Cherwell.org - Student news and reviews at Oxford University
Tuesday 6th January, 2009, 23:02 GMT
Cherwell ETC
Power to the people

by Mohsin Khan | 21:01 GMT, Tue 15 April 2008


Everyone’s excited over London’s mayoral elections: debates, scary ads, Boris. Yet national elections still suffer from low turnouts. It’s no wonder we’re so apathetic. Our control over our lives is reduced to two votes: for our MP and for our MEP. Empowering people locally would fix this.

We should start by electing chief constables, local health boards, powerful mayors, and county governors.
Local government’s powers must go beyond mucking with rubbish, libraries, and parks. The State should let local representatives control major aspects of health, education, and law enforcement. Let them create local laws as people want. We could even introduce regional assemblies in England, leaving Westminster to work on truly national solutions.
 
Critics may mention a 2001 referendum in the North-East where 77% opposed regional assemblies. However, those proposals did not involve MPs giving up significant powers to the regions. Yielding national power to locally elected officials is crucial.

It’s not enough to have an ‘English’ assembly, as England contains 49 million people. We need smaller, truly empowered assemblies; they mustn’t be gimmicks like ‘e-Petitions’ and the ‘Big Conversation’, or need Westminster’s approval.

Take the US, where government starts from the bottom. Yes, we’re not as big as the US. Even so, 37 American states have fewer people than Greater London. In those states, people vote for powerful county and state legislatures, mayors and Governors. And that’s before you elect the Federal Government. Different states can have different laws – just as different problems matter to communities in different areas. A university-dominated county may want different laws on drugs or healthcare than a rural county. They could even learn from each other.

Here Parliament is supreme. Everything important is controlled at Westminster, if you’re English. National law affects us everywhere. It decides when police officers can arrest you, whether your pubs can serve alcohol after midnight, and whether asylum seekers can use your hospitals for free.

If you want to change anything, convincing your MP is not enough. He or she is just one voice out of 646. Instead you need a loud cry, from Birkenhead to Birmingham. You need national consensus before anyone powerful takes a look. Of course, consensus is necessary for the big issues, like war or income tax.

But we don’t need it for issues which worry few people greatly. Most of us don’t have time to create a ‘national consensus’ to change little things. Thus we feel that Government controls us, not vice versa.

Whitehall and Westminster do not have time to legislate everything. Yet everything, besides rubbish bins and pavements, is controlled by these two institutions. People’s voices must not be reduced to just one vote to send an MP to a single Parliament representing millions. We must channel power downwards – or we will continue feeling powerless.
Comments and Opinions:
"Democracy" by annettewah[
Posted:
n political theory, democracy describes a small number of related forms of government and also a political philosophy. Even though there is no universally accepted definition of 'democracy',[4] there are two principles that any definition of democracy is required to have. The first principle is that all members of the society are having equal access to power and second all members to have the freedom to live their lives as they want to.[ _________ annette I challenge you to a game of trivia! Click here to battle against me online at ConQUIZtador. Let's see who's the winner... http://https://www.conquiztador.com/?a=26041.
"We don't vote either" by Willa
Posted:
Even though we can vote for everything, from the dog-catcher on up, it's not like American voter turn out is really any higher. In fact, it's a lot lower. What's more, our voter turnout drops by 10-15% when there isn't a presidential candidate on the ballot. Meaning we actually care less, not more, when the elections are local instead of national.
 
Your email address:
Name:
Comment subject:
Your comment: (max length: 400 chars.)

characters left
Security verification: (Enter the code in the box below)



Award PuffThe Beltway blogSaturday 12:45For the Love of Film 4
POSITIONS AVAILABLE:
MOST DISCUSSED THIS WEEK
C2 HIGHLIGHTS
COMMENT AND WORLD

ETC
© 2008 Oxford Student Publications Ltd.
Design by Henry Clarke Price and Chris Baraniuk
About Us | Get in touch | Send us news | Advertise | RSS Feeds