and the constant expoitation of billions of workers. So I for one shall forgive the generation of '68 for struggling against both the imperialist capitalism of the West AS WELL AS the imperialist state-capitalism of the East. Not only do I forgive them, I call for the intensification of the revolutionary socialist tradition. So JJ, I'll leave you to read some theory and history (for the first time). And enjoy the port, kid. I hear it tastes all the better when you can smell the blood on your hands. James
"smirk" by James Norrie
Posted:
Well I guess I should be impressed that we've only had one such idiotic comment from an Oxford student so far! There's not really any point *but* your suggestion that the KGB funded 'most' '68 movements must be interrogated. Not that you would know, but 68 was so significant exactly because it broke with the apparatchik communist movement. If you'd had a clue you'd know the French Communist Party *avoided* confrontation and succeeded in dissapating the whole situation by sending the unions back to work. And your suggestion that I support 'genocidal maniacs' is beyond infantile. Why should revolutionary socialists bear responsibility for the state-capitalist regimes of the East? Not that, by that logic, you'd be in an any better situation, tacitly supporting an economic system that has seen systematic genocide on unprecedented scales,
"Grow up." by JJA
Posted:
Fight what? Capitalism, civilisation, the West? Will the ORF, too, accept funding from the KGB as most '68 movements did - from the same KGB that arranged for the disappearance, internment and gruelling murder of thousands of innocent people (or maybe not, you may well delude yourself with the leftist apology that they were class traitors)? Will you run around in a t-shirt with the image of a man that ran his very own death camps? Reminisce about the nice times your fellow travellers shot dead over 21,000 prisoners of war in the forest of Katyn? Will you, then, rename the ORF the Oxford Society for the Promotion of Genocidal Maniacs? I hope not - I hope you grow up, get a life and maybe join Amnesty or some other sane human rights NGO, and leave your mass murdering idiot idols behind.
 
Your email address:
Name:
Comment subject:
Your comment: (max length: 400 chars.)

characters left
Security verification: (Enter the code in the box below)



Award PuffThe Beltway blogSaturday 12:45For the Love of Film 4
POSITIONS AVAILABLE:
MOST DISCUSSED THIS WEEK
C2 HIGHLIGHTS
COMMENT AND WORLD

ETC
© 2008 Oxford Student Publications Ltd.
Design by Henry Clarke Price and Chris Baraniuk
About Us | Get in touch | Send us news | Advertise | RSS Feeds